Table of Contents
Introduction: A Desperate Bargain in the Face of Pain
The pain was architectural.
It wasn’t just a feeling; it was a structure being built inside my jaw, a throbbing, malevolent cathedral of agony.
Two days prior, a surgeon had waged a protracted war against an impacted wisdom tooth, a battle that left the surrounding bone and tissue feeling less like a part of my body and more like a casualty report.
Now, in the gray light of a sleepless dawn, the pain had crested.
It was a pulsing, five-alarm fire, and every nerve ending was screaming for rescue.
My first thought, a primal instinct born of desperation, was to dismiss the bottle of ibuprofen on my nightstand.
That was for headaches, for the dull ache of a tweaked muscle after a workout.
This was different.
This was serious pain, the kind that feels like it’s rewriting your personality one excruciating pulse at a time.1
My internal monologue was clear and insistent:
I need a real painkiller.
A strong one.
I need what they give you in the hospital. I was ready to make a bargain, to plead with my doctor for one of the “powerful painkillers,” a prescription for an opioid.
In that moment, the cultural narrative felt like gospel: when the pain is truly biblical, you call in the heavy artillery.
Ibuprofen was a water pistol; I needed a tactical strike.
This moment of agony, and the flawed logic it produced, was the beginning of a journey.
It was a journey that would force me to dismantle a lifetime of assumptions about pain, power, and pharmacology.
I believed, as most of us do, that painkillers exist on a simple linear scale of strength.
At one end, you have the gentle, over-the-counter options, and at the other, the potent, prescription-only opioids reserved for the most severe suffering.2
My crisis wasn’t just physical; it was a crisis of understanding.
The desperation for relief had made me a poor judge, not just of my own needs, but of the very nature of the tools available.
I was about to discover that my entire framework for thinking about pain relief was wrong.
I thought I was choosing between a weak tool and a strong one.
In reality, I was choosing between two entirely different machines, designed for two entirely different jobs.
I was choosing between a firefighter and a hypnotist.
Part I: The City’s Emergency System – An Epiphany in Two Manuals
My epiphany didn’t arrive in a flash of insight.
It came through a slow, meticulous process of investigation, prompted by a skeptical but patient doctor who, instead of immediately writing the prescription I craved, handed me what felt like two different emergency response manuals for the city of my body.
As I delved into them, a new and powerful analogy began to form, one that would change everything.
Imagine your body as a sprawling, complex city.
When you suffer an injury—like my brutalized jaw—a fire has broken out in one of the city’s buildings.
This fire, the tissue damage and inflammation, begins to produce two things in massive quantities: heat and smoke.
In the body, this “heat and smoke” is a flood of chemical compounds called prostaglandins.3
These prostaglandins are the direct cause of the alarm.
They activate the local fire alarms—specialized nerve endings called nociceptors—which then send a frantic, high-priority distress signal along the city’s communication grid (the nervous system) to the central command center (the brain).
The wailing siren you hear in your head is the conscious sensation of pain.
The question is, how do you stop it? The two manuals offered profoundly different strategies.
Manual One: The Local Fire Chief (Ibuprofen)
The first manual described a beautifully logical, direct-action approach.
It detailed the work of the city’s Local Fire Chief.
This chief doesn’t operate out of the central command center.
When an alarm sounds, their units are dispatched directly to the source of the emergency: the burning building itself.4
This is precisely how ibuprofen works.
It belongs to a class of medications called Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, or NSAIDs.5
The name itself is the first and most important clue: its primary job is to fight inflammation.
When you swallow an ibuprofen tablet, it is absorbed into your bloodstream and travels throughout the city, but its real work begins when it arrives at the site of the fire.4
At a molecular level, the Fire Chief’s strategy is to stop the production of the smoke and heat that are triggering the alarm.
Ibuprofen achieves this by inhibiting the activity of two enzymes known as cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).3
These COX enzymes are the molecular factories responsible for manufacturing prostaglandins from a fatty acid called arachidonic acid found in our cell membranes.11
By blocking these enzymes, ibuprofen is like a crew of firefighters spraying specialized foam and water directly onto the flames.
It shuts down the prostaglandin factory.12
The result is immediate and causal.
With prostaglandin production drastically reduced, there is no more “smoke” to trigger the local fire alarm.
The nociceptors fall silent.
The distress signal to the central command center is either never sent or is so faint it barely registers.
The pain subsides not because your brain has been told to ignore it, but because the very chemical signal that constitutes the pain message has been extinguished at its source.
The Fire Chief didn’t just silence the alarm; they put out the fire causing it.
Manual Two: The Central Dispatch Hypnotist (Opioids)
The second manual described a completely different, almost surreal, strategy.
In this scenario, the alarm from the burning building has already reached the city’s central command center.
The sirens are blaring, the dispatch operators are in a panic, and the entire city government is aware of the crisis.
The pain is being fully and consciously felt.
This manual’s solution is not to dispatch firefighters.
It’s to send in a Central Dispatch Hypnotist.
This is the world of opioids.
Opioids are an entirely separate class of drugs, which derive from or mimic the natural substances found in the opium poppy plant.13
They are classified as central nervous system depressants, meaning they don’t work at the site of the injury but directly within the brain and spinal cord.15
When an opioid enters the bloodstream, it travels to the central command center and binds to specialized docking stations on nerve cells called opioid receptors (primarily the mu, kappa, and delta types).17
The Hypnotist has arrived.
Instead of addressing the fire, the Hypnotist gets to work on the dispatch operators.
By binding to these receptors, it does two remarkable things.
First, it physically blocks the pain signal from being processed and relayed.
It’s as if the Hypnotist steps in front of the frantic dispatchers and prevents them from broadcasting the emergency alert any further.17
The conscious perception of pain is dulled or erased.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, the Hypnotist hijacks the city’s internal broadcast system.
It triggers a release of the neurotransmitter dopamine, flooding the command center with powerful feelings of pleasure, calm, and well-being—a state often described as euphoria.14
The Hypnotist isn’t just telling the operators to ignore the sirens; it’s hypnotizing them into believing that not only is there no fire, but that it’s the most beautiful, peaceful day the city has ever known.
This was the core of my epiphany.
The fire in my jaw was still burning.
The inflammation and tissue damage were still there.
But the Hypnotist simply made my brain not care.
It changed my response to the pain, rather than removing the cause of the pain.
Ibuprofen and opioids weren’t two different levels of strength on the same spectrum.
They were not a small hammer and a large hammer.
They were a firefighter and a hypnotist—a local, mechanical solution versus a central, neurological one.
One targets the source of the problem; the other targets the perception of it.
This fundamental distinction meant my initial question—”Which one is stronger?”—was entirely the wrong question to ask.
The right question was: “Which emergency protocol is actually better at resolving the crisis?”
Part II: The Performance Review – Judging a Painkiller by Its Results, Not Its Reputation
Armed with this new mechanical understanding, my perspective shifted from that of a desperate patient to that of a critical investigator.
If one system sends a firefighter to the blaze and the other sends a hypnotist to headquarters, which one actually performs better in an emergency? I began to dig into the data, the clinical trials, and the evidence-based guidelines.
What I found was not just surprising; it was a complete inversion of everything I—and most of the public—believed to be true.
The Acute Crisis: Who Really Wins the Fight?
My immediate problem was acute pain—a short-term, intense crisis caused by a specific injury.1
This is the classic scenario where opioids are culturally positioned as the only viable option.
Yet, the evidence I uncovered told a radically different story.
Report after report from authoritative bodies like the National Safety Council (NSC) and the American Dental Association (ADA) stated in no uncertain terms that for acute pain, NSAIDs like ibuprofen are not just an alternative, but are often more effective than opioids.1
In fact, one NSC report described opioids as merely “mild to moderate painkillers,” a stunning demotion from their reputation as the ultimate weapon against pain.2
The ADA goes further, recommending NSAIDs as the “first-line therapy for acute pain management”.1
The most compelling evidence centered on a simple, over-the-counter strategy: combining the Fire Chief (ibuprofen) with another, different type of pain reliever, acetaminophen.
Acetaminophen (the active ingredient in Tylenol) works through different pathways, and when combined with ibuprofen, the effect is synergistic.
Multiple sources, including a summary from the Journal of the American Dental Association, described the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen as one of the “strongest pain reliever combinations available,” and “clearly more efficacious than any of the opioids used alone or in combination with acetaminophen”.2
The definitive proof came from a powerful statistical tool used in evidence-based medicine: the Number Needed to Treat, or NNT.
The NNT tells you how many patients you need to give a specific treatment to in order for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief over a four-to-six-hour period, compared to a placebo.
A lower NNT signifies a more effective treatment.
The results from a series of Cochrane Reviews—the gold standard in medical evidence synthesis—were staggering.21
For a standard prescription of oxycodone 15 mg, a potent opioid, the NNT was 4.6.
This means you have to treat nearly five people for one to get significant relief.
For the over-the-counter combination of ibuprofen 200 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg, the NNT was just 1.6.21
The data was irrefutable.
The simple, non-prescription combination was almost three times more effective at providing meaningful pain relief than a powerful, highly regulated opioid.
The Local Fire Chief, when paired with an able partner, was overwhelmingly better at managing the acute crisis than the Central Dispatch Hypnotist.
| Medication(s) and Dosage | Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for 50% Pain Relief | Source / Confidence Interval |
| Ibuprofen 200 mg + Acetaminophen 500 mg | 1.6 | (95% CI 1.5 to 1.8) 21 |
| Naproxen | 2.7 | (95% CI 2.3 to 3.2) 21 |
| Oxycodone 10 mg + Acetaminophen 650 mg | 2.7 | (95% CI 2.4 to 3.1) 21 |
| Oxycodone 15 mg | 4.6 | (95% CI 2.9 to 11) 21 |
The Chronic Smolder: When the Hypnotist Makes Things Worse
My investigation then turned to a different kind of fire: the chronic, smoldering blaze of long-term, non-cancer pain, like a bad back that never fully heals.
This is a condition affecting millions, and for which opioids have been prescribed with increasing frequency over the past two decades.2
What happens when the Hypnotist is kept on the city’s broadcast system not for a few days, but for months or years?
Here, the evidence was even more damning.
The case for the long-term efficacy of opioids was not just weak; it was practically non-existent.
A review of the scientific literature concluded bluntly, “There is no high-quality evidence on the efficacy of long-term opioid treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain”.2
A separate, highly respected Cochrane review found that while opioids might offer some short-term benefit over a placebo, there is “no evidence [that] supports opioids are helpful when used for longer than four months”.2
Worse still, some studies suggested that long-term reliance on the Hypnotist could be actively harmful.
A large-scale epidemiological study from Denmark delivered a shocking finding: patients with chronic pain who were on long-term opioid therapy reported higher levels of pain, had a poorer quality of life, and were less functional than patients with similar chronic pain conditions who were not taking opioids.2
It seems that over time, the Hypnotist’s constant broadcasting not only fails to help but may somehow amplify the city’s dysfunction.
This clinical data is reflected in grim public health statistics.
In the last 20 years, the United States has increased its consumption of opioids by more than 600%.
Yet, despite this massive increase in treatment, we have not seen a corresponding decrease in suffering.
A major study in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed that Americans suffered just as much disability from back and neck pain in 2010 as they did in 1990, before the explosion in opioid prescribing began.2
The Hypnotist was talking more than ever, but the city was in just as much trouble.
The Roots of the Myth: Why We Trust the Hypnotist’s Voice
This led me to the final, crucial question of my investigation: If the evidence is so overwhelmingly clear, why does the myth of opioid superiority persist so powerfully in our culture and, until recently, in our medical practices? Why do we instinctively trust the Hypnotist’s voice over the Fire Chief’s actions? The answer lies in a confluence of psychology, history, and commerce.
First and foremost is the potent psychotherapeutic effect of opioids.
The Hypnotist doesn’t just promise pain relief; it delivers a profound sense of calm, relaxation, and euphoria.2
This powerful emotional effect is easily mistaken for powerful pain relief.
When a patient is in distress, the feeling of well-being an opioid provides is so potent that it can overshadow the drug’s actual, more modest analgesic properties.
Looking back at my own desperate state, I had to admit I wasn’t just craving an absence of pain; I was craving the comfort and escape the “strong” drug promised.
Second is the historical influence of the World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder.
Developed in 1986, this guideline was intended for managing cancer pain and was based on expert opinion, the weakest form of medical evidence.2
It placed opioids on a higher rung than NSAIDs for moderate-to-severe pain.
Though designed for a very specific context, this ladder was widely and inappropriately applied to all types of pain, cementing a flawed hierarchy in the minds of a generation of clinicians.2
Third, the role of pharmaceutical marketing cannot be ignored.
The research explicitly states that “pharmaceutical companies have done a good job marketing opioids, so many doctors have come to believe opioids are actually stronger than other medications”.2
This commercial influence helped build and sustain the myth of opioid supremacy, directly contributing to the overprescribing that fueled a public health crisis.
Finally, there is the “no ceiling” fallacy.
In a hospital setting, when given intravenously, opioids have no ceiling effect on their psychotherapeutic properties—higher doses produce a more profound effect, often leading to sleep.2
This contributes to their reputation for ultimate power.
However, this is largely irrelevant for oral outpatient use and comes with the terrifying downside of a proportional increase in the risk of stopping a patient’s breathing.2
The Hypnotist’s voice, turned up too loud, can put the whole city to sleep, permanently.
Part III: The After-Action Report – A Sobering Look at Collateral Damage
My investigation was nearly complete.
I understood the mechanisms and the performance data.
The final step was to review the after-action reports: a head-to-head comparison of the risks and collateral damage associated with deploying each emergency system.
The contrast was as stark as the one between their methods.
The Fire Chief’s Bill: Water Damage and Strained Pipes (Ibuprofen Risks)
Deploying the Local Fire Chief is not without consequences.
Fighting a fire with water and foam inevitably causes some collateral damage to the building and strains the city’s infrastructure.
Similarly, ibuprofen’s mechanism, while targeted, carries its own set of risks.
The most common “water damage” is gastrointestinal.
The same COX-1 enzyme that ibuprofen inhibits to reduce inflammation also plays a crucial role in producing prostaglandins that protect the lining of the stomach and intestines.3
Blocking it can leave the stomach vulnerable, leading to heartburn, stomach pain, and, in more serious cases, ulcers or bleeding.3
The Fire Chief’s methods can also “strain the city’s water pipes.” Prostaglandins help regulate blood flow to the kidneys, so inhibiting them can pose a risk for individuals with pre-existing kidney disease or those who are dehydrated.4
Furthermore, long-term, high-dose use of NSAIDs has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke.7
Finally, ibuprofen can interfere with the function of other critical city services, interacting negatively with medications like blood thinners (warfarin), certain blood pressure drugs, and lithium.4
These risks are significant and demand responsible use.
Ibuprofen should be taken at the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary time.
But critically, these side effects are largely predictable consequences of the drug’s known, anti-inflammatory mechanism.
The Hypnotist’s Toll: A City in Ruins (Opioid Risks)
The risks associated with the Central Dispatch Hypnotist are of an entirely different order of magnitude.
This is not collateral damage; this is a systemic failure that can corrupt the command center and leave the entire city in ruins.
The dangers of opioids are not just side effects; they are fundamental features of how the drug interacts with the human brain.
The first sign of trouble is tolerance.
The city’s dispatchers grow accustomed to the Hypnotist’s voice.
Over time, the same volume is no longer effective.
A louder and more frequent broadcast is required to achieve the same sense of calm and pain relief.16
This inexorably leads to a patient needing higher and higher doses.
Next comes dependence.
After prolonged exposure, the central command center physically and chemically adapts to the Hypnotist’s presence.
The brain’s neurochemistry changes, and it becomes unable to function normally without the drug.
If the broadcast is suddenly stopped, the system descends into chaos.
This is withdrawal: a brutal syndrome of anxiety, agitation, muscle aches, nausea, and cramping.20
The city is no longer just in pain; it is sick from the absence of the cure.
From dependence, the path can lead to addiction, or Opioid Use Disorder (OUD).
The Hypnotist’s euphoric message is so powerfully rewarding that it rewires the brain’s motivational circuits.
The pursuit of the drug becomes compulsive, overriding judgment, responsibility, and even the basic instinct for self-preservation.14
The city’s leaders are no longer running the city; they are consumed with finding a way to keep the Hypnotist’s voice on the air.
The final, catastrophic risk is overdose and respiratory depression.
This is the ultimate system failure.
The Hypnotist’s voice, turned up too loud, doesn’t just calm the dispatchers; it puts the operator of the city’s entire power grid—the respiratory center in the brainstem—into a deep sleep.14
Breathing becomes shallow, then slows, then stops.
The city goes dark.
This risk is amplified by the shocking potency of synthetic opioids like fentanyl, which can be 50 to 100 times more powerful than morphine, meaning a dose the size of a few grains of salt can be fatal.20
The differences could not be clearer.
The Fire Chief’s risks are manageable problems of engineering.
The Hypnotist’s risks are existential threats to the entire system of government.
| Feature | Ibuprofen | Opioids |
| Drug Class | Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) 5 | Opioid (Narcotic) 13 |
| Mechanism of Action | Peripheral: Inhibits COX enzymes at the injury site, stopping prostaglandin production.3 | Central: Binds to opioid receptors in the brain and central nervous system, blocking pain perception and causing euphoria.17 |
| Primary Use Cases | Anti-inflammatory; mild-to-moderate pain from headaches, arthritis, dental pain, menstrual cramps; fever reduction.5 | Moderate-to-severe acute pain, post-surgical pain, cancer-related pain, end-of-life care.16 |
| Key Risks | Gastrointestinal bleeding, ulcers, kidney strain, increased cardiovascular risk with long-term use.4 | Respiratory depression (slowed/stopped breathing), addiction (OUD), physical dependence, tolerance, overdose, death.14 |
| U.S. Regulatory Status | Widely available over-the-counter (OTC) and by prescription.5 | Legally controlled substance (DEA Schedules II-V) due to high potential for abuse and dependence.27 |
Conclusion: Rewriting the Emergency Protocols
My journey, which began in a haze of pain and misconception, had brought me to a place of clarity.
The answer to my original, frantic question—is ibuprofen an opioid?—was a resounding and unequivocal No. They are not related.
They are not colleagues.
They are not even in the same profession.
One is a firefighter, the other a hypnotist.
They belong to fundamentally different drug classes, operate via completely different mechanisms, possess vastly different risk profiles, and are regulated accordingly by law.
This understanding allowed me to rewrite my own personal emergency protocols for pain.
The solution was not to seek out the drug with the most powerful reputation, but to choose the right tool for the specific job.
My new protocol is simple and evidence-based.
For the vast majority of acute pain crises—the sprained ankle, the dental work, the wrenched back—the first call is always to the Local Fire Chief.
The data is clear: the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen is a remarkably effective, first-line treatment that is superior to many prescription opioids.21
It addresses the problem at its source—inflammation—and should be used responsibly, at the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary time, with awareness of its potential for “water damage.”
The Central Dispatch Hypnotist is now reserved in my mind for what it truly is: a highly specialized, high-risk, last-resort intervention.
Its use is justified only in cases of severe, acute pain where the Fire Chief’s methods are insufficient, such as major trauma or immediate post-surgical recovery, or for the unique pain associated with cancer and end-of-life care.16
It is a tool to be used under the strictest medical supervision, for the shortest possible duration, with a clear exit strategy to avoid the catastrophic risks of tolerance, dependence, and addiction.31
This personal transformation is one I now advocate for universally.
The cultural myth of opioid strength is not just wrong; it is dangerous.
It has contributed to a devastating public health crisis born from a fundamental misunderstanding of two very different medicines.
We must empower ourselves with knowledge.
We must question the old narratives and look at the evidence.
The next time you face a pain crisis, I urge you to have a different kind of conversation with your healthcare provider.
Instead of saying, “Doctor, I need something strong,” you can now ask, “Doctor, is my pain primarily inflammatory? Based on the evidence, would a non-opioid combination be the most effective first-line treatment?” This simple shift in language represents a profound shift in understanding—from a passive recipient of “strong” medicine to an active, informed partner in your own care.
True strength in managing pain is not found in the drug that makes the loudest promises or offers the most seductive escape.
It is found in the wisdom to diagnose the problem correctly and choose the right tool for the job.
It is found in knowing when you need a firefighter to put out the fire, and in being exceptionally wary of the hypnotist who only promises to make you forget that your house is burning down.
Works cited
- Oral Analgesics for Acute Dental Pain, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.ada.org/resources/ada-library/oral-health-topics/oral-analgesics-for-acute-dental-pain
- Evidence for the efficacy of pain medications – National Safety Council, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.nsc.org/getmedia/8ecdc0e5-ae58-43e8-b98b-46c205e1c2b2/evidence-efficacy-pain-medications.pdf
- What is the mechanism of Ibuprofen? – Patsnap Synapse, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-the-mechanism-of-ibuprofen
- Ibuprofen Product Information, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/otc-template-pi-ibuprofen.rtf
- Ibuprofen: MedlinePlus Drug Information, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682159.html
- Ibuprofen (oral route) – Side effects & dosage – Mayo Clinic, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ibuprofen-oral-route/description/drg-20070602
- Ibuprofen – Alcohol and Drug Foundation, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://adf.org.au/drug-facts/ibuprofen/
- Ibuprofen: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action | DrugBank Online, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01050
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4355401/#:~:text=The%20main%20mechanism%20of%20action,and%20PTGS2%2C%20respectively%3B%20Fig.
- Ibuprofen – Mechanism of Action – YouTube, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-ixJwtGPpQ
- PharmGKB summary: ibuprofen pathways – PMC, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4355401/
- Ibuprofen – Medical Countermeasures Database – CHEMM, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://chemm.hhs.gov/countermeasure_ibuprofen.htm
- Opioid Class of drugs, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opioid
- Opioids | Johns Hopkins Medicine, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/opioids
- Opioids – Alcohol and Drug Foundation, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://adf.org.au/drug-facts/opioids/
- Opioids (Narcotics): What They Are, Types & Side Effects – Cleveland Clinic, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/21127-opioids
- Opioids – mechanisms of action – Australian Prescriber – Therapeutic Guidelines, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://australianprescriber.tg.org.au/articles/opioids-mechanisms-of-action.html
- Opioids – Physiopedia, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Opioids
- Opioid Agonists – How Do They Work? | Lippincott NursingCenter, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.nursingcenter.com/ncblog/september-2022/opioid-agonists
- Opioids | National Institute on Drug Abuse – NIDA, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/opioids
- NSAIDs are stronger pain medications than opioids – Minnesota Dental Association, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.mndental.org/files/NSAIDs-are-stronger-pain-medications-than-opioids-A-Summary-of-Evidence.pdf
- Health Hack: Ibuprofen Instead of Opioids | University of Utah Health, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://healthcare.utah.edu/the-scope/health-library/all/2019/03/health-hack-ibuprofen-instead-of-opioids
- NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs): Uses – Cleveland Clinic, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/11086-non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory-medicines-nsaids
- Painkillers and NSAIDs | Side-effects, uses, time to work – Versus Arthritis, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://versusarthritis.org/about-arthritis/treatments/drugs/painkillers-and-nsaids/
- Ibuprofen | healthdirect, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/ibuprofen
- Opioid Use Disorder – Psychiatry.org, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/opioid-use-disorder
- Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537318/
- Opioids | DEA.gov, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.dea.gov/highlight-topics/opioids
- HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These highlights do not include all the information needed to use – FDA, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.fda.gov/media/131026/download
- Pain medicines | Canadian Cancer Society, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://cancer.ca/en/treatments/side-effects/pain/pain-medicines
- FDA updates prescribing information for all opioid pain medicines to provide additional guidance for safe use, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-prescribing-information-all-opioid-pain-medicines-provide-additional-guidance-safe-use
- Pocket Guide – DC Health, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://dchealth.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/doh/page_content/attachments/PocketGuideFINAL.pdf
