The Healthcare Ecosystems: A Personal Journey Through the Wilds of Public and Private Insurance

Part I: Lost in the Maze

A Crisis of Contradiction

For fifteen years, I built a career on the clean lines of data. As a health policy analyst, I lived in a world of charts, regression models, and comparative frameworks. I could tell you the per capita spending of a dozen OECD countries, the administrative overhead of single-payer versus multi-payer systems, and the statistical correlation between insurance status and mortality rates. I advised, I wrote, I spoke with the detached confidence of someone who believed the world’s most complex problems could be rendered knowable, even solvable, through the elegant logic of a spreadsheet.

Then my Aunt Carol had a stroke.

And my entire professional world shattered.

It was an ischemic stroke, sudden and severe, paralyzing the left side of her body. She was 62, a retired teacher, and by all American standards, she had done everything right. She had “good” private insurance, a well-regarded PPO plan she had paid into for decades. On paper, she was covered. In the real world, she was drowning.

The first crisis hit in the hospital. The neurologist who saved her life was, we discovered, out-of-network. The bill arrived a month later, a staggering five-figure sum that her insurance refused to cover in full. Then came the fight for rehabilitation. Her doctors prescribed three weeks of intensive inpatient therapy. Her insurer, after a review by a physician who had never met her, authorized five days. The first appeal was denied. The second, a “peer-to-peer” call, was also denied. We were told her progress had “plateaued,” a clinical-sounding term for a financial decision.

Every day was a battle fought on a foreign field with an indecipherable language of CPT codes, EOBs, and prior authorization forms.¹ We spent hours on the phone, navigating automated menus and speaking to representatives who offered scripted sympathy but no solutions. The paperwork was a blizzard of contradictions, a mountain of bills from the hospital, the ER physicians, the out-of-network neurologist, the ambulance service, the in-network rehab facility that her plan wouldn’t cover for the prescribed duration. It was a system that seemed designed not to deliver care, but to create friction, to exhaust and overwhelm, until you either gave up or went broke.³

My aunt, a woman who had spent her life teaching children to read, was now trapped in a system she could not decipher. And I, the policy analyst with all the answers, was useless. My charts and statistics were meaningless in the face of her fear and my family’s mounting panic. Her “good” insurance was a mirage, a promise of security that vanished under the slightest pressure. She was not uninsured; she was underinsured, a state of peril just as precarious and far more insidious.⁶ Her story is not an anomaly; it is a feature of the American system, where even for the insured, one illness can be a direct path to financial ruin.³

This personal crisis forced me to confront a devastating truth: the frameworks I had used my entire career were failing. The neat binary of “public vs. private” healthcare was a dangerously simplistic map for a treacherous and complex landscape. We are taught to see these systems as machines. Public systems, like the UK’s NHS or Canada’s Medicare, are often portrayed as well-meaning but clunky, prone to long wait times and bureaucratic inefficiency, yet fundamentally fair.⁸ Private systems, like the one in the United States, are lauded for innovation and consumer choice but criticized for their expense and cruelty.⁸

This mechanical view—a world of inputs, outputs, and interchangeable parts—could not explain the lived reality of my aunt’s suffering. It couldn’t account for the profound waste, the Kafkaesque bureaucracy, or the sheer terror that the system instilled. It was clear that these systems were not machines at all. They were something else entirely—something more chaotic, more dynamic, and more alive. My quest to understand what happened to my aunt became a quest for a new map, a new way of seeing that could make sense of the contradictions and complexities that my old models ignored.

Part II: The Epiphany – A New Map

Beyond Machines and Markets: Discovering the Healthcare Ecosystem

In the depths of my professional crisis, I stumbled upon an answer in the most unexpected of places: the field of ecology. While reading about the complex, interdependent relationships that define a natural ecosystem—the flow of energy, the competition for resources, the symbiotic and parasitic relationships between species—I had a moment of profound clarity. A healthcare system doesn’t behave like a machine with predictable outputs. It behaves like an ecosystem.

This wasn’t just a clever metaphor; it was a new analytical paradigm.¹¹ An ecosystem is a complex web of interactions between organisms and their environment. Its health is not measured by a single output, but by its overall resilience, productivity, and balance.¹¹ Viewing healthcare through this lens allowed me to move beyond the sterile language of policy and see the system for what it is: a dynamic, living entity shaped by powerful environmental forces. This “Healthcare Ecosystem” framework became my new map, organized around four fundamental components.

1. The Climate (The Funding Philosophy)

The climate is the foundational energy source that sustains the entire ecosystem. It is the philosophical answer to the question: How is healthcare paid for? This is the most critical element, as it determines the availability and distribution of resources for every inhabitant.

• Publicly Funded Systems (The Rainforest): In countries like the UK and Canada, the climate is like a rainforest. It is sustained by a consistent, universal source of energy—general taxation.⁸ This creates a humid, resource-rich environment where the basic necessity of care, like water, is available to all inhabitants. The system is designed for broad distribution and stability.
• Privately Funded Systems (The Desert): In a system dominated by private insurance, like the United States, the climate is more like a desert. Resources are not universally distributed. They are concentrated in unpredictable oases, funded by individual and employer premiums.⁸ Access to these resources is conditional and often precarious. While these oases can be incredibly lush and technologically advanced for those who can afford them, the surrounding landscape is arid and unforgiving for those left outside.

2. The Inhabitants (The Actors)

Every ecosystem is defined by its inhabitants and the relationships between them. In healthcare, the primary inhabitants are patients, providers (doctors, nurses, hospitals), and payers (private insurance companies, government agencies). Their interactions, incentives, and power dynamics create the ecosystem’s “food web.” Are their relationships symbiotic, working together for the collective health of the system? Or are they predatory, with one group’s survival coming at the expense of another’s? The design of the ecosystem dictates these behaviors.¹⁶

3. The Terrain (The Infrastructure and Access)

The terrain is the physical and digital landscape of the ecosystem. It dictates how inhabitants move and whether they can access the resources they need to survive.

• Public Terrain: A publicly oriented system aims to create a terrain with well-trodden, clearly marked public paths. The goal is to ensure that every inhabitant, regardless of their location or status, has a reasonable and direct route to care.¹³
• Private Terrain: A private system creates a complex and fragmented terrain. The landscape is carved into a patchwork of exclusive territories known as “provider networks”.¹ Navigating this terrain is treacherous. A wrong turn into an “out-of-network” zone can be financially catastrophic, creating invisible walls and vast deserts of inaccessibility even for those who are nominally “insured.”

4. The Apex Predator (The Role of Profit)

In many ecosystems, the behavior of an apex predator can fundamentally shape the environment for all other species. In healthcare, the most powerful and transformative force is the role of profit, particularly within the insurance function. This is not a moral judgment but an ecological observation.

When the primary payer in the system is a for-profit entity, its survival depends on maximizing revenue and minimizing costs (payouts for care). This creates a powerful evolutionary pressure that rewards specific behaviors. As legal scholar David Light articulated in his “Inverse Coverage Law,” the core logic of for-profit health insurance is to cover the healthy and avoid the sick—the exact opposite of a healthcare system’s purpose.¹⁸ This force incentivizes the denial of claims, the creation of complex rules to limit access, and the avoidance of high-risk populations (a phenomenon known as “adverse selection”).¹⁹ The presence of this apex predator fundamentally alters the relationships between all inhabitants, often turning potentially symbiotic interactions into adversarial, zero-sum conflicts. The immense administrative waste seen in such systems is the ecological equivalent of a costly evolutionary arms race, where payers and providers spend vast resources on armor and weaponry (billing departments, denial algorithms, legal teams) rather than on the actual provision of care.²⁰

Armed with this new map, I could finally begin to understand the wilderness my aunt had been lost in. I set out to apply this framework to four different ecosystems, to see how their unique climates, terrains, and inhabitants shaped the lives of those within them.

Part III: Four Ecosystem Case Studies

1. The American Marketplace Savannah: A Land of Feast and Famine

The United States healthcare system is not a unified system but a vast, competitive savannah. It is an ecosystem defined by stark contrasts: resource-rich oases of astonishing technological sophistication stand adjacent to arid plains of profound neglect. Survival depends on one’s ability to secure access to these oases, a precarious and often brutal struggle.

Ecosystem Profile

• Climate: The American climate is a volatile mix of funding sources. The largest portion comes from private employer-sponsored and individual insurance premiums, creating pockets of rich resources.¹⁵ Government programs like Medicare and Medicaid act as separate, state-managed river systems, providing life-sustaining water for the elderly and the very poor.¹⁰ However, for millions, the climate is one of drought; they are either uninsured or, like my aunt, underinsured, exposed to the harsh elements with only the illusion of protection.⁶
• Terrain: The terrain is a bewildering and treacherous patchwork of private networks. Navigating from a primary care doctor to a specialist to a hospital requires a complex map of “in-network” providers, and a single misstep can lead to financial disaster.¹ The landscape is intentionally complex, littered with the obstacles of prior authorizations, complex cost-sharing structures (deductibles, copays, coinsurance), and a vocabulary designed to confuse.¹ This complexity is not a bug; it is a feature designed to manage costs by discouraging use.
• Apex Predator: The ecosystem is dominated by a powerful apex predator: the for-profit health insurance industry. Its behavior shapes the entire landscape. The fundamental need to generate profit for shareholders creates a relentless pressure to minimize payouts for care.¹⁸ This dynamic establishes an inherently adversarial relationship between the payer and both patients and providers, turning the act of seeking and delivering care into a constant negotiation and conflict.

The Inhabitants’ Experience

Life on the savannah is a story of two extremes: feast and famine.

The Feast: For those with comprehensive, high-quality insurance and the resources to navigate its complexities, the American ecosystem offers unparalleled benefits. The U.S. is a world leader in medical innovation, home to many of the world’s best hospitals and research centers.²⁴ Patients can experience state-of-the-art treatments and a high degree of choice among top-tier specialists. On measures of care process, such as the availability of preventive screenings like mammograms or flu vaccinations, the U.S. performs remarkably well, ranking second among high-income nations in a 2024 Commonwealth Fund report.²⁵ This is the oasis: a place of immense technological prowess and potential for excellent outcomes, accessible to those who hold the right map and can pay the price of admission.

The Famine: For a vast and growing portion of the population, the experience is one of constant peril. The famine takes many forms:

• The Terror of Denial: The most direct expression of the apex predator’s influence is the claim denial. In the U.S., nearly one in five claims submitted to Affordable Care Act marketplace plans is denied.²⁶ This is not a rare occurrence but a routine business practice, often automated by algorithms designed to flag claims for rejection with minimal human review.²⁷ One lawsuit alleged that the insurer Cigna denied over 300,000 claims in just two months, spending an average of only 1.2 seconds on each case.²⁷ These denials force patients and their doctors into a grueling appeals process, a war of attrition that consumes time, energy, and hope. Stories abound of insurance reviewers with no relevant specialty denying critical care, such as a “peer” asking why a patient with a protein C deficiency couldn’t just drink protein shakes, or denying an urgent MRI for a patient with clear signs of a spinal cord emergency until they first completed six weeks of physical therapy.²⁸ This process creates what one physician resident called “artificially created problems in people’s lives,” delaying critical care and causing immense psychological distress for patients and their families at their most vulnerable moments.²⁹
• The Specter of Medical Bankruptcy: The ultimate consequence of this system is financial ruin. The United States is the only wealthy nation where illness is a common cause of bankruptcy.⁷ A staggering 41% of American adults—around 100 million people—carry medical debt.³ Crucially, the vast majority of those with medical debt—80%—
  are insured.³ Like my aunt, they are bankrupted not by a lack of coverage, but by the gaps within it: high deductibles, coinsurance, and bills from out-of-network providers. The story of George, a warehouse worker with diabetes, is tragically representative. An on-the-job injury led to a toe amputation. Even with insurance, he was left with over $20,000 in debt, lost his job, and had to forgo necessary follow-up care, all while his credit was ruined.³ These are not just financial hardships; they are life-altering events that prevent people from saving for retirement, buying a home, or pursuing a better life.
• The Tragedy of the Underinsured: The most heartbreaking stories are of those who die not because medicine failed them, but because the financing system did. Dr. Debra Richter tells the story of George and Tina, siblings with childhood diabetes whose family rarely had insurance through their low-wage jobs.³¹ She scrounged for free insulin and supplies, but it wasn’t enough. George went blind at 20 and died of organ failure at 21, qualifying for Medicaid only after he was too disabled to work. Tina died at 25 after a heart attack. Their deaths were preventable. They were victims of an ecosystem that treats healthcare not as a right, but as a commodity available only to those who can pay.

Ecological Imbalance

The defining characteristic of the American savannah is its staggering inefficiency. The ecosystem burns a colossal amount of energy on non-productive, adversarial activities. Administrative costs account for an estimated 15% to 30% of all healthcare spending in the U.S., far higher than in any other developed nation.²⁰ This amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

This is not just bureaucratic bloat; it is the direct cost of the evolutionary arms race between payers and providers. Hospitals and doctor’s offices must hire armies of billing and coding specialists to fight for reimbursement from insurers, who in turn employ their own armies to scrutinize and deny claims.²¹ One study found that U.S. physicians dedicate about 50% more time to administrative tasks than their Canadian counterparts.²¹ This massive expenditure of resources—time, money, and human talent—produces no better health.

The result is the great American healthcare paradox: the U.S. spends vastly more than any other nation—over 18% of its GDP—yet achieves some of the worst health outcomes among its peers, including the lowest life expectancy and the highest rates of preventable deaths.¹⁰ The Marketplace Savannah is an ecosystem that is both spectacularly innovative and catastrophically wasteful, a place of feast for a few and famine for many, where the constant conflict for resources leaves the entire environment depleted and fundamentally unhealthy.

2. The Canadian Boreal Forest: The Promise and Peril of a Single River

The Canadian healthcare system, known as Medicare, presents a stark contrast to the American savannah. It is a vast, sprawling boreal forest, an ecosystem defined by a single, powerful life source: a publicly funded, single-payer river that provides essential sustenance to all its inhabitants. This design offers profound security but also creates unique vulnerabilities, leading to an experience of both safety and deep frustration.

Ecosystem Profile

• Climate: The climate is stable and predictable, nourished by a single source: provincial and federal taxes.¹³ This creates a universally humid environment where no inhabitant will die of “thirst” for medically necessary hospital and physician care. This principle of universality, enshrined in the Canada Health Act of 1984, is the bedrock of the ecosystem, ensuring access is based on need, not ability to pay.¹³
• Terrain: For core medical services, the terrain is remarkably simple and uniform. There are no competing networks, no “out-of-network” deserts, and no complex financial obstacles like deductibles or coinsurance for insured services.³⁶ A resident of one province can receive care in another, a principle known as portability.¹³ This creates a landscape that is easy to navigate, removing the financial fear and complexity that characterize the American experience.
• Apex Predator: The for-profit insurance predator has been deliberately excluded from the core of the ecosystem. Private insurance exists, but it is relegated to a supplementary role, covering services outside the public basket like prescription drugs, dental, and vision care.³⁶ This fundamental design choice removes the adversarial dynamic between payer and patient for essential medical care.

The Inhabitants’ Experience

Life in the Canadian forest is defined by a trade-off: the inhabitants exchange the risk of financial catastrophe for the certainty of delay.

The Security: The overwhelming, defining experience for Canadians is freedom from the financial terror of healthcare. The system eliminates medical bankruptcy for necessary care, a concept that is simply a non-issue in the national discourse.³⁹ This provides a baseline of social equity and security that is difficult to overstate. Patients are free to focus on their health without the concurrent stress of navigating bills and insurance denials. This is the great promise of the single river: it sustains everyone, ensuring that a diagnosis of cancer or a heart attack does not also come with a diagnosis of impending bankruptcy.

The Frustration: The great peril of the Canadian forest is the logjam in its single river. The system’s primary and most persistent failure is its long wait times for specialist consultations and non-emergency procedures.³⁸ In 2024, the median wait time from a GP referral to receiving treatment was a staggering 30 weeks—more than triple what it was in 1993.⁴⁰ For some specialties, it is even worse; the median wait for orthopedic surgery was 57.5 weeks.⁴⁰

These are not mere inconveniences; they are life-altering delays that have profound human and economic consequences.

• The Human Cost: The story of Karen Harris, a Windsor resident with a rare and painful condition called Eagle’s syndrome, vividly illustrates the human toll. She waited five years for a surgery that she hoped would restore her quality of life. During this time, she couldn’t sit upright for long, had to wear a neck brace in the car, and sometimes needed a wheelchair. When the surgery finally happened, it failed, and she was placed back on a waiting list with no end in sight.⁴¹ For millions of Canadians, waiting means living with pain, disability, and psychological distress. A 2024 survey found that nearly two-thirds of Canadians reported that their lives were negatively affected by the wait to see a specialist.⁴² Tragically, for some, the wait is fatal. Between 2023 and 2024, at least 15,474 Canadians died while on a waiting list for a surgery or diagnostic scan.⁴³
• The Economic Cost: The economic burden of these delays is immense. A 2024 study estimated that Canadians waiting for care lost $5.2 billion in wages and productivity. When the value of leisure time lost to pain and disability is included, the cost skyrockets to $15.9 billion, or over $10,200 per person on a waiting list.⁴⁴

Ecological Imbalance

The Canadian ecosystem’s primary imbalance is a chronic lack of capacity relative to demand. The “single river” model, while equitable, can be sluggish and inflexible. Several factors contribute to the logjams:

• Resource Scarcity: The forest suffers from a “drought” of key resources. Compared to other high-income countries, Canada has fewer physicians, hospital beds, and diagnostic scanners (like MRI and CT machines) per capita.⁴⁵
• Physician Shortages and “Brain Drain”: Many areas, particularly rural ones, face a shortage of primary care doctors, making the initial referral that starts the clock on wait times difficult to obtain.³⁸ Furthermore, the system has historically struggled with a “brain drain,” where Canadian-trained doctors and nurses leave for higher-paying jobs in the United States, although this trend has fluctuated over time.⁴⁷ This outflow of talent further depletes the ecosystem’s capacity.
• Inefficient Flow: The system itself can be inefficient. As one Ontario surgeon noted, if each of a hospital’s six operating rooms starts just 10 minutes late each day, it adds up to 260 hours of wasted surgical time per year—time that could be used to clear the backlog.⁴¹

The ongoing debate in Canada over increasing the role of private, for-profit clinics is an ecological one. Proponents argue that these clinics can act as “tributaries,” taking pressure off the main river and reducing wait times. Opponents fear they will create a two-tier system, siphoning resources and personnel away from the public river and leaving it to care for only the most complex and costly patients, ultimately undermining the principle of universality that defines the entire ecosystem.³⁸ The Canadian Boreal Forest offers its inhabitants security from predators, but its very design creates the constant risk of getting stuck in the slow-moving current.

3. The British Managed Garden: The National Health Service (NHS)

The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) is perhaps the world’s most famous healthcare ecosystem. It is not a wild forest or a competitive savannah, but a centrally planned national garden. Conceived in the ashes of World War II and launched in 1948, the NHS was a deliberate act of social engineering, designed with the explicit goal of providing comprehensive and equitable care to every citizen, free at the point of use.¹⁴ This ecosystem is defined by its founding principles, its deep cultural resonance, and the chronic tension between its noble ambitions and its limited resources.

Ecosystem Profile

• Climate: The NHS garden is watered exclusively by the rains of general taxation.¹⁴ This funding model ensures that financial status is not a barrier to receiving care. It is a system built on the principle of social solidarity, where the healthy contribute to the care of the sick.
• Terrain: The terrain is designed to be uniform and accessible. It is a public park with no financial gates or private toll roads for essential services. The “gardeners”—the vast majority of clinicians and hospital staff—are public employees or contractors, working within a single, integrated system.¹⁴ This structure results in extremely low administrative costs, as the friction of billing and claims processing is virtually eliminated.⁴⁵
• Apex Predator: The for-profit insurance predator is almost entirely absent from this managed garden. A small private insurance market exists for those who wish to bypass NHS queues for elective procedures, but it operates on the periphery and does not threaten the public system’s dominance.

The Inhabitants’ Experience

Living in the NHS garden is an experience shaped by a profound sense of collective ownership and the frustrations of scarcity.

The Equity: The greatest strength of the NHS is its remarkable equity. It provides a high degree of financial protection, with minimal out-of-pocket costs for patients.²⁵ This has fostered a deep national pride in the institution, which is often cited as a defining feature of British identity.⁴⁵ Patient forums and stories frequently express gratitude for the dedication of NHS staff and the security the service provides.⁵² The system is built to be a great leveler, treating a duke and a dustman with the same clinical priority.

The Scarcity: The garden, however, has always been tended on a tight budget. For decades, UK health spending per capita has lagged behind that of comparable European nations like France and Germany.⁵¹ This chronic under-resourcing manifests in several ways:

• Long Waiting Lists: While historically distinct from Canada’s issue, wait times in the NHS have become a critical problem, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The constitutional right for patients to receive treatment within 18 weeks of a referral has not been met since 2016.⁵⁶ By August 2023, the elective care waiting list had swelled to a record 7.75 million people.⁵⁸ These are not just numbers; they represent millions of lives on hold, people living with pain and uncertainty while waiting for procedures like hip replacements or cataract surgery.
• The “Postcode Lottery”: The promise of a uniform national garden has been compromised by significant regional disparities in care, a phenomenon known as the “postcode lottery.” Where a patient lives can dramatically affect their access to treatment.⁵⁹ Analysis has shown that treatment rates can be three times higher in one part of England than another just 80 miles away.⁵⁹ This applies not just to surgery but also to social care and access to new treatments, such as weight-loss injections, where funding and availability can vary dramatically from one local health authority to another.⁶⁰
• Resource Shortages: The underfunding is visible on the ground. The UK has substantially fewer doctors, nurses, hospital beds, and diagnostic scanners (CT and MRI) per capita than many of its peers.⁴⁵ This lack of capital investment and workforce capacity makes the entire ecosystem fragile and vulnerable to shocks like a pandemic, which saw elective procedures in the UK fall more sharply than in comparable countries.⁴⁵

Ecological Imbalance

The fundamental imbalance in the NHS ecosystem is the persistent gap between public expectations and political willingness to fund the service adequately. The garden is expected to produce a world-class harvest with soil that is chronically under-fertilized. This leads to staff burnout, reliance on foreign-trained clinicians to fill gaps, and a system that is constantly struggling to keep up with demand.⁴⁵

Recent government plans aim to address these challenges by “rewiring” the NHS.⁶² The focus is on moving care from hospitals into the community through new “neighbourhood health centres,” embracing digital tools like the NHS App and AI scribes to improve efficiency, and focusing more on prevention.⁶² However, these reforms are being implemented alongside significant budget cuts to the administrative bodies (Integrated Care Boards) tasked with overseeing them.⁶³ There is a significant risk that these changes will be layered onto a system that is already cracking under the strain of its fundamental resource constraints. The rise in private, out-of-pocket spending is a worrying sign that some inhabitants are beginning to cultivate their own private plots because the soil of the public garden is becoming too depleted to meet their needs.⁶⁵ The British Managed Garden is a testament to the power of social solidarity, but its future depends on whether its guardians are willing to provide the resources it needs to truly flourish.

4. The Australian Coral Reef: A Symbiotic Public-Private Hybrid

The Australian healthcare system is a complex and vibrant coral reef, a dynamic ecosystem where public and private lifeforms coexist in a carefully managed, and sometimes fraught, symbiosis. It is not a purely public system like the UK’s, nor is it a private-dominant market like the US. Instead, Australia has engineered a unique hybrid that seeks to blend the security of universal coverage with the choice and flexibility of a private market.

Ecosystem Profile

• Climate: The Australian ecosystem is nourished by a dual-source climate. The foundational energy comes from general taxation, which funds the universal public insurance scheme, Medicare.⁶⁶ This ensures a baseline of essential care for all citizens. Layered on top of this is a significant private insurance market, actively encouraged by government policy. This creates a richer, more complex climate than in Canada or the UK.
• Terrain: The terrain is a two-track landscape. There is a robust, comprehensive public path—Medicare—which provides free care in public hospitals and subsidizes the cost of physician visits and prescription drugs (through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme).⁶⁶ Alongside this runs a parallel private path, which allows patients to choose their doctor, be treated in a private hospital, and bypass public hospital waiting lists for elective surgery.⁶⁹ The government actively steers higher-income inhabitants toward this private path through a system of “carrots” (a means-tested rebate on private insurance premiums) and “sticks” (an extra tax, the Medicare Levy Surcharge, for high earners who do not purchase private hospital cover).⁷⁰
• Apex Predator: The for-profit insurance predator exists and is an integral part of the coral reef, but its behavior is heavily regulated and managed by the government. Unlike in the US, where the predator roams freely, in Australia, it is kept on a leash. The government sets the rules of engagement, attempting to balance the insurers’ viability with the public good.

The Inhabitants’ Experience

Life on the Australian coral reef is characterized by choice and high quality, but also by growing concerns about affordability and equity.

The Choice and Quality: The hybrid model has produced an ecosystem that performs exceptionally well on many international metrics. In the 2024 Commonwealth Fund report, Australia’s health system was ranked among the top three high-income countries, praised for its strong health outcomes and equity based on income.²⁵ The system offers a genuine choice: citizens can rely solely on the high-quality public Medicare system, or they can purchase private insurance to gain faster access to elective care and a greater choice of providers.⁶⁹ This dual structure is designed to relieve pressure on the public system while catering to consumer demand for more options.

The Affordability and Access Gaps: The reef, however, is showing signs of ecological stress. The primary concern is the rising tide of out-of-pocket costs.⁷³ Even with Medicare and private insurance, Australians pay for a significant portion of their healthcare directly (17% of total spending).⁶⁶ These “gap payments” for specialist visits and diagnostics are a growing barrier to care. A 2024 survey revealed that rising out-of-pocket costs were the top healthcare challenge for Australians, with nearly half of respondents visiting their GP less often as a result.⁷³

Other signs of stress include:

• Growing Wait Times: While not as severe as in Canada, waiting times for public services are a growing problem. Many patients turn to the Emergency Department (ED) not because of an emergency, but because they cannot get a timely or affordable GP appointment.⁷³
• Rural-Urban Divide: The ecosystem is much healthier in urban centers than in rural and remote areas, which suffer from clinician shortages and poorer access to care, leading to worse health outcomes and lower life expectancy.⁶⁹
• Private Insurance Complaints: Despite the regulation, the private insurance sector is a source of frustration. The most common complaints revolve around waiting periods for pre-existing conditions, unexpected hospital exclusions and restrictions, and disputes over benefits—issues that echo the problems seen in the US system, albeit on a smaller scale.⁷⁵

Ecological Imbalance

The central challenge for the Australian ecosystem is maintaining the delicate balance between its public and private components. There is a constant risk of the system tipping into a true two-tier model, where the public reef is left to care for the elderly, the chronically ill, and the poor, while the healthy and wealthy migrate to the exclusive lagoons of the private sector.⁷⁷ This is not a theoretical concern. Private hospitals, which perform 7 out of 10 elective surgeries, are facing financial pressure, squeezed between rising costs and insurers who want to pay less.⁷⁷

The Australian government is in a perpetual state of ecological management, constantly adjusting the levers of rebates, surcharges, and regulations to keep the reef in equilibrium. It is a complex, high-maintenance model. The Australian Coral Reef demonstrates that a symbiotic relationship between public and private healthcare is possible, but it requires constant vigilance and careful stewardship to prevent the more competitive private species from overwhelming the foundational public structure that sustains the entire ecosystem.

Part IV: An Ecological Assessment

Comparative Analysis: The Health of the Ecosystems

After journeying through these four distinct healthcare ecosystems, we can now step back and assess their overall health. An ecosystem’s health is not defined by a single metric but by a holistic evaluation of its productivity, resilience, and, most importantly, its ability to sustain all its inhabitants equitably. This comparative analysis moves beyond simple rankings to reveal the fundamental trade-offs each nation has made—choices that reflect deep-seated historical paths and national values.

To ground this assessment, we can turn to the work of journalist T.R. Reid. In his seminal book, The Healing of America, Reid travels the world examining different healthcare systems. He concludes that while the models vary, they are all built upon a foundational moral principle. As he puts it, “The primary issue for any health care system is a moral one”.³⁰ Every other wealthy, developed nation has made the decision that healthcare is a right for all citizens. The United States stands alone in treating it primarily as a market commodity.⁷⁸ This moral choice is the “primordial climate” that determines the very nature of each ecosystem.

The following tables quantify the consequences of these different choices, first from a high-level, system-wide perspective, and then from the ground-level view of the patient.

---

Table 1: The Four Healthcare Ecosystems at a Glance

This table provides a satellite view of the four ecosystems, highlighting the stark differences in how resources are generated and what macro-level outcomes they produce. It immediately illuminates the central paradox of the American system: it is an outlier in cost by a vast margin, yet this enormous expenditure does not translate into superior health for its population as a whole.

Feature	United States	Canada	United Kingdom	Australia
Ecosystem Model (Analogy)	Marketplace Savannah	Boreal Forest	Managed Garden	Coral Reef
Official System Type	Private-Dominant Hybrid	National Health Insurance (Single-Payer)	National Health Service (Beveridge Model)	Public-Private Hybrid
Primary Funding Source	Private Premiums & Taxes	General Taxation	General Taxation	General Taxation & Private Premiums
Per Capita Health Spending (USD, 2022)	$12,914 34	$6,500 34	$5,467 33	$6,226 33
Health Spending as % of GDP (2022)	18.3% 34	10.8% (approx.) 33	11.3% (approx.) 33	10.5% 25
Administrative Costs (% of Spending)	15-30% 20	~13% (Physician/Hospital)	1.9% 51	~13% (Physician/Hospital)
Life Expectancy at Birth (Years, 2023)	78.4 81	82.7 (2022) 81	82.5 (Eng/Wales) 81	83.2 (2022) 81

The data in this table is stark. The U.S. spends roughly double per person what the other three nations spend, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of its economy. A significant portion of this excess spending is consumed by administrative friction, the “wasteful conflict” inherent in its marketplace design. Despite this massive investment, Americans live shorter lives than their counterparts in Canada, the UK, and Australia. This satellite view provides irrefutable evidence that the design of the ecosystem—its climate and the presence of a dominant apex predator—has a profound impact on both efficiency and overall population health. More spending does not equal better health when a large portion of that spending is diverted from care to conflict.

---

Table 2: The Patient Experience Matrix

This table shifts the perspective from the satellite to the ground, translating the abstract data of national spending into the concrete, lived reality of the inhabitants. It codifies the central pain point of each ecosystem, making the systemic trade-offs tangible and personal.

Feature	United States	Canada	United Kingdom	Australia
Cost-Related Access Problems (% reporting)	High (37% insured adults) 6	Low 39	Very Low 25	Moderate & Rising 73
Risk of Medical Debt/Bankruptcy	High 3	Minimal 39	Minimal 45	Low 66
Median Wait for Specialist (Weeks)	Low (if insured/can pay) 24	30.0 (2024) 40	High & Rising (18+ weeks target missed) 57	Moderate 73
Scope of Public Coverage	Limited (Medicare/Medicaid); gaps in dental, vision 10	Core medical/hospital; gaps in pharma, dental, vision 13	Comprehensive; gaps in dental, vision 45	Core medical/hospital; subsidized pharma; gaps in dental, vision 66
Primary Patient Complaint	Cost, Bills, & Claim Denials 6	Wait Times 38	Wait Times & Bureaucracy 54	Out-of-Pocket Costs & Rural Access 73

This matrix reveals the fundamental bargain each society has struck. An American inhabitant may get a quick appointment but lives with the constant fear of a ruinous bill or a denied claim. A Canadian is free from that fear but faces the prospect of enduring a long, painful wait for care. A Briton is protected from costs but may be frustrated by an under-resourced, bureaucratic system and the “postcode lottery.” An Australian enjoys a high-quality system with choice but is increasingly burdened by rising out-of-pocket costs that create new barriers to access.

No ecosystem is a paradise. Each environment presents its own unique challenges for survival and well-being. The matrix makes clear that the design of the system is a series of choices, and every choice has a consequence that is felt deeply in the lives of its citizens.

Conclusion: Lessons from the Wild – Principles for a Thriving System

My journey, which began in the sterile world of policy analysis and was thrown into chaos by my aunt’s personal tragedy, has led me to this new understanding. Healthcare systems are not machines to be optimized, but ecosystems to be cultivated. The simplistic debate of public versus private is a false choice. The American savannah is not purely private, and the British garden is not purely public. Each is a complex mix of elements, shaped by a unique evolutionary history.

The analysis of these four ecosystems reveals that no single model is perfect. The American savannah, for all its brutality, fosters incredible innovation. The Canadian forest, for all its stagnation, provides profound security. The British garden, for all its fragility, is a powerful symbol of equity. The Australian reef, for all its vulnerability, demonstrates that a balance is possible.

Returning to my aunt’s story, I can now see it not as a random, personal misfortune, but as the predictable outcome of the ecosystem she inhabited. She was a vulnerable inhabitant on a competitive savannah, caught between powerful predators in a landscape designed for conflict. The out-of-network bills, the denied claims, the administrative nightmare—these were not system bugs; they were the system functioning as designed. This realization does not erase the pain, but it transforms it into a clear, systemic diagnosis.

The crucial question is not which machine to build, but what kind of ecosystem we want to live in. The lessons from the wild suggest that a healthy healthcare ecosystem, regardless of its specific model, must possess three core attributes:

1. Equity (A Stable Climate): A healthy ecosystem ensures that all its inhabitants have reliable access to the fundamental resources needed for survival. It must be built on a stable and universal funding climate that guarantees care as a right, not a privilege. This is the moral foundation upon which all else is built.
2. Efficiency (A Balanced Food Web): A healthy ecosystem minimizes the energy lost to wasteful, zero-sum conflict. It aligns the incentives of patients, providers, and payers, fostering symbiotic relationships rather than predatory ones. The goal must be to redirect the vast resources currently consumed by administrative warfare toward the productive purpose of patient care.
3. Resilience (A Diverse Terrain): A healthy ecosystem must be able to adapt to changing conditions and shocks, from pandemics to aging populations. This requires a diverse and flexible terrain, with sufficient capacity in its public pathways and the ability to innovate and respond to the evolving needs of its inhabitants.

The global healthcare debate is too often a shouting match between people holding different, incomplete maps. By adopting an ecological perspective, we can begin to see the entire landscape in all its complexity. We can appreciate the trade-offs each nation has made and learn from both their successes and their failures. The ultimate goal is not to replicate any single model, but to cultivate an ecosystem where the pursuit of health is a shared endeavor, not a brutal struggle for survival.

Works cited

1. 3 things to know before you pick a health insurance plan | HealthCare.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/choose-a-plan/comparing-plans/
2. Navigating the Maze: A Look at Health Insurance Complexities and Consumer Protections, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/issue-brief/navigating-the-maze-a-look-at-health-insurance-complexities-and-consumer-protections/
3. Healthcare Insights: How Medical Debt Is Crushing 100 Million Americans | The ILR School, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/scheinman-institute/blog/john-august-healthcare/healthcare-insights-how-medical-debt-crushing-100-million-americans
4. American redditors, what is your worst healthcare story? : r/AskReddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1hh6wse/american_redditors_what_is_your_worst_healthcare/
5. Americans, what is your insurance horror story? : r/AskReddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1hdevne/americans_what_is_your_insurance_horror_story/
6. Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs | KFF, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
7. Myth and Measurement: The Case of Medical Bankruptcies – PMC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5865642/
8. 1.2 Types of healthcare systems (public, private, mixed) – Fiveable, accessed August 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/healthcare-systems/unit-1/types-healthcare-systems-public-private-mixed/study-guide/CKr8Y3KjQKtFfzzz
9. Private vs. Public Healthcare: What’s the Difference? – Velocity Global, accessed August 8, 2025, https://velocityglobal.com/resources/blog/private-vs-public-healthcare/
10. Universal Health Care | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, Medicare …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/universal-health-care-debate
11. Ecosystem health – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem_health
12. “Ecosystem Health: More than a Metaphor?” | Environment & Society Portal, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.environmentandsociety.org/mml/ecosystem-health-more-metaphor
13. About Canada’s health care system, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-health-care-system.html
14. National Health Service – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service
15. The differences between private vs. public healthcare – Oyster HR, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.oysterhr.com/library/whats-the-difference-between-public-and-private-health-insurance
16. What is Healthcare Ecosystem? – Healthie, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gethealthie.com/glossary/healthcare-ecosystem
17. Health Insurance Basics | CMS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/files/document/nsa-health-insurance-basics.pdf
18. Private Health Insurance – Health Action International, accessed August 8, 2025, https://haiweb.org/encyclopaedia/private-health-insurance/
19. Risk Pooling: How Health Insurance in the Individual Market Works – Actuary.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://actuary.org/risk-pooling-how-health-insurance-in-the-individual-market-works/
20. The Role Of Administrative Waste In Excess US Health Spending, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/briefs/role-administrative-waste-excess-us-health-spending
21. Excess Administrative Costs Burden the U.S. Health Care System, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/excess-administrative-costs-burden-u-s-health-care-system/
22. Private Health Insurance: A Primer | Congress.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47507
23. 6 Reasons Healthcare Is So Expensive in the U.S. – Investopedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/080615/6-reasons-healthcare-so-expensive-us.asp
24. The U.S. Healthcare System: Accessing Care as a Foreigner, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/systems/us-healthcare.php
25. Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
26. My $30000 health insurance claim was denied. Then I tweeted about it – The Guardian, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2025/feb/26/health-insurance-claims-social-media
27. New AI tool counters health insurance denials decided by automated algorithms | US healthcare | The Guardian, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/25/health-insurers-ai
28. Tell me the story of the most absurd/dangerous/mind-boggling denial you have ever seen : r/medicine – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/1h8661b/tell_me_the_story_of_the_most/
29. Sickest patients face insurance denials despite policy fixes: “They won’t help me”, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-insurance-denials-prior-authorization-policy/
30. The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2779642/
31. Case Study: The Uninsured, accessed August 8, 2025, http://fbaum.unc.edu/lobby/010_Insuring_the_Uninsured/Organizational_Statements/AMSA/AMSA_Sep2000.htm
32. Skyrocketing Hospital Administrative Costs, Burdensome Commercial Insurer Policies Impacting Patient Care | AHA, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.aha.org/guidesreports/2024-09-10-skyrocketing-hospital-administrative-costs-burdensome-commercial-insurer-policies-are-impacting
33. International Comparison of Health Systems – KFF, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-policy-101-international-comparison-of-health-systems/
34. US vs. Canadian Healthcare: What is The Difference? | RUSM, accessed August 8, 2025, https://medical.rossu.edu/about/blog/us-vs-canadian-healthcare
35. How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries? – Peterson Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-system-compare-to-other-countries/
36. US vs Canadian Healthcare: What Are the Differences? – AIMS Education, accessed August 8, 2025, https://aimseducation.edu/blog/us-vs-canadian-healthcare-differences
37. Canada’s universal health-care system: achieving its potential – PMC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7138369/
38. The Canadian Healthcare System | International Citizens Insurance, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/systems/canadian-health-care/
39. Pros and Cons of Healthcare in Canada: A Closer Look | Caring …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.caringsupport.com/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-canadas-healthcare-system
40. Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2024 Report | Fraser Institute, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2024
41. Ontario woman back on a waitlist after surgery she waited for 5 years failed – CTV News, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/ontario-woman-back-on-a-waitlist-after-surgery-she-waited-for-5-years-failed/
42. The Daily — Wait times to see a medical specialist in Canada, 2024, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/250729/dq250729a-eng.htm
43. 15,474 Canadians Died Waiting for Health Care in 2023-24 – SecondStreet.Org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://secondstreet.org/2025/01/15/15474-canadians-died-waiting-for-health-care-in-2023-24/
44. Long waits for health care hit Canadians in their pocketbooks – Fraser Institute, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/long-waits-health-care-hit-canadians-their-pocketbooks
45. How does the NHS compare to the health care systems of other countries? – The King’s Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://assets.kingsfund.org.uk/f/256914/x/7cdf5ad1de/how_nhs_compares_other_countries_abpi_2023.pdf
46. U.S. Health Care Spending Highest Among Developed Countries | Johns Hopkins, accessed August 8, 2025, https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2019/us-health-care-spending-highest-among-developed-countries
47. How provinces are leveraging the U.S. ‘brain drain’ in medicine, and how Canada can help, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cma.ca/latest-stories/how-provinces-are-leveraging-us-brain-drain-medicine-and-how-canada-can-help
48. Fewer Canadian MDs heading to the US – CMAJ, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/26/e898
49. How bad is the brain drain? – CMAJ, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cmaj.ca/content/161/8/1028
50. Milestones of the NHS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/nhs-history/
51. How does UK health spending compare across Europe over the past decade?, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/features-and-opinion/features/how-does-uk-health-spending-compare-across-europe-over-the-past
52. Blogs – NHS England, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.england.nhs.uk/blogs/
53. Patient experience – NHS England, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.england.nhs.uk/gp/patient-experience/
54. Your stories – The Patients Association, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.patients-association.org.uk/blogs/your-stories/category/your-stories/tag/patient-experience
55. Patient Forum – George Eliot Hospital, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.geh.nhs.uk/about-us/get-involved/patient-forum
56. www.health.org.uk, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/analysis/government-s-plan-for-18-week-nhs-waiting-times-is-it-realistic#:~:text=Under%20the%20NHS%20Constitution%2C%20patients,delaying%20treatment%20is%20clinically%20appropriate).
57. Government’s plan for 18-week NHS waiting times: is it realistic? – The Health Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/analysis/government-s-plan-for-18-week-nhs-waiting-times-is-it-realistic
58. Elective (planned) treatment waiting times | Nuffield Trust, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/treatment-waiting-times
59. Location, location, location: NHS treatment is still a lottery | Medical Technology Group, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mtg.org.uk/location-location-location-nhs-treatment-is-still-a-lottery/
60. Thousands of patients miss out on weight loss jab due to NHS ‘postcode lottery’, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/nhs-weight-loss-jabs-mounjaro-postcode-lottery-b2802280.html
61. Massive postcode lottery for care facing the public today, new analysis from the Care and Support Alliance (CSA) reveals | Mencap, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mencap.org.uk/press-release/massive-postcode-lottery-care-facing-public-today-new-analysis-care-and-support
62. PM launches new era for NHS with easier care in neighbourhoods – GOV.UK, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-launches-new-era-for-nhs-with-easier-care-in-neighbourhoods
63. Reforms to the NHS – Summer 2025 – BMA, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/nhs-reforms/reforms-to-the-nhs
64. Change NHS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://change.nhs.uk/
65. Trends in public and private health spending – Office for Budget Responsibility – OBR, accessed August 8, 2025, https://obr.uk/box/trends-in-public-and-private-health-spending/
66. The Australian health system | Australian Government Department of …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.gov.au/about-us/the-australian-health-system
67. The history of Medicare – Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.health.gov.au/stronger-medicare/history
68. Medicare at 40: A Legacy of Excellence and Innovation in Australian Healthcare – Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, accessed August 8, 2025, https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/events-folder/conferences/2024/celebrating-40-years-of-medicare
69. Health care in Australia – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Australia
70. Australian Government Rebate on Private Health Insurance, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.healthpartners.com.au/health-insurance/government-rebates
71. Government Surcharges & Incentives – PrivateHealth.gov.au, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.privatehealth.gov.au/health_insurance/surcharges_incentives/index.htm
72. Rebates & Incentives | Health Insurance – RT Health, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.rthealth.com.au/health-insurance/incentives-and-rebates
73. The top three health concerns for Australians revealed – and how Sonder can support, accessed August 8, 2025, https://sonder.io/resources/blog/top-healthcare-concerns-australians-2024/
74. Successes and challenges of primary health care in Australia: A scoping review and comparative analysis – PubMed Central, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10311945/
75. Australia’s most complained about health insurers | CHOICE, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.choice.com.au/money/insurance/health/articles/the-most-complained-about-health-funds
76. Most-complained-about health insurance funds – YourLifeChoices, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.yourlifechoices.com.au/health/health-insurance/australias-most-complained-about-health-insurance-funds/
77. Why private hospitals are in poor health – Grattan Institute, accessed August 8, 2025, https://grattan.edu.au/news/why-private-hospitals-are-in-poor-health/
78. Three Keys to Reforming Health Care: T.R. Reid’s The Healing of America | Sojourners, accessed August 8, 2025, https://sojo.net/articles/three-keys-reforming-health-care-tr-reids-healing-america
79. The Healing of America – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Healing_of_America
80. T.R. Reid, The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care, New York, The Penguin Press, 2009, 277p – OpenEdition Journals, accessed August 8, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/4765
81. How does U.S. life expectancy compare to other countries? – Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/u-s-life-expectancy-compare-countries/
82. NHS 75: the history of our National Health Service | RCN Magazine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.rcn.org.uk/magazines/History/2023/July/NHS-75-anniversary-history-of-the-National-Health-Service