The Missing Keystone: Why Mississippi’s Healthcare System is on the Brink and How a New Perspective Can Save It

Part I: The View from the Unfinished Bridge

Introduction: A Policy Analyst’s Frustration and a Father’s Fear

For years, I have been a policy analyst, a professional trained to find order in chaos, to see the signal through the noise of data. My work has taken me deep into the complex, often heartbreaking, world of American healthcare. But no puzzle has been more confounding, more stubbornly resistant to conventional analysis, than the state of healthcare in Mississippi. I found myself staring at a landscape of contradictions: a morass of conflicting statistics, circular political arguments, and well-intentioned policies that seemed to curdle into failure upon contact with reality. The data points felt like disconnected islands in a fog of ideology, and every path I charted seemed to lead to a dead end.

I saw reports of soaring enrollment in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace, hailed by some as a sign of success. Simultaneously, I read grim statistics that placed Mississippi at the bottom of every national health ranking and near the top for its rate of uninsured citizens. I listened to debates in the state legislature that felt like reruns of a decade-old play, with the same arguments leading to the same impasse, year after year. The frustration was immense. The tools of my trade—spreadsheets, regression analyses, policy briefs—felt inadequate. They could describe the symptoms of the crisis in excruciating detail, but they failed to reveal the underlying disease.

It was during this period of professional disillusionment that I encountered the story of Brandon Allred, a 35-year-old father from Tupelo. His experience cut through the academic abstraction and gave the crisis a human face. Brandon works full-time, supporting a family with six children. Yet, for nearly a decade, he has had no health insurance.¹ He lives with the gnawing fear of developing the same stage IV lung cancer that took his father’s life at age 55, but the preventive screenings he knows he needs are a luxury he cannot afford. The problem is not just potential or future; it is immediate. After losing several teeth over the years, a problem that could have been managed with basic dental care, he had to teach himself how to speak again.¹

His story crystallized the central paradox that had stumped me. Here was a working man, a father, doing everything society asks of him, yet left completely vulnerable. His question, posed with a mix of desperation and defiance, became the anchor for my entire investigation: “What kind of future do I have in Mississippi if I’m not protected on a most basic level?”.¹

Brandon’s story was the heartbreaking failure that forced me to discard my old maps and question everything I thought I knew. It became clear that I wasn’t just looking at a series of isolated problems. I was looking at a systemic collapse, and to understand it, I needed a whole new way to see.

The Central Contradiction

The puzzle of Mississippi’s healthcare system is built on a fundamental contradiction. On one side of the ledger, the state has witnessed a phenomenal surge in residents signing up for private health insurance through the ACA Marketplace. Between 2020 and 2025, enrollment skyrocketed by 242%, reaching a total of 338,159 people.² For the 2024 plan year alone, a record 286,410 Mississippians selected a Marketplace plan, a figure that seems, on its face, to be a resounding victory for the ACA.³

Yet, on the other side of the ledger, the broader picture is one of profound and persistent crisis. Despite this record enrollment, Mississippi still has one of the highest uninsured rates in the United States, at 12.4% overall and a staggering 16.4% among its working-age population.² The state consistently ranks at or near the bottom of the nation for nearly every conceivable health outcome, from life expectancy to infant mortality.¹

How can these two realities coexist? How can a state enroll so many people in coverage and yet leave so many others behind, with such devastating consequences? The conventional analysis, which often looks at these data points in isolation, provides a dangerously misleading answer. Some political leaders have pointed to the high Marketplace enrollment as proof that the current system is working and that further reforms, like Medicaid expansion, are unnecessary.²

This conclusion, however, ignores a critical piece of the story. A significant portion of this enrollment surge is not a sign of a healthy system attracting new consumers, but a symptom of systemic distress. The “unwinding” of the pandemic-era continuous coverage rule for Medicaid, which began in 2023, is a key driver. This process forced states to redetermine eligibility for millions of people. In Mississippi, this led to more than 70,000 residents losing their Medicaid coverage and being pushed onto the Marketplace to find a new plan.⁴ They were not new to needing health coverage; they were refugees from a different part of the public safety net, desperately seeking a new port in a storm.

This reveals a more troubling truth. The record-high ACA enrollment is not a measure of the system’s overall health, but rather a measure of the immense pressure being placed on a single, fragile component of it. It is akin to looking at a hospital emergency room overflowing with patients and declaring the community’s health to be excellent because so many people are receiving care. The high numbers do not signal success; they signal a system under unbearable strain, a system failing to meet the needs of its people in a sustainable or comprehensive way. This deep-seated contradiction demanded a new framework, a new way of thinking that could explain not just one piece of the puzzle, but how all the pieces fit together—or, more accurately, how they were failing to fit together at all.

Part II: The Architect’s Epiphany: Discovering the Missing Keystone

The Flaw in Our Thinking: From a List of Problems to a Systemic Failure

My frustration with the Mississippi healthcare puzzle led me to a realization: I was using the wrong mental model. I had been treating the crisis as a list of discrete problems—uninsured individuals, financially struggling hospitals, partisan political battles, poor health outcomes. I analyzed each in its own silo, hoping that by solving them one by one, the whole picture might improve. This is the classic, linear approach to policymaking: identify a problem, propose a targeted solution, and measure the result.⁷

But this approach was failing because the problems were not discrete. They were interconnected, feeding back on one another in a vicious cycle. The financial instability of rural hospitals was directly linked to the high number of uninsured patients they treated. The high number of uninsured patients was a direct result of a political decision. That political decision was often justified by a misreading of other data, like Marketplace enrollment. It was a tangled web, and pulling on one thread only seemed to tighten the knots elsewhere.⁸

The real turning point came when I stepped outside the world of health policy and began exploring principles from other fields, specifically structural engineering and systems thinking. Systems thinking teaches that the behavior of a complex system—be it an ecosystem, a corporation, or a public service—is determined not by its individual parts, but by the connections and interactions between those parts.⁹ To understand why a system is failing, you don’t just inspect the parts; you have to understand the architectural design. You have to look for the single, critical point of failure that compromises the integrity of the entire structure. I stopped asking, “What are Mississippi’s healthcare problems?” and started asking, “What is the fundamental design flaw in Mississippi’s healthcare system?”

The Keystone Analogy: A New Mental Model

This shift in perspective led me to the central epiphany of my analysis, an analogy that suddenly made the entire chaotic picture snap into focus. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was not designed as a series of separate programs. It was designed as a single, integrated structure, much like a classic Roman arch bridge.

Imagine this bridge is meant to span the chasm of the uninsured, providing a pathway to coverage for everyone. The architecture of this bridge has two fundamental pillars, two massive abutments rising from either side of the chasm:

1. The Private Insurance Marketplace: On one side, you have the system of federal subsidies (premium tax credits) designed to help individuals and families with moderate incomes—those earning between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL)—purchase private insurance plans.⁵ This is the pillar for the working and middle class.
2. Medicaid: On the other side, you have the Medicaid program, the nation’s public health insurance program historically designed for specific low-income populations, including children, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities.¹¹

The ACA’s architects understood that for the bridge to be complete, these two pillars needed to be joined. The original design intended to expand Medicaid to cover a new, crucial group: all adults with incomes up to 138% of the FPL.¹² This expansion was not an optional add-on or a separate project. It was the

keystone.

In architecture, the keystone is the central, wedge-shaped stone at the very apex of an arch. It is the last piece placed, and it is the piece that locks all the other stones into position, allowing the arch to bear weight and become self-supporting. Without the keystone, the two sides of the arch are just two unstable, unconnected stacks of stone, liable to collapse under the slightest pressure.

This is the fundamental design flaw in Mississippi. By choosing not to expand Medicaid following the 2012 Supreme Court ruling that made it optional, the state’s leaders did not simply leave a “coverage gap”.¹² They built an incomplete bridge. They constructed the two pillars but omitted the most critical structural component. They left out the keystone.

This analogy, rooted in systems thinking, reveals that Mississippi’s healthcare crisis is not a collection of unrelated misfortunes. It is the predictable, inevitable consequence of a single, catastrophic architectural error.¹⁴ The crumbling hospitals, the thousands of uninsured workers, the stressed Marketplace, and the tragic stories of people like Brandon Allred are not separate problems. They are the visible cracks and strains appearing throughout a structure that was built without its load-bearing centerpiece.

Shifting the Narrative from “Welfare” to “Infrastructure”

The power of the keystone analogy extends beyond diagnosis. It offers a way to fundamentally reframe the entire political debate, moving it from a toxic, ideological battlefield to a pragmatic, objective discussion.

For over a decade, the conversation around Medicaid expansion in Mississippi has been mired in the language of social spending. Opponents have framed it as an issue of “welfare,” dependency, and affordability. Arguments like “I don’t see Medicaid expansion as something that is beneficial to the state of Mississippi” or concerns about “putting people on the welfare rolls” have dominated the discourse.¹⁵ This framing inevitably leads to a political stalemate, pitting ideologies of individual responsibility against concepts of a social safety net.

The keystone analogy shatters this frame. An arch bridge is not a social program; it is a piece of public infrastructure. We do not judge the value of a highway bridge based on the moral worthiness of the drivers who cross it. We judge it on its utility, its structural integrity, and its economic importance to the region it connects. Its construction is viewed as an investment, not a handout.

By presenting Medicaid expansion as the missing keystone, the argument is transformed. The conversation is no longer about “welfare.” It is about infrastructure. The core questions become:

• Is the bridge finished? No.
• Is the current structure stable? No.
• What does the original blueprint require to make the structure sound? The keystone.
• What is the cost of not completing this critical infrastructure project?

This new narrative is far more persuasive to a broader coalition of stakeholders, including business leaders, engineers, economists, and pragmatic policymakers. It aligns perfectly with the overwhelming evidence that Medicaid expansion is not a fiscal drain but a powerful economic engine—an investment that generates jobs, increases GDP, and provides a net financial benefit to the state.¹⁶ It transforms the decision from a partisan squabble into a commonsense, necessary act of completing a vital public works project. It is no longer about ideology; it is about sound engineering and smart economics.

Part III: Surveying the Stressed Structure: The Four Pillars of a System Under Strain

With the keystone analogy as our guide, we can now survey the entire healthcare structure in Mississippi. By examining each component, we can see precisely how the absence of the central, load-bearing piece—Medicaid expansion—compromises the integrity of the whole system. The cracks are visible everywhere, from the overburdened roadway of the Marketplace to the crumbling foundations of the state’s hospitals.

Pillar 1: The Overburdened Roadway (The ACA Marketplace)

The part of Mississippi’s healthcare bridge that is “in use” by the public is the ACA Marketplace. At first glance, the volume of traffic it carries seems impressive. With 338,159 people enrolled for 2025 coverage, it is one of the most significant coverage sources in the state.² However, a closer inspection reveals that this roadway is not a robust, standalone highway. It is a fragile path, showing signs of extreme stress, propped up by massive and unsustainable levels of external support.

The population using this roadway is not the one it was primarily designed for. The Marketplace, with its private insurance plans, was intended for those with moderate incomes who could afford some premiums. Yet in Mississippi, it has become the default option for a vast population of the working poor. The evidence of this strain is stark: an astonishing 98% to 99% of all Mississippi Marketplace enrollees require federal subsidies to afford their monthly premiums.⁴ Furthermore, 71% of enrollees have incomes so low that they also qualify for cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), which help pay for deductibles and copayments.⁴

The scale of this support is immense. During the 2024 open enrollment period, the average monthly subsidy for a Mississippi family was $592.⁴ This financial assistance is the only thing making the plans accessible. For 46% of enrollees, the subsidies are so large that their final monthly premium is less than $10.⁴ This is not a functioning market in the traditional sense; it is a lifeline, almost entirely funded by federal aid, for a population that would be more appropriately and efficiently served by Medicaid.

This already precarious situation is about to become much worse. The recent passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) at the federal level is set to reduce the enhanced subsidies that have kept these plans affordable since the American Rescue Plan Act.² According to an analysis by KFF, the result of this policy change will be a direct and painful increase in out-of-pocket costs for Mississippi families. The average premium payment is projected to rise by an estimated $480 per year.² This new financial barrier threatens to push coverage out of reach for the very working-poor families the system is ostensibly designed to help, potentially swelling the ranks of the uninsured even further.

The table below quantifies the extreme fragility of this pillar of the healthcare system. It demonstrates that the high enrollment numbers, far from being a sign of strength, are a measure of the state’s dependency on a heavily subsidized system that is now facing a direct threat to its financial underpinnings.

Table 1: The Fragility of the ACA Roadway in Mississippi (2021-2025)

Year	Total Marketplace Enrollment	% of Enrollees Receiving Subsidies	Average Monthly Subsidy	Projected Annual Premium Increase (Post-OBBBA)
2021	162,000 (approx.)	~95% (est.)	Varies (pre-ARP)	N/A
2022	206,000 (approx.)	>95%	>$500	N/A
2023	237,000 (approx.)	>95%	>$550	N/A
2024	286,410	98%	$592	N/A
2025	338,159	99% (est.)	>$600 (est.)	+$480

Sources: ²

This roadway was never meant to bear this much weight, especially not with this level of financial assistance. Without the keystone of Medicaid expansion to handle the lowest-income population, the Marketplace is being asked to do a job it wasn’t designed for, and the structure is beginning to buckle under the strain.

Pillar 2: The Chasm Below (The Coverage Gap)

While the Marketplace roadway groans under its load, a far more dangerous situation exists below. The space where the keystone should be is not empty; it is a chasm. This is the infamous “coverage gap,” and it is not a statistical abstraction. It is a policy-created void into which an estimated 74,000 Mississippians have fallen.¹³

These are the people for whom the unfinished bridge offers no path to safety. They are primarily the state’s working poor. They are the cashiers, cooks, construction laborers, retail salespeople, and janitors who form the backbone of local economies.⁵ Their tragedy is one of cruel arithmetic. They earn too much to qualify for Mississippi’s existing, non-expanded Medicaid program, which has one of the strictest income limits in the nation. For a parent in a family of three, the income cutoff is a mere 28% of the FPL, or around $7,000 a year. Non-disabled adults without children are not eligible at all, no matter how low their income.¹² Yet, these same individuals earn too little—less than 100% of the FPL, or about $15,000 for an individual—to qualify for the federal subsidies that make Marketplace plans affordable.⁵

They are trapped. The state’s policy choices have created a situation where working more can actually be punitive. A small raise that pushes a family just over the Medicaid income limit can result in the complete loss of health coverage for the parents, with no alternative option. This is not just a failure of health policy; it is a failure of economic policy, creating a direct disincentive to work and climb the economic ladder for the state’s most vulnerable citizens.

The human cost of this policy choice is staggering, and it is best understood through the lives of those left in the chasm.

• Tina, a 58-year-old Black woman from the Mississippi Delta, spent over two decades working at a catfish plant. Before she eventually qualified for Medicaid through other means, she lived in the gap. She was forced to ration her prescription medications and depend on the charity of her children and friends to scrape together the money for doctor’s visits and gas to get there. Her story also highlights the immense bureaucratic hurdles and the deep-seated legacy of racial health disparities that plague the system; more than half of the people in the coverage gap in Mississippi are people of color.²¹
• John Kress of Yazoo City is a survivor of late-stage colon cancer. He lost his job and his health insurance in 2020 and had to rely on charity care and the sacrifice of his brother to get through treatment. His story is a testament to the fact that a sudden job loss can plunge anyone into the gap, where a catastrophic illness can mean financial ruin or worse.²²
• Preston, a single mother, embodies the cruel irony of the gap. Her son, who has ADHD, is covered by Medicaid, so his necessary medication is affordable. Preston, however, falls into the coverage gap and cannot get coverage for herself. She is forced to go without her own prescribed ADHD medication to ensure her son gets his, a choice no parent should have to make.²³

These are not isolated anecdotes. They are the predictable outcomes of a system designed with a critical piece missing. The coverage gap is a policy-induced trap that punishes work, exacerbates poverty, and leaves tens of thousands of hardworking Mississippians to face illness and injury with no protection at all.

Pillar 3: The Crumbling Foundations (Hospitals and Providers)

The entire healthcare bridge, no matter how it is designed, rests on a single foundation: the state’s network of hospitals and healthcare providers. They are the bedrock. And in Mississippi, that bedrock is cracking. The decision not to place the keystone and cover the lowest-income adults has placed an unsustainable financial burden on these institutions, threatening the stability of the entire system.

The primary stress fracture is uncompensated care—the cost of treating uninsured patients who cannot pay their bills. When a state refuses to expand Medicaid, its hospitals are forced to absorb these costs, leading to devastating financial consequences. This is especially acute for rural hospitals, which often operate on razor-thin margins and serve communities with higher rates of poverty and uninsurance. In many rural Mississippi towns, the local hospital is not just a healthcare provider; it is the largest employer and the anchor of the local economy.²⁴

The most damning evidence of this financial decay comes not from projections or estimates, but from a direct, real-world experiment. One need only look across the river to Mississippi’s neighbor, Arkansas—a state with similar demographics, population, and rural challenges.⁶ The key difference is that Arkansas chose to expand its Medicaid program in 2014. A rigorous 2024 academic study compared the financial performance of hospitals in both states before and after Arkansas’s decision, and the results are a smoking gun.

• Before 2014: Mississippi’s hospitals were, on average, in a stronger financial position than those in Arkansas. They had lower rates of uncompensated care and bad debt, and healthier operating and total margins.⁶
• After 2014: The fortunes of the two states’ hospital systems dramatically diverged. In Arkansas, with Medicaid expansion in place, uncompensated care costs and bad debt plummeted. Hospital profit margins improved significantly. In Mississippi, the opposite happened. Uncompensated care costs and bad debt soared. Hospital operating and total margins cratered, falling deep into negative territory.⁶

The data is irrefutable. The policy decision not to expand Medicaid has been a direct and catastrophic blow to the financial health of Mississippi’s hospitals. The table below, drawn from the detailed findings of the comparative study, quantifies this damage. It is not a projection; it is a historical accounting of the real-world consequences of leaving the keystone out.

Table 2: The Financial Impact of the Missing Keystone: A Tale of Two States (2011-2020)

Financial Metric	Mississippi (Pre-2014)	Arkansas (Pre-2014)	Mississippi (Post-2014)	Arkansas (Post-2014)	Net Negative Impact on Mississippi
Uncompensated Care Cost Rate	Lower	Higher	Increased	Decreased	+2.89 percentage points
Bad Debt Rate	Lower	Higher	Increased	Decreased	+2.02 percentage points
Average Operating Margin	Higher (Positive)	Lower (Negative)	Decreased (Negative)	Improved	-5.24 percentage points
Average Total Margin	Higher (Positive)	Lower (Negative)	Decreased (Negative)	Improved	-5.49 percentage points

Source: ⁶

This financial decay has a real and tragic human cost. Since 2010, Mississippi has witnessed the closure of five rural hospitals.²⁵ As of 2025, another eight are on a list of facilities at immediate risk of failure.²⁶ When a rural hospital closes, the consequences ripple through the community. Studies show that mortality rates in the surrounding area increase by nearly 6%.²⁶ Patients must travel, on average, 20 miles farther for common care and 40 miles farther for specialized care—a dangerous delay in the event of a heart attack or stroke.²⁴ The foundation of the state’s healthcare system is crumbling, and the decision not to expand Medicaid is the direct cause.

Pillar 4: The Political Weather (The Legislative and Economic Debate)

The final element to survey is the political and ideological “weather” that has surrounded the healthcare bridge, preventing the keystone from being placed. For more than a decade, a storm of arguments against expansion has raged, creating a political climate where inaction seemed safer than action. However, a closer look at these arguments, when held up against the state’s own data and the shifting views of its citizens, reveals that the storm clouds are beginning to part.

The opposition has been built on a handful of recurring claims, each of which can be systematically dismantled.

• Argument 1: “We can’t afford it.” This has been the most persistent argument, suggesting that the 10% state share of the cost is an unbearable burden for taxpayers.¹⁵
• Rebuttal: This claim is directly contradicted by extensive economic analysis, including a 2024 report from Mississippi’s own university economists. Their model shows that due to enhanced federal funding, new tax revenues, and savings in other state programs, Medicaid expansion would be a net fiscal positive for the state for more than seven years. Beyond the direct budget impact, it would act as a massive economic stimulus, increasing the state’s real GDP by up to $843 million annually and creating an average of 11,700 new jobs each year.¹⁶ The American Rescue Plan Act further sweetened the deal, offering a temporary five-percentage-point increase in the federal matching rate for the state’s
  entire traditional Medicaid population, a bonus worth hundreds of millions of dollars.¹¹ The evidence is clear: Mississippi isn’t unable to afford expansion; it is paying a steep price for
  not expanding.
• Argument 2: “It’s welfare for people who won’t work.” This argument frames expansion as a handout that encourages dependency.¹⁵
• Rebuttal: This ignores the reality of who is in the coverage gap. The majority—nearly 61%—are either already working or actively looking for work, typically in low-wage jobs that do not offer health benefits.⁵ The debate over imposing work requirements, which ultimately scuttled a legislative compromise in 2024, is largely a red herring.¹³ Studies from other states, like Georgia, have shown that work requirements are administratively costly, create immense bureaucratic hurdles, and ultimately block the vast majority of potential beneficiaries from getting covered, defeating the entire purpose of the program.²⁸
• Argument 3: “It won’t improve health outcomes.” This counterargument posits that simply giving someone a Medicaid card doesn’t make them healthier, pointing to the poor health rankings of neighboring expansion states like Louisiana and Arkansas.²⁹
• Rebuttal: While health outcomes are complex and influenced by many factors, this argument misses the fundamental point. First, multiple studies have found that Medicaid expansion is associated with significant benefits, including substantial reductions in mortality and improvements in self-reported health, particularly for minority populations.²⁸ Second, and more critically, it provides the financial stability necessary for hospitals and clinics to remain open, which is the absolute prerequisite for delivering
  any care at all. As the stark financial data from the Arkansas comparison shows, expansion is essential for the survival of the healthcare infrastructure itself.⁶

Perhaps most importantly, the political weather itself is changing. The arguments against expansion are losing their force, not just with the general public, but with the very voters who have traditionally opposed it. A Cygnal poll conducted in November 2024 delivered a political bombshell: a clear and growing majority (58.5%) of Republican primary voters in Mississippi now support Medicaid expansion. An overwhelming 74% of these same voters believe it is important for the House and Senate to reach an agreement on the issue in the 2025 legislative session.¹⁷

The political calculus has been inverted. For years, the perceived risk was in supporting expansion. Today, the data shows that the far greater political risk lies in continued inaction and defiance of the clear will of the people. The winds have shifted, offering the fairest weather in a decade to finally complete the bridge.

Part IV: Placing the Keystone: A Blueprint for a Complete and Resilient System

The Only Path Forward: Completing the Arch

The survey of Mississippi’s healthcare system is complete, and the diagnosis is clear. The state is not suffering from a dozen different ailments; it is suffering from a single, critical design flaw. The healthcare bridge is incomplete. The constant financial pressure on the Marketplace, the tragic chasm of the coverage gap, the crumbling foundations of the state’s hospitals, and the circular, unproductive political debates are all symptoms of this one root cause: the missing keystone.

It follows, then, that piecemeal solutions are doomed to fail. Trying to patch the Marketplace with more state funds, attempting to create small, bespoke programs for a fraction of those in the coverage gap, or offering temporary bailouts to failing hospitals are like trying to hold up a collapsing arch with scaffolding and duct tape. These efforts treat the symptoms, not the disease. They are expensive, inefficient, and ultimately futile because they do not address the fundamental structural instability.

There is only one path forward that is logical, economical, and sustainable. The state must address the root of the problem. It must finish the job. The only way to stabilize the structure, protect the foundations, and permanently bridge the chasm is to install the missing component: full Medicaid expansion as envisioned in the Affordable Care Act.

Actionable Recommendations for Key Stakeholders

The time for debate is over. The time for action is now. The evidence is overwhelming, the public will is clear, and the economic case is undeniable. The following are targeted, actionable recommendations for the key stakeholders who have the power to finally place the keystone.

1. For State Legislators:

The decision rests, ultimately, in the hands of the Mississippi Legislature. The path to a “yes” vote is clearer than ever before. This report serves as a legislator’s briefing book, arming them with the irrefutable evidence needed to act with confidence.

• Embrace the Fiscal and Economic Case: Champion the findings of the state’s own university economists. Frame expansion not as an expenditure, but as a strategic investment in Mississippi’s economic future. Highlight the projected $843 million in annual GDP growth and the creation of 11,700 jobs per year.¹⁶
• Heed the Warning from Arkansas: Present the stark, comparative data from the Mississippi vs. Arkansas hospital study (Table 2) to colleagues, especially those from rural districts. This is not a theoretical model; it is a real-world demonstration of the financial devastation that non-expansion is inflicting on local hospitals and economies.⁶
• Trust Your Voters: Recognize that the political ground has shifted dramatically. The 2024 polling data shows that a majority of Republican primary voters want this issue solved.¹⁷ The political risk is no longer in voting for expansion; it is in defying the will of a growing majority of constituents who are demanding action.
• The Recommendation: Pass a clean expansion bill during the 2025 legislative session. Resist the temptation to add complex and ineffective work requirements that have been shown to sabotage implementation elsewhere.²⁸ Seize the historic financial opportunity offered by the federal government and make the single most impactful decision possible for the health and economic vitality of the state.

2. For Healthcare Advocates & Associations (MHA, MSMA, MHAP, etc.):

This coalition of advocates, including the Mississippi Hospital Association, the Mississippi State Medical Association, and the Mississippi Health Advocacy Program, has fought tirelessly for years.³¹ To break the final impasse, a new communications strategy is needed.

• Unify Around the “Missing Keystone” Narrative: Adopt and relentlessly promote the “Incomplete Bridge” analogy. This simple, powerful metaphor can cut through the political noise, depoliticize the issue, and build a broad-based public coalition that includes the business community, faith leaders, and everyday citizens. It reframes the issue as a commonsense infrastructure project, not a partisan debate.
• Humanize the Data: Anchor the public-facing campaign in the personal stories of Mississippians. The experiences of Brandon Allred, the working father afraid for his future, and Tina, the grandmother who had to ration her medicine, are more powerful than any statistic.¹ These stories transform abstract policy into a relatable human issue of survival, dignity, and family.
• The Recommendation: Launch a coordinated, statewide public education campaign centered on the “Complete the Bridge” theme. Use the stories, the economic data, and the polling numbers to create overwhelming public pressure on the legislature to act in 2025.

3. For Mississippi’s Business & Economic Leaders:

The voice of the business community can be decisive. The appeal to this group should be framed not in terms of social welfare, but in the clear-eyed language of economic development, workforce stability, and risk management.

• View Expansion as a Pro-Growth Strategy: Recognize that Medicaid expansion is one of the most powerful economic development tools available to the state. It injects hundreds of millions of federal dollars directly into the economy, creating thousands of jobs in the healthcare sector and beyond.¹⁶
• Protect Critical Infrastructure: Understand that the survival of rural hospitals is a core business issue. These institutions are major employers and are essential for attracting and retaining other businesses in rural communities. Allowing them to fail due to the burden of uncompensated care is economic malpractice.²⁴
• Invest in a Healthy Workforce: A healthy workforce is a productive workforce. When employees like Brandon Allred or Preston cannot get the care they need, it leads to increased absenteeism, lower productivity, and higher downstream costs for everyone. Covering the 74,000 people in the gap is a direct investment in the state’s human capital.
• The Recommendation: Publicly and forcefully advocate for Medicaid expansion as a top economic priority for the state. Use your influence to communicate to legislators that a stable, fully-funded healthcare system is not a partisan issue, but a prerequisite for a competitive and prosperous Mississippi.

Conclusion: A Vision of a Finished Bridge

My journey as a policy analyst began in a fog of confusion, staring at a set of problems that seemed intractable. The data was contradictory, the politics were deadlocked, and the human suffering was immense. The path out of that fog was not a better spreadsheet, but a better way of seeing—the realization that Mississippi’s healthcare crisis was not a list of problems, but a single, systemic failure of design.

The story of the unfinished bridge provided the clarity that had been missing. It explained everything. It connected the dots between a father in Tupelo unable to see a dentist and a rural hospital on the brink of closure. It linked a political decision made in the state capitol to the financial strain felt in every clinic and emergency room across the state.

Placing the keystone is not a panacea. Mississippi will still face immense challenges in public health. But it is the essential first step. It is the act that makes all other progress possible. It stabilizes the entire structure, allowing the state to shift its focus from crisis management to the long-term work of building a culture of health.

I can now envision a different future for Mississippi. It is a future with a completed healthcare bridge, strong and resilient. It is a future where fathers like Brandon Allred can get the preventive care they need to watch their children grow up. It is a future where mothers like Tina and Preston no longer have to choose between their own health and their family’s needs. It is a future where rural hospitals are not just surviving, but thriving as economic and social anchors for their communities. It is a future where Mississippi has finally built the strong, complete, and compassionate infrastructure necessary to ensure a healthier and more prosperous life for all of its citizens. The blueprints are there. The materials are waiting. The public is ready. It is time to place the keystone. It is time to finish the bridge.

Works cited

1. Mississippi is closer than ever to expanding Medicaid. What are the …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/what-kind-of-future-do-i-have-in-mississippi-medicaid-advocates-push-for-expansion
2. Health care in Mississippi could get even worse with new federal law, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mississippitoday.org/2025/07/27/health-care-worse-new-federal-law/
3. Mississippi, accessed August 14, 2025, https://healthjournalism.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Mississippifor-AHCJ2024.pdf
4. Mississippi ACA Health Insurance Marketplace – Healthinsurance.org, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.healthinsurance.org/aca-marketplace/mississippi/
5. Q&A: Explaining the health care coverage gap – Magee Courier-Simpson County News, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.simpsoncounty.ms/index.php/most-recent/qa-explaining-health-care-coverage-gap-66230f218de14
6. Hospital Uncompensated Care Costs and Profits: A … – medica@musc, accessed August 14, 2025, https://medica-musc.researchcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1767&context=theses
7. (PDF) Systems Thinking Metaphors for Illuminating Fundamental Policy Dilemmas, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323979189_Systems_Thinking_Metaphors_for_Illuminating_Fundamental_Policy_Dilemmas
8. Connecting Systems Thinking and Action – The Systems Thinker, accessed August 14, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/connecting-systems-thinking-and-action/
9. What Is Systems Thinking? | University of Phoenix, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.phoenix.edu/articles/business/what-is-systems-thinking.html
10. Systems thinking for policymaking – Public Policy Design, accessed August 14, 2025, https://publicpolicydesign.blog.gov.uk/2023/09/08/systems-thinking-for-policymaking/
11. Medicaid Expansion in Mississippi — What’s at Stake | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/medicaid-expansion-mississippi-whats-stake
12. Q&A: Explaining the health care coverage gap – Mississippi Today, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mississippitoday.org/2024/04/18/qa-explaining-the-health-care-coverage-gap/
13. Medicaid expansion in Mississippi is in limbo, for now, as lawmakers table discussions, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mpbonline.org/blogs/news/medicaid-expansion-in-mississippi-is-in-limbo-for-now-as-lawmakers-table-discussions/
14. System Failure | Demos, accessed August 14, 2025, https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/systemfailure.pdf
15. Who’s opposed to Medicaid expansion and why? – Mississippi Today, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mississippitoday.org/2022/11/15/medicaid-expansion-opposition-why/
16. A FISCAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MEDICAID EXPANSION …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mississippi.edu/sites/default/files/ihl/files/urcmedicaid2023a.pdf
17. New Poll: Mississippi Republican Voters Want Medicaid Expansion in 2025, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.fightcancer.org/releases/new-poll-mississippi-republican-voters-want-medicaid-expansion-2025
18. health insurance marketplaces 2024 open enrollment report | cms, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/files/document/health-insurance-exchanges-2024-open-enrollment-report-final.pdf
19. Marketplace 2024 Open Enrollment Period Report: Final National Snapshot | CMS, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/marketplace-2024-open-enrollment-period-report-final-national-snapshot
20. www.kff.org, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/a-closer-look-at-medicaid-expansion-efforts-in-mississippi/#:~:text=KFF%20estimates%20that%20123%2C000%20uninsured,100%25%20and%20138%25%20FPL.
21. Stepping Into the Gap: Medicaid Expansion in the Deep South as a …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/medicaid-expansion-deep-south/
22. Medicaid Covers US: Mississippi | American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.fightcancer.org/medicaid-covers-us-mississippi
23. Medicaid expansion efforts die in Mississippi | WBHM 90.3, accessed August 14, 2025, https://wbhm.org/2024/stupidity-of-politics-medicaid-expansion-effort-dies-in-mississippi/
24. What proposed Medicaid cuts could mean for rural communities, hospital access, accessed August 14, 2025, https://sph.umich.edu/news/2025posts/what-proposed-medicaid-cuts-could-mean-for-rural-communities-hospital-access.html
25. More Rural Hospitals Closing in States Refusing Medicaid Coverage Expansion, accessed August 14, 2025, https://ccf.georgetown.edu/2018/10/29/more-rural-hospitals-closing-in-states-refusing-medicaid-coverage-expansion/
26. It Will Take National Single Payer to Save Rural Hospitals – CounterPunch.org, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/08/13/it-will-take-national-single-payer-to-save-rural-hospitals/
27. 125,000 in MS Could Gain Medicaid Coverage Through Expansion …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://advisory.avalerehealth.com/insights/125000-in-ms-could-gain-medicaid-coverage-through-expansion
28. Exploring costs, benefits of Medicaid expansion in Mississippi, accessed August 14, 2025, https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/exploring-costs-benefits-of-medicaid-expansion-in-mississippi/
29. Was Medicaid Expansion the Cure in Louisiana & Arkansas? No …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://magnoliatribune.com/2024/02/17/louisiana-arkansas-cautionary-tales/
30. Medicaid Expansion Slowed Rates of Health Decline for Low-Income Adults in Southern States, accessed August 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7169046/
31. Mississippi Health Advocacy Program, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mhap.org/
32. Advocacy – Mississippi State Medical Association, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.msmaonline.com/Public/Physician_Advocacy/Public/Government%20Affairs/Government_Affairs.aspx?hkey=72b0346d-4d6b-4088-b0cb-07d486fd329e
33. Mississippi Organizations – Rural Health Information Hub, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/states/mississippi/organizations