Beyond the Gatekeeper: How I Escaped the HMO vs. PPO Trap and Found a Smarter Way to Health Insurance

The Advisor’s Dilemma: A Broken Compass in a High-Stakes Maze

Introduction – The Failure That Forced a Reckoning

For more than a decade, I’ve been a benefits analyst.

My job is to sit across from families and help them navigate one of the most complex and emotionally charged decisions of their lives: choosing a health insurance plan.

I’ve always prided myself on being a steady hand, a trusted guide who could translate the arcane language of deductibles, copays, and networks into a clear path forward.

I thought I had a reliable compass.

Then, the Tostison family showed me it was broken.

The case that haunts me, the one that forced a total professional reckoning, involved their seven-year-old daughter, Jennifer.¹

She was suffering from a persistent fever and debilitating headaches that wouldn’t go away.

Following the standard playbook for a family concerned about costs, I had advised them into a traditional Health Maintenance Organization (HMO).

It seemed like the responsible choice—predictable costs, coordinated care.

In reality, it became a bureaucratic labyrinth.

Over the course of a month, Jennifer was seen by three different doctors who prescribed a revolving door of antibiotics, but her condition only worsened.¹

A chest X-ray finally revealed pneumonia, and her primary care physician (PCP) ordered a neurological exam to investigate the source of her unrelenting headaches.

This should have been a moment of relief, a step toward an answer.

Instead, it was a dead end.

The HMO’s contracted medical group informed the family that the earliest they could schedule the exam was in five weeks.¹

I remember the sheer panic and fury in Andrew Tostison’s voice when he called me.

His daughter had missed nearly a month of school, and the system I had recommended was telling him to wait.

“What if it had been a brain tumor?” he asked, a question that hung in the air long after the call ended.¹

The Tostisons, on the advice of friends, ended up fighting their way to a specialist at another hospital.

After two appeals, the HMO finally relented.

Jennifer was diagnosed with a mild viral meningitis secondary to the pneumonia and eventually recovered.

But the Tostisons’ question became my own.

What if?

That experience shattered my confidence in the conventional wisdom I had been dispensing for years.

It laid bare the fundamental, agonizing conflict at the heart of American health insurance: the brutal trade-off between affordability and timely access to care.

I realized that for too long, I had been presenting clients with a false choice between two deeply flawed models.

It was time to deconstruct the myth and find a better map.

Deconstructing the Two Flawed Pillars: The HMO vs. PPO Myth

The health insurance landscape has long been dominated by two towering, yet imperfect, pillars: the HMO and the Preferred Provider Organization (PPO).

Consumers are taught to see this as a simple choice between cost and freedom.

My experience with the Tostisons proved it was anything but simple.

To find a real solution, I first had to understand exactly where and why these pillars fail.

The HMO Fortress and the Tyranny of the Gatekeeper

The traditional HMO model is built on an admirable premise: to maintain health, not just treat sickness.²

It achieves this through a tightly controlled system designed to manage costs.

Insurers contract with a limited network of doctors and hospitals, offering them a steady volume of patients in exchange for lower, pre-negotiated service rates.⁴

For the member, this translates into some of the lowest monthly premiums and out-of-pocket costs available.⁶

The defining feature of this fortress is the Primary Care Physician (PCP) acting as a “gatekeeper”.⁸

The PCP is the single point of entry for all non-emergency care.

If you need to see a cardiologist, a dermatologist, or a physical therapist, you must first get a referral—an official authorization—from your PCP.¹⁰

In theory, this ensures care is coordinated, medically necessary, and not wasteful.³

In practice, however, this system can become a prison of delays and frustrations.

Patients frequently report feeling powerless, stuck waiting for a PCP appointment just to get permission to make another appointment with the specialist they knew they needed all along.¹⁰

This administrative hurdle isn’t just an inconvenience; it can lead to dangerous delays in diagnosis and treatment.

In one tragic and well-documented legal case, a 34-year-old woman died from a treatable condition after her HMO repeatedly delayed and denied specialist referrals and necessary diagnostic tests.

The lawsuit alleged that the HMO’s restrictive policies were a direct cause of her preventable death.¹³

This reveals a deeper, more corrosive problem within the gatekeeper model.

The system is designed to control costs, and the PCP is the primary instrument of that control.

This can create a subtle but powerful conflict of interest.

HMOs may select PCPs not only for their medical acumen but also for their effectiveness in managing utilization—that is, their ability to limit referrals to expensive specialists.⁹

This financial pressure can incentivize a “wait and see” approach, which may be prudent for minor ailments but can be devastating for patients with complex or aggressive diseases.

Studies have suggested that this very system of gatekeeping may be linked to delayed cancer diagnoses and poorer survival rates compared to systems with more direct access to specialty care.¹⁴

When a patient’s urgent need for answers clashes with the gatekeeper’s systemic role in cost containment, the foundational trust of the doctor-patient relationship begins to erode.

The PPO Mirage: The High Cost of “Freedom”

The PPO was born as the market’s answer to the rigid confines of the HMO.

It offers the promise of freedom.

PPO plans feature a larger “preferred” network of providers and, most critically, allow members to see any doctor they choose—including specialists—without needing a referral.⁷

For those who value autonomy and want to avoid the gatekeeper, the PPO seems like the obvious choice.

But this freedom is often a mirage, shimmering behind a wall of prohibitive costs.

PPO plans consistently carry the highest monthly premiums and demand significant out-of-pocket spending in the form of deductibles and coinsurance before their full benefits kick in.⁴

The promise of out-of-network access comes with its own financial traps.

When a patient sees an out-of-network provider, the insurer will only pay a portion of what it considers a “usual, customary, and reasonable” (UCR) fee.

The patient is then billed for the remainder of the provider’s full charge, a practice known as “balance billing” that can lead to shocking, unexpected medical debt.³

Furthermore, patients using out-of-network services may have to pay the entire bill upfront and then navigate a cumbersome claims process to get reimbursed from their insurer.¹⁷

The problems with the PPO model run even deeper than its price tag.

The very idea that it represents a widely available choice is becoming a fallacy.

Across the country, especially in the individual market where people buy their own insurance, PPOs are vanishing.

Insurance brokers, the frontline advisors for consumers, report universal frustration with the lack of PPO options, noting that insurers are increasingly offering only HMO-style products.²¹

This isn’t an accident; it’s a market correction driven by the relentless pressure to control healthcare costs.

The tight, closed networks of HMOs and their cousins, Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPOs), are simply more effective at containing costs than the sprawling, flexible networks of PPOs.²²

Data from the federal health insurance marketplace confirms this trend, showing that PPOs now make up a small fraction of available plans compared to HMOs and EPOs.²³

This creates a profound dilemma.

The one plan that appears to solve the HMO’s gatekeeper problem is becoming an endangered species, priced out of reach for many and simply unavailable to others.

Consumers and the brokers trying to help them are being squeezed, trapped between a restrictive fortress and a costly, disappearing mirage.

It was clear the old map was useless.

I needed a new one.

The Epiphany: A New Map for Navigating Healthcare

The “Restaurant Menu” Analogy – A New Mental Model

The breakthrough didn’t come from a dense industry report or a healthcare policy seminar.

It came to me while staring at a restaurant menu, feeling the familiar tension between a set menu and ordering à la carte.

Suddenly, the entire health insurance puzzle clicked into place.

I realized I had been using the wrong language.

The labels “HMO” and “PPO” were confusing and loaded with baggage.

What people needed was a simple, functional analogy to understand their real options.

This is the mental model that transformed my practice:

• The Traditional HMO is a Prix-Fixe Menu. You go to a restaurant that offers a three-course meal for a single, low price. It’s affordable and the costs are completely predictable. The catch? The chef (your PCP) has chosen every course for you. You can’t substitute the soup for the salad or the fish for the chicken. You have no say in the matter. It’s a great deal, but only if you’re happy with the chef’s choices.
• The PPO is an À La Carte Menu. This menu offers absolute freedom. You can order anything you want, in any combination. You can have three appetizers for dinner, or just dessert. You can even ask the waiter to run to the restaurant next door to get you a special dish they don’t have. The freedom is exhilarating. The problem comes when the bill arrives. Each item is priced separately, and that special dish from next door comes with a hefty surcharge. The final cost is unpredictable and can easily become astronomical.
• The Open Access HMO is a Curated Buffet. This is the brilliant middle ground. You enter a high-end buffet with a single, clear price that’s more than the prix-fixe meal but far less than an unrestrained à la carte feast. Inside, you find a vast spread of options: a carving station, a seafood bar, a salad station, a dessert table. You have the freedom to go directly to any station you want, in any order, and take as much as you like, without having to ask the chef for permission for each plate. Your choice is abundant. The only rule? You must stay within the buffet. You can’t ask the waiter to bring you something from the restaurant across the street. The cost is controlled, but the freedom within the walls is immense.

This analogy was more than a clever trick.

It was a new framework.

It allowed me to stop talking about confusing acronyms and start talking about how plans actually function in a person’s life.

It reframed the conversation from a binary choice of “cost vs. freedom” to a spectrum of options, each with a clear purpose.

And right in the center of that spectrum was the curated buffet—the hybrid plan that offered a solution to the very problem that had tormented the Tostison family.

Charting the Middle Ground – The Rise of Hybrid Plans

Armed with this new mental model, I began to explore the “buffet” options—the hybrid plans designed to bridge the gap between the HMO fortress and the PPO mirage.

These plans acknowledge the central conflict of American healthcare and attempt to solve it by blending the best features of both traditional models.

The Star of the Buffet – A Deep Dive into the Open Access HMO

The quintessential hybrid plan, and the one that offers a direct solution to the gatekeeper problem, is the Open Access HMO.²⁴

It is elegantly designed around two core principles that give it a unique position in the market.

First, and most importantly, it eliminates the need for referrals to see specialists.⁶

Just like a PPO, a member of an Open Access HMO can identify an in-network specialist—a cardiologist, an orthopedist, a dermatologist—and schedule an appointment directly.

This single feature dismantles the most frustrating barrier of the traditional HMO.

It returns a sense of control and timeliness to the patient, preventing the dangerous delays that can arise from the gatekeeper system.⁶

Second, to make this freedom affordable, the Open Access HMO adopts the cost-control structure of a traditional HMO: it generally provides no coverage for care received outside of its network, except in cases of a true medical emergency.⁶

By requiring members to stay “inside the buffet,” the plan can maintain contracts with its network providers that keep costs—and therefore premiums—significantly lower than those of a PPO.

This new structure fundamentally changes the role of the Primary Care Physician.

While many Open Access HMOs no longer require you to officially designate a PCP, they almost universally encourage it.⁶

The difference is that the PCP’s role shifts from being a restrictive “gatekeeper” to being a collaborative “health coach.” For members, especially those with chronic conditions, having a PCP who knows their full health history can lead to better-coordinated care, reduce medical errors, and prevent duplicate testing.

The choice to engage with that coach, however, rests with the patient.

It is crucial to understand that “Open Access” does not mean “no rules.” This is a common and costly misconception.

Even without referral requirements, these plans still use pre-authorization (also called pre-certification) to manage the costs of expensive services.

This means the insurance company must grant approval before a member receives certain types of care, such as an MRI or CT scan, an outpatient surgery, or specialty drug infusions.²

Forgetting to get pre-authorization can result in the insurer refusing to pay, leaving the member with a massive bill.

Additionally, some Open Access plans further manage costs by using

tiered networks.

In this model, in-network providers are sorted into different cost levels.

A visit to a “Tier 1” hospital might have a simple $250 copay, while the same service at a “Tier 2” hospital could involve a deductible and 20% coinsurance, making it much more expensive for the member.¹⁹

The Close Cousin – The EPO (Exclusive Provider Organization)

In the landscape of hybrid plans, the Open Access HMO has a very close relative: the Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO).

On the surface, the two can appear nearly identical.

An EPO, as its name implies, requires members to use an “exclusive” network of providers and, like an Open Access HMO, generally does not require referrals to see specialists.¹⁶

And just like an HMO, an EPO typically offers no coverage for out-of-network care except in emergencies.¹⁸

So what, if any, is the difference? The distinction is subtle but important, lying in the plans’ underlying philosophies and, often, their network construction.

An EPO is best understood as a PPO that has had its out-of-network benefits stripped away.

Its primary value proposition is offering a list of discounted providers you can access freely.

Its focus is on the provider network.

An Open Access HMO, by contrast, is an evolution of the care management model.

Even with the gatekeeper removed, the “Health Maintenance” DNA remains.

These plans often come with more robust tools for care coordination, disease management programs, and a stronger emphasis on the PCP’s role as a central health advocate, even if that role is optional.³

For the consumer, this can translate into a tangible difference in network size.

Because EPOs are built more like PPOs, their networks are often larger than a typical HMO network, giving them an appealing position as a middle ground in terms of provider choice.¹⁸

An individual choosing between the two might face this trade-off: the EPO may offer a slightly wider selection of doctors, while the Open Access HMO might provide better-integrated support for managing a chronic condition.

It’s a level of nuance that requires looking past the marketing labels and into the very architecture of the plan.

The Ultimate Health Plan Comparison Matrix

To distill this complexity into a clear, actionable tool, I developed a comparison matrix.

This became the centerpiece of my advisory sessions, allowing clients to see the entire landscape at a glance and visually weigh the trade-offs between the four major plan types.

Feature	Traditional HMO	Open Access HMO	EPO (Exclusive Provider Org)	PPO (Preferred Provider Org)
PCP Required?	Yes, mandatory. Acts as gatekeeper.	Optional, but recommended.	No, generally not required.	No, not required.
Referrals for Specialists?	Yes, required from PCP.	No, direct access to in-network specialists.	No, direct access to in-network specialists.	No, direct access to any specialist.
In-Network Coverage	Yes, services are covered.	Yes, services are covered.	Yes, services are covered.	Yes, services are covered at a lower cost.
Out-of-Network Coverage	No (except for true emergencies).	No (except for true emergencies).	No (except for true emergencies).	Yes, but at a significantly higher cost.
Typical Monthly Premium	Lowest	Low to Moderate	Low to Moderate	Highest
Typical Out-of-Pocket Costs	Lowest (for in-network care).	Low (for in-network care).	Low to Moderate	Highest (especially for out-of-network).
Network Size	Narrowest	Typically Narrow to Moderate	Typically Moderate to Broad	Broadest
Ideal User Profile	Individuals who prioritize low cost and are comfortable with a managed, coordinated care system.	Individuals wanting a balance of cost control and freedom to see specialists without referrals, and who don’t need out-of-network care.	Similar to Open Access HMO users, but may prefer a potentially larger network over integrated care features.	Individuals who need maximum flexibility, want to see specific out-of-network doctors, and are willing to pay a premium for it.

The Blueprint in Action: Applying the New Wisdom

The Success Story – From Frustration to Freedom

Theory and analogies are one thing; real-world results are another.

The true test of my new framework came with my next client, a woman I’ll call Sarah.

Her story became the perfect counterpoint to the Tostisons’ ordeal, a clear demonstration of the power of finding the right tool for the right job.

Sarah was living with a complex autoimmune condition that required her to see a team of specialists—a rheumatologist, a dermatologist, and a gastroenterologist—on a regular basis.

She was on a traditional HMO, and her life had become a constant battle with the referral system.

Every flare-up, every new symptom, meant a trip to her PCP to plead her case for a referral, followed by a frustrating wait for approvals.

The delays were not just an inconvenience; they were actively hindering her ability to manage her health and causing immense stress.

A PPO, with its high premiums, was simply not a financially viable option for her.

She came to me feeling trapped and exhausted.

This time, instead of just laying out the two old, flawed options, I walked her through the “restaurant menu” analogy.

We talked about the curated buffet.

I explained the Open Access HMO model: direct access to her entire team of in-network specialists, with the cost-control of staying within a defined network.

We found an Open Access HMO plan that included all three of her specialists in its network.

The change was transformative.

The next time she needed to see her rheumatologist, she just called and made an appointment.

No referral, no permission slip, no delay.

She regained a sense of agency over her own healthcare.

She could be proactive, scheduling follow-ups and addressing symptoms as they arose without fighting through a bureaucratic firewall.

Because she was diligent about staying in-network and getting pre-authorizations for her biologic infusions, her costs remained predictable and manageable.⁶

Sarah’s story was the proof: for the right person, the Open Access HMO wasn’t a compromise.

It was a liberation.

A Practical Guide to Choosing Your Plan – Becoming Your Own Advocate

My experience with Sarah solidified my new mission: to empower people to become their own health advocates.

Choosing the right plan isn’t about picking a label; it’s about becoming an architect of your own care.

It requires looking past the marketing and digging into the fine print with a clear set of questions.

Reading the Fine Print – Beyond the Label

Whether you’re considering an Open Access HMO or any other plan, you must investigate these four critical areas before you enroll:

1. Check for Tiered Networks: Ask the question: “Does this plan have different cost-sharing tiers for hospitals or specialists?” Many plans, especially in competitive markets, use tiers to steer members toward more cost-effective providers. Your in-network hospital might be in Tier 1 with a low copay, or it could be in Tier 2 with a high deductible. You must know which tier your preferred doctors and hospitals fall into, as it can dramatically affect your out-of-pocket costs.¹⁹
2. Understand the Pre-authorization List: Ask: “What specific services, procedures, or drugs require pre-approval from the insurer?” Every plan has a list of services that need a green light before they will pay. This often includes advanced imaging (MRIs, PET scans), planned surgeries, and expensive medications. Find this list and understand the process. Knowing this rule upfront can save you from a denied claim worth thousands of dollars.²
3. Verify the Provider Directory: Never trust the online provider directory alone. These lists can be notoriously out of date, with doctors leaving networks at any time.¹¹ The single most important step you can take is to
   call your doctor’s billing office directly. Ask them: “Do you currently accept this specific plan, for example, the Aetna Open Access HMO Choice plan?” This confirmation is your best defense against a surprise out-of-network bill.
4. Scrutinize the Prescription Drug Formulary: Ask: “Are my specific medications covered, and at what tier?” The formulary is the list of drugs the plan covers. Drugs are typically sorted into tiers, with Tier 1 generic drugs having the lowest copay and Tier 4 or 5 specialty drugs having the highest. If you take a regular medication, ensuring it’s on the formulary—and that you can afford the copay—is non-negotiable.³⁰

Who Wins with an Open Access HMO?

After doing the research, it becomes clear that the Open Access HMO is an exceptional solution for specific types of healthcare consumers.

• The biggest winners are patients with chronic conditions who need frequent, ongoing access to a team of specialists. Like Sarah, these individuals gain immense quality-of-life benefits from the removal of referral barriers. It allows them to manage their care proactively and collaboratively with their doctors, without the administrative friction of a traditional HMO.⁶
• Families with children often find great value in this model. The ability to take a child directly to an in-network allergist, ENT, or dermatologist saves the time and cost of an initial, often unnecessary, PCP visit.
• Cost-conscious individuals who value choice are also ideal candidates. This plan is for anyone who finds PPO premiums to be out of reach but feels constrained and disempowered by the traditional HMO gatekeeper. It strikes a deliberate and effective balance between cost and flexibility.

However, this plan is not a universal solution.

• Frequent travelers or those who live in multiple locations should be cautious. Because these plans offer no non-emergency out-of-network coverage, needing routine care while away from your home service area can be problematic. For these individuals, the higher premium of a PPO might be a worthwhile investment for peace of mind.¹⁰
• Patients with deep, long-standing relationships with out-of-network doctors also need to think carefully. If your trusted specialist of 20 years does not participate in any available HMO or EPO network, the freedom to see them under a PPO plan may be more important than the cost savings of an Open Access HMO.

Conclusion – Architecting Your Own Healthcare Journey

Looking back, the journey from my failure with the Tostison family to my success with Sarah was more than just a professional evolution; it was a fundamental shift in perspective.

I learned that my role as a benefits advisor wasn’t to be a simple purveyor of two flawed options.

It was to be a “content architect”—someone who helps people build a personalized healthcare strategy that fits the unique contours of their lives.

The rise of hybrid plans like the Open Access HMO represents a crucial maturation of the health insurance market.

It is an acknowledgment that the old binary choice between the HMO fortress and the PPO mirage is no longer sufficient.

It offers a third way, a path that balances the need for cost control with the human desire for autonomy and timely care.

This report is not meant to declare the Open Access HMO the single “best” plan.

No such plan exists.

Instead, the goal is to arm you with a new mental model—the restaurant menu—and a practical toolkit to dissect and understand any plan you encounter.

By asking the right questions, verifying the details, and honestly assessing your own needs, you can move from being a passive recipient of a complex and often intimidating system to being an active, informed architect of your own health and well-being.

The map is in your hands.

Works cited

1. Inside The World Of An Hmo – Newsweek, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/inside-world-hmo-191764
2. What are HMO, PPO, EPO, POS and HDHP health insurance plans? – United Healthcare, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.uhc.com/understanding-health-insurance/types-of-health-insurance/understanding-hmo-ppo-epo-pos
3. Benefits and Disadvantages of HMOs and How They Work – Verywell Health, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-an-hmo-how-does-it-work-1738661
4. HMO vs. PPO – WebMD, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.webmd.com/health-insurance/hmo-vs-ppo
5. Health Maintenance Organization (HMO): What It Is, Pros and Cons – Investopedia, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hmo.asp
6. 5 Key Insights into What Open Access HMO Plans Require, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.kbibenefits.com/5-key-insights-into-what-open-access-hmo-plans-require
7. HMO vs. PPO: Understanding the key differences – Kaiser Permanente, accessed August 14, 2025, https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/learn/hc.hmo-vs-ppo-advantages
8. PPB No. 70 – Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.levyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ppb70.pdf
9. The Gatekeeper Concept | How HMOs Operate | California Insurance Law – Gianelli & Morris, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.gmlawyers.com/hmo-gatekeeper-concept/
10. The Pros and Cons of HMO Health Insurance Plans – PERSONAL …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://lgblissconsultants.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-hmo-health-insurance-plans/
11. What Is HMO Insurance? Pros and Cons – GoodRx, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.goodrx.com/insurance/health-insurance/hmo-pros-cons
12. Are HMOs really worse than PPOs? : r/HealthInsurance – Reddit, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HealthInsurance/comments/1cy2bmp/are_hmos_really_worse_than_ppos/
13. HMO’s Negligence Results in Tragic Death: Kelley | Uustal Seeks Justice for Family, accessed August 14, 2025, https://kelleyuustal.com/hmos-negligence-results-in-tragic-death-kelley-uustal-seeks-justice-for-family/
14. Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review, accessed August 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6478478/
15. HMO vs PPO: Things To Consider – Carefirst BlueCross BlueShield, accessed August 14, 2025, https://individual.carefirst.com/individuals-families/health-insurance-basics/how-health-insurance-works/hmo-vs-ppo.page
16. What’s the Difference Between HMO, PPO, POS, and EPO? – Justworks, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.justworks.com/blog/breaking-down-difference-between-hmo-ppo
17. HMO vs. PPO: Which is right for you? – Humana, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.humana.com/medicare/medicare-resources/hmo-vs-ppo
18. What is the Difference Between an HMO, EPO, and PPO? – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/knowledge-center/hmo-ppo-epo
19. Open Access Plans – Illinois Department of Central Management Services, accessed August 14, 2025, https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/college/openaccessplans.html
20. Consumer Guide to Health Care Definitions | Texas DSHS, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.dshs.texas.gov/center-health-statistics/texas-health-care-information-collection/general-public-information/consumer-guide-to-health-care-definitions
21. Perspective from Brokers: The Individual Market Stabilizes While Short-Term and Other Alternative Products Pose Risks | Urban Institute, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/102063/perspective-from-brokers-the-individual-market-stabilizes-while-short-term-and-other-alternative-products-pose-risks.pdf
22. HMO, PPO, EPO, POS–Which Plan Should You Choose? – Verywell Health, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.verywellhealth.com/hmo-ppo-epo-pos-whats-the-difference-1738615
23. HMO vs PPO vs POS vs EPO: What’s the difference? – Healthinsurance.org, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/hmo-ppo-epo-or-pos-choosing-a-managed-care-option/
24. Open-Access HMO – Mployer Advisor, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mployeradvisor.com/all-terms/open-access-hmo
25. mployeradvisor.com, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mployeradvisor.com/all-terms/open-access-hmo#:~:text=An%20Open%2DAccess%20Health%20Maintenance,Preferred%20Provider%20Organizations%20(PPOs).
26. What is an open access plan in health insurance? | Sana Benefits, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.sanabenefits.com/blog/open-access-network-health-insurance/
27. What’s the difference between an HMO, PPO and EPO? | Covered California™, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.coveredca.com/support/before-you-buy/plan-and-network-types/
28. EPO vs. HMO vs. PPO Plans: Key Differences Explained | Rippling, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.rippling.com/blog/epo-vs-hmo
29. HMO, PPO, POS, EPO, & HDHP: What’s the Difference | Aetna, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/health-guide/hmo-pos-ppo-hdhp-whats-the-difference.html
30. 5 Things to Consider When Shopping for Health Insurance – Covered California, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.coveredca.com/marketing-blog/5-things-to-consider-when-shopping-for-health-insurance/