The Invisible Architecture: Why Understanding Social Factors is the Key to Solving Our Biggest Problems

For the first decade of my career in public health, I felt like I was fighting a ghost. I had the data, the training, and a genuine passion for improving community health. My team and I would parachute into neighborhoods struggling with high rates of diabetes, heart disease, and infant mortality, armed with beautifully designed pamphlets, evidence-based workshops, and a clear, simple message: “Make better choices.” We talked about nutrition, exercise, and smoking cessation. And almost every time, we failed.

I’ll never forget one particular initiative in a low-income urban community. We had a brilliant program designed to promote healthy eating. We ran cooking classes and handed out recipes for nutritious, affordable meals. The data said it should work. But attendance was abysmal, and the health metrics we were tracking didn’t budge. Frustrated, I started talking to people—not as a public health official, but just as a person. What I learned was a lesson in humility. The nearest full-service grocery store was over two miles away, a food desert. Most residents worked multiple, low-wage jobs, leaving them with neither the time nor the energy to cook complex meals from scratch. The chronic, grinding stress of poverty made the “choice” between a cheap, fast meal and an expensive, time-consuming one a foregone conclusion.

My program wasn’t just ineffective; it was irrelevant. It was designed for a world of choices that these residents simply didn’t have. That failure forced me to question everything. I had been meticulously analyzing individual behaviors, but I was completely blind to the invisible architecture of the world they lived in—the complex web of conditions that shaped their lives long before they made any “choice.”

The real turning point came from a place I never expected: ecology. I was reading about the concept of a “keystone species”—an animal or plant that has a disproportionately large effect on its ecosystem.¹ When you remove a keystone species, the entire ecosystem can unravel in a “trophic cascade”.² The classic example is the sea otter. By preying on sea urchins, otters prevent the urchins from destroying the kelp forests that provide a habitat for hundreds of other species.³ It hit me with the force of a revelation: I wasn’t dealing with a collection of individual health problems. I was dealing with a

social ecosystem. And my interventions were failing because I was trying to fix the kelp while ignoring the fact that the otters were gone.

This shift in perspective—from focusing on individual choices to understanding the systemic forces that enable or constrain them—is the single most important leap I’ve ever made in my professional life. The term for these forces is “social factors,” a deceptively simple phrase for the vast, powerful, and often invisible architecture that governs our lives. To truly solve our most stubborn problems, from public health crises to economic inequality, we must first learn to see and understand this architecture.

A Multi-Disciplinary Rosetta Stone: Defining Social Factors

My first step in this new journey was to understand that I wasn’t the only one looking at this problem. Different fields had been studying this invisible architecture for decades, each using its own language and lens. “Social factors” is a conceptual chameleon; its meaning changes depending on the discipline using it. To build a complete picture, I had to learn to see it from multiple perspectives.

The Sociological Lens: Society’s Blueprint

Sociology provides the widest lens, viewing social factors as the very blueprint of society. From this perspective, social factors are the elements that shape human interactions and build societal structures, including cultural norms, values, demographics, and social institutions like the family, education, and religion.⁵ This is a macro-level view, focusing on how broad structures, such as the legal or education system, create patterns of advantage and disadvantage that influence entire groups.⁷ The pioneering work of sociologist Émile Durkheim, for example, traced how the concept of “social factors” evolved from a “collective conscience” into a powerful normative force that organizes society and shapes individual action.⁹ The sociological lens is crucial because it forces us to look beyond individual blame to the societal structures that enable or constrain people’s lives, making it indispensable for understanding systemic issues like inequality.⁸

The Psychological Lens: The External World Within

If sociology provides the blueprint, psychology shows how that blueprint gets built inside our heads. Psychology defines social factors as the external influences on an individual’s behavior, thoughts, emotions, and mental health.¹¹ This is a micro-level perspective that examines how the real, imagined, or implied presence of other people changes how we act.¹⁴ Social psychology, for instance, studies phenomena like conformity, prejudice, and groupthink, all of which are driven by our reactions to the social world around us.¹⁴ The term “psychosocial factors” makes this link explicit, describing the dynamic interplay between our internal psychological state and our external social environment.¹⁵ This lens is vital because it explains the

mechanism by which large-scale societal structures are translated into personal experience, action, and well-being.

The Economic Lens: Socioeconomics

Economics offers a third, critical perspective, examining the powerful interplay between social behavior and economic activity.¹⁶ This field, often called socioeconomics, argues that our financial decisions are not made in a purely rational vacuum. Instead, they are profoundly shaped by social factors like our socioeconomic class, education level, cultural norms, and social networks.¹⁷ This view challenges the classical model of a perfectly rational economic actor by integrating insights from sociology and psychology.¹⁶ It reveals how socioeconomic status influences everything from our access to job opportunities and financial resources to our consumption habits and even our ability to plan for the future.⁷ For example, studies show that people born into higher-income families typically have better access to quality education and influential social networks, which reinforces economic disparities across generations.¹⁶ This lens is essential for understanding that poverty and wealth are not merely the results of individual effort but are deeply embedded in the social architecture of our society.¹⁰

The Public Health Lens: The Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)

Finally, my own field of public health provides what is perhaps the most actionable framework. Here, social factors are defined as the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)—the nonmedical factors and conditions in the environments where people are born, grow, live, work, and age that directly influence health outcomes.²⁰ This is a population-level, outcomes-focused approach. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categorize SDOH into five key domains:

1. Economic Stability
2. Education Access and Quality
3. Health Care Access and Quality
4. Neighborhood and Built Environment
5. Social and Community Context.²⁰

This framework makes the abstract concept of social factors concrete and measurable. It draws a direct line from conditions like unsafe housing, food insecurity, and air pollution to health risks like heart disease, diabetes, and lower life expectancy.²³ The SDOH framework is revolutionary because it provides a clear roadmap for policy, proving that health is created not primarily in clinics and hospitals, but in our communities. Crucially, it recognizes that these social determinants can have a greater influence on our health than even our genetics or access to healthcare services.²⁰

The lack of a single, universal definition of social factors is not a weakness. It is a reflection of the concept’s profound complexity. Understanding these different lenses is the first step toward building a unified model that can be used to drive real-world change.

Discipline	Core Definition	Level of Analysis	Key Concepts	Primary Objective
Sociology	Elements that shape human interactions and societal structures, including cultural norms, values, and social institutions.5	Macro-Societal	Social Institutions, Norms, Collective Conscience, Stratification	Understanding social order and inequality.
Psychology	External influences on an individual’s behavior, thoughts, emotions, and mental health.11	Micro-Individual	Social Influence, Cognition, Group Behavior, Psychosocial Factors	Explaining individual behavior and mental processes.
Economics	The interrelationship between social behavior and economic activity, shaping decisions and outcomes.16	Meso-Group/Market	Socioeconomic Status, Rational Choice, Institutional Economics	Analyzing economic disparities and behavior.
Public Health	Nonmedical conditions in the environments where people live that affect health outcomes and risks.20	Macro-Population	Social Determinants of Health (SDOH), Health Equity	Improving population health and reducing health disparities.

The Social-Ecological Framework: A Unified Model for a Complex World

Seeing social factors through these different disciplinary lenses was like assembling the pieces of a puzzle. But I still needed a way to put them together to see the whole picture. I needed a framework that could move from a simple list of factors to a dynamic system of factors. That is the power of the Social-Ecological Model, which, when combined with my “keystone” epiphany, provides a powerful new way to understand and act upon the world.

Introducing the Social-Ecological Model

The Social-Ecological Model provides a framework for understanding the dynamic and reciprocal interplay between individuals and their environments.²⁴ It is often visualized as a set of nested concentric circles, illustrating how our lives are shaped by multiple, interacting levels of influence.²⁶

• The Individual: At the center are our own internal characteristics: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and skills.
• The Interpersonal: This layer includes our closest relationships with family, friends, and peers, which shape our social identity and norms.
• The Community: This encompasses the settings where our social relationships occur, such as schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods, along with the rules and institutions that govern them.
• The Societal/Policy: This is the outermost layer, comprising the broad societal factors like economic policies, cultural values, and public health regulations that create the context for everything else.

This model is powerful because it integrates the different disciplinary perspectives into one cohesive system. The individual level aligns with psychology, the interpersonal with social psychology, the community with sociology, and the societal level with sociology, economics, and public health.²⁴ Most importantly, it shows how these levels are interconnected and mutually influential. A change in public policy at the societal level can ripple inward, transforming communities, strengthening families, and ultimately enabling healthier individual lives.

A Cross-Disciplinary Analogy: The Keystone Concept

My epiphany about keystone species provided the missing piece: a way to understand leverage and vulnerability within this complex social-ecological system. In an ecosystem, not all species are created equal in terms of their impact. A keystone species is one whose influence on its environment is disproportionately large relative to its abundance.¹ Its removal can trigger a devastating chain reaction, known as a trophic cascade, that destabilizes the entire system.²

This concept translates with stunning clarity to social systems. I began to think in terms of “Social-Ecological Keystones”: those social factors that, like their biological counterparts, have a disproportionate impact on the stability, function, and health of a social system. Their weakness or absence can trigger a trophic cascade of disadvantage, unraveling the social fabric and producing a cluster of negative outcomes.

This is not just a metaphor. Researchers have already applied the keystone concept to analyze the deep connections between cultures and their environments, identifying “cultural keystone species” as plants or animals so fundamental to a society’s diet, materials, and identity that their loss would fundamentally change that culture.²⁹ By extending this logic, we can identify abstract social factors that serve the same foundational role. Based on decades of public health and economic research, factors like

Economic Stability (stable employment, livable income) and Education Access and Quality are prime candidates for being society’s keystones.²⁰

Trophic Cascades of Disadvantage

Once you start looking for them, you see these negative cascades everywhere. Consider this all-too-common chain of events:

1. Societal Level (Keystone Failure): A shift in economic policy leads to de-industrialization, eliminating stable, well-paying manufacturing jobs in a region. The “Stable Employment” keystone has been removed.
2. Community Level: Widespread unemployment erodes the local tax base. As a result, public services decay: schools become underfunded, parks fall into disrepair, and public transit is cut.³³ Social cohesion frays and crime rates may rise.⁷
3. Interpersonal Level: Financial strain places immense stress on families, correlating with increases in domestic conflict, substance abuse, and relationship breakdowns.³⁵ Social support networks weaken as people are forced to move to find work.
4. Individual Level: Residents experience chronic stress and anxiety, leading to poor mental and physical health. With limited access to healthy food and safe recreational spaces, and with stress as a key driver, unhealthy behaviors like smoking and poor diet become more prevalent.³² Their children, attending under-resourced schools and growing up in unstable homes, face diminished educational and economic prospects, perpetuating the cycle.

This cascade powerfully illustrates why my early, individual-focused interventions were doomed to fail. An anti-smoking campaign or a healthy eating workshop is useless when the entire social ecosystem is architected to produce stress, limit opportunity, and make healthy choices the most difficult ones. To be effective, the intervention must address the initial keystone failure. This framework transforms our understanding from a static list of problems into a dynamic, interconnected system, allowing us to identify the most critical points of leverage for creating lasting change.

The Architecture of Inequality: A Case Study in Systemic Failure (The United Kingdom)

Nowhere is this concept of a trophic cascade of disadvantage more evident than in the United Kingdom. The UK presents a stark paradox: it has a world-renowned National Health Service (NHS) founded on the principle of universal access, yet it is plagued by deep and widening health inequalities that map directly onto socioeconomic status.³² This proves, in tragic detail, that providing healthcare downstream is not enough to overcome the powerful currents of inequality flowing from upstream.

The Statistical Reality of the UK’s Health Gap

The data on the UK’s health inequalities is staggering and paints a clear picture of a system failing its most vulnerable.

• The Life Expectancy Gradient: A man living in one of the UK’s least deprived areas can expect to live 9.4 years longer than a man in one of the most deprived areas. For women, the gap is nearly 8 years.³⁴
• The Healthy Life Gap: The disparity is even more shocking when looking at healthy life expectancy—the number of years lived in good health. Here, the gap between the most and least deprived is over 18 years.³⁷ This means that people in poorer areas not only live shorter lives, but they spend a much greater proportion of those lives—nearly a third—in poor health.³⁴
• Avoidable Deaths and Disease: People in the most deprived areas are more than twice as likely to die prematurely from cardiovascular disease and 3.6 times more likely to die from an avoidable cause overall.³⁴ Hospital admissions for infectious diseases are nearly twice as high in these areas, and conditions like type 2 diabetes and chronic pain are projected to increase much faster there than in affluent areas.³⁹

Health Indicator	Most Deprived 10% of Areas	Least Deprived 10% of Areas	The Inequality Gap
Life Expectancy at Birth – Male	74.1 years	83.5 years	9.4 years
Life Expectancy at Birth – Female	78.7 years	86.4 years	7.7 years
Healthy Life Expectancy at Birth – Male	52.3 years	70.7 years	18.4 years
Healthy Life Expectancy at Birth – Female	51.3 years	71.2 years	19.9 years
Avoidable Mortality Rate (per 100,000)	405.1 (Blackpool)	138.0 (Hart)	~3.6x higher

Data compiled from sources ³⁴, and ³⁴ for years 2017-2019.

A Keystone Failure Analysis

Using the social-ecological keystone model, we can trace this cascade of poor health back to its source. The UK’s health crisis is not primarily a healthcare crisis; it is a crisis of its foundational social determinants.

• Keystone 1: Economic Instability: Income is one of the most powerful predictors of health. In 2023-2024, 14.4 million people in the UK were living in poverty.⁴¹ This low income limits access to nutritious food and safe housing and is a primary driver of chronic stress, which in turn increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and mental health conditions.⁴¹
• Keystone 2: Environment and Housing: Poor housing conditions, such as cold and damp, are linked to a host of respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses and are estimated to cost the NHS at least £600 million per year.⁴² Furthermore, deprived neighborhoods often have higher levels of air pollution and less access to safe green spaces, compounding health risks.³³
• Keystone 3: Education and Skills: Educational attainment is strongly linked to health outcomes, yet a clear gradient exists in the UK where children from poorer backgrounds consistently achieve less academically, setting them on a path to poorer health from an early age.³²

These upstream failures create a torrent of downstream health problems that the NHS is left to manage. The system is heroically treating the symptoms of a sick society. This is not a failure of the NHS, but a failure of the broader social and economic architecture that surrounds it. The UK case study is a powerful warning: without reinforcing the social keystones of income, housing, and education, no amount of healthcare spending can close the gap in health equity.

Engineering Equity: A Case Study in Systemic Success (Bogotá, Colombia)

If the UK demonstrates a cascade of disadvantage, the story of Bogotá’s TransMilenio transport system shows the opposite: how a strategic “keystone intervention” can trigger a powerful cascade of positive change. It is a lesson in how to consciously re-engineer a city’s social architecture to promote equity.

Mobility as a Keystone

In the 1990s, Bogotá was a city fractured by inequality. Its chaotic and dangerous private bus system was a major barrier to progress, leaving low-income communities on the city’s periphery physically and economically isolated from the opportunities in its center.⁴⁴ For the city’s visionary mayor at the time, Enrique Peñalosa, mobility was not just a logistical problem; it was a moral one. He famously stated that a wealthy citizen in a car taking up 70 square meters of road space and a poor citizen on a bus taking up 1 square meter should have an equal right to the city. A bus stuck in traffic was not just an inefficiency; it was a profound symbol of inequality.⁴⁶

Designing for Social Equity: The TransMilenio Project

Launched in 2000, the TransMilenio Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system was an audacious act of social engineering. Its primary goal was not just to move people, but to advance social equity.⁴⁷ Its design reflected this mission:

• Dedicated Bus Lanes: By taking road space from private cars and giving it to high-capacity buses, the system prioritized the efficient movement of the many over the convenience of the few.⁴⁶
• The Feeder System: This was the crucial keystone element. Free or low-cost feeder buses were designed to connect the poorest and most remote residential areas to the main transit arteries, ensuring the system was accessible to the very people who needed it most.⁴⁹
• Integrated Urbanism: The project was not just about buses. It was integrated with the creation of hundreds of kilometers of bike paths (Ciclorutas) and public plazas, with secure bike parking at stations to encourage a holistic, multi-modal transport ecosystem.⁴⁸

The Positive Cascade of Effects

The impact was immediate and transformative, rippling through every level of the city’s social-ecological system.

• Economic Impact: The system dramatically increased access to employment, with one study finding a 24% increase in job opportunities for the low-income population.⁵¹ Travel times were cut by an average of 32%, saving commuters hundreds of hours a year—a benefit felt most acutely by the poor, who often had the longest journeys.⁵²
• Health and Safety Impact: The results were stunning. In the corridors where TransMilenio operated, road deaths plummeted by 92% and injuries by 75%.⁵² The reduction in traffic and older, polluting buses led to a 40% decrease in air pollutants.⁵²
• Social Impact: The time savings had a direct impact on family life, with 37% of users reporting they could spend more time with their families.⁵² The system became a great public equalizer, a shared space where, as Peñalosa envisioned, citizens could meet as equals.⁴⁶

Bogotá’s story is not a perfect one. The system’s incredible success has led to immense demand and overcrowding, and the network has not been built out as quickly as planned, eroding some of the initial public goodwill.⁴⁵ Yet, the lesson remains powerful. By identifying and investing in a single keystone factor—equitable mobility—Bogotá unlocked a cascade of positive benefits across public health, economic productivity, and social well-being. It is a masterclass in upstream intervention.

The Policy Landscape: National Strategies and Global Challenges

The contrast between the UK and Bogotá highlights a critical point: how a nation frames the problem of social factors determines its approach to solving it. A look at the policy landscapes in the UK and Australia reveals how national history and context shape these crucial decisions.

The United Kingdom’s Approach: Health, Deprivation, and “Levelling Up”

The UK’s approach is heavily influenced by its history of class-based society and its centralized NHS. Consequently, policy is primarily framed through the lens of health inequalities driven by socioeconomic deprivation.⁵⁵ The government uses sophisticated tools like the Public Health Outcomes Framework to monitor a wide range of social determinants, from fuel poverty to work-related illness.⁴³ Current policy priorities for 2024-2025 focus on the immense fiscal pressures on the NHS, with urgent calls to increase investment in public health and prevention to tackle the root causes of ill-health, particularly among the working-age population.⁴⁰

Australia’s Approach: Cohesion, Migration, and Multiculturalism

Australia, as a nation fundamentally shaped by immigration, frames the issue differently. Its primary concern is maintaining social cohesion within a diverse, multicultural society.⁵⁹ While its history includes a “wage-earner’s welfare state” aimed at protecting working-class families ⁶¹, modern policy is built on strong anti-discrimination laws and a carefully managed migration system, seen as essential pillars of a harmonious society.⁶⁰ A key priority for 2024-2025 is the “Closing the Gap” initiative, a partnership with First Nations peoples to address deep-seated, systemic inequities in housing, justice, and well-being.⁶²

Universal Challenges

Despite these different national framings, all countries face a set of universal challenges. As the WHO framework makes clear, truly addressing social determinants requires improving daily living conditions and tackling the inequitable distribution of power and resources.²¹ The primary obstacles are consistent globally: the difficulty of collecting comprehensive data across different sectors, the immense complexity of coordinating action between siloed government departments (health, housing, transport, education), and the lack of sustained political will to invest in long-term, upstream solutions that may not yield results within a single election cycle.²¹

A nation’s approach is path-dependent, shaped by its unique history. The UK’s focus on health inequality provides a powerful diagnostic tool for identifying the downstream consequences of social failure. Australia’s focus on social cohesion emphasizes the proactive need to build trust and belonging. Both are valid, but an ideal approach would integrate the strengths of each: rigorously measuring the health impacts of inequality while proactively investing in the architecture of a cohesive, inclusive, and equitable society.

Policy Dimension	United Kingdom	Australia
Primary Framing	Health inequalities; Socioeconomic deprivation; “Levelling up”.41	Social cohesion; Multiculturalism; Diversity and migration management.59
Key Legislative Instruments	Equality Act 2010; Human Rights Act 1998; NHS Constitution.55	Racial Discrimination Act 1975; Sex Discrimination Act 1984; Migration Act 1958.60
Main Monitoring Tools	Public Health Outcomes Framework; Wider Determinants of Health Dashboard.43	Scanlon Foundation “Mapping Social Cohesion” surveys; Migrant Integration Policy Index.60
2024-2025 Priorities	2025 Spending Review; Restoring public health grant; Shifting care to community; Tackling working-age ill-health.58	“Closing the Gap” policy partnership with First Nations; National Preventive Health Strategy; Managing migration levels.62

Conclusion: Towards a Socially Conscious Future

My journey from a data-driven public health analyst to a systems-thinking advocate has taught me one fundamental lesson: we cannot solve our most complex challenges by focusing on individuals alone. The invisible architecture of social factors—the conditions of our lives—exerts a more powerful influence on our well-being than almost any personal choice we can make.

By synthesizing insights from across the social sciences into a unified Social-Ecological Keystone model, we can move beyond simply listing problems to understanding their systemic roots. This framework allows us to diagnose the trophic cascades of disadvantage that perpetuate inequality, as seen in the UK, and to identify the powerful keystone interventions that can trigger cascades of positive change, as demonstrated by Bogotá. The path forward requires a radical shift in perspective and policy.

Recommendations for Policy and Practice

1. Adopt a “Keystone First” Policy Approach. Governments must reorient their focus and funding from downstream, reactive services (like acute healthcare) to upstream, proactive investments in “social keystones.” Prioritizing stable employment with fair pay, high-quality public education, and safe, affordable housing is the most effective and efficient long-term health and social policy.
2. Mandate Cross-Sectoral “Social Impact Assessments.” No major economic, housing, or transport policy should be enacted without a rigorous assessment of its potential impact on social equity. This would compel policymakers to consider the systemic consequences of their decisions and prevent the creation of new cascades of disadvantage.⁵⁶
3. Invest in Integrated Data Systems. To overcome the universal challenge of measurement, nations must build data infrastructure that connects information across health, education, social care, and economic sectors. This is the only way to accurately track the impact of social determinants and prove the return on investment of upstream interventions.²¹
4. Empower Local Communities. The Social-Ecological model highlights the community as a critical level for intervention. National governments should devolve greater power and resources to local authorities and community organizations, who are best positioned to identify and strengthen the specific keystones that are weakest in their unique social ecosystems.⁴³

Building a healthier, more equitable world is not a mystery. It is an engineering challenge. It demands that we learn to see the invisible architecture that shapes our lives and that we have the courage to reinforce its foundations, ensuring the entire structure is resilient, stable, and just for everyone who lives within it.

Works cited

1. Keystone species – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_species
2. Keystone Species – Project Regeneration, accessed August 8, 2025, https://regeneration.org/nexus/keystone-species
3. What is a Keystone Species? – Defenders of Wildlife, accessed August 8, 2025, https://defenders.org/blog/2023/02/what-keystone-species
4. Trophic Cascades and Keystone Species – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh42Uo8UznA
5. library.fiveable.me, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/social-factors#:~:text=Social%20factors%20refer%20to%20the,%2C%20demographics%2C%20and%20social%20institutions.
6. Social Factors – (AP Human Geography) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/social-factors
7. 75 Social Factors Examples (with Definition) (2025) – Helpful Professor, accessed August 8, 2025, https://helpfulprofessor.com/social-factors-examples/
8. Common Misconceptions about Society – Dummies.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/humanities/common-misconceptions-about-society-193074/
9. Social Factors in E. Durkheim’s Theory – J-Stage, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsr1950/6/1/6_1_51/_article
10. 16 Biggest Social Issues That Lead to Social Injustices – Yeshiva University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://online.yu.edu/wurzweiler/blog/16-biggest-social-issues-that-lead-to-social-injustices
11. library.fiveable.me, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-psych/social-factors#:~:text=Social%20factors%20refer%20to%20the,cultural%20norms%2C%20and%20societal%20expectations.
12. Social Factors – (AP Psychology) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-psych/social-factors
13. social factors – APA Dictionary of Psychology – American …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://dictionary.apa.org/social-factors
14. What Is Social Psychology, Exactly? – Verywell Mind, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/social-psychology-4157177
15. What is psychosocial factors? – Focuskeeper Glossary, accessed August 8, 2025, https://focuskeeper.co/glossary/what-is-psychosocial-factors
16. What Is Social Economics, and How Does It Impact Society?, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/social-economics.asp
17. Social Economics – Definition, Impact, Understanding – Corporate Finance Institute, accessed August 8, 2025, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/social-economics/
18. Socio-economic factors – (AP Human Geography) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/socio-economic-factors
19. Social and economic factors – County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/health-data/community-conditions/social-and-economic-factors
20. Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) | About CDC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/about/priorities/why-is-addressing-sdoh-important.html
21. Social determinants of health – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health
22. odphp.health.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health#:~:text=Social%20determinants%20of%20health%20(SDOH,Education%20Access%20and%20Quality
23. Social Determinants of Health – Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
24. The Social Ecological Model | Health Promotion | Health & Wellness – William & Mary, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.wm.edu/offices/wellness/ohp/about/sem/
25. Conceptual Social Ecology – UC Irvine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://socialecology.uci.edu/pages/conceptual-social-ecology
26. BRIEF ON THE SOCIAL ECOLOGICAL MODEL – Unicef, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/media/135011/file/Global%20multisectoral%20operational%20framework.pdf
27. What is Social Ecology? – Issues in Social Work – Online MSW Programs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.onlinemswprograms.com/social-work/what-is-social-ecology/
28. 10 Keystone Species Examples and the Important Role they Play in Every Ecosystem, accessed August 8, 2025, https://outforia.com/keystone-species-examples/
29. The Social-Ecological Keystone Concept: A Quantifiable Metaphor …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3294
30. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42763872_Cultural_Keystone_Species_Implications_for_Ecological_Conservation_and_Restoration
31. Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1/main.html
32. The Social Determinants of Health: It’s Time to Consider the Causes …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3863696/
33. Health disparities and health inequalities: applying All Our Health – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-disparities-and-health-inequalities-applying-all-our-health/health-disparities-and-health-inequalities-applying-all-our-health
34. What Are Health Inequalities? | The King’s Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/long-reads/what-are-health-inequalities
35. Grand Challenges for Social Work identify 12 top social problems facing America, accessed August 8, 2025, https://socialwork.uw.edu/news/grand-challenges-social-work-identify-12-top-social-problems-facing-america/
36. Tackling Health Inequalities | Seven Priorities For The NHS | The King’s Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/long-reads/tackling-health-inequalities-seven-priorities-nhs
37. Health inequalities – Office for National Statistics, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthinequalities
38. Health inequalities in a nutshell | The King’s Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/health-inequalities-nutshell
39. UKHSA publishes new analysis of health inequalities in England – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ukhsa-publishes-new-analysis-of-health-inequalities-in-england
40. Health inequalities in 2040 – The Health Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/reports/health-inequalities-in-2040
41. Social Determinants of Health in the UK: Understanding Context, Impact, and Intervention (2025) – knexu., accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.knexu.co.uk/featured-insights/social-determinants-of-health-in-the-uk-understanding-context-impact-and-intervention-2025
42. Broader determinants of health: trends – The King’s Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/articles/time-to-think-differently-broader-determinants-of-health-trends
43. Chapter 4 – Social determinants of health – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b359340f0b66eab99fb88/CMO_Annual_Report_2011_Chapter_4.pdf
44. TransMilenio: Bogotá, Colombia – EBRD Green Cities, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ebrdgreencities.com/policy-tool/transmilenio-bogota-colombia/
45. Transcending the TransMilenio – Bogotá – The Bogota Post, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thebogotapost.com/transcending-the-transmilenio/20701/
46. Enrique Peñalosa: “An Advanced City Is One Where the Rich Take Public Transport”, accessed August 8, 2025, https://citychangers.org/enrique-penalosa/
47. A New Approach: Social Factors in Urban Development | Smart …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/new-approach-social-factors-urban-development/227866/
48. How Bogota got people to use buses | World Economic Forum, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2014/09/design-public-transport-buses-bikes/
49. Bogotá, Colombia’s Tranmilenio: How Public Transportation Can Socially Include and Socially Exclude | Smart Cities Dive, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/bogota-colombias-tranmilenio-how-public-transportation-can-socially-include-and-exclud/95236/
50. IMPACT OF TRANSMILENIO ON POPULATION DENSITY AND LAND USE IN BOGOTÁ – WCTRS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.wctrs-society.com/wp-content/uploads/abstracts/rio/general/1522.pdf
51. The impacts of formalization and integration of public transport in social equity: The case of Bogota – World Transit Research, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research/9040/
52. TransMilenio: renewing Bogotá’s transport system – Centre for Public Impact, accessed August 8, 2025, https://centreforpublicimpact.org/public-impact-fundamentals/transmilenio-renewing-bogotas-transport-system/
53. TransMilenio Bus Rapid Transit System | use: urban sustainability exchange | Metropolis, accessed August 8, 2025, https://use.metropolis.org/case-studies/transmilenio-bus-rapid-transit-system
54. Bogota: TransMilenio’s overcrowding problem and a professor’s solution – World Bank Blogs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/transport/bogota-transmilenio-s-overcrowding-problem-and-professors-solution
55. Shared social values – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65fd731ef1d3a0001d32ade2/Shared_Social_Values.pdf
56. Tackling Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom: The Progress and Pitfalls of Policy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1360979/
57. Wider Determinants of Health | Fingertips | Department of Health and Social Care, accessed August 8, 2025, https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/wider-determinants
58. Spending Review 2025: priorities for health, the NHS and social care in England, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/analysis/spending-review-2025-priorities
59. About social cohesion – Department of Home Affairs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/our-portfolios/social-cohesion/about-social-cohesion
60. Diversity, migration and social cohesion – Parliament of Australia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Issues_and_Insights/48th_Parliament/Diversitymigrationandsocialcohesion
61. Regional Issue: Social Policy Developments in Australia and New Zealand – PMC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3886295/
62. Social and Emotional Wellbeing Policy Partnership | Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.gov.au/committees-and-groups/social-and-emotional-wellbeing-policy-partnership
63. 2 Facing the challenges in the social sciences – The Open University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/sociology/the-social-social-science/content-section-2.1
64. Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Examples of Successful Evidence-Based Strategies and Current Federal Efforts, accessed August 8, 2025, https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/e2b650cd64cf84aae8ff0fae7474af82/SDOH-Evidence-Review.pdf
65. A framework for NHS action on social determinants of health | The Health Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/briefings/a-framework-for-nhs-action-on-social-determinants-of-health
66. Fit for the Future: The 10 Year Health Plan for England – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68760ad755c4bd0544dcae33/fit-for-the-future-10-year-health-plan-for-england.pdf
67. National Preventive Health Strategy 2021-2030, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/12/national-preventive-health-strategy-2021-2030_1.pdf
68. BETTER HEALTH THROUGH EQUITY, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.apha.org/getcontentasset/db2668d9-713b-493f-8ec8-8fba0f86394d/7ca0dc9d-611d-46e2-9fd3-26a4c03ddcbb/equity_stories.pdf?language=en