Table of Contents
Introduction: The $30,000 Appendectomy
In the spring of 2019, Cory Dowd, a 31-year-old self-employed event planner, found himself in a common but precarious position: temporarily without health insurance.
Having recently finished a stint with the Peace Corps that provided benefits, he was more than a year away from starting a graduate program that would offer coverage.
Healthy and young, he sought what millions of Americans search for each year: a sensible, affordable safety Net. He wanted insurance not for checkups or minor ailments, but for the “big one”—a true medical emergency.1
His search led him to what looked like a great deal: a short-term health plan from an agency called Pivot Health.
The monthly premium was an astonishingly low $100, and the policy promised to cover up to $1 million in claims.
It seemed like the perfect solution, providing peace of mind against a catastrophe without the high cost of a comprehensive plan.
He signed up, began paying his premiums, and, like many, did not scrutinize the fine print.1
In July 2020, the catastrophe he had insured against arrived, not as a dramatic multi-car pileup, but as a searing pain in his abdomen.
The diagnosis was appendicitis, a common and typically routine medical emergency.
The subsequent appendectomy at Mather Hospital in Port Jefferson, New York, generated an initial bill of more than $41,000.
When Dowd submitted the claim, he expected his “emergency” insurance to perform its sole function.
Instead, the policy paid just $1,682, leaving him personally responsible for a staggering $33,600.1
Stunned, and at the urging of the hospital’s billing department, he finally dug into his policy documents.
There, buried in a long list of exclusions and disclaimers, he found the clause that had financially crippled him.
The policy limited coverage for surgical services to “usual and customary charges, not to exceed $2,500 per surgery”.1
His million-dollar safety net was, in practice, a trap.
“I do have to wonder exactly what kind of surgical procedure can be had for $2,500,” he later remarked, his frustration and fury palpable.1
Dowd’s story is not an anomaly.
It is a stark illustration of a critical consumer dilemma at the heart of the American healthcare system.
Faced with the world’s highest medical costs, many individuals and families seek what they colloquially call “emergency-only insurance.” It is a rational response to an irrational system.
But this investigation reveals that the search for such coverage is a journey into a treacherous and poorly understood corner of the insurance market.
What does “emergency-only” coverage actually mean? What products are being sold to meet this desperate need? And, as Cory Dowd discovered, do they provide a real safety net, or merely the dangerous illusion of security?1
Section 1: The Anatomy of an “Emergency-Only” Plan
The term “emergency-only insurance” does not describe a formal category of health insurance.
Rather, it is a consumer-driven colloquialism, a shorthand for a deep-seated desire: financial protection from a worst-case medical scenario without the perceived expense of comprehensive coverage.3
This search, however, leads consumers down three very different, and often deceptively similar, paths.
One path is narrow, regulated, and legitimate, while the others are fraught with risks, exclusions, and regulatory gaps that can lead to financial ruin.
Understanding the anatomy of these plans is the first step in navigating this perilous landscape.
Path 1: The Legitimate Contender – The ACA Catastrophic Plan
Within the framework of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there is one product specifically designed to function as a true safety net: the Catastrophic plan.5
These plans are fully compliant with the ACA and intended to shield individuals from the financial devastation of a major medical event, such as a severe accident or a sudden, life-threatening illness, rather than cover routine medical care.3
Their legitimacy, however, comes with strict limitations on who can purchase them.
Eligibility is confined to two specific groups.
The first is individuals under the age of 30, a demographic that is statistically healthier and may rationally opt for lower premiums in exchange for higher potential out-of-pocket costs.3
The second group consists of individuals of any age who receive a “hardship” or “affordability” exemption from the government.8
These exemptions are not granted lightly; they are reserved for those facing significant life challenges, such as recent homelessness, bankruptcy, eviction, domestic violence, or the death of a close family member.10
This narrow eligibility underscores the plan’s specific purpose as a last-resort option for distinct populations.
The financial structure of a Catastrophic plan is a stark trade-off: policyholders pay a very low monthly premium in exchange for accepting a very high annual deductible.3
For these plans, the deductible is the same as the annual out-of-pocket maximum.
In 2025, that federally mandated limit is $9,200 for an individual.12
This means the policyholder is responsible for every dollar of their medical costs—from doctor’s visits to hospital stays—until their spending reaches that $9,200 threshold.
Only after meeting this high deductible does the insurance begin to pay, at which point it covers 100% of all in-network, covered services for the remainder of the plan year.5
Despite this high barrier to coverage, Catastrophic plans are far from bare-bones.
As ACA-compliant products, they are legally required to cover the same 10 essential health benefits as all other Marketplace plans.
This includes critical services like emergency care, hospitalization, surgery, and prescription drugs.5
Furthermore, they offer significant value even before the deductible is M.T. All ACA-compliant plans, including Catastrophic ones, must cover a range of preventive services—such as certain health screenings, vaccinations, and annual check-ups—at no cost to the consumer.5
Catastrophic plans also uniquely cover at least three primary care visits per year before the deductible is met, typically requiring only a standard copayment.5
A final, critical feature defines their place in the market: premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions, the federal subsidies that make ACA plans affordable for millions of Americans, cannot be applied to Catastrophic plans.9
This is a crucial distinction.
For many individuals who would otherwise qualify for a Catastrophic plan based on age or income, a subsidized Bronze or Silver plan may offer a lower deductible and more robust coverage for a comparable or even lower net monthly premium.
Path 2: The Risky Alternative – Short-Term, Limited-Duration (STLD) Insurance
Often found alongside Catastrophic plans in online searches, Short-Term, Limited-Duration (STLD) plans represent a fundamentally different and far riskier proposition.
These plans are designed as temporary stopgaps to fill brief coverage gaps, such as the time between losing one job and starting another.13
They are explicitly
not compliant with the Affordable Care Act and do not qualify as minimum essential coverage.13
Their regulatory status is so tenuous that several states, including California and Washington, have banned or severely restricted their sale.17
The single greatest danger of STLD plans lies in their treatment of pre-existing conditions.
Unlike ACA plans, which are forbidden from discriminating based on health history, STLD plans almost universally engage in medical underwriting.
This means they can—and do—deny applications from individuals with pre-existing conditions.
For those who are approved, the plans typically include clauses that exclude coverage for any medical issue related to a condition that existed before the policy began.13
This practice of screening out the sick is the primary mechanism by which STLD plans maintain their low premiums, but it leaves consumers who develop complications from a chronic illness completely exposed.20
Beyond the pre-existing condition trap, these plans are riddled with significant gaps in coverage.
They are not required to cover the ACA’s 10 essential health benefits, and they often don’t.
A 2018 Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) analysis of STLD plans found that 43% did not cover mental health services, 62% excluded substance abuse treatment, 71% did not cover outpatient prescription drugs, and 100% excluded maternity care.22
A person buying one of these plans for an “emergency” might discover too late that their particular emergency—be it a mental health crisis or a complication requiring expensive medication—is simply not a covered benefit.
These plans also lack the core consumer protections mandated by the ACA.
They are not subject to the ban on annual or lifetime coverage limits, meaning a plan could cap payments at a level far below the cost of a serious illness or injury.20
They are also exempt from the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule, which requires ACA plans to spend at least 80% of premium dollars on medical care and quality improvement.
STLD plans can devote a much larger share of premiums to administrative costs, marketing, and profit; some have been found to pay out as little as 35 to 62 cents of every premium dollar on actual medical claims.19
Path 3: The Misunderstood Supplement – Hospital Indemnity & Limited-Benefit Plans
The third path consumers may wander down is that of supplemental insurance, which includes products like hospital indemnity, accident-only, and specified-disease (e.g., cancer) policies.25
The critical and often misunderstood fact about these plans is that they are
not major medical insurance.
They are designed to supplement a comprehensive health plan, not replace it.25
Their mechanism is fundamentally different from traditional insurance.
Instead of paying providers based on the cost of care, these plans pay a fixed, pre-determined cash benefit directly to the policyholder upon a specific, covered event.28
For example, a hospital indemnity plan might pay $200 for each day of a hospital stay, or an accident plan might pay a lump sum of $5,000 for a broken leg.30
This cash can be used for any purpose—to help cover the deductible on a primary plan, pay for household bills, or cover transportation costs.29
The danger arises when these plans are marketed, or mistaken, as a substitute for real insurance.2
The fixed benefit amounts they provide are rarely sufficient to cover the full cost of a major medical event.
A plan that pays $200 per day offers little protection against a hospital bill that can run into thousands of dollars per day.
Consumers who purchase an indemnity plan believing they have secured “emergency-only” coverage are left dangerously exposed.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken enforcement actions against companies that use deceptive marketing to sell these limited-benefit plans as if they were comprehensive coverage, a testament to the potential for consumer harm.32
The market for minimalist coverage thus presents consumers with a confusing array of products that appear similar on the surface—all promising low premiums—but are fundamentally different in their regulatory structure, coverage, and level of financial protection.
This architecture of “choice” is inherently deceptive.
A consumer who searches online for “cheap emergency insurance” is met with a wall of advertisements that place ACA-compliant Catastrophic plans next to unregulated STLDs and supplemental policies.33
The marketing for these non-compliant plans often employs the language of comprehensive coverage, touting high dollar limits like “$1 million in protection” to create a false sense of security, as Cory Dowd’s experience demonstrates.1
The crucial distinctions—ACA compliance, pre-existing condition exclusions, and gaping benefit holes—are often buried in the fine print that few consumers read or understand.1
This was the exact tactic targeted by the FTC in its case against Assurance IQ and MediaAlpha, which used misleading website domains like “ObamacarePlans.com” to funnel consumers toward inferior, non-compliant products.32
The result is not an environment of informed choice, but a market structure that preys on information asymmetry and consumer desperation.
This consumer demand is not an isolated phenomenon driven by a few risk-tolerant young people.
It is a direct market response to the systemic and growing crisis of underinsurance in America.
Even among those who have health insurance, particularly through an employer, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs have risen so dramatically that the coverage feels inadequate for anything short of a true catastrophe.34
The Commonwealth Fund found that in 2024, nearly a quarter of working-age adults with year-round insurance were underinsured, meaning their out-of-pocket cost exposure was dangerously high relative to their income.36
These high-deductible plans force individuals to pay thousands out-of-pocket before their insurance contributes, making them functionally similar to a catastrophic plan for most medical needs.27
This experience normalizes the idea that insurance is useful only for “the big one,” which in turn creates a fertile market for plans that explicitly adopt this model at a lower premium price point.6
The consumer searching for an “emergency-only” plan is therefore not an outlier but a reflection of the mainstream experience of American health insurance, where the line between “covered” and “financially secure” has become dangerously blurred.
Table 1: Plan Comparison Matrix: Decoding “Emergency-Only” Options
To clarify these critical distinctions, the following table provides a direct comparison of the three primary plan types consumers encounter when seeking minimalist coverage.
It is designed to cut through marketing jargon and visually organize the trade-offs in regulation, coverage, and risk.
| Plan Type | ACA Compliant? | Who Can Buy It? | Covers Pre-Existing Conditions? | Covers Essential Health Benefits? | How it Pays | Key Risk |
| ACA Catastrophic Plan | Yes 5 | People under 30 or with a hardship/affordability exemption 3 | Yes, by law 5 | Yes, all 10 essential benefits are covered after the deductible is met 7 | Pays a percentage (100% in-network) of medical bills after a very high deductible is met 5 | Extremely high out-of-pocket costs ($9,200 in 2025) before coverage kicks in; cannot use subsidies 9 |
| Short-Term Limited Duration (STLD) Plan | No 13 | Generally, anyone who can pass medical underwriting; banned/restricted in some states 15 | No, can deny coverage or exclude treatment for pre-existing conditions 13 | No, not required to cover essential benefits; often excludes prescriptions, mental health, maternity care 16 | Pays a percentage of bills for a limited set of covered services, often with coverage caps 20 | Denial of claims for pre-existing conditions; unexpected gaps in coverage; potential for massive bills 1 |
| Hospital Indemnity Plan | No 25 | Generally, anyone can buy it, often through an employer 28 | Not applicable; pays based on event, not condition. May have waiting periods 28 | No, it is not major medical insurance 25 | Pays a fixed dollar amount directly to you per event (e.g., per day in hospital) 29 | Mistaking it for real insurance; benefit amount is often a tiny fraction of the actual hospital bill 38 |
Section 2: The High Cost of a Low Premium: Underinsurance and the Medical Debt Crisis
The appeal of a low-premium plan is undeniable, but this immediate saving often obscures a far greater financial risk.
The landscape of American healthcare is defined by staggering costs that can quickly overwhelm the flimsy protection offered by minimalist insurance plans.
Understanding the true cost of an emergency, the pervasive problem of underinsurance, and the national medical debt crisis is essential to grasping the high-stakes gamble consumers take when they opt for “emergency-only” coverage.
The Reality of Emergency Costs
The sticker shock of emergency medical care in the United States is a primary driver of the search for safety-net insurance.
A single visit to the emergency room for a non-life-threatening condition can cost between $1,500 and $3,000 on average for an uninsured person, with most people spending around $2,100.40
More complex ER visits can easily reach $3,400 or more.41
This cost is incurred before any significant treatment even begins.
An ambulance ride to get to the hospital typically adds another $400 to $1,200 for ground transport, and can soar past $12,000 for air transport.40
Hospitals often use a tiered billing system for ER facility fees, which are charged based on the perceived severity of the patient’s condition.
These fees, which cover the basic cost of being evaluated by a physician, are just the starting point.
A Level 5 visit (non-urgent) might have a facility fee of $200 to $500, while a Level 3 visit (urgent but not life-threatening) can range from $600 to $1,200.
For a Level 1 emergency (life-threatening), the facility fee alone can be as high as $4,000.40
Every test, image, and procedure is an additional charge on top of this base fee.
When these costs are applied to common emergency scenarios, the potential for financial catastrophe becomes clear.
Treatment for a broken bone that requires surgery can easily result in bills of $10,000 to $20,000 or more.40
A major medical event like a heart attack can generate bills in the tens of thousands of dollars, encompassing costs for the ER, cardiac catheterization, a multi-day hospital stay (part of which may be in the intensive care unit), and expensive medications.6
These figures demonstrate with stark clarity how the high deductible of a Catastrophic plan—$9,200 in 2025—can be met and rapidly surpassed by a single, unpredictable event.12
The Underinsurance Epidemic
The financial vulnerability exposed by these high costs is not limited to the uninsured.
A large and growing segment of the insured population is “underinsured,” meaning they have health coverage, but it fails to provide affordable access to care.36
The Commonwealth Fund provides a working definition for this status: an individual is considered underinsured if their out-of-pocket costs (excluding premiums) over the year equal 10% or more of their household income, or 5% or more for those living below 200% of the federal poverty level.
Alternatively, an individual whose plan deductible constitutes 5% or more of their household income is also deemed underinsured.34
This is not a fringe problem.
According to a 2024 Commonwealth Fund survey, a staggering 23% of U.S. adults who had health coverage for the entire year were underinsured.36
This challenges the common assumption that simply having insurance equates to being protected.
Critically, the majority of these underinsured individuals—66%—are covered by employer-sponsored plans, the bedrock of the American health insurance system.36
This indicates a systemic erosion of the quality and affordability of job-based coverage.
The consequences of underinsurance are severe and closely mirror the behavior of the uninsured.
People with inadequate coverage are forced to make painful choices, often delaying or forgoing necessary medical care due to cost concerns.36
The 2024 survey found that nearly three in five (57%) underinsured adults reported avoiding needed care because of its cost.
Furthermore, 44% of underinsured adults reported having medical or dental debt that they were paying off over time.36
This creates a direct and measurable link between the fine print of an insurance policy and the real-world outcomes of worsening health and deepening financial distress.
The National Context: America’s Medical Debt Crisis
The individual risks of high deductibles and underinsurance play out against the backdrop of a national medical debt crisis of unprecedented scale.
By 2024, it was estimated that people in the United States owed at least $220 billion in medical debt.43
A KFF Health News investigation revealed that more than 100 million people—a startling 41% of all adults—are saddled with healthcare debt.45
This is a systemic feature of American healthcare, not an isolated problem.
Crucially, this debt is not confined to the uninsured.
Analysis has repeatedly shown that most people struggling with medical bills were insured at the time they received care.35
KFF polling confirms that 41% of
all adults, regardless of insurance status, report having some form of healthcare-related debt, which includes money owed to providers, on credit cards, or to family members.47
This burden is not distributed equally.
The crisis disproportionately affects communities of color, with Black adults being 50% more likely than white adults to hold medical debt.45
Individuals in fair or poor health and those with lower incomes are also at a significantly higher risk of accumulating debt, creating a vicious cycle where sickness leads to debt, and debt creates barriers to getting well.37
The sheer scale of this crisis underscores the high stakes of choosing an insurance plan and the devastating consequences of getting that choice wrong.
The financial architecture of “emergency-only” and other high-deductible plans contributes directly to a vicious cycle of debt and declining health.
The high upfront cost-sharing creates a powerful, perverse incentive to avoid or delay medical care.
A person with a high-deductible plan who experiences a concerning but not yet life-threatening symptom—like a persistent cough or minor chest pain—is faced with a difficult calculation.
Seeking care means paying the full cost of a doctor’s visit, diagnostic tests, and initial treatment entirely out of pocket.
Faced with this certainty, many choose to wait and see if the problem resolves on its own.37
Data confirms this behavior: 37% of all insured adults and 57% of underinsured adults report postponing care due to cost.36
This delay allows a manageable issue to escalate into a major health crisis, such as pneumonia or a heart attack, which then necessitates an expensive emergency room visit and hospitalization.6
At this point, the patient is hit with a massive bill that may meet their deductible but still leaves them with thousands of dollars in medical debt.40
The very plan designed to protect against a financial catastrophe actively contributed to creating one by discouraging early, less expensive intervention.
On a broader scale, the proliferation of limited-coverage plans erodes the fundamental social contract of insurance.
The core principle of insurance is risk pooling: a large group of people, both healthy and sick, contribute to a shared fund, which keeps premiums manageable for everyone.
Non-compliant STLD plans shatter this model.
By using medical underwriting to screen out anyone with a pre-existing condition, they effectively “cherry-pick” only the healthiest individuals from the broader risk pool.14
This exodus of low-cost members leaves the ACA-compliant market with a sicker, more expensive group of enrollees.21
Consequently, premiums for comprehensive ACA plans must rise to cover these higher average costs.19
These rising premiums, in turn, make the seemingly cheap STLD plans even more attractive to the remaining healthy people, accelerating a destructive cycle.
This isn’t just a bad deal for one person who buys a flimsy plan; it is a systemic threat to the viability and affordability of the comprehensive insurance market for everyone who needs it.
Table 2: The True Cost of an Emergency: A Scenario Analysis
To make these abstract financial risks tangible, the following table analyzes two common medical emergencies.
It starkly illustrates the potential out-of-pocket liability a consumer faces, even with a “safety net” plan, demonstrating how quickly costs can escalate to the maximum limit.
| Cost Component | Average Uninsured Cost | Potential Out-of-Pocket with Catastrophic Plan (assuming $9,200 deductible/max out-of-pocket) |
| Scenario 1: Complicated Leg Fracture | ||
| Ambulance (Basic Life Support) | $900 40 | $900 |
| ER Facility Fee (Level 2) | $1,400 40 | $1,400 |
| Imaging (X-ray, CT Scan) | $800 | $800 |
| Orthopedic Surgery | $12,000 42 | $6,100 |
| Anesthesia | $2,500 | $0 (Deductible Met) |
| Hospital Stay (3 days) | $6,000 | $0 (Deductible Met) |
| Total | $23,600 | $9,200 |
| Scenario 2: Heart Attack | ||
| Ambulance (Advanced Life Support) | $1,200 40 | $1,200 |
| ER Facility Fee (Level 1) | $2,500 40 | $2,500 |
| Cardiac Catheterization & Stent | $25,000+ | $5,500 |
| ICU Stay (1 day) | $4,000 | $0 (Deductible Met) |
| Hospital Stay (3 additional days) | $6,000 | $0 (Deductible Met) |
| Medications | $1,500 | $0 (Deductible Met) |
| Total | $40,200+ | $9,200 |
Note: Uninsured costs are estimates based on data from sources.40
The out-of-pocket calculation for the Catastrophic plan assumes all providers are in-network and all services are covered.
The final bill for the consumer under the Catastrophic plan is their full out-of-pocket maximum for the year.
Section 3: The Market’s Minefield: Deception, Denials, and Regulatory Gaps
The market for low-cost health coverage is not merely a landscape of difficult trade-offs; it is an active minefield of deceptive marketing, opaque business practices, and critical regulatory gaps.
Consumers seeking protection are often met with confusion and predatory tactics designed to exploit their financial anxieties.
Even those who successfully navigate to a legitimate, regulated plan can find themselves battling a system of claim denials that leaves them bewildered and burdened.
Case Study in Deception: The FTC vs. Assurance IQ & MediaAlpha
A landmark 2025 enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) provides a stark case study in the market’s predatory nature.
The FTC secured a $145 million settlement with Assurance IQ and MediaAlpha for a widespread scheme that misled millions of consumers seeking health insurance.32
Their tactics perfectly illustrate the “confusion by design” that characterizes this market segment.
The scheme began online, where the companies used misleading website domains like “ObamacarePlans.com” and “GovernmentHealthInsurance.com” to create the false impression of being official government-affiliated entities.
They even hired actors and celebrities to promote a non-existent government “Health Insurance Give Back Program”.32
Unsuspecting consumers, believing they were exploring comprehensive ACA plans, would enter their personal information.
This was the bait.
The switch occurred when this information was sold to vast networks of telemarketers.
These agents would then bombard consumers, including many on the National Do Not Call Registry, with high-pressure sales calls.32
Instead of offering the ACA-compliant coverage the consumers were seeking, the telemarketers aggressively pushed non-compliant short-term and limited-benefit indemnity plans.
They made a host of false claims, alleging that these flimsy plans covered pre-existing conditions, had no benefit caps, and offered access to broad provider networks that would lower costs.32
The result was catastrophic for consumers.
Believing they had purchased real insurance, they were left unprotected and on the hook for massive medical bills when they needed care, all while being unfairly charged for products they never knowingly consented to buy.2
This case is a documented, large-scale example of how the market actively exploits consumer confusion between legitimate and unregulated products.
The Black Box of Claim Denials
Even when consumers purchase a legitimate, ACA-compliant plan, securing payment for care is not guaranteed.
The process of claim denials is a significant hurdle that adds another layer of stress and financial risk.
In 2023, insurers selling plans on the federal HealthCare.gov marketplace denied an average of 19% of all in-network claims submitted.52
This figure represents 73 million denied claims for in-network services alone.52
This average conceals a vast and troubling range of behavior among insurers.
While some companies denied as few as 1% of claims, others denied more than half, with one insurer in Florida rejecting 54% of all in-network claims.52
This extreme variability suggests that a consumer’s ability to have their care covered depends heavily on the specific insurer they choose, a factor that is difficult to assess at the time of purchase.
The reasons provided for these denials are often unhelpful and opaque, leaving consumers in the dark.
A KFF analysis of 2023 denial data found that the most common reason cited by insurers, accounting for 34% of denials, was a vague, catch-all category of “Other.” Only 6% of denials were based on a lack of medical necessity.
Far more common were administrative reasons (18%), findings that a service was excluded from the policy (16%), or a lack of prior authorization or referral (9%).52
This lack of transparency makes it nearly impossible for a consumer to understand why their claim was rejected or how to effectively challenge the decision.
Faced with this complexity, most consumers simply give up.
Data shows that only about 1% of denied in-network claims were formally appealed by consumers in 2023.
For those who did appeal, the odds were not in their favor: insurers upheld their own original denials in 56% of cases.
The final step, an external review by an independent third party, was almost never utilized.53
This “appeals cliff” demonstrates a system where consumers are so disempowered by the complexity and opacity of the process that they abandon their right to challenge a denial, effectively absorbing the cost themselves.
The Protection Gap: ACA vs. Non-ACA Regulation
The stark differences in consumer experiences between plan types are rooted in a fundamental regulatory divide.
ACA-compliant plans operate under a robust set of federal rules designed to protect consumers, while non-ACA plans exist in a less-regulated space that prioritizes insurer flexibility and profit.
- Guaranteed Issue and Pre-Existing Conditions: ACA plans are legally required to be “guaranteed-issue” during open enrollment, meaning they cannot deny coverage or charge a higher premium based on an individual’s health status or pre-existing conditions.56 Non-ACA plans, by contrast, use medical underwriting to screen and reject applicants they deem too risky.14
- Essential Health Benefits (EHBs): The ACA mandates that compliant plans cover a comprehensive package of 10 EHBs, ensuring a baseline of adequate coverage.7 Non-ACA plans are exempt from this rule, leading to the significant benefit gaps in areas like prescription drugs, mental health, and maternity care.16
- Financial Protections: A cornerstone of the ACA is the annual limit on out-of-pocket spending, which shields consumers from unlimited financial liability in a bad year.5 Non-ACA plans are not bound by this rule and can have much higher out-of-pocket maximums, or impose separate annual or lifetime caps on the total benefits they will pay, leaving patients exposed to catastrophic costs.20
- Medical Loss Ratio (MLR): The ACA’s 80/20 rule dictates that insurers in the individual market must spend at least 80% of the premiums they collect on medical care and quality improvement activities, with no more than 20% going to administrative costs and profit.20 This ensures that premiums primarily pay for healthcare. Non-compliant plans have no such requirement. As a result, their MLRs can be dramatically lower, with some STLD plans spending as little as 35 cents of every premium dollar on actual medical claims.19 The rest is allocated to marketing, overhead, and profit.
The data on low medical loss ratios for non-compliant plans, when combined with the FTC’s findings on deceptive marketing, reveals a clear and troubling business model: maximizing profit by engineering consumer confusion.
The financial incentive is to attract customers with low headline prices, sell them a product whose limitations are obscured, and then aggressively minimize claim payouts through a web of exclusions and denials.
The lower a plan’s medical loss ratio, the more profitable it is to deny care.
This is not a flaw in the system of non-compliant plans; it is its central, defining feature.
This is achieved through strict underwriting to filter out the sick before they enroll and broad policy exclusions to deny their claims after they have paid premiums.
The marketing must obscure these harsh realities to attract customers in the first place, leading directly to the kind of deceptive practices prosecuted by the FTC.
The coexistence of a highly regulated ACA market and a loosely regulated non-ACA market creates a “shadow” insurance system.
This shadow market not only poses a direct financial threat to its own customers but also poisons the well for the entire industry.
When a consumer like Cory Dowd has a catastrophic financial experience with a plan he believed was legitimate insurance, his trust in the entire concept of health insurance is eroded.1
This experience, multiplied across millions of consumers, fosters a deep-seated cynicism.
KFF data shows that half of all insured adults already struggle to understand their insurance, and a majority have experienced a problem with their coverage.59
When consumers cannot easily distinguish between a regulated product with consumer protections and a deceptive, unregulated one, the bad actors tarnish the reputation of all, making it harder for people to engage constructively with even good-faith insurers and plans.
Section 4: A Tool for the Savvy Consumer: Making an Informed Choice
Navigating the treacherous market for minimalist health coverage requires a high degree of diligence and skepticism.
While the landscape is fraught with risk, there are tools and strategies that can empower consumers to make a more informed, rational choice.
This involves realistically assessing the narrow circumstances under which a Catastrophic plan might make sense, learning to decode the critical information presented in standardized documents, and arming oneself with a checklist of essential questions.
Is a Catastrophic Plan Ever the Right Choice?
Despite the significant risks, there is a consensus among some experts that for a very specific and limited profile, an ACA-compliant Catastrophic plan can be a rational choice.
The ideal candidate is a young adult, under 30, who is in excellent health, has no chronic conditions, anticipates needing little to no medical care beyond preventive services, and does not have access to affordable coverage through an employer or parent.3
For this individual, the plan’s extremely low premium can provide a crucial financial backstop against a true worst-case-scenario accident or sudden, severe illness.4
However, this decision should never be made in a vacuum.
The most critical step for any potential Catastrophic plan buyer is to first visit the official Health Insurance Marketplace at HealthCare.gov and check their eligibility for federal subsidies.8
Because premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions cannot be used with Catastrophic plans, a subsidized Bronze or Silver plan is often a much better value.9
For many low- and middle-income individuals, a subsidized Marketplace plan can offer a significantly lower deductible and more robust day-to-day coverage for a monthly premium that is comparable to, or even less than, that of an unsubsidized Catastrophic plan.12
Ultimately, choosing a Catastrophic plan is a high-stakes gamble.
The consumer is betting their financial future on the prediction that they will remain perfectly healthy for an entire year.
Given the inherent unpredictability of life—from car accidents to acute infections to sudden-onset diseases—this is a profound risk.
As one expert from the National Patient Advocate Foundation cautions, “You’re going to be a patient one day”.12
The low monthly premium saves money only if that day does not arrive during the plan year.
Decoding Your Coverage: A Guide to the Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC)
The single most powerful tool for a consumer comparing health plans is the Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC).
Mandated by the ACA, the SBC is a standardized, plain-language document that all compliant plans must provide.
Its uniform format is designed to help consumers make direct, “apples-to-apples” comparisons of costs, benefits, and limitations.61
Its absence is an immediate red flag; non-compliant plans like STLDs are not required to provide an SBC, and consumers should be wary of any plan for which one is not available.64
To use the SBC effectively, consumers should focus on several key sections:
- Important Questions: This section, typically on the first page, provides the most critical financial information at a glance. Here, a consumer can find the plan’s deductible (the amount you must pay before the plan starts paying) and its out-of-pocket limit (the absolute most you will have to pay for in-network care in a year).62 For a Catastrophic plan, these two numbers will be the same. Understanding this out-of-pocket maximum is paramount, as it represents the total financial risk in an emergency.
- Common Medical Events: This chart details the cost-sharing (copayments or coinsurance) for specific services like an ER visit, a specialist appointment, or a hospital stay.62 It is crucial to check the costs for both
in-network and out-of-network providers. Seeing an out-of-network provider, even unintentionally at an in-network hospital, can expose a patient to “balance billing,” where the provider can bill the patient for the full difference between their charge and what the insurance plan allows—a cost that does not count toward the out-of-pocket limit.62 - Excluded Services & Other Covered Services: This section is a list of what the plan will not pay for. Consumers should scan this list for red flags. A plan that excludes or severely limits coverage for “inpatient hospital services” or “emergency transportation” is not a true safety net and should be avoided.61
- Coverage Examples: The SBC includes two hypothetical scenarios—typically managing type 2 diabetes and having a baby—to illustrate how the plan’s cost-sharing works in practice.61 Even if these specific situations do not apply to the consumer, reviewing the cost breakdown can provide a tangible sense of the plan’s overall financial protection and how quickly the deductible can be met.62
The existence of transparency tools like the SBC is a necessary step, but it is not sufficient to guarantee informed consumer choice.
The fundamental complexity of insurance terminology—distinguishing between a deductible and an out-of-pocket maximum, or a copay versus coinsurance—remains a significant barrier.
KFF research has shown that roughly half of all insured adults, including those with college degrees, report difficulty understanding their health insurance.59
The fact that a robust, federally funded program like the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) exists primarily to provide one-on-one counseling to help people navigate the complexities of Medicare is a testament to this reality.66
A document alone, no matter how well-designed, cannot replace the need for human-centered support and guidance.
Effective consumer protection, therefore, requires not just the availability of information, but also a support infrastructure to help people interpret and act on it.
A Consumer’s Due Diligence Checklist
Before purchasing any plan that purports to be “emergency-only” or offers a very low premium, consumers should arm themselves with the following critical questions:
- Is this plan ACA-compliant? This is the most important question. An affirmative answer means the plan includes key consumer protections.5
- Can I see the Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) before I enroll? If the answer is no, or if the seller is evasive, walk away.62
- What is the exact dollar amount of the individual deductible and the out-of-pocket maximum? Get these numbers in writing.8
- Does this plan cover pre-existing conditions? Is there a waiting period for coverage of certain conditions? For non-ACA plans, the answer is often no.14
- Are my local hospital, its emergency room, and its affiliated specialists in this plan’s network? Check the plan’s provider directory yourself; do not rely on the seller’s word.61
- What major services are explicitly excluded from coverage? Look for exclusions related to hospitalization, surgery, prescription drugs, and mental health.23
- Does this plan have an annual or lifetime dollar limit on what it will pay for my care? ACA-compliant plans cannot have these limits on essential benefits.56
- Have I checked HealthCare.gov or my state’s official marketplace to see if I qualify for a subsidized Bronze or Silver plan instead? This could provide better coverage for less money.8
Section 5: When the Net Fails: Resources for the Stranded Consumer
When a minimalist health plan fails to provide the expected coverage, leaving a consumer with overwhelming medical bills, the situation can feel hopeless.
However, a network of state and federal resources exists to provide assistance, advocacy, and a formal process for recourse.
Navigating this system can be challenging, but it offers a crucial lifeline for consumers who have fallen into the insurance trap.
First Line of Defense: State Regulators and Assistance Programs
The primary oversight of the insurance industry happens at the state level.
Every state has a Department of Insurance (DOI) that is responsible for licensing insurance companies and agents, ensuring they comply with state laws, and investigating consumer complaints.70
If a consumer believes they have been sold a policy through deceptive marketing, or if an insurer is refusing to pay a legitimate claim, the state DOI is the first and most important place to file a formal complaint.
In addition to regulatory bodies, many states offer Consumer Assistance Programs (CAPs) that provide free, direct help to individuals struggling with insurance problems.72
These programs are staffed by advocates who can help consumers understand their rights, appeal a denied claim, or negotiate with a provider.
Examples include Maine’s Consumers for Affordable Health Care (CAHC), which helped a family win an appeal after their insurer improperly processed claims, and the Health Consumer Alliance (HCA) in California, which helps residents resolve problems with their health plans and reduce unaffordable medical bills.73
Maryland’s official marketplace, Maryland Health Connection, also operates a dedicated consumer support call center.75
Navigating the Maze with a Guide: The State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP)
One of the most effective models for consumer support is the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP).
SHIP is a national, federally funded program with offices in every state, designed to provide free, unbiased, one-on-one counseling and education.66
While its primary mission is to help Medicare beneficiaries, the program’s success highlights the profound need for expert, human guidance in a complex system.
SHIP counselors are highly trained to help individuals compare plan options, understand benefits, and navigate enrollment.66
The program’s value is best captured in the words of those it has helped.
One beneficiary, overwhelmed by trying to navigate government websites, found SHIP’s in-person assistance essential, stating, “It’s much better to sit down in front of somebody, and they can explain it to you”.77
Another captured the program’s impact on financial well-being: “You shouldn’t have to decide between food or medication…
the Medicare Counselors help…
get you the cheapest program, the program that works best for you”.77
These testimonials underscore the power of the support infrastructure that is vital for true consumer empowerment.
The Formal Process: Appeals and Financial Aid
For consumers with ACA-compliant plans, the law guarantees a formal process to challenge an insurer’s decision.
This right to appeal is a powerful tool, though it is often underutilized.
The process typically involves two main steps 57:
- Internal Appeal: The consumer first files an appeal directly with their insurance company, asking them to reconsider the denied claim. The insurer is required to review the case and provide a decision within a specific timeframe.
- External Review: If the insurer upholds its denial, the consumer has the right to take their case to an independent, third-party reviewer. This external review organization is unaffiliated with the insurance company and makes a binding decision.
Beyond the appeals process, consumers facing large hospital bills have another important avenue for help.
Non-profit hospitals, which constitute the majority of hospitals in the U.S., are required by federal law to maintain financial assistance policies, often called “charity care.” Patients who are uninsured, underinsured, or simply unable to afford their out-of-pocket costs should always contact the hospital’s billing or financial services department to ask for a financial assistance application.
This was the path that ultimately provided relief for Cory Dowd, whose remaining hospital balance was waived after he applied to the hospital’s assistance program.1
The stark reality that so few consumers utilize these formal protections is not an indictment of the consumers themselves, but rather of the system they are forced to confront.
The data showing that a mere 1% of denied claims are appealed, and that many people are unaware they even have a right to an external review, points to a systemic failure.53
The process of filing an appeal is daunting; it requires gathering extensive medical records, understanding complex policy language, and adhering to strict deadlines.71
A person who is sick, recovering from an injury, or caring for an ill family member is in the worst possible position to wage this kind of bureaucratic battle.
The immense burden of proof and action is placed squarely on the shoulders of the most vulnerable party in the transaction.
Consequently, the low appeal rate is not a sign of consumer satisfaction or the accuracy of insurer denials; it is a clear indicator of a system that exhausts and intimidates consumers into submission.
Conclusion: A Symptom of a Systemic Illness
The powerful consumer demand for “emergency-only” health insurance is not an anomaly driven by reckless gamblers.
It is a rational, if risky, response to a deeply dysfunctional American healthcare system—a system defined by an intractable affordability crisis that touches everyone, from the uninsured to those with premier employer-sponsored plans.45
This investigation has shown that the search for a simple safety net leads consumers into a complex and hazardous market, where the promise of protection is often an illusion.
The landscape is a study in contrasts.
A narrow, legitimate path exists through ACA-compliant Catastrophic plans, which offer a real, albeit limited, backstop against financial ruin for a very specific population.
Yet this path is surrounded by a minefield of high-risk alternatives.
Deregulated short-term plans prey on the healthy, offering the mirage of coverage while riddled with exclusions that can render them useless in a crisis.
Supplemental indemnity plans, valuable in their proper context, are often deceptively marketed as a substitute for real insurance, leaving unsuspecting buyers perilously exposed.2
The “choice” presented to the American consumer is, for many, a false one.
It is not a choice between a good plan and a cheap plan, but often between a plan whose premiums are unaffordable and one whose coverage is inadequate.
For millions, it is a choice between the certainty of a high monthly bill they cannot pay and the risk of a future medical bill that could bankrupt them.
The human cost of this dynamic is immense.
For every individual who successfully uses a minimalist plan as intended, there are countless others like Cory Dowd, who fall into a trap laid by fine print and deceptive marketing.1
They are left with the very outcome they paid to avoid: crippling medical debt that can derail lives, destroy credit, and create insurmountable barriers to financial stability.43
This is the predictable consequence of a system that forces its citizens to gamble with their health and their future.
Ultimately, addressing the dangers of the “emergency-only” insurance market requires more than just better consumer education and stronger warnings.
While tools like the Summary of Benefits and Coverage and resources like State Health Insurance Assistance Programs are vital, they are palliative measures treating the symptoms of a deeper systemic illness.
A true solution must address the root causes: the unsustainable cost of medical care itself and the pervasive and growing crisis of underinsurance.
Until the day that having health insurance once again means having a reliable and affordable shield against financial hardship, Americans will continue to seek out desperate measures, and the safety net will, for too many, remain a trap.
Works cited
- He Bought Health Insurance for Emergencies. Then He Fell Into a …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.propublica.org/article/junk-insurance
- Spot Health Insurance Scams | Consumer Advice, accessed August 12, 2025, https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/spot-health-insurance-scams
- Catastrophic Insurance: Plans & Emergency Coverage | eHealth, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/health-plans/catastrophic-insurance
- Health Insurance for Emergencies | Decent, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.decent.com/blog/health-insurance-for-emergencies
- Catastrophic Health Insurance: Plans, Coverage, and More, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-catastrophic-health-insurance-1738813
- Catastrophic Plans – Insurance for Major Emergencies – UHOne.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.uhone.com/health-insurance/catastrophic-plans
- Find out what Marketplace health insurance plans cover | HealthCare.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/what-marketplace-plans-cover/
- Catastrophic health plans | HealthCare.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/choose-a-plan/catastrophic-health-plans/
- Catastrophic Health Insurance: What Is It And How Does It Work? – Forbes, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/catastrophic-health-insurance/
- Catastrophic Health Insurance Coverage | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/knowledge-center/what-is-catastrophic-health-insurance
- What is a catastrophic health insurance plan? – Maryland Health Connection, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.marylandhealthconnection.gov/glossaryslug/catastrophic-plan/
- What is a catastrophic health plan, and is it right for you? – UHOne.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.uhone.com/health-and-wellness/health-insurance/what-is-a-catastrophic-health-plan-and-is-it-right-for-you
- What is Short Term Health Insurance? | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/knowledge-center/what-is-short-term-health-insurance
- ACA vs Short Term Health Insurance: Pros and Cons | eHealth, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/resources/short-term/aca-vs-short-term-health-insurance
- Short term health insurance | Individuals & families | UnitedHealthcare, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.uhc.com/individuals-families/short-term-health-insurance
- Non ACA Health Insurance Explained: Pros, Cons, and How It Works? – AHiX Marketplace, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ahix.com/blog/non-aca-health-insurance-explained/
- What you need to know about short-term medical plans – Insurance.wa.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insurance.wa.gov/insurance-resources/health-insurance/health-insurance-coverage/what-you-need-know-about-short-term-medical-plans
- Short-Term Health Insurance for Californians – Covered California, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.coveredca.com/marketing-blog/short-term-health-insurance-for-californians/
- Commentary: Growing Evidence Shows Need for Stronger Rules for Short-Term Health Plans, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/commentary-growing-evidence-shows-need-for-stronger-rules-for-short-term-health
- Why Do Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Have Lower Premiums Than Plans That Comply with the ACA? | KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/why-do-short-term-health-insurance-plans-have-lower-premiums-than-plans-that-comply-with-the-aca/
- Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Charge Less than Half as Much in Premiums as ACA Plans By Excluding Pre-Existing Conditions and Severely Limiting Benefits | KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/press-release/short-term-health-insurance-plans-charge-less-than-half-as-much-in-premiums-as-aca-plans-by-excluding-pre-existing-conditions-and-severely-limiting-benefits/
- Limited-Benefit Plans and Alternative Coverage – Insurance – GoodRx, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.goodrx.com/insurance/alternative
- Analysis: Most Short-Term Health Plans Don’t Cover Drug Treatment or Prescription Drugs, and None Cover Maternity Care | KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/press-release/analysis-most-short-term-health-plans-dont-cover-drug-treatment-or-prescription-drugs-and-none-cover-maternity-care/
- What is ACA-compliant coverage? – Healthinsurance.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthinsurance.org/glossary/aca-compliant-coverage/
- What is a limited-benefit plan? – Healthinsurance.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthinsurance.org/glossary/limited-benefit-plan/
- Hospital Confinement Indemnity Insurance Plans – Colonial Life, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.coloniallife.com/individuals/products/hospital-indemnity-insurance
- Should My Business Offer Limited Health Plans? – KBI Benefits, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kbibenefits.com/should-my-business-offer-limited-health-plans
- Hospital indemnity insurance – MetLife, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.metlife.com/insurance/accident-health/hospital-indemnity-insurance/
- What Is Hospital Indemnity Insurance? Coverage & Benefits – MetLife, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.metlife.com/stories/accident-health/insurance-you-want-if-you-end-up-in-hospital/
- Hospital Indemnity Insurance | Chubb, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.chubb.com/us-en/business-insurance/hospital-indemnity-insurance.html
- Hospital Indemnity Insurance – What Is It | Anthem, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.anthem.com/individual-and-family/insurance-basics/supplemental-limited-duration-insurance/hospital-indemnity
- Assurance IQ and MediaAlpha to Pay a Total of $145 Million to …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/08/assurance-iq-mediaalpha-pay-total-145-million-settle-ftc-charges-they-misled-consumers-seeking
- Best Short-Term Health Insurance Companies Of 2025 – Forbes, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/best-short-term-health-insurance/
- How Many Are Underinsured? Trends Among U.S. Adults, 2003 And 2007 | Health Affairs, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.w298
- Medical Debt among People With Health Insurance – KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/report-section/medical-debt-among-people-with-health-insurance-how-does-medical-debt-become-a-problem-for-people-with-health-insurance/view/print/
- State of Health Insurance Coverage in U.S.: 2024 Biennial Survey | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/surveys/2024/nov/state-health-insurance-coverage-us-2024-biennial-survey
- The US Medical Debt Crisis: Catastrophic Costs of Insufficient Health Coverage, accessed August 12, 2025, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/medical-debt/
- Be ready: What is Hospital Indemnity Insurance, and how can it help you? | Voya.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.voya.com/blog/be-ready-what-hospital-indemnity-insurance-and-how-can-it-help-you
- Alternative health plans – Texas Department of Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/consumer/alternative-health-plans.html
- How Much Does An Emergency Room Visit Cost? (2025) – BetterCare, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bettercare.com/costs/er-visit-cost
- How Much Does Healthcare Cost in the U.S.? [2024 Data] – International Citizens Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.internationalinsurance.com/resources/healthcare-costs-in-the-usa.php
- Urgent Care vs Emergency Room Costs, Differences and Options – Debt.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.debt.org/medical/emergency-room-urgent-care-costs/
- The Burden of Medical Debt in the United States – KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
- The burden of medical debt in the United States – Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
- Diagnosis: Debt – KFF Health News, accessed August 12, 2025, https://kffhealthnews.org/diagnosis-debt/
- The Burden of Medical Debt – Section 2: The Role of Health Insurance – 8806 – KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/report-section/the-burden-of-medical-debt-section-2-the-role-of-health-insurance/
- AHA Senate Statement on What Can Congress Do to End the Medical Debt Crisis in America – American Hospital Association, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aha.org/testimony/2024-07-10-aha-senate-statement-what-can-congress-do-end-medical-debt-crisis-america
- Polling on Medical Debt Illustrates the Challenges that Blocked Credit Reporting Rule Sought to Address | KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/quick-take/polling-on-medical-debt-illustrates-the-challenges-that-blocked-credit-reporting-rule-sought-to-address/
- ONLY HALF THE PROBLEM IS BEING ADDRESSED: UNDERINSURANCE IS AS BIG A PROBLEM AS UNINSURANCE – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3506388/
- Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs – KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
- Updated: The Potential Impact of Short-Term Limited-Duration Policies on Insurance Coverage, Premiums, and Federal Spending – Urban Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/96781/2001727_updated_finalized.pdf
- Claims Denials and Appeals in ACA Marketplace Plans in 2023 – KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/issue-brief/claims-denials-and-appeals-in-aca-marketplace-plans-in-2023/
- HealthCare.gov Insurers Denied Nearly 1 in 5 In-Network Claims in 2023, but Information About Reasons is Limited in Public Data | KFF, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/press-release/healthcare-gov-insurers-denied-nearly-1-in-5-in-network-claims-in-2023-but-information-about-reasons-is-limited-in-public-data/
- How Insurance Claim Denials Harm Patients’ Health, Finances, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ajmc.com/view/how-insurance-claim-denials-harm-patients-health-finances
- Shapiro Administration Releases Health Insurers Claims Data Report, Highlights D – Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.pa.gov/agencies/insurance/newsroom/shapiro-administration-releases-health-insurers-claims-data-report-highlights-denial-appeal-process-to-ensure-pennsylvanians-receive-benefits-they-are-owed
- ACA-qualified vs non-ACA-qualified individual health insurance – LegUp Health, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.leguphealth.com/blog/aca-qualified-vs-non-aca-qualified-individual-health-insurance
- The Affordable Care Act and Insurer Business Practices – AMA Journal of Ethics, accessed August 12, 2025, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/affordable-care-act-and-insurer-business-practices/2015-08
- ACA vs Non-ACA Plans: Understanding Your Health Insurance Options, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.inshura.com/blog/aca-vs-non-aca-plans-understanding-health-insurance-options/
- Navigating the Maze: A Look at Health Insurance Complexities and Consumer Protections, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/issue-brief/navigating-the-maze-a-look-at-health-insurance-complexities-and-consumer-protections/
- any advice for emergency health insurance : r/HealthInsurance – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HealthInsurance/comments/15js2nr/any_advice_for_emergency_health_insurance/
- Guide to the Summary and Benefits of Coverage – National Health Council, accessed August 12, 2025, https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NHC_Files/Pdf_Files/Summary_and_Benefits_Guide.pdf
- Understanding the Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC): Fast Facts for Assisters – CMS, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/marketplace/technical-assistance-resources/summary-of-benefits-fast-facts.pdf
- Summary of Benefits and Coverage – the Health Insurance Marketplace, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/health-care-law-protections/summary-of-benefits-and-coverage/
- 2023 National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT HEALTH CARE REFORM TABLE OF CONTENTS – NAIC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/ci-faq-updates-for-2024.pdf
- How to Read Your Summary of Benefits and Coverage – BeWell, New Mexico’s Health Insurance Marketplace – beWellnm.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bewellnm.com/blogs/how-to-read-your-summary-of-benefits-and-coverage/
- State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP), accessed August 12, 2025, https://acl.gov/programs/connecting-people-services/state-health-insurance-assistance-program-ship
- State Health Insurance Assistance Programs: Home, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.shiphelp.org/
- How to Choose the Best Emergency Health Care Insurance – AHiX Marketplace, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ahix.com/blog/best-emergency-health-care-insurance-for-your-family/
- 3 things to know before you pick a health insurance plan | HealthCare.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/choose-a-plan/comparing-plans/
- Consumer – NAIC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://content.naic.org/consumer
- Filing a Consumer Complaint About Health Insurance: A Step by Step Guide – Community Catalyst, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.communitycatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Filing-a-Consumer-Complaint-Step-by-Step-Guide-FINAL-1.pdf
- How can I get consumer help if I have insurance? | HealthCare.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthcare.gov/how-can-i-get-consumer-help-if-i-have-insurance/
- Consumers for Affordable Health Care, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mainecahc.org/
- Helping Californians get the health care they need – Health Consumer Alliance (HCA), accessed August 12, 2025, https://healthconsumer.org/
- What is a Consumer Assistance Program? – Maryland Health Connection, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.marylandhealthconnection.gov/glossaryslug/consumer-assistance-program/
- State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) – Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nemcsa.org/services/senior-services/state-health-insurance-assistance-program-ship.html
- Success Stories – State Health Insurance Assistance Programs, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.shiphelp.org/success-stories
- Senior Health Insurance Program – Illinois Department on Aging, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ilaging.illinois.gov/ship.html
- Healthcare debts in the United States: a silent fight – PMC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918610/
