The Healthcare Supermarket vs. The Community Garden: An American’s Journey from Financial Fear to Collective Care

Introduction: The Diagnosis That Changed Everything

The phone call came the day before I moved to Berlin. It was my gynecologist in the United States, her voice a calm but urgent counterpoint to the chaos of my packed life. My last pap smear, she said, showed signs of cancer. I needed to come in immediately to have the cells removed. I remember hanging up the phone, the receiver feeling impossibly heavy, and thinking with a clarity that still chills me: I will deal with that tomorrow.

My flight was in the morning. Even if I canceled it, it wouldn’t matter. I had already quit my job, and with it, my health insurance had vanished. The umbilical cord that tied me to the American healthcare system had been severed. The thought of walking into a US hospital as an uninsured person to deal with a word like “cancer” was not just frightening; it was an economic impossibility, a portal to a kind of debt from which I knew people never truly escaped.

So I got on the plane. I arrived at my Berlin Airbnb, a stranger in a new city, overwhelmed and terrified. It was Easter weekend. The city was shuttered and quiet. I felt a profound sense of helplessness, a feeling familiar to so many Americans who have found themselves at the mercy of a system that often feels designed to break you. For four straight days, I barely left my bed, my fear of the diagnosis inextricably tangled with my fear of the cost. In the American system, a medical diagnosis is never just a medical diagnosis; it is always accompanied by a second, often more terrifying, financial one.¹ The question is never simply, “How do I get well?” but “How can I possibly afford to?” This concept, which researchers call “financial toxicity,” had become my primary symptom. The potential malignancy in my body was a distant threat compared to the certain malignancy of the bill that would follow any attempt to treat it.¹ I was living out the reality that haunts millions of my compatriots: the knowledge that a single illness, a single accident, can unravel a life, leaving behind a wreckage of debt and despair.⁵

Part I: The Epiphany – A New Way of Seeing Health

On the Monday after that long, silent weekend, I finally found the courage to tell my Airbnb host my story. As I explained my situation, her eyes widened, not with pity, but with a kind of horrified urgency. “Why did you wait so long to tell me!?” she exclaimed. I explained my terror—the lack of insurance, the certainty of ruinous costs. She looked at me, a deep line of confusion creasing her brow, and as she dialed the number for her own gynecologist, she said the words that would fundamentally reframe my understanding of what healthcare could be: “You don’t have to worry about that. This isn’t America”.⁵

Despite being an uninsured foreigner who had been in the country for less than a week, the gynecologist saw me the very next day. There was no demand for a credit card, no labyrinthine intake forms about financial responsibility. The focus was entirely, and solely, on my health. The doctor performed a full examination, took blood work, and then asked if I would be willing to pay out of pocket for a high-resolution ultrasound, explaining that this specific test was not covered by the public insurance I would soon have. She told me the price upfront: €50. Six months later, after a course of treatment that left me fully healed, that €50 was all I had ever paid.⁵

That experience was my epiphany. It was a moment of profound cognitive dissonance. The relief was overwhelming, but so was the question: how could this be possible? I realized that the American healthcare system wasn’t just “expensive” or “inefficient.” It operated according to a completely different philosophy, a different logic of being. It was in trying to explain this chasm to friends back home that I developed a new paradigm, a central analogy that has since become the lens through which I understand everything.

The United States has a Healthcare Supermarket. It is a vast, dazzling, competitive marketplace. The aisles are stocked with the most advanced medical “products” in the world—cutting-edge surgeries, miraculous drugs, gleaming diagnostic machines. It champions consumerism, profit, and individual responsibility.⁷ It promises endless choice for those who can afford the price of admission. But like any supermarket, it has premium, organic aisles for the wealthy and processed, budget options for the rest. And, most critically, it is surrounded by vast

healthcare deserts—entire communities where the shelves are bare, where fresh, nutritious care is simply unavailable, leaving millions to subsist on the equivalent of junk food, or to go hungry.¹⁰

Germany, I came to understand, has a Community Health Garden. It is a shared resource, cultivated by every member of the community through mandatory, income-based contributions, for the well-being of all. The goal is not profit or variety for its own sake, but sustainability, collective responsibility, and ensuring that everyone—regardless of their wealth or health status—has access to the harvest.¹² It is a system built not on transactions, but on a principle of

solidarity (Solidarität), a foundational pillar of the social contract.¹²

This report, therefore, will argue that the profound differences in cost, access, and outcomes between the United States and Germany are not merely matters of policy but are the direct, logical consequences of these two opposing philosophical models. The core of the debate is not about which system has better doctors or more advanced machines, but about whether a society chooses to treat healthcare as a commodity to be purchased in a marketplace or as a collective good to be nurtured in a community garden. The answer to that single question determines everything that follows.

Part II: The Healthcare Supermarket: Aisle by Aisle Through the US System

Chapter 1: The Illusion of Choice & The Price of Admission

The foundational promise of the American Healthcare Supermarket is “choice.” It is a concept held up as a sacred value, the singular way to honor autonomy and individual preference in one’s own care.⁸ Yet, for the vast majority of Americans, this choice is a carefully constructed illusion, a marketing slogan that masks a reality of profound systemic constraints and hidden costs. The journey through this supermarket begins not with a free selection, but with a complex and often perilous calculation of what one can actually afford to put in the cart.

The Employer-Based Aisles: A Golden Cage

For roughly half of all Americans, the “choice” of health insurance is made for them before they ever enter the store.¹⁶ Their access to healthcare is tethered to their job. This system of employer-sponsored insurance is not the result of a grand, deliberate design, but rather a series of historical accidents and policy quirks. During World War II, federal wage and price controls prevented companies from offering higher salaries to attract scarce labor. Instead, they began offering fringe benefits, including health insurance.⁹ The National Labor Relations Board ruled that these benefits were a legitimate subject for union bargaining, and a subsequent IRS decision made employer contributions tax-deductible for the company and non-taxable as income for the employee.¹⁸

This confluence of events cemented the role of the employer as the primary purveyor of health coverage in the United States. While this provides a veneer of security for those with stable, full-time employment at large companies, it creates a golden cage. The “choice” is limited to the handful of plans the employer has negotiated, and the constant threat of job loss means the simultaneous loss of healthcare access. It is a system that inextricably links a person’s physical well-being to their economic productivity, a precarious foundation for a healthy society.

The Marketplace and Public Aisles: Navigating the Tiers

For those outside the employer-based system—the self-employed, the unemployed, the gig worker—the supermarket offers other aisles, each with its own set of rules and price points. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) created health insurance marketplaces, a section of the store where individuals can theoretically shop for plans.¹⁷ Yet this “shopping” experience is notoriously complex. Consumers are faced with a bewildering array of plans—Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum—each with different premiums, deductibles, copayments, and provider networks. Research has shown that, even with subsidies, many people struggle to choose wisely among these options, often picking plans that are ill-suited to their needs or financial situations.⁸

Separate from this are the public aisles: Medicare for the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid for the low-income.¹⁷ These programs are crucial safety nets, but they operate as distinct, often siloed, sections of the supermarket. They have different eligibility requirements, cover different services, and are subject to constant political pressure and state-level variations. This fragmentation means that a person’s access to care can change dramatically based on their age, income, disability status, or even the state they live in, creating a confusing patchwork rather than a coherent system.

The Hidden Price Tags: The Staggering Cost of Entry

Regardless of which aisle a consumer shops in, one feature of the American Healthcare Supermarket is consistent: the exorbitant price. The United States spends a staggering amount on healthcare, dwarfing every other developed nation on Earth. In 2023, US health expenditures per person were $13,432, more than $3,700 higher than the next closest country and nearly double the average of comparable wealthy nations ($7,393).²¹ Germany, by comparison, spent roughly $8,441 per person.²¹ This spending amounts to nearly 18% of the entire US Gross Domestic Product (GDP), again, almost twice the average of its peers.²¹

This astronomical spending is not because Americans use more healthcare; in fact, they visit physicians less frequently than people in most other high-income countries.²² The primary driver is price. The market-based system, with its fragmented payers and powerful provider monopolies, has led to inflated prices for everything from prescription drugs and diagnostic tests to hospital stays.²³ Without a centralized body to negotiate prices, as exists in Germany and other nations, providers and pharmaceutical companies can effectively charge what the market will bear. The result is a system where the price of admission is breathtakingly high, a cost borne by employers, the government, and ultimately, by every American family through premiums, taxes, and out-of-pocket expenses.

Surprise! Your Cart is Full of Hidden Fees

Perhaps the most uniquely cruel feature of the Healthcare Supermarket is the “surprise bill.” It is the equivalent of filling your grocery cart, going to the checkout, and discovering that the milk is ten times the price you thought and the cashier is charging you an extra “shelf-stocking fee” you never agreed to.

This phenomenon arises from the fractured nature of provider networks. A patient can do their due diligence, choosing an “in-network” hospital for a surgery, only to be treated by an out-of-network anesthesiologist or radiologist who happens to be on duty that day.³ Because that specialist does not have a contract with the patient’s insurance plan, they are free to bill the patient directly for the full, undiscounted cost of their services—a practice known as “balance billing”.³ The insurance company pays its (lower) out-of-network rate, and the patient is left on the hook for the balance, which can amount to thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars.

In 2017, it was estimated that 18% of all emergency room visits and 16% of in-network hospital stays for people with large employer health plans resulted in at least one out-of-network charge.³ This constant, pervasive risk creates a state of financial anxiety for patients. The federal

No Surprises Act, which took effect in 2022, was designed to protect patients from some of the most egregious forms of surprise billing, particularly in emergency situations and for ancillary services at in-network facilities.²⁷ While a crucial step, the law is a legislative patch applied to a fundamentally broken structure. It attempts to regulate the most predatory outcomes of the market system without changing the market logic itself. The very fact that such a law is necessary reveals a profound truth about the American system: the “choice” it offers is a dangerous illusion, a complex and risky burden placed on a consumer who lacks the information, power, and often the consciousness to make a truly free and informed decision in a system designed for profit, not for their protection.

Chapter 2: Premium Brands and Barren Shelves – The Geography of Access

The American Healthcare Supermarket is not a uniform landscape. Like a national grocery chain, it strategically places its flagship stores, with their gleaming aisles and premium organic produce, in affluent neighborhoods where customers have the purchasing power to support them. In other areas, the shelves are sparsely stocked, the produce is wilted, and in some communities, the store has closed down altogether, leaving behind a “food desert.” This same logic of market-driven allocation governs the distribution of healthcare in the United States, creating a stark geography of access and abandonment that is reflected in the nation’s deeply inequitable health outcomes.

The Uninsured Aisle: Left Outside the Store

The most glaring feature of this geography is the population left outside the supermarket doors entirely. The United States is the only wealthy, industrialized nation in the world that does not guarantee universal health coverage to its citizens.¹⁷ In 2021, 8.6% of the population—millions of men, women, and children—were uninsured.²² For this group, the supermarket is a place they can look at but not enter. Routine care is an unaffordable luxury, and a medical emergency is a catastrophe.

The consequences are predictable and devastating. Lacking the financial means to pay for care, the uninsured often delay or forgo it altogether. A 2025 poll found that a staggering 75% of uninsured adults under 65 had skipped or postponed needed care in the past year because of the cost.² This avoidance of care means that manageable conditions like hypertension or diabetes go untreated, evolving into life-threatening emergencies. It is a system that ensures a steady supply of sicker, more expensive patients for the nation’s emergency rooms, the one place that cannot, by law, turn them away.

Healthcare Deserts: Zones of Scarcity

The market-based model naturally directs resources toward profit. Providing care to affluent, well-insured populations is a reliable business model; serving poor, uninsured, or publicly insured (with lower reimbursement rates) populations is not. This economic reality has created vast “healthcare deserts” across the country, directly analogous to the food deserts found in low-income urban and rural areas.¹⁰

These deserts manifest in multiple ways. Rural America has been particularly hard-hit, with hundreds of hospital closures over the past two decades, leaving entire communities without local access to emergency or inpatient care. But the most pervasive desert is in the realm of mental healthcare. The United States is facing a severe and worsening shortage of mental health professionals.¹¹ As of late 2021, an estimated 130 million people lived in a federally designated Mental Health Care Health Professional Shortage Area.¹¹ The crisis is particularly acute in rural regions, but even in urban centers, finding an available and affordable psychiatrist, psychologist, or therapist who is in-network can be an odyssey of months-long waiting lists and endless phone calls.³² This scarcity means that for millions suffering from depression, anxiety, and other serious mental illnesses, the “mental health aisle” of the supermarket is effectively empty.

This system functions as a powerful sorting mechanism. It concentrates the highest quality resources—the top-ranked hospitals, the most sought-after specialists, the latest technologies—on the healthiest and wealthiest segments of the population. Simultaneously, it creates zones of scarcity and neglect for the most vulnerable. This is not a bug in the system; it is the logical outcome of a market-driven philosophy. The result is a self-perpetuating cycle: lack of access leads to poorer health outcomes, which makes a population less “profitable” to serve, further discouraging investment and exacerbating the desertification of care.

Disparities in Outcomes: The Price of Neglect

The ultimate measure of a healthcare system is the health of its people. By this standard, the American Healthcare Supermarket is a catastrophic failure, producing some of the worst health outcomes in the developed world despite its astronomical price tag. The geography of access translates directly into a geography of life and death.

The statistics are a damning indictment. Life expectancy in the U.S., at 77.5 years in 2022, is nearly five years shorter than the average in comparable countries (82.2 years).³⁴ This gap has widened significantly in recent decades.²² The U.S. has the highest rate of avoidable deaths among its peers—deaths that could have been prevented through effective public health measures and timely medical care.²²

Nowhere are the system’s inequities more apparent than in its mortality rates. The U.S. maternal mortality rate is a national shame, standing at 22.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2022. This is more than five times the average of comparable countries (3.9) and is tragically higher than that of nations with far fewer resources.²² The infant mortality rate tells a similar story: at 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, the U.S. ranks near the bottom of its high-income peers.²²

These national averages mask even deeper disparities within the country. The system’s sorting mechanism is starkly visible along lines of race and income. In 2019, the average life expectancy for a non-Hispanic Black American was 74.8 years, four years lower than for a non-Hispanic white American (78.8 years). For a non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, it was a shocking 71.8 years—seven years lower.²² These are not just statistics; they are the final, unassailable evidence of a system that allocates not just care, but years of life, based on wealth, geography, and the color of one’s skin. The premium brands are reserved for a select few, while for millions, the shelves are tragically, and fatally, bare.

Chapter 3: The Self-Checkout Maze – The Burden of Being a Patient

In a well-designed system, the user experience should be intuitive, supportive, and oriented toward success. In the American Healthcare Supermarket, the experience of the “user”—the patient—is anything but. After navigating the treacherous aisles of access and cost, the patient arrives at the self-checkout, only to find a bewildering maze of paperwork, confusing rules, and hostile automated attendants. The system places an immense administrative, cognitive, and emotional burden on the very people who are least equipped to handle it: the sick, the injured, and the frightened. This burden transforms the act of receiving care into a grueling second job, and the patient from a recipient of care into a litigant in a complex, adversarial process.

The Adversarial Relationship with Insurers

For many Americans, the relationship with their health insurance company is not one of partnership, but of conflict. The industry’s business model is predicated on managing costs, which often translates into denying or delaying care. The “prior authorization” process is a prime example. Before a doctor can perform a certain procedure, prescribe a specific medication, or order a test, they must first obtain permission from the patient’s insurer. This process, intended to curb unnecessary spending, has become a bureaucratic nightmare that creates profound stress and dangerous delays in care. A staggering 94% of physicians surveyed by the American Medical Association reported that prior authorization requirements have delayed access to necessary care, with one in four stating that these delays led to a serious or life-threatening medical event for a patient.³⁶

When care is delivered, the battle is often just beginning. Insurance claim denials are rampant. While precise numbers are difficult to obtain due to the fragmented nature of the system, some estimates suggest that 10% to 20% of all health insurance claims are denied each year.³⁷ Patients receive letters informing them that a life-saving hospitalization was deemed “not medically necessary,” or that a critical scan was rejected, leaving them with bills for tens of thousands of dollars.³⁷

The appeals process is an exhausting war of attrition. It involves hours spent on hold, navigating phone trees, writing letters, and gathering documentation—all while trying to recover from an illness.³⁷ One physician described watching a colleague go from a compassionate healer to a “burnt-out shell” over a decade, spending more time arguing with insurance companies than seeing patients.³⁹ This adversarial dynamic poisons the well of trust and turns the pursuit of health into a fight against the very entities meant to facilitate it.

The Rise of the Patient Advocate: A Symptom of Systemic Failure

The most powerful evidence of the system’s hostility toward its users is the emergence of an entire profession dedicated to helping people survive it: the patient advocate. In a functional system, such a role would be redundant. In the American system, it is a lifeline.⁴⁰

Patient advocates are paid guides hired to navigate the healthcare maze. Their duties reveal the system’s myriad failures. They help patients set up appointments, find second opinions, and understand their diagnosis. But their most critical functions are adversarial: they negotiate medical bills, review them for errors, and resolve disputes between patients and their insurance companies.⁴¹ They are part translator, part case manager, and part legal counsel. Non-profit organizations like the Patient Advocate Foundation exist solely to help people with serious illnesses fight for and pay for their prescribed care.⁴²

The very existence of this profession transforms the patient’s role. They are no longer simply a person in need of healing. They are now a client in a complex case, a litigant in a dispute who requires professional representation. The need for an advocate is a glaring symptom of a system that is not designed for the patient’s ease of use. It is a system so convoluted, so opaque, and so fraught with financial peril that sick individuals cannot be expected to navigate it alone. It is a tacit admission of systemic failure, a multi-billion dollar industry built on the premise that the healthcare system is fundamentally broken.

The Mental Health Toll of Navigation

The constant stress of this navigation—the fear of denial, the endless paperwork, the frustrating phone calls, the fight for care—takes a heavy toll on a patient’s mental health. It is a significant and often overlooked comorbidity of being sick in America. The process itself can be traumatizing, creating what some have called “moral injury” as patients are made to feel powerless and devalued by a system that is supposed to care for them.⁴⁴

This burden is especially heavy for those already struggling with mental illness. People with mental health conditions are more likely to face barriers to accessing care, from affordability issues to the lingering stigma they perceive from healthcare professionals.³² For them, navigating the system is not just frustrating; it can be an insurmountable obstacle that exacerbates their condition.

Even for the physically ill, the experience can be deeply damaging. One physician, writing about her experience caring for her own stepmother with dementia, described the process as a “series of roadblocks” and “frustration and desperation.” She noted how the views and observations of caregivers and family are often discounted or dismissed by medical staff, a well-known patient safety issue.⁴⁵ When the system treats you as an obstacle rather than a partner, it adds a layer of emotional and psychological harm to the physical ailment, making the journey to recovery that much harder. The self-checkout maze is not just inefficient; it is actively injurious to the health of those forced to run it.

Chapter 4: When the Bill Comes Due – The Crushing Weight of Medical Debt

The final, and perhaps most devastating, stage of the American Healthcare Supermarket experience is the checkout. After surviving the illness and the arduous journey of navigating the system, the patient is presented with the bill. For millions of Americans, this is not a simple transaction but the beginning of a long-term financial crisis. The bill that comes due is often unpayable, leading to a cascade of consequences—debt, bankruptcy, and a desperate rationing of future care—that can be as debilitating as the original medical condition itself. In the United States, medical debt is not just a financial problem; it is a chronic public health disease.

The Debt Spiral

The scale of America’s medical debt crisis is immense. More than 100 million adults nationwide are struggling with healthcare-related debt.⁴⁶ A 2021 survey found that the American people owe at least $220 billion in medical debt.⁴⁷ This is not a problem confined to the uninsured. While the uninsured are highly vulnerable, a KFF poll found that four in ten adults—including a substantial number of insured individuals—reported having debt due to medical or dental bills.² The structure of American insurance, with its high deductibles, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket maximums, means that even a “good” plan can leave a family with thousands of dollars in bills after a serious medical event.⁴

This debt is not an abstract number on a balance sheet; it has profound, real-world consequences. People with medical debt report cutting spending on food, clothing, and other basic necessities. They drain their savings, borrow from family and friends, or take on high-interest credit card debt to pay hospital bills.² The debt follows them, damaging their credit scores, which in turn affects their ability to secure a loan, buy a car, or even find a job.⁴ The constant stress of collection calls and threatening letters creates a state of perpetual anxiety, a mental burden that weighs on every aspect of life.⁴⁶

Medical Bankruptcy: The Final Consequence

For many, the debt spiral ends in bankruptcy. Study after study has identified medical bills as a leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States.¹ One prominent 2019 study estimated that medical illness and the associated costs are linked to approximately 530,000 bankruptcies filed each year.¹ Again, this is not a crisis of the uninsured. The majority of people who file for bankruptcy due to medical bills have health insurance; their coverage is simply inadequate to protect them from the catastrophic costs of the American system.¹

The stories are heartbreakingly similar. A woman with cancer finds out her in-network hospital stay was not fully covered and is left with hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills.¹ A man with diabetes loses his job after a leg amputation, cannot afford COBRA, and ends up with over $400,000 in medical bills, homeless and living on the street.¹ A young woman with a seizure disorder is pushed into bankruptcy by a single $1,000 bill for a routine lab test that her insurance mistakenly refused to cover.¹ These are not stories of financial irresponsibility; they are stories of a healthcare system that has become a primary driver of financial ruin.

Rationing Care: The Silent Epidemic

The fear of this crushing debt creates a silent and deadly epidemic of self-rationing. Faced with high costs, millions of Americans make the impossible choice to delay or forgo the care they need. About one-third of all adults—and a shocking three-quarters of the uninsured—report having skipped or postponed health care in the past year due to cost.² This includes skipping doctor-recommended tests and treatments.

This rationing extends to life-saving medications. About one in five adults has not filled a prescription because of the cost, while a similar number have cut pills in half or skipped doses to make their medicine last longer.² This is a particularly acute problem for those with chronic conditions like diabetes, where consistent access to insulin is a matter of life and death. Studies show that up to 26% of adults with diabetes engage in cost-related insulin rationing, a practice linked to increased emergency room visits and hospitalizations.⁴⁹

This behavior creates a vicious cycle. Skipping a checkup or a prescription to save money today often leads to a worsening of the condition, resulting in a much more serious—and expensive—medical crisis down the road.² The story of Deamonte Driver, a 12-year-old boy on Medicaid, is a tragic illustration. His family could not find a dentist who would accept his insurance for a routine $80 tooth extraction. The untreated infection spread to his brain, leading to two brain surgeries and a six-week hospital stay that cost approximately $250,000. In the end, he died.⁵⁰

This is the ultimate logic of the Healthcare Supermarket. It is a system where access is rationed by the ability to pay. This rationing is not always explicit, but it is pervasive and deadly. Medical debt, therefore, functions as its own chronic condition. It has long-term, debilitating effects on a person’s financial, mental, and physical health. It has symptoms (financial hardship, anxiety), requires ongoing management (payment plans, credit repair), and leads to severe comorbidities, including the worsening of the very physical illnesses that caused it. It is a disease inflicted by the system itself.

Part III: The Community Health Garden: Tending to the German System

Chapter 5: Planting the Seeds of Solidarity – The Bismarckian Blueprint

To understand the German healthcare system is to step out of the transactional logic of the supermarket and into the communal ethos of a garden. It is a system founded not on principles of market competition and consumer choice, but on a deeply ingrained concept of social solidarity. Its architecture, funding, and core purpose are all oriented toward a different goal: not to sell a product, but to cultivate a collective good. This philosophy can be traced back to its very roots in the 19th century, in a political project designed to bind a new nation together through shared responsibility.

The Bismarckian Roots: Healthcare as Social Engineering

The German system is the world’s oldest national social health insurance program, and its origins are revealing. It was created in the 1880s by the “Iron Chancellor,” Otto von Bismarck.⁵¹ Bismarck was no progressive social reformer; he was a canny conservative statesman facing a rising tide of socialism among the industrial working class. His solution was a form of “revolutionary conservatism”: to co-opt the socialists’ demands for social protection by creating a state-run welfare system.⁵³

By enacting the Health Insurance Bill of 1883, followed by accident, old age, and disability insurance, Bismarck tied the German worker’s security directly to the state and to their status as a productive member of society.⁵¹ This was a masterstroke of social engineering. It was designed to foster social cohesion, quell unrest, and build a sense of collective identity in the newly unified German Empire.⁵³ The foundational principle was

solidarity (Solidarität). This was not just about charity or helping the sick; it was about creating a system of mutual dependence where everyone had a stake in the well-being of the whole community. This historical context is crucial: from its inception, German healthcare was conceived not as an economic good, but as a foundational pillar of the social contract and a tool for national stability.¹²

How the Garden is Funded: The Logic of Collective Contribution

The funding mechanism of the German “community garden” flows directly from this philosophy of solidarity. Unlike the American system of individual, risk-rated premiums, the German system is financed primarily through mandatory, income-based contributions.¹²

Every employed person in Germany under a certain high-income threshold (currently €73,800 per year as of 2025) is required to be a member of the public health insurance system.⁵⁶ They pay a fixed percentage of their gross salary (currently around 14.6%, plus a small supplementary premium) into one of roughly 100 non-profit “sickness funds” (

Krankenkassen).⁵⁵ This contribution is split equally between the employee and the employer, reinforcing the idea of shared responsibility.⁵⁵

This model has several profound implications. First, the cost of insurance is not based on an individual’s health status or risk profile, but on their ability to pay. A young, healthy CEO and an older factory worker with a chronic illness both pay the same percentage of their income (up to a contribution ceiling). Second, risk is pooled across the entire society, making the system incredibly stable. Third, and perhaps most importantly, dependents—non-earning spouses and children—are covered for free under a family member’s plan.⁵⁶ This single policy decision embodies the “community garden” ethos: the health of the family unit is a collective responsibility, not an individual financial burden. The system is designed to ensure that everyone who is part of the community gets to share in the harvest.

Public vs. Private: A Two-Tiered Garden

The German system is not, however, a monolithic single-payer model. It is a dual system that allows for a private alternative. Approximately 90% of the population is covered by the public statutory health insurance (Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung, GKV).¹⁶ The remaining 10-11%—primarily high-income earners, the self-employed, and civil servants—can opt out of the GKV and purchase private health insurance (

Private Krankenversicherung, PKV).⁵⁵

Private insurance premiums are risk-rated, based on age and health status, and can be cheaper for young, healthy individuals.⁵⁶ This creates a two-tiered system that is a source of ongoing debate and tension in Germany. Those with private insurance often enjoy perks like faster access to specialist appointments, as doctors can charge higher fees for their services, and more comfortable hospital rooms.¹³

While the quality of medical care is legally required to be the same, the difference in access creates a perception of inequality. Critics argue that it allows the wealthiest and healthiest members of society to opt out of the solidarity-based public system, weakening its financial base. Nonetheless, the system’s mandatory nature ensures that everyone is covered by one path or the other. Unlike the American supermarket, where millions are left outside, in the German garden, everyone is required to have a plot, ensuring that the principle of universal access, the seed planted by Bismarck over a century ago, remains the defining feature of the landscape.

Chapter 6: Tending to the Whole Person, For Life

The German “Community Health Garden” is designed not just to treat acute problems—the sudden pest or blight—but to nurture the long-term health of its members throughout their entire life course. The system’s architecture reflects a proactive philosophy of managing predictable life risks through collective insurance mechanisms. It anticipates the challenges of temporary illness, chronic disease, and old age, and builds structures to support individuals through these phases. This contrasts sharply with the American system, which is largely reactive, treating health events as discrete, insurable incidents rather than as part of a continuous human journey.

Beyond the Doctor’s Visit: The Security of Sick Leave

One of the most significant ways the German system supports the whole person is by decoupling a health crisis from a financial one through its robust sickness benefit (Krankengeld). In the United States, sick leave is an employment benefit, often limited and unpaid, forcing many to choose between their health and their paycheck. In Germany, it is an integrated part of the social security system.⁶⁰

When an employee in Germany falls ill, their employer is legally required to continue paying their full salary for the first six weeks.⁶¹ If the illness persists beyond that, the employee’s health insurance fund takes over, paying approximately 70% of their gross salary for up to 78 weeks (a year and a half).⁶⁰ This single provision provides an immense sense of security. It means that a serious illness, a major surgery, or a period of severe burnout does not automatically trigger a financial catastrophe. It allows individuals the time and space to recover without the terror of losing their income and home. This contributes significantly to a better work-life balance and a lower level of societal stress, as the predictable risk of getting sick is managed collectively.⁶⁰

Caring for the Elderly: The Pflegeversicherung Promise

Perhaps the clearest expression of Germany’s life-course approach is its mandatory, universal long-term care insurance (Pflegeversicherung or LTCI). Recognizing the demographic certainty of an aging population, Germany proactively addressed the challenge of elder care by establishing this system in 1995 as a fourth pillar of its social insurance structure, alongside health, unemployment, and pension insurance.⁵²

Like health insurance, LTCI is funded by mandatory payroll contributions shared by employers and employees.⁶² It provides benefits to any resident who requires assistance with the activities of daily living, whether that care is provided in a nursing home or, preferably, in their own home.⁶² This universal system pools the financial risk of aging across the entire population. It prevents the all-too-common American tragedy of elderly individuals being forced to spend down their entire life savings to qualify for Medicaid-funded nursing home care.⁶² While the German system faces its own sustainability challenges with a shrinking workforce, its existence provides a level of dignity and security in old age that is simply absent in the fragmented, expensive, and often impoverishing US approach to long-term care.⁶⁴

Managing Chronic Illness: The Structure of Disease Management Programs (DMPs)

For the growing number of people living with chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, or asthma, the German system offers structured Disease Management Programs (DMPs). Introduced in 2002, these programs are a departure from the fee-for-service model and aim to provide coordinated, evidence-based, long-term care.⁶⁶

Patients enrolled in a DMP work with their physician to establish therapy goals and create an individual treatment plan. The programs emphasize patient education and self-management, empowering individuals to take an active role in their own health.⁶⁶ They also facilitate more efficient, coordinated care between general practitioners, specialists, and hospitals, addressing one of the key weaknesses of a fragmented system.⁶⁶ By June 2020, over 7 million people were enrolled in DMPs covering a wide range of conditions.⁶⁶ While the system is not perfect, the DMPs represent a systematic, nationwide effort to manage chronic illness proactively, a stark contrast to the often chaotic and uncoordinated experience of chronically ill patients in the US system.

A Culture of Prevention and Patient Rights

Underpinning these structural elements is a cultural emphasis on prevention and patient rights. The German system places a high value on ensuring patients are comprehensively informed about their conditions and treatment options, and are actively involved in decisions about their care.²³ Doctors are expected to spend time counseling their patients. Citizens have a legal right to early detection screenings for chronic diseases, and insurance funds are required to inform their members about available preventive measures.⁶⁸ While patient surveys indicate a public desire for an even stronger focus on prevention ⁶⁹, the principle is embedded in the system’s DNA. This life-course philosophy—managing risk from cradle to grave—is the essence of the Community Health Garden. It is a system designed not just to react to problems as they arise, but to tend to the health of its members continuously, ensuring the entire community remains as resilient and healthy as possible.

Chapter 7: The Shared Harvest – The Fruits and Weeds of a Collective Approach

No system is a utopia, and the German Community Health Garden is no exception. While its collective, solidarity-based approach yields a rich harvest of security and predictability for its members, the garden is not without its weeds. The lived experience of navigating German healthcare is a complex tapestry of profound benefits and significant frustrations. A balanced assessment reveals a system that excels at protecting its citizens from financial catastrophe but can sometimes fall short in the more personal, human dimensions of care.

The Harvest: Security, Predictability, and Peace of Mind

The single greatest fruit of the German system is financial peace of mind. The fear of medical bankruptcy, a constant, low-grade fever in American life, is virtually nonexistent in Germany.⁶ Because the system is funded through predictable, income-based contributions and has strict caps on out-of-pocket costs (2% of household income, or 1% for the chronically ill), patients are shielded from the financial toxicity that defines the US experience.⁵⁵

This security is thrown into sharpest relief during major life events. The experience of childbirth is a powerful example. In the United States, even with “good” insurance, a delivery can easily result in thousands of dollars of out-of-pocket costs.⁷⁰ In Germany, the entire process—from prenatal checkups and birthing classes to the delivery and postpartum care—is almost entirely free for those in the public system.⁷⁰ One American mother living in Germany recounted paying about $3,000 for her son’s birth in the US, while for her two births in Germany, her only expenses were for hospital parking and a voluntary upgrade to a private room.⁷⁰ Another described a high-risk pregnancy, a C-section, and a week-long NICU stay for her baby that cost her a grand total of “NOTHING”.⁷³ This is the harvest of solidarity: the ability to welcome a new life or face a health crisis without the accompanying terror of financial ruin.

The Weeds: Bureaucracy and the Long Wait

However, the garden is also tangled with the weeds of bureaucracy and delay. A common complaint among both Germans and expats is the frustration of navigating the system’s administrative requirements and, most notably, the long waiting times for specialist appointments.⁷⁴

While access to a general practitioner (GP or Hausarzt) is generally quick, getting a referral to a specialist like a dermatologist or pulmonologist can mean waiting for weeks or even months, particularly for patients in the public insurance system.¹³ This is a point of significant friction and a key area where the two-tiered nature of the system becomes apparent, as privately insured patients can often get appointments much faster.⁷⁸ Patients recount feeling dismissed or unheard by GPs, struggling to get the referrals they feel they need, and having to be relentlessly assertive to get timely care.⁷⁵ One foreigner described waiting over an hour for a dermatologist appointment, only to spend a mere 40 seconds with the doctor, leaving them feeling rushed and unheard.⁷⁵

The Patient-Doctor Relationship: A Different Dynamic

This feeling of being rushed points to a fundamental difference in the patient-doctor relationship. The American system, for all its flaws, operates in a competitive market where “customer service” is a key metric. This can lead to a more communicative and accommodating bedside manner. The German system, as a social utility, is more focused on efficiency and adequacy. Doctors, paid through regulated fee schedules, may seem more direct, less empathetic, and more dismissive of patient concerns than their American counterparts.⁷⁵

International surveys bear this out, revealing a fascinating paradox. While Germans are far more secure in the system’s affordability, they are often less satisfied with the interpersonal aspects of their care. A 2008 Commonwealth Fund survey of sicker adults found that German patients were less likely than Americans to report that their doctor discussed treatment goals, provided a written care plan, or contacted them after an appointment to check on their well-being.⁸⁰ Only 34% of German respondents rated their care as “excellent” or “very good,” compared to 55% in the US.⁸⁰ This suggests an inverse relationship between financial satisfaction and interpersonal satisfaction in the two systems. Americans are often more satisfied with their individual doctors but terrified of the system’s cost; Germans are secure in the system’s cost but less satisfied with the personal experience of care.

The Mental Health Challenge: A Shared Struggle

Finally, it is crucial to note that on one of the most pressing health challenges of our time—mental healthcare—the German garden struggles as much as the American supermarket. Germany faces a significant gap between the demand for and supply of mental health services, leading to extremely long waiting lists for therapy, often lasting many months.³³

The system is fragmented, with poor coordination between inpatient, outpatient, and community services, leaving the most severely ill patients to fall through the cracks.⁸¹ While the financial barriers are lower than in the US, the access barriers are just as formidable. Patients describe a difficult, bureaucratic path to getting treatment, and a system where those with less severe problems may get quicker access to resources than those in desperate need.³³ This shared failure underscores a global truth: that building a healthcare system that effectively and humanely cares for the mind is a challenge that transcends any single model. Even in a well-tended garden, some areas remain stubbornly difficult to cultivate.

Part IV: A Comparative Analysis: The Tale of the Tape

To fully grasp the profound divergence between the American Healthcare Supermarket and the German Community Health Garden, it is essential to move beyond narrative and examine the cold, hard data. The following tables provide a direct, side-by-side comparison of the two systems across the critical domains of finance, health outcomes, and the lived experience of care. This quantitative analysis makes the abstract concepts of “financial toxicity” and “social solidarity” tangible, revealing the real-world consequences of each nation’s chosen philosophy.

Table 1: The Bottom Line: System Funding & Costs at a Glance (US vs. Germany)

This table quantifies the immense financial differences between the two systems. It demonstrates not only that the US spends vastly more, but that it places a far greater and more unpredictable financial burden directly onto its citizens. This data provides the foundational evidence for the high-price, high-risk nature of the “supermarket” model compared to the predictable, collective-cost model of the “garden.”

Metric	United States (The Supermarket)	Germany (The Garden)
Total Health Expenditure (% of GDP)	~17.8% 22	~11.7% 16
Health Expenditure per Capita (2023)	$13,432 21	$8,441 21
Primary Funding Source	A complex mix: Private insurance premiums (often via employers), direct out-of-pocket payments, and general taxation for public programs (Medicare/Medicaid).7	Mandatory social security contributions, shared equally by employers and employees, pooled in non-profit “sickness funds” (Krankenkassen).12
Share of Population Uninsured	~8.6% (2021) 22	<0.1% (2019) 82
Patient Cost-Sharing Burden	High and unpredictable: significant deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and the risk of “surprise” balance bills from out-of-network providers.3	Low and predictable: Small copayments (e.g., €5-10 for prescriptions, €10/day for hospital stays), with an annual cap at 2% of household income (1% for the chronically ill).55
Prevalence of Medical Debt/Bankruptcy	Widespread. Tens of millions of adults have medical debt.47 Medical bills are a leading contributor to personal bankruptcy, even for the insured.1	Virtually nonexistent. The system’s structure of capped, income-based contributions and low cost-sharing prevents medical-induced financial ruin.6

Table 2: The Human Toll: Key Health Outcomes & Access Metrics (US vs. Germany)

This table directly challenges the notion that higher spending equates to better health. Despite its world-leading expenditures, the United States consistently underperforms Germany and other peer nations on key indicators of population health. This data demonstrates a profound inefficiency in the American system—high financial input yields tragically low health output—and supports the argument that the German model’s focus on universal access produces a healthier society.

Metric	United States (The Supermarket)	Germany (The Garden)
Life Expectancy at Birth (2021/2022)	76.4 – 77.5 years 34	80.8 years 35
Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000 live births, 2022)	22.3 34	4.1 34
Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births, 2021)	5.4 35	Lower than US, comparable to OECD average of 4.0 34
Avoidable Deaths (Rate per 100,000)	Highest rate among all comparable countries analyzed.22	Significantly lower than the US rate.22
Physician Visits per Capita (per year)	4.0 (below OECD average) 22	Higher than the US; more frequent access to primary care.22
Wait Times for Specialist Appointment	Highly variable. Can be very short for those with premium private insurance, but access can be difficult and wait times long for others, especially in “healthcare deserts”.11	Generally longer than the US for publicly insured patients, a common source of frustration. Weeks or months for non-urgent specialist care is common.13

Table 3: The Lived Experience: A Comparative Snapshot (Childbirth, Chronic & Mental Health)

This table translates the high-level data from the preceding tables into three tangible, real-world scenarios. It illustrates how the systemic differences in philosophy and funding play out in the lives of individuals during critical moments of need, providing a concrete summary of the qualitative and narrative evidence presented in the report.

Life Event / Condition	United States (The Supermarket)	Germany (The Garden)
Childbirth	Cost: Thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expenses are common, even with insurance.70	Postpartum Care: Typically a single 6-week checkup. Further support relies on personal networks.70	Parental Leave: No federal mandate for paid leave. Often short, unpaid, or dependent on employer policy.70	Cost: Virtually free under public insurance; minimal fees for optional private rooms.70	Postpartum Care: Extensive home visits from a midwife are standard and covered by insurance.70	Parental Leave: Generous, state-supported paid leave for up to a year or more.70
Chronic Illness Management	System Approach: Fragmented and reactive. Care is often uncoordinated between multiple specialists. The patient bears the burden of managing their own care and fighting for coverage.45	Financial Protection: High cost-sharing, deductibles, and prescription costs can lead to rationing of care and significant debt.2	System Approach: Proactive and structured. Disease Management Programs (DMPs) provide coordinated, evidence-based care and patient education.66	Financial Protection: Out-of-pocket costs are capped at 1% of annual income, removing financial barriers to consistent care.55
Mental Healthcare Access	Key Challenge: A trifecta of barriers: severe provider shortages, high costs, and restrictive insurance networks make finding care extremely difficult.11	Patient Burden: The primary struggle is finding a provider who is available, affordable, and in-network.44	Key Challenge: A severe shortage of therapists leads to extremely long waiting lists (many months) for covered psychotherapy.33	Patient Burden: The primary struggle is enduring the long wait for an available, publicly-funded therapist slot.81

Conclusion: From Consumer to Community Member

My journey began with a terrifying phone call that plunged me into the heart of the American healthcare paradox: the paralyzing fear that the cost of staying alive would bankrupt me. That experience, and my subsequent immersion in the German system, was more than just a change of scenery; it was a fundamental re-education. I went from being a frightened, isolated consumer in a high-stakes marketplace to a secure, supported member of a community.

This report has used the analogy of the Healthcare Supermarket and the Community Health Garden to argue that the differences between the US and German systems are not superficial but philosophical. They stem from two irreconcilable answers to the question of what healthcare is.

The American Healthcare Supermarket, for all its technological marvels and rhetoric of choice, is ultimately a business. Its aisles are designed to maximize profit. This market logic inevitably leads to the outcomes we see: staggering costs, millions left uninsured in “healthcare deserts,” deep inequities that are measured in years of lost life, and a system so complex and adversarial that it inflicts its own form of trauma on the sick. It is a system where the bill that comes due at the checkout counter can be more devastating than the illness itself.

The German Community Health Garden, by contrast, is a social utility. It is not perfect. Its paths can be overgrown with the weeds of bureaucracy, the wait for certain harvests can be frustratingly long, and its sheer scale can make the experience feel impersonal. Yet, its foundational purpose is entirely different. It is designed to nourish everyone. Its principles of solidarity and shared contribution ensure that no one is left to starve for lack of ability to pay. It provides a profound sense of security, a safety net that catches people not just in moments of acute crisis, but across the entire course of their lives.

The ultimate lesson from this comparison is not that the United States should or could simply copy and paste German policies. The historical, political, and cultural contexts are too different. Rather, the lesson is that America must confront a fundamental philosophical choice. A nation’s healthcare system is a mirror, reflecting its deepest values. The endless, circular debates in the US over premiums, deductibles, and network adequacy are arguments about the price and packaging of a product. They fail to address the core question.

The real debate, the one Germany settled over a century ago and the one America has yet to truly have, is about the nature of society itself. Is health an individual responsibility to be managed through market transactions, or is it a collective good to be guaranteed through a social contract? The path to a healthier, more secure America does not begin with a new policy or a better insurance plan. It begins with a new paradigm—a national shift from the isolating mindset of the consumer to the empowering mindset of the community member. It requires asking not, “What can I afford to buy?” but “What are we, as a society, willing to cultivate, together?”

Works cited

1. ‘I live on the street now’: how Americans fall into medical bankruptcy …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/14/health-insurance-medical-bankruptcy-debt
2. Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs – KFF, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
3. An examination of surprise medical bills and proposals to protect consumers from them, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/an-examination-of-surprise-medical-bills-and-proposals-to-protect-consumers-from-them-3/
4. Healthcare Insights: How Medical Debt Is Crushing 100 Million Americans | The ILR School, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/scheinman-institute/blog/john-august-healthcare/healthcare-insights-how-medical-debt-crushing-100-million-americans
5. Notes on healthcare from an American immigrant in Germany | by …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/notes-on-healthcare-from-an-american-immigrant-in-germany-4842e74c344b
6. German Healthcare Feels Like a Hidden Luxury : r/germany – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/1jx6y6f/german_healthcare_feels_like_a_hidden_luxury/
7. A layman’s guide to the U.S. health care system – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193322/
8. Failures of Market-Based Health Care Policies – Penn LDI – University of Pennsylvania, accessed August 7, 2025, https://ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/research-updates/article-by-hoffman-details-the-failures-of-market-based-health-care-policies/
9. How health insurance changed from protecting patients to seeking profit | Stanford Medicine, accessed August 7, 2025, https://stanmed.stanford.edu/how-health-insurance-changed-from-protecting-patients-to-seeking-profit/
10. Food desert – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_desert
11. Exploring Barriers to Mental Health Care in the U.S. | AAMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/health-care/exploring-barriers-mental-health-care-us
12. Bending the Cost Growth Curve and Expanding Coverage: Lessons from Germany’s All‐Payer System A Tribute to Uwe Reinhardt – PubMed Central, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7296437/
13. German Healthcare System [2025 English Guide] – GermanPedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://germanpedia.com/german-healthcare-system/
14. Public Health Benefits of Community Gardens – School of Public …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://publichealth.tulane.edu/blog/benefits-of-community-gardens/
15. How does Germany’s health sector contribute to the economy?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/how-does-germany-s-health-sector-contribute-to-the-economy
16. Competition of the 21st Century: United States vs. Germany – Which …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://sites.gsu.edu/gsuglobalhealth/2021/02/15/competition-of-the-21st-century-united-states-vs-germany-which-healthcare-system-is-superior/
17. US Healthcare System Overview-Background – ISPOR, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/more-heor-resources/us-healthcare-system-overview/us-healthcare-system-overview-background-page-1
18. Market-Based Approaches to Insurance Reform – America’s Children – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230372/
19. HISTORY OF HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, accessed August 7, 2025, https://account.ache.org/iweb/upload/Morrisey2253_Chapter_1-3b5f4e08.pdf
20. A (Brief) History of Health Policy in the United States – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10810293/
21. How does health spending in the U.S. compare to other countries …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-countries/
22. Global Perspective on U.S. Health Care | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/jan/us-health-care-global-perspective-2022
23. German healthcare compared to the USA: Cultural differences and preparation tips for foreigners – IHC Company S.A., accessed August 7, 2025, https://ihc-company.eu/german-healthcare-compared-to-the-usa-cultural-differences-and-preparation-tips-for-foreigners/
24. U.S. Healthcare: A Story of Rising Market Power, Barriers to Entry, and Supply Constraints in, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2021/180/article-A001-en.xml
25. Comparing the German and American Health Care Systems | The Pursuit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://sph.umich.edu/pursuit/2018posts/comparing-the-german-and-american-health-care-systems.html
26. The Underlying Causes of Surprise Medical Bills | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2019/underlying-causes-surprise-medical-bills
27. Avoid Surprise Healthcare Expenses: How the No Surprises Act Can Protect You, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/publications/avoid-surprise-healthcare-expenses
28. What is a “surprise medical bill” and what should I know about the No Surprises Act?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-surprise-medical-bill-and-what-should-i-know-about-the-no-surprises-act-en-2123/
29. What consumers need to know about surprise or balance billing – Insurance.wa.gov, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.insurance.wa.gov/insurance-resources/health-insurance/how-health-insurance-works/what-consumers-need-know-about-surprise-or-balance-billing
30. No Surprise Billing – CMS, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/nosurprises
31. Healthy Food, Healthy Communities: – PolicyLink, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/HEALTHYFOOD.pdf
32. A human-centered vision for improving the mental health care ecosystem – Deloitte, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/government-public-sector-services/mental-health-equity-and-creating-an-accessible-system.html
33. Germans struggle to find mental health care – DW – 12/28/2018, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.dw.com/en/germans-struggle-to-find-mental-health-care-during-holidays/a-46888972
34. How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/
35. International Comparison | 2023 Annual Report | AHR – America’s Health Rankings, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2023-annual-report/international-comparison
36. FOX13 Investigates denied health care coverage – YouTube, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMAQ58V_Gt4
37. My $30,000 health insurance claim was denied. Then I tweeted …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2025/feb/26/health-insurance-claims-social-media
38. Sickest patients face insurance denials despite policy fixes: “They won’t help me”, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-insurance-denials-prior-authorization-policy/
39. Tell me the story of the most absurd/dangerous/mind-boggling denial you have ever seen : r/medicine – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/1h8661b/tell_me_the_story_of_the_most/
40. TakeCHARGE: Use an Advocate or Be an Advocate for Others – Joint Commission, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.jointcommission.org/en-us/knowledge-library/for-patients/takecharge/use-an-advocate-or-be-an-advocate-for-others
41. What Is a Patient Advocate? (And What Do They Do) | Coursera, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/articles/patient-advocate
42. Patient Advocate Foundation: Home, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.patientadvocate.org/
43. Find a patient advocate – CMS, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/medical-bill-rights/help/guides/patient-advocate
44. Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: A population-based study – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8214217/
45. Navigating the Health Care System is a Challenge—Even for Those Within It – NCQA, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ncqa.org/blog/navigating-the-health-care-system-is-a-challenge-even-for-those-within-it/
46. Stories Archive – Undue Medical Debt, accessed August 7, 2025, https://unduemedicaldebt.org/stories/
47. The burden of medical debt in the United States – Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
48. Myth and Measurement: The Case of Medical Bankruptcies – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5865642/
49. The Association Between Cost-Related Insulin Rationing and Health Care Utilization in U.S. Adults With Diabetes, accessed August 7, 2025, https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/48/3/400/157645/The-Association-Between-Cost-Related-Insulin
50. Racial Inequities in Mortality and Access to Health Care: The Untold Peril of Rationing Health Care in the United States – Scholarship Commons, accessed August 7, 2025, https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=faculty
51. Bismarck model – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bismarck_model
52. Germany: Health System History, accessed August 7, 2025, https://healthsystemsfacts.org/national-health-systems/bismarck-model/germany/germany-health-system-history/
53. An International Health Model History Lesson – MedAxiom, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.medaxiom.com/blog/an-international-health-model-history-lesson/
54. Bismarck’s health insurance and its impact on mortality – CEPR, accessed August 7, 2025, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/bismarcks-health-insurance-and-its-impact-mortality
55. Germany | International Health Care System Profiles – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/germany
56. Guide to Health Insurance and the Healthcare System in Germany – InterNations, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.internations.org/germany-expats/guide/healthcare
57. ​Understanding Health Insurance in Germany: A Guide for U.S. Expats, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.connectedfinancialplanning.com/health-insurance-germany
58. Health Insurance in Germany – The German Healthcare System, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.germany-visa.org/insurances-germany/health-insurance/
59. Germany health system information, accessed August 7, 2025, https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/germany
60. I’ve heard about Germany being good when it comes to work-life balance. Is this true? : r/AskAGerman – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAGerman/comments/1m9syiz/ive_heard_about_germany_being_good_when_it_comes/
61. Germany has 4th-best life-work balance in the world – IamExpat.de, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.iamexpat.de/career/employment-news/germany-has-4th-best-life-work-balance-world
62. German Elder Care – American Bar Association, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/publications/bifocal/vol46/vol46issue3/germaneldercare/
63. Is German long-term care insurance a model for the United States? – PubMed, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11562009/
64. Germany’s Long-Term Care System: Lessons for U.S. States, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.acgusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Germanys-Long-Term-Care-System-Lessons-for-US-States_Working-Paper_December-2024.pdf
65. Reforms to Help Meet the Growing Demand for Long-Term Care Services, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/reforms-to-help-meet-the-growing-demand-for-long-term-care-services/
66. Patient education in Germany, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/16-11-2023-patient-education-in-germany
67. Full article: Database Supported Long-term Management of Chronic Diseases – Data from the German Disease Management Programmes as a Source for Continuing Medical Education – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21614083.2021.2014038
68. Germany – Assessing Chronic Disease Management in European Health Systems – NCBI, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK458734/
69. Patient-Centric care in Germany: Pharma’s role in bridging gaps | ZS, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.zs.com/insights/how-pharma-can-bridge-patient-provider-gaps-in-germany
70. A U.S. mom moved to Germany – and was shocked by how different …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.babycenter.com/pregnancy/hear-from-moms/giving-birth-in-germany-vs-united-states_41001694
71. This Interactive Map Shows the Cost of Childbirth Worldwide – Parents, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/everything-pregnancy/interactive-map-shows-cost-of-childbirth-around-the-world-and-its/
72. Out of curiosity, how much did your birth cost, and what country are you in? – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Mommit/comments/vnebg0/out_of_curiosity_how_much_did_your_birth_cost_and/
73. *REAL* RECEIPTS: What my Birth in Germany Costs in the USA | Universal vs. Private Healthcare – YouTube, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpE2bZ7UHFs
74. Guide to German doctors and GPs | Expatica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.expatica.com/de/healthcare/healthcare-services/doctors-in-germany-1090580/
75. What It’s REALLY Like For A Foreigner to Visit the Doctors in Germany, accessed August 7, 2025, https://lifeingermany.com/foreigner-to-visit-the-doctors-in-germany/
76. What is wrong with the German health system? Can you share some …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-is-wrong-with-the-German-health-system-Can-you-share-some-bad-personal-experiences
77. What’s your experience with german healthcare been like? : r/germany – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/1b7g4vy/whats_your_experience_with_german_healthcare_been/
78. How Do Germans Plan Their Medical Appointments So Far in Advance? : r/germany – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/1laz6k7/how_do_germans_plan_their_medical_appointments_so/
79. Navigating Healthcare Here. : r/germany – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/17uubxc/navigating_healthcare_here/
80. The German Health Care System in International Comparison: A …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2897000/
81. Full article: Mental health services in Germany – Structures, outcomes and future challenges, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540261.2025.2479601?src=
82. Healthcare in Germany – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Germany
83. Healthcare wait times across the world | Compare the Market, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.comparethemarket.com.au/health-insurance/features/health-appointment-wait-times-aross-the-world-2024/
84. Patient Self-Rationing, a Health System Problem – AMA Journal of Ethics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/patient-self-rationing-health-system-problem/2012-11