Table of Contents
Part I: The Crack in the Foundation – An American Crisis
Introduction: The Bill That Broke My Worldview
I’ve always considered myself a product of the American system, and for most of my life, I believed in its promises.
As a public health policy analyst, I understood the critiques leveled against our healthcare apparatus, but on a personal level, I was insulated.
I had what everyone calls “good insurance,” a comprehensive PPO plan provided by my employer.
It was my shield, the buffer that was supposed to protect my family from the horror stories I analyzed in my work.
I believed in the narrative we tell ourselves: that while our system is expensive, it delivers the best, most innovative care in the world.
My shield, I would discover, was made of glass.
The crisis arrived not with a dramatic, life-threatening bang, but with a quiet, routine procedure for my spouse.
It was a minor outpatient surgery, something we scheduled weeks in advance.
We did our due diligence, or so we thought.
We confirmed the hospital was in-network.
We confirmed the surgeon was in-network.
We paid our co-pay and went home, relieved.
The first bill arrived a month later.
It was from the anesthesiologist.
He was, inexplicably, out-of-network.
The charge was four times what our insurance deemed “reasonable and customary.” That was just the beginning.
A second bill followed for the pathology lab that analyzed the tissue sample—also out-of-network.
Then came a cascade of EOBs (Explanation of Benefits) from our insurer, documents so dense and coded they felt intentionally obtuse.
Our “good insurance” covered a fraction of these surprise charges, leaving us with a five-figure debt for a procedure we were told would cost us a few hundred dollars out-of-pocket.
The months that followed were a descent into a bureaucratic labyrinth.
I spent countless hours on the phone, navigating automated menus and speaking with representatives who offered scripted sympathy but no solutions.
We were fighting a ghost system, an opaque network of providers, billing departments, and insurance adjusters, none of whom seemed accountable to the other.
The financial strain was immense, but the psychological toll was worse.
It was the gnawing anxiety, the feeling of being cheated by a system designed to be incomprehensible.
It was the realization that our financial security was built on sand, vulnerable to a single, unpredictable medical event.1
This experience didn’t just cost us money; it shattered my worldview.
The system I had studied from a professional distance had now become a personal antagonist.
It forced me to confront a terrifying question: if this could happen to us, with our “good” jobs and “good” insurance, what was happening to everyone else? This was the crack in the foundation that sent me on a journey to understand not just how our system fails, but whether a better way was even possible.
Anatomy of a System: The High-Stakes, High-Tech Marketplace
To understand the American healthcare crisis is to understand that the United States does not have a healthcare system in the way most developed nations do.
It has a sprawling, fragmented, and ferociously competitive healthcare marketplace.2
This marketplace was not built by grand design but emerged from a series of historical accidents and political compromises.
Its foundational DNA was written during World War II, when federal wage and price controls prevented employers from offering higher salaries to attract scarce labor.
As a workaround, the War Labor Board allowed them to offer “fringe benefits,” including health insurance.3
This decision, a wartime expediency, tethered health coverage to employment, a link that defines the American model to this day.5
What began as a perk for some has become the primary, and often precarious, source of coverage for the majority, a commercial product rather than a social good.6
The Cost Paradox
The most glaring feature of this marketplace is its astronomical cost.
The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country on earth, and it is not even close.
In 2023, U.S. health expenditures reached $4.9 trillion, or $14,570 per person.7
This figure is staggering on its own, but it becomes truly shocking in comparison to peer nations.
In 2023, the U.S. spent $13,432 per person, while the average for similarly wealthy countries was just $7,393—nearly half.9
This spending consumes an ever-growing share of the national economy.
In 1970, U.S. health spending was about 6.2% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), comparable to other developed nations.
But in the 1980s, the American spending curve broke away, accelerating at a rate far exceeding its peers.9
By 2023, healthcare accounted for 17.6% of U.S. GDP, almost double the average of comparable countries.7
This isn’t a small gap; it’s a chasm that has been widening for four decades.
The Price, Not Utilization, Problem
A common defense of this high spending is that Americans simply consume more high-tech, cutting-edge healthcare.
The data, however, debunks this myth.
The primary driver of America’s exorbitant costs is not the quantity of care, but the price of it.
Compared to peer nations, Americans have fewer physician visits per capita and shorter average hospital stays.11
Yet, the price for each service is dramatically higher.
The International Federation of Health Plans provides stark examples: an angioplasty, a common procedure to open blocked arteries, costs multiples more in the U.S. than in countries like the Netherlands or Switzerland.
The average price of a coronary bypass surgery in the U.S. is 129% more than the next-highest average in Switzerland.
A C-section or a normal delivery costs far more in the U.S..11
An MRI exam in the U.S. costs, on average, $1,119, which is 420% more than the average price in Australia.11
This pattern holds true for prescription drugs, where brand-name pharmaceuticals are priced two to three times higher than in other OECD countries, and for the salaries of medical professionals, which are significantly higher than their international counterparts.13
The U.S. healthcare marketplace lacks the price control mechanisms common elsewhere; it never instituted the “brakes” on payments for new technologies or drugs that other countries did.15
The result is a system where providers charge what the market will bear, and the market—a complex web of private insurers, government programs, and individual patients—bears it at a tremendous cost.
The Engine of Inefficiency: Administrative Waste
Fueling this high-price environment is a colossal engine of administrative inefficiency.
The fragmented nature of the American marketplace, with over 1,000 different private insurance companies, creates a bureaucratic nightmare.16
Every provider must navigate a dizzying array of different billing codes, reimbursement rates, and prior authorization requirements for each insurer.
This complexity requires a “huge army of people” whose job is not to deliver care, but to manage the paperwork of paying for it.15
The cost of this administrative bloat is breathtaking.
The U.S. spends between $925 and $1,055 per capita on administration, compared to an average of just $245 in comparable countries.12
This single category accounts for a stunning 12% of the total difference in health spending between the U.S. and its peers.12
A study of hospital costs across eight nations found that administrative expenditures made up 25.3% of total hospital spending in the U.S.—a figure far exceeding any other country and one that is still increasing.18
This is the cost of complexity, the tax paid for a non-system that prioritizes market choice over streamlined efficiency.
The Human Toll: Medical Debt and Bankruptcy
The ultimate consequence of this high-cost, inefficient marketplace is the profound financial toxicity it inflicts on the American people.
The fear of medical bills is a constant, ambient stress in American life, affecting the insured and the 8.6% of the population who remain uninsured alike.1
Stories abound of families bankrupted by a child’s cancer diagnosis or an unexpected heart transplant, even with insurance.1
For years, policymakers claimed that medical bills were the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the U.S., a figure often cited as high as 60%.19
More rigorous recent research has challenged that specific number, arguing that the causal link is more complex.
However, that same research confirms a clear, statistically significant relationship: a hospital admission sharply increases a person’s likelihood of filing for bankruptcy in the subsequent years.
The study estimates that hospitalizations are a direct cause of approximately 4% of bankruptcies among non-elderly adults, and 6% among the uninsured.19
While this is lower than the oft-quoted figure, it still represents tens of thousands of families pushed over the financial brink each year by the very system meant to heal them.
This financial burden is not a bug in the system; it is a direct and predictable feature of a marketplace model where the risk is borne not by society, but by the individual.
The system’s failure is not just its exorbitant cost, but its fundamental lack of value.
For the highest price in the world, it delivers mediocre outcomes, a reality laid bare by international comparisons of health and longevity.10
Part II: An Accidental Epiphany – A European Detour
The Shock of Simplicity: An Encounter with a Different Philosophy
My family’s move to London for a two-year work assignment was the catalyst for the epiphany.
We arrived armed with the usual expat preparations and a healthy dose of skepticism about “socialized medicine,” a term that in the American lexicon conjures images of long waits, rationed care, and bureaucratic indifference.
My own experience with the American system had left me cynical, but I still carried the implicit bias that our model, for all its flaws, was the global standard for quality.
The test came unexpectedly.
One rainy afternoon, my young son took a hard fall at a playground, landing awkwardly on his A.M. His cry was one of true pain, and the angle of his wrist was unnatural.
My American instincts kicked in immediately, a familiar checklist of anxieties: Which hospital is in our network? How much will the ER visit cost? Will they demand payment upfront? But here, the process was jarringly different.
We took a taxi to the nearest hospital’s Accident & Emergency (A&E) department.
There was no one at the reception desk demanding an insurance card or a credit Card. A triage nurse saw us within minutes, assessed my son’s arm, and calmly directed us to a waiting area.
The wait was about an hour, not the multi-hour ordeal I had braced for.
We were called into an examination bay where a doctor, after a gentle examination, confirmed a fracture.
He spoke directly to my son, explaining what was happening with a kindness that disarmed my parental panic.
An X-ray was taken, a cast was set, and we were given a follow-up appointment for the following week.
The entire time, the focus was exclusively on my son’s injury.
The topic of payment never came up.
As we were leaving, I stopped a nurse and, almost apologetically, asked how we were supposed to pay for the visit.
She looked at me, genuinely perplexed, before replying, “Pay? Oh, no, you don’t pay.
You’re a resident here.
Just make sure you come back for your follow-up.
We just want to make sure he heals properly.”
In that moment, the contrast with my previous ordeal in the U.S. was overwhelming.
It wasn’t just about the absence of a bill; it was about the absence of fear.
It was the shock of encountering a system where the first question was not “How will you pay?” but “How can we help?”.21
This was the experience that forced me to see with new eyes.
I realized I wasn’t just comparing two healthcare systems; I was comparing two entirely different social philosophies.
The American model, a consumer product, had treated my family’s health as a transaction.
This European model treated it as a public good, a fundamental responsibility.
Deconstructing the Blueprints: Healthcare as Essential Public Infrastructure
This accidental encounter became the key to a new paradigm for my work.
I began to see that what unites the varied systems across Europe is a shared, foundational belief: healthcare is not a consumer good or a luxury item, but a piece of essential public infrastructure, as vital to a functioning society as roads, clean water, or an electrical grid.
While the specific architectural “blueprints” differ from country to country, they are all built on the principles of social solidarity and universal access.
The American system, in contrast, is an outlier, built on a blueprint of market competition and individual risk.
To truly understand the debate, one must first understand these different blueprints.
Blueprint 1: The National Utility – The UK’s National Health Service (NHS)
The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) is perhaps the purest expression of the “public utility” model.
Established in 1948 out of the ashes of World War II, it was founded on three core principles: that it meets the needs of everyone, that it is free at the point of delivery, and that it is based on clinical need, not the ability to pay.22
It operates as a single-payer system, funded almost entirely from general taxation and smaller National Insurance contributions.22
For legal residents, including American expats who pay an annual Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) as part of their visa process, the NHS provides comprehensive care without co-pays or deductibles for most services.24
The experience of using the NHS, as many American expats report, is a study in contrasts.
The overwhelming positive is the liberation from financial anxiety.
Patients praise the high quality of care for serious conditions like cancer, which are often put on an expedited treatment pathway, and the relief of not receiving a catastrophic bill at the end.25
One expat, whose father went through cancer treatment on private insurance while their mother went through the NHS, saw “no real difference in the quality of their care”.27
However, the system’s primary weakness, a direct result of its fixed, tax-funded budget, is pressure on access.
Long waiting times for elective surgeries (like hip or knee replacements) and specialist appointments are a common and deeply frustrating complaint.28
The OECD reports median wait times for a knee replacement can be over 140 days.28
The NHS is a system perpetually strained by demand that outstrips its government-allocated resources, but one that holds fast to its founding promise of preventing illness from leading to financial ruin.
Blueprint 2: The Regulated Cooperative – Germany’s Sickness Funds
Germany offers a different blueprint, one based on social insurance rather than direct state provision.
Its universal, multi-payer system is one of the oldest in the world.
The vast majority of the population—around 89%—is mandatorily insured through one of approximately 96 non-profit, heavily regulated “sickness funds” (Krankenkassen).31
These funds are financed through mandatory contributions, calculated as a percentage of income and split equally between employee and employer.32
This model preserves a degree of market choice among funds while operating under a framework of social solidarity: contributions are based on ability to pay, but benefits are the same for all.
A small, wealthier segment of the population (about 11%), including high-earners and the self-employed, can opt out of the public system and purchase substitutive private health insurance (PHI).31
For the patient, the German system is navigated with an electronic health card (elektronische Gesundheitskarte, or eGK), which is presented at every doctor’s visit.
The doctor then bills the sickness fund directly, meaning there are typically no upfront payments for public patients.33
The system is lauded by expats for its comprehensive benefits, which include not only medical and dental care but also robust sick pay benefits, where the health insurance fund will cover a portion of a person’s salary during extended illness.35
One American expat in Germany described how their husband’s three-night hospital stay for surgery cost only about $100, and how their insurance paid their salary when a back problem kept them from work for months.35
The primary criticism, however, is the emergence of a perceived two-tier system.
Because private insurance often reimburses doctors at higher rates, some feel that privately insured patients receive faster access to specialist appointments.16
Research has shown that public patients may wait longer for specialists than their privately insured counterparts.16
Furthermore, while basic dental care is covered, more complex procedures can be expensive without supplementary private insurance.37
Blueprint 3: The Hybrid Grid – France’s Sécurité Sociale & Mutuelle
France employs a hybrid blueprint, blending a robust state-funded system with a near-universal private insurance market.
All legal residents are covered by the national health insurance scheme, Sécurité Sociale, which is funded primarily through social security contributions levied on salaries and other income.38
This public system is generous, typically reimbursing 70-80% of the costs for doctor visits, hospital stays, and medications.38
To cover the remaining co-payment, over 95% of the French population purchases complementary private insurance, known as a mutuelle.40
This creates a system where the state provides a strong foundation of coverage, and private insurance fills the gaps.
American expats can typically apply for state coverage after three months of stable residency.38
The patient experience is defined by the
Carte Vitale, a green health card that streamlines the reimbursement process.
For a standard GP visit, which has a regulated fee of around €25, a patient might pay upfront and be reimbursed by the state system directly into their bank account within days.39
The
mutuelle then automatically covers the rest.
This model is praised for providing universal access to high-quality care and protecting citizens from high costs.39
American travelers often share stories of receiving excellent care and prescriptions for a fraction of the U.S. cost.21
The main challenge for users is the complexity of navigating the dual system of state and private reimbursement, and ensuring their
mutuelle provides adequate coverage for their needs, particularly for dental and optical care, which have significant out-of-pocket costs without it.40
What these three blueprints reveal is that there is no single “European model.” Instead, there is a shared European philosophy.
The pain point common to these systems—waiting lists—is not an accidental failure but a deliberate design choice.
By operating on fixed budgets or tightly regulated fee schedules, these countries control the rampant price inflation that plagues the U.S. market.
With universal demand and a controlled budget, the only remaining lever to balance the equation is access.
Non-urgent care is therefore triaged and queued.
This is the fundamental trade-off: they prioritize universal financial protection over immediate access for all services.
This is the mirror image of the American trade-off, which prioritizes speed and choice for the well-insured at the cost of financial ruin and lack of access for millions.
The care is not “free”; it is a pre-paid system, but one where the terrifying financial transaction is decoupled from the moment of vulnerability and illness.
Part III: The Performance Review – A Tale of Two Investments
Return on Investment: Spending vs. Human Life
A healthcare system, at its core, is an investment in human life and well-being.
When we compare the American marketplace model with the European infrastructure models, the difference in their return on investment is not just a matter of degrees; it is a fundamental divergence in outcomes.
Despite spending nearly twice as much per person, the United States consistently achieves poorer health results than its European peers on nearly every major population health metric.10
Life Expectancy
The most basic measure of a nation’s health is how long its people live.
Here, the American deficit is stark and growing.
In 1980, life expectancy at birth in the U.S. was similar to the average of comparable countries.
Since then, while other nations have seen steady gains, the U.S. has fallen dramatically behind.42
By 2022, U.S. life expectancy had dropped to 77.5 years, nearly five years shorter than the comparable country average of 82.2 years.42
This gap was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which hit the U.S. far harder, but the trend of divergence began decades earlier.
The core reason for this gap is a significantly higher rate of premature death in the U.S. from preventable causes, including cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, substance use, and violence.10
Mortality
The tragedy of America’s underperformance is most acute in its mortality rates for the most vulnerable.
The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate among all developed nations, a figure that is a national disgrace.
In 2022, there were 22.3 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births in the U.S. The average for comparable countries was 3.9.42
A woman giving birth in the United States is nearly six times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications than her counterpart in Germany, Sweden, or Australia.
Similarly, the U.S. infant mortality rate of 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births ranks 33rd out of 38 OECD countries, well behind almost all of Europe.44
These are not just statistics; they are indictments of a system that fails to protect mothers and babies despite its immense cost.
The Paradox of Quality
This grim picture of population health contains a critical nuance.
While the U.S. system fails at producing broad public health, it excels in specific, often highly technical, areas of care.
The Commonwealth Fund’s “Mirror, Mirror” report, which ranks the U.S. last overall among high-income countries, also ranks it second on the domain of “Care Process”.45
This category measures aspects like preventative care (e.g., vaccination rates, cancer screenings) and patient safety protocols.
Furthermore, for acute, life-threatening events, the U.S. performs as well as or better than its peers.
For instance, 30-day mortality rates after a heart attack or an ischemic stroke are similar to or lower than the average in comparable countries.42
This reveals the central paradox of the American system.
Its market-based, profit-driven nature creates powerful incentives for innovation in high-cost, high-tech specialty care.
The most profitable sectors of medicine are not primary care or chronic disease management, but complex surgeries, advanced diagnostics, and new pharmaceuticals.
Capital and talent flow to these areas, resulting in world-class care for those with acute, complex problems and the insurance to access it.
However, this same incentive structure neglects the less profitable but more impactful work of population-level primary and preventative care.
The system is perfectly engineered to produce exactly the results it gets: expensive, technologically advanced rescues for some, alongside neglected public health for the many.
This explains why the U.S. can be a world leader in performing a coronary bypass while simultaneously having one of the developed world’s lowest life expectancies.
It invests in the roof while the foundation crumbles.
The different strategic importance of “preventative care” highlights this philosophical divide.
In Europe’s publicly funded systems, where the state is responsible for a citizen’s health over their entire lifetime, preventing a costly disease is a direct financial investment in the system’s long-term solvency.
This logic drives organized, population-based screening programs for cancers and other conditions, which are seen as essential public health infrastructure.46
In the U.S.’s fragmented, private insurance market, the incentives are short-term.
An insurer has little financial motivation to pay for preventative care for a 35-year-old who will likely be on a competitor’s plan by the time they are 60 and develop heart disease.
Prevention is often an “opportunistic” event, reliant on an individual’s initiative rather than a systematic public health strategy.46
Table: The Global Health Scorecard
To synthesize these complex comparisons, the following table provides an at-a-glance scorecard of the four systems across key metrics.
It serves as a visual anchor for the report’s central findings, starkly illustrating the trade-offs inherent in each nation’s approach.
| Metric | United States | United Kingdom | Germany | France |
| Funding Model | Fragmented; Private Employer-Based, Public Programs | Tax-Funded Single Payer (NHS) | Social Insurance (Sickness Funds) | Social Insurance + Complementary Private |
| Per Capita Spending (2023) | $13,432 9 | $6,023 9 | $8,441 9 | $7,136 9 |
| Spending as % of GDP | 16.7% (2023) 9 | 10.9% (2023) 47 | ~11.9% (2023) 16 | ~11.9% (2023) 16 |
| Admin. Cost per Capita | ~$925-$1,055 12 | Low (part of single-payer) | Low | Low |
| Life Expectancy (2022) | 77.5 years 42 | ~80.4 years 44 | ~80.8 years 44 | ~82.5 years (Comparable Avg. 43) |
| Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100k) | 22.3 42 | Low (Comp. Avg. 3.9) 42 | 4.1 42 | Low (Comp. Avg. 3.9) 42 |
| Primary Patient “Pain Point” | Catastrophic Cost, Medical Debt 1 | Long Wait Times for Elective Care 28 | Two-tier Access, Bureaucracy 16 | Co-payments, Navigating Mutuelle 38 |
| Primary Patient “Praise Point” | Innovation, Choice, Speed (for insured) 45 | Free at Point of Use, No Financial Fear 21 | Comprehensive Benefits, Sick Pay 33 | High Quality, Universal Access 39 |
Part IV: Conclusion – Lessons for a New American Blueprint
Beyond ‘Socialized Medicine’: Reframing the Debate
My journey through the American healthcare maze and my accidental education in Europe brought me to a final, clarifying conclusion.
The American debate about healthcare reform is paralyzed.
It is trapped in a tired, politically charged, and fundamentally false binary: a choice between our “free market” system and a monolithic, fearsome entity called “socialized medicine.” This framing is a relic of the Cold War, and it actively prevents us from having an honest conversation about what actually works.
The greatest lesson from Europe is not that America should import the NHS wholesale or adopt the German sickness fund model.
The lesson is that there are many different blueprints for success.
The true choice is not between capitalism and socialism; it is between treating healthcare as a consumer good subject to market forces or as an essential piece of public infrastructure that is a prerequisite for a healthy society and a productive economy.
Every other developed nation has chosen the latter.
America stands alone in its insistence on the former, and it is paying an enormous price in both dollars and human lives.
When I think back to the fear and powerlessness I felt staring at that anesthesiologist’s bill, I remember the feeling of being a lone consumer fighting a faceless corporation.
When I contrast that with the simple, humane response of the nurse in London—”We just want to make sure he heals properly”—I understand the difference.
One is a system of transactions.
The other is a system of values.
Principles for a Healthier Future: A New American Blueprint
Building a better American system does not require abandoning American ideals.
It requires applying our famous ingenuity and pragmatism to a new set of principles, gleaned from the successes and failures of others.
We don’t need a European blueprint; we need a new American one, founded on these four pillars:
- Principle 1: Decouple Coverage from Employment. The historical accident that tied health insurance to a job is now an economic anchor. It creates “job lock,” stifles entrepreneurship, and leaves millions vulnerable to the whims of the business cycle. A modern system must provide stable, portable coverage that follows the person, not the job.
- Principle 2: Centralize and Simplify to Control Costs. The administrative waste in the U.S. system is a multi-hundred-billion-dollar tax on inefficiency. By radically simplifying the system—standardizing billing, for instance—we can redirect those funds to actual care. More importantly, we must leverage the nation’s collective purchasing power. A single entity, or a small number of regulated ones, must be empowered to negotiate fair prices for drugs, devices, and services on behalf of the entire population, ending the era of unchecked price-gouging.
- Principle 3: Reinvest in the Foundation. We must shift our financial and intellectual focus from an over-reliance on expensive, late-stage interventions to a robust foundation of primary, preventative, and mental healthcare. This means investing in the primary care workforce, ensuring everyone has a medical home, and building the public health infrastructure needed to manage chronic diseases and prevent future pandemics. This is not only more humane; it is the most effective long-term cost-control strategy there is.
- Principle 4: Make Access Universal and Affordable. A decent society does not allow its citizens to go bankrupt or die because they get sick. The goal must be universal coverage that provides a comprehensive baseline of care for every American. This means ensuring that insurance is not just a card in a wallet, but a genuine shield against financial ruin, with meaningful limits on out-of-pocket costs.
Creating this new American blueprint will not be easy.
It will require political courage and a willingness to challenge entrenched interests.
But it is not impossible.
It is a matter of national priority.
We have the resources.
We have the talent.
We have the innovative capacity.
The question is whether we have the collective will to finally build a healthcare system that reflects our nation’s values—one that is not only the most expensive in the world, but also, finally, among the best.
Works cited
- Stories Archive – Undue Medical Debt, accessed August 7, 2025, https://unduemedicaldebt.org/stories/
- nashbio.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://nashbio.com/blog/healthcare/the-healthcare-divide-privatized-us-vs-public-european-models/#:~:text=The%20US%20has%20a%20primarily,life%20expectancy%20and%20infant%20mortality.
- The U.S. Health Care Non-System, 1908-2008 – AMA Journal of Ethics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/us-health-care-non-system-1908-2008/2008-05
- Health insurance in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_in_the_United_States
- An In-Depth History of Health Insurance in the United States – TheCollector, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.thecollector.com/history-health-insurance-united-states/
- The Evolution of Private Health Insurance: Past Issues, Future Challenges – NCBI, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK231254/
- Historical – CMS, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-reports/national-health-expenditure-data/historical
- How has U.S. spending on healthcare changed over time? – Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/u-s-spending-healthcare-changed-time/
- How does health spending in the U.S. compare to other countries?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-countries/
- U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective, 2022: Accelerating Spending, Worsening Outcomes – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/jan/us-health-care-global-perspective-2022
- How do healthcare prices and use in the U.S. compare to other countries?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/how-do-healthcare-prices-and-use-in-the-u-s-compare-to-other-countries/
- What drives health spending in the U.S. compared to other countries?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/what-drives-health-spending-in-the-u-s-compared-to-other-countries/
- U.S. Health Care Spending Highest Among Developed Countries | Johns Hopkins, accessed August 7, 2025, https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2019/us-health-care-spending-highest-among-developed-countries
- High U.S. Health Care Spending | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/oct/high-us-health-care-spending-where-is-it-all-going
- The most expensive health care system in the world | Harvard T.H. …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/the-most-expensive-health-care-system-in-the-world/
- US and European Healthcare: An Insider’s View | by Carlotta Riesser | Jun, 2025 | Medium, accessed August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@CRiesser/us-and-european-healthcare-an-insiders-view-c8ca893a7b7e
- How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries? – Peterson Foundation, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-system-compare-to-other-countries/
- A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far – PubMed, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25201663/
- Myth and Measurement: The Case of Medical Bankruptcies – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5865642/
- European vs American Healthcare: Discover the Differences … – Kona HR, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.konahr.com/american-vs-european-healthcare/
- My Readers Share Their Own European Health Care Stories – Rick Steves’ Travel Blog, accessed August 7, 2025, https://blog.ricksteves.com/blog/my-readers-share-their-own-european-health-care-stories/
- National Health Service (England) – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_(England)
- The NHS Budget And How It Has Changed | The King’s Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/nhs-budget-nutshell
- Healthcare in the UK for Americans – Experts for Expats, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.expertsforexpats.com/advice/relocation/healthcare-in-the-uk-for-americans?hsLang=en
- Using American health insurance in the UK : r/AmericanExpatsUK – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanExpatsUK/comments/zffrjt/using_american_health_insurance_in_the_uk/
- Medical care US vs UK : r/AmericanExpatsUK – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanExpatsUK/comments/1dvum1t/medical_care_us_vs_uk/
- Trying to understand NHS/health insurance : r/AmericanExpatsUK – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanExpatsUK/comments/1gqo7hx/trying_to_understand_nhshealth_insurance/
- How do waiting times compare internationally? – Q-bital Healthcare Solutions, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.q-bital.com/how-do-waiting-times-compare-internationally/
- UK Expatriate Health Insurance – Everything You Need to Know About Expat Health Insurance in the United Kingdom – Insubuy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.insubuy.com/uk-expatriate-health-insurance/
- Terrified of Medical Care! : r/AmericanExpatsUK – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanExpatsUK/comments/1leyheb/terrified_of_medical_care/
- Germany health system information, accessed August 7, 2025, https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/germany
- Understanding Health Insurance in Germany: A Guide for U.S. Expats, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.connectedfinancialplanning.com/health-insurance-germany
- Health insurance – Make it in Germany, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.make-it-in-germany.com/en/living-in-germany/money-insurance/health-insurance
- Statutory health insurance – Germany for Ukraine – Germany4Ukraine, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.germany4ukraine.de/EN/medizinische-versorgung/krankenversicherung-ukrainer/seite_node.html
- US Expats – Have you moved to a country with socialized Healthcare …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/expats/comments/gcbo9w/us_expats_have_you_moved_to_a_country_with/
- What’s your experience with german healthcare been like? : r/germany – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/1b7g4vy/whats_your_experience_with_german_healthcare_been/
- Health Insurance Germany | Expat Guide to Healthcare & More, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.expatriatehealthcare.com/country-facts/health-insurance-germany/
- Social Security – Euraxess France, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.euraxess.fr/france/information-assistance/social-security
- The French healthcare system | Expatica France, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.expatica.com/fr/healthcare/healthcare-basics/a-guide-to-the-french-healthcare-system-101166/
- France health system information, accessed August 7, 2025, https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/france
- Healthcare System in France for American Expats | Ibanista, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ibanista.com/guide-to-healthcare-system-in-france-for-american-expats/
- How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/
- What drives differences in life expectancy between the U.S. and …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/what-drives-differences-in-life-expectancy-between-the-u-s-and-comparable-countries/
- International Comparison | 2023 Annual Report | AHR – America’s Health Rankings, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2023-annual-report/international-comparison
- Health Care by Country 2024 Report | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
- USA vs Europe: Who Does Cancer Screening Better? – OncoDaily, accessed August 7, 2025, https://oncodaily.com/oncolibrary/cancer-screening-usa-vs-europe
- Key facts and figures about the NHS – The King’s Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/key-facts-figures-nhs
- The healthcare is literally why I left to the USA : r/AmericaBad – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericaBad/comments/17wkwe3/the_healthcare_is_literally_why_i_left_to_the_usa/
