The Two Roads: A Journey Through the American Medicaid Maze

Introduction: The Diagnosis

Maria’s world tilted the day a doctor, in the quiet of a small examination room, gave a name to the constellation of symptoms that had shadowed her seven-year-old son, Leo. It was a chronic condition, one that would require a lifetime of specialized care, expensive medications, and regular monitoring. For Maria, a single mother working a job that offered no health insurance, the diagnosis was a dual blow: a fear for her son’s health and the paralyzing terror of how she would ever afford his care.¹ Her story, a composite of the experiences of millions of American families, is the story of an encounter with Medicaid—a system that is at once a lifeline and a labyrinth.

Maria and Leo are not alone. They stand with over 83 million Americans who depend on Medicaid, the single largest source of health coverage in the United States.³ This joint federal and state program is the bedrock of the nation’s healthcare safety net, accounting for nearly one out of every five dollars spent on health care.⁵ It is the primary insurer for the country’s most vulnerable populations, covering 39% of all children, including 82% of children living in poverty. It is the principal payer for long-term care, supporting the majority of nursing home residents, and a critical source of coverage for pregnant women, low-income parents, and individuals with profound disabilities.⁷ For families like Maria’s, for children like Leo, Medicaid is not an abstract policy; it is, as one mother put it, the difference between a child who can thrive and one who “can’t live”.¹

This report navigates the complex world of Medicaid through the lens of Maria’s journey. It begins with the initial, often bewildering, process of establishing eligibility and choosing a plan. It then plunges into the challenges of navigating the modern system of managed care, from finding a doctor in a “phantom network” to fighting for approval for necessary treatments. Finally, it pulls back to reveal the architectural choices—the financing mechanisms and policy decisions made in state capitals and Washington, D.C.—that shape every beneficiary’s reality. Maria’s story reveals a fundamental paradox at the heart of American healthcare: Medicaid is a guaranteed entitlement to care ⁵, yet it is delivered through 56 different, often contradictory and confusing, state-based systems.⁵ It is a journey of struggle and discovery, one that exposes the vast gap between the promise of care and the bureaucratic ordeal often required to obtain it.

---

Part I: The Gateway

The first phase of any Medicaid journey involves passing through a series of gates. For a family in crisis, these initial steps—proving eligibility and making a foundational choice about how to receive care—are often the most daunting. This is the threshold where the promise of healthcare meets the hard reality of bureaucracy.

Chapter 1: Crossing the Threshold: The Ordeal of Eligibility

The relief Maria felt upon learning that help might be available was quickly replaced by a wave of confusion. She discovered that Medicaid is not a single, uniform program. Eligibility is a patchwork of state-specific rules, a complex maze of income charts and acronyms that vary dramatically from one state to the next.¹⁰

Her journey began with understanding the two primary pathways into the program. For most children, pregnant women, and adults in states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), eligibility is determined using Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI). This method, based on taxable income and tax-filing relationships, was intended to simplify the process.³ Yet, Maria found that even this “simpler” path was complex. The income limit for a child like Leo was different from the limit for a parent like herself, and both would be different for a pregnant woman—with each threshold varying significantly by state.³ For other groups, such as seniors and people with disabilities, a completely different set of rules applies. This “non-MAGI” pathway is generally based on the stringent methodologies of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program and often includes strict limits on assets and resources—the amount of money one can have in the bank or the value of a second car, for instance.³ These parallel and distinct entry points create a system that can feel arbitrary and opaque.

The very structure of this federal-state partnership creates what can only be described as a “lottery of geography.” Because states establish their own eligibility standards and benefit packages under broad federal guidelines, a person’s access to life-sustaining care is fundamentally determined by their zip code.⁵ The federal government provides a financial match for state spending, known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), which is higher for states with lower per capita incomes.⁶ However, the crucial decision to expand Medicaid to cover nearly all low-income adults under the ACA was left to the states.⁸ In states that did not expand, a “coverage gap” persists, leaving millions of adults like Maria earning too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid but not enough to receive subsidies for private insurance on the marketplace.⁸ A family’s health and financial security are therefore contingent not on their need, but on the political and economic calculus of the state they happen to call home.

Overwhelmed, Maria sought help from a Medicaid Navigator. The very existence of this role—a trained, unbiased expert paid through government grants to help people apply—is a testament to the system’s overwhelming complexity.¹⁹ The Navigator walked Maria through the essential non-financial requirements: proving she was a resident of the state, was a U.S. citizen or qualified non-citizen, and had a Social Security number for Leo.³ This guidance was invaluable, but the Navigator had a critical limitation: they could help Maria apply, but they could not recommend a specific health plan.¹⁹ That choice, she would have to make alone.

This process is more than just a series of administrative hurdles; it is a form of “administrative burden” that imposes immense costs on the most vulnerable. The confusing MAGI and non-MAGI rules and intricate income charts represent high learning costs.³ The endless paperwork and documentation requirements are significant

compliance costs. And the stress, anxiety, and stigma of navigating this bureaucracy inflict profound psychological costs.²² This burden is not an accidental byproduct of the system; it functions as a form of gatekeeping, a non-financial barrier so high that it can deter eligible people from accessing the benefits to which they are legally entitled.

Chapter 2: The Fork in the Road: Fee-for-Service vs. Managed Care

After weeks of gathering documents and filling out forms, Maria received an approval notice. She and Leo were covered. But her relief was short-lived. The notice presented her with another monumental choice, a fork in the road that would define their entire healthcare experience: enroll in a private Managed Care plan or use traditional Fee-for-Service Medicaid.

The first path, Fee-for-Service (FFS), can be thought of as an open road. In this traditional model, the state Medicaid agency pays doctors, hospitals, and other providers directly for each individual service they deliver.²⁵ The primary advantage of this model is freedom of choice. Maria could take Leo to any specialist in the state who was willing to accept Medicaid, and she generally wouldn’t need a referral from a primary care gatekeeper to do so.²⁷ However, this open road is filled with potential obstacles. FFS payment rates for physicians are notoriously low—on average, just 67% of what Medicare pays—a factor that discourages many doctors from participating in the program at all.⁹ Finding a specialist willing to accept a new Medicaid patient could be a long and frustrating search. Moreover, under FFS, care is often fragmented. No single entity is responsible for coordinating Leo’s care among his various doctors, a significant concern for a child with a complex, chronic condition.²⁶

The second path, Managed Care, is more like a guided tour. This is now the dominant model in American Medicaid, with over 70% of all beneficiaries enrolled in a Managed Care Organization (MCO).³⁰ Under this model, the state pays a private insurance company a fixed monthly fee for each person enrolled—a “capitation payment”—and the MCO becomes responsible for managing and paying for all of that person’s care.²⁵ For Maria, the MCOs promised better care coordination, population health management, and access to a 24/7 nurse advice line—all highly attractive features for a parent of a child with special needs.²⁶ The plans might also offer “value-added” benefits not available in FFS, like extra transportation services or wellness programs.³² The trade-off for these conveniences is a loss of freedom. Maria and Leo would be restricted to using doctors and hospitals within the MCO’s network.²⁷ Access to specialists would likely require a referral from a primary care provider, and the MCO itself would become a new gatekeeper, requiring prior authorization for many services.

This nationwide shift from FFS to managed care represents a fundamental restructuring of Medicaid. It is a move by states to privatize both financial risk and administrative responsibility. The capitated payment model means the MCO is at financial risk; it can keep as profit any money not spent on care, but it loses money if costs exceed the fixed payment.²⁵ This structure explicitly shifts the risk of unpredictable healthcare costs from the state, which gains budget predictability, to the private corporation.³⁰ This creates a powerful, inherent incentive for the MCO to control utilization and costs. The very challenges Maria would soon face with narrow provider networks and prior authorization denials are not bugs in the system; they are features, the direct and logical consequences of a privatized, risk-bearing model where a beneficiary’s access to care is mediated by an entity with a bottom-line financial interest.

Feature	Fee-for-Service (FFS)	Managed Care (MCO)
Provider Choice	Broad: Any willing Medicaid provider 27	Limited: Must use providers in the plan’s network 28
Finding a Doctor	Patient’s responsibility; can be difficult due to low payment rates 25	Plan helps assign a Primary Care Provider; network may be narrow 26
Specialist Referrals	Generally not required 34	Often required from Primary Care Provider 34
Care Coordination	None; care is fragmented 26	A key feature; plan is responsible for managing care 25
Extra Benefits	Only state-defined mandatory/optional benefits 15	May offer “value-added” services like gym memberships or extra transportation 28
Appeals Process	State fair hearing 26	Must first appeal to the plan, then can go to a state fair hearing 26

---

Part II: The Managed Care Gauntlet

Persuaded by the promise of coordinated care for Leo’s complex condition, Maria chose the guided tour. She decided to enroll in a Managed Care Organization. In doing so, she stepped from one labyrinth into another. This new path came with its own set of trials, a gauntlet of challenges endemic to the managed care model, where the needs of the patient are often pitted against the financial incentives of the plan.

Chapter 3: Picking a Team: The Search for a Network

Maria’s first task was to choose a specific MCO from a list of several available in her county.³³ She approached the decision diligently, trying to be an informed consumer. Her first priority was to ensure that Leo’s trusted pediatric specialist was in-network, so she began by consulting the online provider directories for each plan.³⁶ Next, she compared the “value-added” services—the extra benefits like transportation or wellness programs that MCOs use to compete for members.³³ Finally, she looked for state-produced consumer report cards and member satisfaction surveys, hoping to find objective data on plan quality.⁴¹

Her research quickly devolved into a frustrating ordeal. The provider directories, which should have been her most reliable tool, were riddled with errors. This phenomenon of “phantom networks” is a well-documented flaw in the system.⁴⁵ She found doctors listed who were no longer at the given address, who were not accepting new Medicaid patients, or who, upon calling their office, confirmed they did not participate in the plan at all.⁴⁵ Each call was a new dead end, a small but significant drain on her time and emotional energy as she navigated a system that seemed designed to confuse and exhaust.⁴⁷

This experience reveals that the concept of “network adequacy” is often a regulatory fiction. Federal and state rules require MCOs to maintain networks with a sufficient number and geographic distribution of providers, often measured by quantitative standards like travel time and distance.⁴⁵ However, states have broad discretion in setting and enforcing these standards, and oversight is often weak.⁴⁵ The system relies on MCOs self-reporting data from their provider directories, but if those directories are fundamentally inaccurate, the entire regulatory framework rests on a faulty foundation. Studies show that care for Medicaid patients is often highly concentrated among a very small number of physicians, meaning the functional network is far smaller than what is presented on paper.⁴⁶ While states may have enforcement mechanisms like corrective action plans or financial penalties, they are often not specific to network failures or are too small to be a meaningful deterrent for a multi-billion dollar insurance company.⁴⁵ The result is a system where a plan can be compliant on paper while beneficiaries like Maria are left with functionally inadequate access to care. The burden of verifying the network—of discovering which providers are real and which are phantoms—is shifted from the plan to the patient. This inadequacy is not a simple administrative error; its roots lie in the low reimbursement rates and high administrative burdens that discourage providers from participating in Medicaid networks in the first place.⁴⁶

Chapter 4: The Great Wall: Prior Authorization

After hours of painstaking research, Maria finally selected a plan that seemed to include Leo’s specialist. For a few months, the system worked. But then Leo’s doctor recommended a new, highly effective but costly therapy. The request was sent to the MCO for prior authorization. The denial arrived a week later. Maria had just hit the great wall of managed care.

The denial notice was a masterpiece of bureaucratic obfuscation, filled with clinical jargon about “medical necessity” and lacking a clear explanation for the decision.⁵² Maria’s experience is tragically common. Medicaid MCOs have prior authorization denial rates that are more than double those of private Medicare Advantage plans, with some plans denying more than a quarter of all requests.⁵² For patients, these denials are not just paperwork; they are barriers to care that can lead to dangerous delays, treatment abandonment, and a measurable decline in health.⁵⁴

With her doctor’s office, Maria entered the appeals labyrinth. She discovered a process that imposes a staggering burden on providers, who report spending an average of 13 hours per week on prior authorization paperwork and often must hire dedicated staff just to manage the workload.⁵⁴ The timelines for a decision, while federally mandated, feel agonizingly slow when a child’s health is at stake.⁵² The plan offered a “peer-to-peer” review, but this often means a specialist must argue their case with a plan-employed doctor from a completely different field who lacks the clinical expertise to properly evaluate the request.⁵⁶ The odds were stacked against her. A staggering 89% of MCO denials are never appealed by beneficiaries, and of the few that are, only about one-third are overturned at the plan level.⁵²

In the managed care context, prior authorization has evolved from a tool for ensuring clinical quality into a primary mechanism for cost containment. It functions as a form of systemic rationing. The process is not designed for clinical collaboration but for friction. The high denial rates, the immense provider burden, the confusing notices, and the low probability of a successful appeal are not individual flaws but interconnected components of a system highly effective at reducing MCO expenditures. By making the process so opaque, burdensome, and adversarial, plans create an obstacle course that leads many providers and patients to simply give up.⁵⁴ This is rationing by bureaucracy, achieving cost savings for the plan by delaying and denying care to its members.

Step	Description	Key Terms to Know	Typical Timeline	Pro-Tip for Beneficiaries
1. Initial Request & Denial	Your provider submits a request for a service or medication. The MCO denies it.	Medical Necessity, Clinical Criteria	7-14 calendar days for standard requests; 72 hours for expedited requests.52	Ask your doctor for the exact clinical reason for the denial and what specific information the plan says it needs.52
2. Internal MCO Appeal	You or your provider formally ask the MCO to reconsider its decision.	Internal Appeal, Peer-to-Peer Review	You must file the appeal within 60 days of the date on the denial notice.52	Submit a detailed letter of medical necessity from your doctor. Include any supporting studies or personal testimony about the need for the treatment.52
3. External Review / State Fair Hearing	If the MCO upholds its denial, you can appeal to an independent third party or the state.	State Fair Hearing, External Medical Review	Varies by state.	This is a formal, often legal, proceeding. Contact your state’s Medicaid Ombudsman or a legal aid society for free assistance and representation.26

---

Part III: Specialized Lifelines & Systemic Forces

After weeks of fighting, Maria’s appeal was successful. Leo would get his therapy. But the experience changed her. She sought out a support group for parents of children with chronic illnesses, and there, her understanding of Medicaid expanded dramatically. She learned that the system she had been battling was just one part of a much larger, more complex universe of programs, all shaped by powerful forces of policy and finance.

Chapter 5: Finding the Right Path: Specialized Plans and Waivers

In her support group, Maria met families whose journeys through Medicaid had taken them down different paths, revealing a system with a surprising degree of adaptability designed to meet the most intensive needs.

She met the parents of a child with severe developmental disabilities who were not enrolled in a standard MCO. Instead, they relied on a Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waiver. They explained that this special program, authorized under Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act, provided the funds for in-home nursing, medical equipment, and specialized therapies that allowed their child to live a full life at home, rather than in an institution.¹ This conversation illuminated Medicaid’s crucial, and often invisible, role as the nation’s primary payer for long-term services and supports (LTSS)—a role no other insurer, public or private, fills on such a scale.⁷

Another woman in the group was caring for her elderly husband, who had Alzheimer’s disease. They were “dually eligible,” meaning they had both Medicare and Medicaid. She explained how Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs), which are administered by Medicaid, helped pay her husband’s Medicare Part B premiums and other cost-sharing that would otherwise be unaffordable.⁶¹ Critically, she explained that while Medicare paid for his doctor visits and hospital stays, it was Medicaid that would cover the astronomical cost of nursing home care when he could no longer live at home—a benefit Medicare largely excludes.¹²

The stories continued, revealing an ecosystem of specialized programs. Maria learned about HIV Special Needs Plans (SNPs) and Health and Recovery Plans (HARPs) designed for people with serious mental illness, which offer tailored benefits and care management.¹² She heard about programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) that provide an extra layer of support beyond what standard Medicaid offers.⁶⁵

The existence of this vast array of waivers, buy-in programs, and specialized plans reveals a core truth about the American healthcare landscape. Medicaid, originally a narrow program tied to cash welfare ⁹, has evolved to become a series of essential “patches” that cover the profound failures and gaps left by the private insurance market and even Medicare. It has become the nation’s de facto long-term care insurer because Medicare does not cover it and private options are inaccessible to most.⁸ It has become the backstop for low-income seniors for whom Medicare’s own out-of-pocket costs are too high.⁶¹ These specialized programs are not minor tweaks; they are fundamental adaptations that demonstrate Medicaid’s role as the ultimate safety net for the populations with the most complex and costly needs—a role for which it was not originally designed but has been forced by necessity to assume.

Chapter 6: The Architects of the Maze: How Policy Shapes Reality

Maria’s journey, from the initial eligibility ordeal to the prior authorization battle, felt deeply personal. Yet, as she learned more, she began to see the invisible architecture shaping her reality. Every frustration, every barrier, and every lifeline could be traced back to foundational policy and financing decisions made miles away in her state capital and in Washington, D.C.

The entire system is built on the federal-state partnership, a concept that sounds collaborative but in practice creates vast inequities.¹² The engine of this partnership is the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP). This is an open-ended matching formula where the federal government pays a share of each state’s Medicaid costs. The formula is designed to be progressive, with the federal government picking up a larger share of the bill in states with lower per capita incomes, ensuring a match of at least 50% and up to 83%.⁵

While the federal government provides the majority of the funds and sets broad rules, it is the states that wield immense power over the day-to-day reality of the program. States decide who is eligible, what benefits are covered, how services are delivered, and how much to pay providers.⁵ This discretion is the direct cause of the “lottery of geography” Maria first encountered.

A few key policy choices, made at the state level, have the most profound impact:

• The ACA Expansion: The decision of whether to expand Medicaid to cover low-income adults is the single most significant choice a state makes. In expansion states, a parent like Maria is likely eligible for coverage herself. In a non-expansion state, an identical parent could fall into the coverage gap, uninsured and unable to afford care.⁸ This single policy decision creates two entirely different Americas for the working poor.⁷¹
• The Delivery System: A state’s choice to deliver benefits primarily through private MCOs rather than a state-run FFS system is a policy decision that trades budget predictability for the introduction of managed care gatekeeping. This choice directly created the prior authorization gauntlet that Maria and her doctor had to run.²⁵
• Provider Payment Rates: The rates a state chooses to pay its doctors and hospitals are a direct policy lever. Setting low reimbursement rates, often a choice driven by state budget constraints, is a primary cause of narrow provider networks and the “phantom provider” problem that makes finding care so difficult.²⁵

Maria came to understand that her struggles were not the result of random bad luck or isolated administrative errors. They were the predictable outcomes of a complex system of interlocking policy choices, a maze designed by architects with competing priorities of cost, access, and political ideology.

---

Conclusion: From Patient to Advocate

Maria’s journey through the Medicaid maze was a trial by bureaucratic fire. She began as a frightened mother, overwhelmed by a complex diagnosis and a seemingly impenetrable system. She emerged as an empowered navigator, a fierce advocate for her son, and a voice in her community. Having successfully fought for Leo’s care, she is no longer a passive recipient of services but an active participant who understands the system’s flaws and its profound importance.

Her story synthesizes the lived reality of millions. It validates the data showing that while the vast majority of Medicaid enrollees rate their coverage positively once they have it, more than half report experiencing significant problems trying to use it.⁷² The journey reveals a system defined by paradoxes: the “lottery of geography” that makes care dependent on one’s address; the privatization of risk through managed care that pits profit against patients; the regulatory fiction of “network adequacy” that masks a reality of phantom providers; and the systemic rationing of care through the gauntlet of prior authorization.

For families about to embark on this journey, Maria’s experience offers a roadmap. For policymakers, it serves as an urgent call for reform.

Actionable Guidance for Beneficiaries

Choosing a Medicaid managed care plan is one of the most critical decisions a family will make. Based on the challenges encountered by beneficiaries across the country, the following checklist can help turn confusion into a clear plan of action.

Checklist: Choosing Your Managed Care Plan

1. Verify Your Doctors: Do not trust the plan’s provider directory. Call the offices of your most important doctors and specialists directly. Ask the receptionist two questions: “Do you participate in [Plan Name] Medicaid?” and “Are you currently accepting new patients with this plan?”.³⁷
2. Confirm Specialist Access: If you or a family member has a special health need, confirm that the plan’s network includes the right type of specialists (e.g., pediatric cardiologists, behavioral health providers). Ask if you will need a referral from your primary care doctor to see them.³⁹
3. Review the Drug Formulary: If you take regular prescription medications, find the plan’s formulary (list of covered drugs) on its website or call member services. Ensure your medications are on the list and find out what the co-payment, if any, will be.³⁶
4. Compare the “Extras”: Look closely at the value-added services. One plan might offer better transportation benefits, which could be critical for getting to appointments. Another might have a wellness program or rewards for healthy behaviors that fit your family’s needs.³²
5. Seek Expert Help: You do not have to make this choice alone. Most states have enrollment brokers or Navigators who are trained to help you compare plans and understand your options. Their services are free.³⁵

Recommendations for Policymakers

The challenges faced by beneficiaries are not insurmountable; they are the result of policy choices that can be changed. Meaningful reform should focus on three key areas:

1. Strengthen Network Adequacy Oversight: The fiction of “phantom networks” must end. States and the federal government must mandate and fund regular, independent, third-party validation of MCO provider directories. This includes “secret shopper” calls to verify provider availability. Meaningful, escalating financial penalties must be enforced for non-compliance to ensure MCOs have a real incentive to maintain accurate and accessible networks.
2. Reform Prior Authorization: The process must be reformed to prioritize patient care over bureaucratic delay. This includes requiring MCOs to use publicly transparent, binding clinical criteria; simplifying and standardizing denial notices and the appeals process; and implementing automatic external medical reviews for all upheld denials of medically necessary care.
3. Close the Coverage Gap: The single most effective action to improve health equity and access in the United States is for the remaining states to expand their Medicaid programs. The federal government should continue to offer enhanced financial incentives to encourage this expansion, ensuring that no American is denied healthcare simply because of where they live.

Medicaid is far more than a line item in a federal or state budget. It is the foundational promise that in a country of immense wealth, a sick child will get care, a person with a disability can live with dignity, and a family can weather a medical catastrophe without being driven into financial ruin.⁶⁰ Maria’s journey underscores the profound importance of this promise and the urgent moral imperative to dismantle the bureaucratic barriers that prevent it from becoming a reality for all who depend on it.

Works cited

1. Medicaid Stories Library – Modern Medicaid Alliance, accessed August 11, 2025, https://modernmedicaid.org/medicaid-stories-library/
2. Why Medicaid Matters to Me: Five New York Stories, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medicaidmattersny.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Why-Medicaid-Matters-to-Me-Five-NY-Stories.pdf
3. Eligibility Policy | Medicaid, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/eligibility-policy
4. Medicaid State Fact Sheets – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/interactive/medicaid-state-fact-sheets/
5. Medicaid 101 – MACPAC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.macpac.gov/medicaid-101/
6. Medicaid Financing: The Basics – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-financing-the-basics/
7. Medicaid 101 – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-policy-101-medicaid/
8. A Medicaid Overview – Q&A with Kaiser Family Foundation – Funders Roundtable, accessed August 11, 2025, https://fundersroundtable.org/2020/01/16/a-medicaid-overview-qa-with-kaiser-family-foundation/
9. Medicaid: The Health and Economic Benefits of Expanding Eligibility – HHS ASPE, accessed August 11, 2025, https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/effbde36dd9852a49d10e66e4a4ee333/medicaid-health-economic-benefits.pdf
10. What’s the difference between Medicare and Medicaid? – HHS.gov, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/answers/medicare-and-medicaid/what-is-the-difference-between-medicare-medicaid/index.html
11. 10 Things to Know About Medicaid – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/10-things-to-know-about-medicaid/
12. Medicaid | Medicare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.medicare.gov/basics/costs/help/medicaid
13. Who’s eligible for Medicaid? – HHS.gov, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/answers/medicare-and-medicaid/who-is-eligible-for-medicaid/index.html
14. NC Medicaid Eligibility, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medicaid.ncdhhs.gov/eligibility
15. Medicaid – Health, United States – CDC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/sources-definitions/medicaid.htm
16. Medicaid / ​Medical Assistance General Eligibility Requirements – Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.pa.gov/agencies/dhs/resources/medicaid/medicaid-general-eligibility
17. Medicaid Eligibility Income Chart by State (Updated July 2025), accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.medicaidplanningassistance.org/medicaid-eligibility-income-chart/
18. How Do We Pay for Medicaid? – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/explainer/2025/mar/how-do-we-pay-for-medicaid
19. What are Navigators? – Healthinsurance.org, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.healthinsurance.org/glossary/navigator/
20. Navigators and Assisters | Health Affairs, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20131031.857471/
21. Assister Roles and Responsibilities – MNsure, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.mnsure.org/assister-central/shared-resources/joint-policies/assister-roles-and-responsibilities.jsp
22. Health care administrative burdens: Centering patient experiences – PMC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522557/
23. How Administrative Burdens Can Harm Health | McCourt School of Public Policy, accessed August 11, 2025, https://mccourt.georgetown.edu/news/how-administrative-burdens-can-harm-health/
24. How Administrative Burdens Can Harm Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20200904.405159/
25. Provider payment and delivery systems – MACPAC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.macpac.gov/medicaid-101/provider-payment-and-delivery-systems/
26. Medicaid managed care and fee-for-service – Washington State …, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hca.wa.gov/sites/default/files/program/managed-care-and-ffs.pdf
27. Different Types of Managed Care Plans – Community Health Advocates, accessed August 11, 2025, https://communityhealthadvocates.org/healthcareqa/how-do-i-use-my-health-insurance/different-types-of-managed-care-plans/
28. Managed care’s effect on outcomes – MACPAC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.macpac.gov/subtopic/managed-cares-effect-on-outcomes/
29. Medicaid Managed Care 101, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.dmas.virginia.gov/media/2104/va-medicaid-managed-care-10-2-2019_final-draft.pdf
30. Why did they do it that way? Understanding managed care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medicaiddirectors.org/resource/understanding-managed-care/
31. 10 Things to Know About Medicaid Managed Care – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/10-things-to-know-about-medicaid-managed-care/
32. Choose – Virginia Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://virginiamanagedcare.com/choose
33. Compare health plans | NC Medicaid Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://ncmedicaidplans.gov/viewhealthplans
34. Medicaid Delivery Systems 101 – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/health/medicaid-delivery-systems-101
35. Enrolling in a Health Plan – Statewide Medicaid Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.flmedicaidmanagedcare.com/health/enroll
36. STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR CHOOSING A HEALTH PLAN – Education Resource Library, accessed August 11, 2025, https://education.patientadvocate.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Step-by-Step-Guide-Marketplace.pdf
37. Members: Managed Care Health Plans – Indiana Medicaid – IN.gov, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.in.gov/medicaid/members/member-resources/managed-care-health-plans/
38. Managed Care Enrollment – the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) website, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.dhs.state.mn.us/dhs16_145398/
39. Frequently asked questions – NC Medicaid Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://ncmedicaidplans.gov/get-answers
40. Tips for choosing a health plan | NC Medicaid Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://ncmedicaidplans.gov/tips-choosing-health-plan
41. Healthplan Report Card – AHCCCS, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.azahcccs.gov/Resources/HPRC/
42. Consumer Report Card – On Health Insurance Carriers In Connecticut October 2024 – CT.gov, accessed August 11, 2025, https://portal.ct.gov/cid/-/media/cid/reports/consumer-report-card/2024-consumerreportcard.pdf
43. Medicaid Satisfaction Survey Report – April 2025 – New York State Department of Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/managed_care/medicaid_satisfaction_report/2025/
44. Medicaid Satisfaction Survey Report – April 2024 – New York State Department of Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/managed_care/medicaid_satisfaction_report/2024/
45. Medicaid Managed Care Network Adequacy & Access: Current Standards and Proposed Changes | KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-managed-care-network-adequacy-access-current-standards-and-proposed-changes/
46. 05 Care Segregation and Network Inadequacy: Medicaid’s Network Challenges and Corrective Attempts – Waymark, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.waymarkcare.com/book/05-care-segregation-and-network-inadequacy-medicaids-network-challenges-and-corrective-attempts
47. Can I Sue My Insurance Company for Emotional Distress? Your Legal Guide – Wocl Leydon, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.woclleydon.com/blog/can-i-sue-my-insurance-company-for-emotional-distress/
48. “Where Do We Go from Here?” Health System Frustrations Expressed by Patients with Multimorbidity, Their Caregivers and Family Physicians, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4749886/
49. Issue Brief: Health Plan Network Adequacy – American Medical Association, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/issue-brief-health-plan-network-adequacy.pdf
50. Summary Health Insurance Network Adequacy Requirements – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/health/health-insurance-network-adequacy-requirements
51. Network Adequacy Standards and Enforcement – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/network-adequacy-standards-and-enforcement/
52. Prior Authorization Process Policies in Medicaid Managed Care: Findings from a Survey of State Medicaid Programs | KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/prior-authorization-process-policies-in-medicaid-managed-care-findings-from-a-survey-of-state-medicaid-programs/
53. High Rates of Prior Authorization Denials by Some Plans and Limited State Oversight Raise Concerns About Access to Care in Medicaid Managed Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/all/2023/high-rates-of-prior-authorization-denials-by-some-plans-and-limited-state-oversight-raise-concerns-about-access-to-care-in-medicaid-managed-care/
54. More Medicaid Cuts, More Delays: The Cost of Prior Authorization, accessed August 11, 2025, https://healthlaw.org/more-medicaid-cuts-more-delays-the-cost-of-prior-authorization/
55. Consumer Problems with Prior Authorization: Evidence from KFF Survey, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/consumer-problems-with-prior-authorization-evidence-from-kff-survey/
56. Fixing prior auth: These critical changes must be made – American Medical Association, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/prior-authorization/fixing-prior-auth-these-critical-changes-must-be-made
57. Prior Authorization in Medicaid | MACPAC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Prior-Authorization-in-Medicaid.pdf
58. Medicaid for Children and Adults with Disabilities | Texas Health and Human Services, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.texas.gov/services/health/medicaid-chip/medicaid-chip-programs-services/programs-children-adults-disabilities/medicaid-children-adults-disabilities
59. Elderly – Georgia Medicaid, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medicaid.georgia.gov/programs/elderly
60. Medicaid – Kaiser Permanente, accessed August 11, 2025, https://about.kaiserpermanente.org/expertise-and-impact/public-policy/our-key-issues/medicaid
61. Seniors & Medicare and Medicaid Enrollees, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/eligibility/seniors-medicare-and-medicaid-enrollees
62. Programs for Seniors and Aging – Texas Health and Human Services, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.texas.gov/services/health/medicaid-chip/medicaid-chip-programs-services/programs-seniors-aging
63. Medicaid for the Elderly and People with Disabilities | Texas Health and Human Services, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.texas.gov/services/health/medicaid-chip/medicaid-chip-programs-services/programs-children-adults-disabilities/medicaid-elderly-people-disabilities
64. Now is the time to join a – health plan – New York State Department of Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.health.ny.gov/publications/1109.pdf
65. Government Programs for Children With Special Needs | SSA, accessed August 11, 2025, https://blog.ssa.gov/government-programs-for-children-with-special-needs/
66. Children with Special Health Care Needs Services Program, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.texas.gov/services/disability/children-special-health-care-needs-services-program
67. Children’s Special Health Care Services – State of Michigan, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/assistance-programs/cshcs
68. Rhode Island Medicaid Programs for Children with Special Healthcare Needs – Executive Office of Health and Human Services, accessed August 11, 2025, https://eohhs.ri.gov/sites/g/files/xkgbur226/files/2024-05/RI%20Medicaid%20Programs%20for%20Children%205.30.24.pdf
69. www.medicare.gov, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.medicare.gov/basics/costs/help/medicaid#:~:text=Medicaid%20is%20a%20joint%20federal,medical%20costs%20for%20other%20adults.
70. Medicaid’s Impact on Health Care Access, Outcomes and State Economies, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.rwjf.org/en/insights/our-research/2019/02/medicaid-s-impact-on-health-care-access-outcomes-and-state-economies.html
71. Faces of Medicaid – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/video/faces-of-medicaid/
72. A Look at Navigating the Health Care System: Medicaid Consumer Perspectives – KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/a-look-at-navigating-the-health-care-system-medicaid-consumer-perspectives/
73. KFF Survey of Consumer Experiences with Health Insurance, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/poll-finding/kff-survey-of-consumer-experiences-with-health-insurance/
74. Consumer Checklist – New York State Department of Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/managed_care/living_with_hiv/consumer_checklist.htm
75. Navigator Directory | NY State of Health, accessed August 11, 2025, https://info.nystateofhealth.ny.gov/NavigatorDirectory
76. Reducing Medicaid Churn: Policies to Promote Stable Health Coverage and Access to Care, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2025/jun/reducing-medicaid-churn-policies-promote-stable-health-coverage
77. Medicaid Stories – Catholic Health Association, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.chausa.org/advocacy/medicaid/stories