Table of Contents
Introduction: The Case That Broke My Confidence
I remember “David” as if it were yesterday.
He walked into my physical therapy clinic in my third year of practice, a 45-year-old man with a file thick with reports and a look of weary resignation.
His diagnosis was chronic low back pain.
The centerpiece of his file was an MRI report that noted “mild degenerative disc disease at L4-L5,” a finding about as remarkable in a middle-aged adult as finding gray hairs.
Armed with my degree and the biomechanical model that had been drilled into me, I was confident.
The map was clear: his structure was compromised, so we needed to fix the structure.
My plan was textbook.
We would strengthen his core stabilizers, stretch his tight hamstrings, and correct his posture.
I was the mechanic, and his body was the machine.
But the machine refused to be fixed.
With every session, David’s pain flared.
An exercise designed to build strength would leave him in agony for days.
His world, already small, began to shrink further.
He stopped walking his dog, avoided picking up his daughter, and his face was a constant mask of fear and frustration.
His pain was a raging inferno, yet the “objective” evidence on his MRI was a barely smoldering ember.
This failure was more than a clinical setback; it was a crisis of faith.
The map I had been given, the one that neatly connected tissue damage to pain levels, was leading us deeper into the wilderness.
David’s suffering was undeniably real, but its source was clearly not just the mild wear-and-tear in his spine.
I had followed the standard advice, and in doing so, I had failed him.
This heartbreaking disconnect forced me to question everything I thought I knew about pain and sent me searching for a new map, one that could account for the vast, complex, and deeply human territory of chronic suffering.
Part 1: The Old World Map: Why “Fixing the Body” Sometimes Fails
To understand why my initial approach failed David, we first need to appreciate the map I was using.
It’s not a bad map; it’s just a map of a very specific country—the country of acute pain.
The Body as a Brilliantly Wired Machine (The Theory of Acute Pain)
The traditional biomedical model views pain through the lens of nociception, an elegant and vital process that protects us from harm.1
Think of it as a “true pain alarm”.3
When you touch a hot stove, specialized nerve endings called nociceptors in your skin detect the potentially damaging heat.4
These are our frontline sensors, tuned to detect mechanical, thermal, or chemical threats.4
Once a nociceptor is activated, it sends an electrical danger signal along nerve fibers toward the spinal cord.
This signal travels on two main types of fibers:
- A-delta fibers: These are like high-speed fiber-optic cables. They are myelinated, which allows the signal to travel incredibly fast (up to 30 m/s). They are responsible for that initial, sharp, well-localized pain that makes you instantly pull your hand back.4
- C-fibers: These are more like older copper wires. They are unmyelinated and conduct signals more slowly (around 1 m/s). They transmit the secondary, dull, throbbing, or burning ache that follows the initial injury.5
When these signals reach the spinal cord, they are relayed to second-order neurons.
These neurons immediately cross to the other side of the spinal cord and ascend to the brain, primarily via the spinothalamic tract.4
The thalamus acts as a central relay station, directing the signal to various parts of the brain, including the somatosensory cortex, which identifies the location and intensity of the pain.5
The brain processes this information in a flash, orchestrating a protective motor response—like yanking your hand away from the stove—and creating the conscious experience of pain.4
This system is a masterpiece of evolutionary engineering, essential for our survival.
When the Map Leads You Astray (The Limits of the Model)
This map of nociception is perfect for understanding the pain from a broken bone, a cut, or a burn.
The alarm is proportional to the threat.
But chronic pain is a different country altogether.
It is not simply acute pain that lasts a long time; it is a fundamentally different state.6
My mistake with David was trying to use the acute pain map to navigate his chronic pain territory.
I was looking for a “broken part” to fix, but his problem was no longer in the tissues of his back; it had migrated to the processing system itself.
This is where the biomedical model often leads practitioners and patients down a dangerous path.
The relentless search for a structural cause often culminates in an MRI or X-ray.
While these can be crucial for ruling out serious pathology, they are notoriously poor at explaining chronic pain.
Studies have shown that a huge percentage of people with no back pain at all have “abnormalities” like bulging discs, degeneration, and arthritis on their scans.9
Yet, when a patient in pain sees these words on a report, the conclusion seems obvious: “I am damaged.”
This leads to what I call the Tyranny of the Scan, an iatrogenic (medically induced) catalyst for fear.
The diagnostic process itself becomes a source of harm.
The patient, like David, receives a report filled with pathologizing language.
They internalize the belief that their body is fragile and that “hurt equals harm,” a common and dangerous myth.3
This belief is not just a passing thought; it becomes the seed for a host of psychological changes that actively drive pain.
It fuels fear of movement, anxiety about the future, and catastrophic thinking (“This will never get better; I’ll end up in a wheelchair”).11
These psychological states are not mere reactions to pain; they are powerful biological signals that sensitize the entire central nervous system, effectively turning up the volume on the pain experience.
The very tool used to find the “problem” ended up creating a much bigger one.
The Vicious Cycle of Ineffective Care
When the old map fails to provide a clear target, patients are often funneled into a cycle of treatments that are equally misguided because they are still aimed at the wrong problem.
They are prescribed prolonged rest, which is one of the worst things for chronic pain as it leads to deconditioning, muscle loss, and increased pain sensitivity.12
They may receive repeated spinal injections or even undergo spine surgeries, interventions that have shown a profound lack of effectiveness for most chronic back and neck pain.14
Perhaps most pervasively, they are prescribed long-term opioid medications.
While opioids can be effective for severe acute pain, research has shown they are no more effective than non-opioid alternatives for chronic pain and come with a host of devastating risks, including addiction.15
A large 2018 study published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association found that for chronic back, hip, or knee pain, opioids were no better than non-opioid medications at improving pain-related function and that adverse effects were significantly more common in the opioid group.16
These treatments fail because they are trying to silence a true alarm in the tissues when the real problem is a faulty alarm system in the nervous system.
Part 2: The Epiphany: Pain Is Not a Damage Meter, It’s an Alarm System
My frustration with David’s case pushed me to the edge of my professional knowledge.
I spent nights poring over research that existed outside my standard textbooks, and that’s when I found it.
It wasn’t just a new technique; it was a new way of seeing.
I discovered the Biopsychosocial (BPS) model of pain.17
This framework proposed that pain is never just a physical sensation.
It is a complex experience that emerges from a dynamic interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors.19
This led to my epiphany, a simple but profound shift in perspective that I now share with every patient.
It is the central idea of the new map:
Pain is not a damage meter; it is a threat detection system.
I began to think of pain like a home security system.
- Acute Pain: A burglar smashes a window (actual tissue damage). The alarm goes off—loud, specific, and incredibly useful. It alerts you to a real, immediate threat. You call the police (seek medical care), and once the threat is gone and the window is fixed, the alarm turns off.
- Chronic Pain: The alarm system itself has become faulty. A traumatic break-in (the initial injury) has left it hyper-sensitive. Now, the wind rattling the window frame, a cat jumping on the fence, or even a memory of the break-in can trigger a full-blown alarm. The problem is no longer an external threat; the problem is the alarm system’s calibration. It has become over-protective.3
This analogy changes everything.
The goal is no longer to hunt for a burglar who isn’t there (more scans, more surgeries).
The goal is to recalibrate the overly sensitive alarm system.
Crucially, the BPS model is not a simple checklist where you add Bio + Psycho + Social.
The factors are dynamically integrated and reciprocally influence one another, often in a multiplicative Way.17
A negative factor in one domain can exponentially worsen the others.
For example, a biological injury (Bio) leads to job loss (Social), which causes depression (Psycho).
That depression then alters brain chemistry, disrupts sleep, and increases inflammation (Bio), which makes the pain worse, further deepening the depression and social isolation.
It’s a vicious, self-amplifying cycle.
To break it, you have to see all the interconnected parts.
To make this tangible, I developed a tool to help my patients start drawing their own, more accurate pain map.
Table 1: The Biopsychosocial Framework: Your Personal Pain Profile
| Biological Factors (The “Hardware” & “Wiring”) | Psychological Factors (The “Software” & “Volume Knob”) | Social Factors (The “Environment” & “Network”) |
| Examples: Tissue injury/disease, genetic predispositions, nervous system sensitivity, inflammation, sleep quality, nutrition, physical fitness, hormonal changes. | Examples: Beliefs about pain (e.g., “hurt equals harm”), fear of movement, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, coping strategies, self-efficacy, past trauma, stress levels. | Examples: Work environment (stress, accommodations), family support or stress, cultural beliefs about pain, access to quality healthcare, financial stability, social expectations, isolation. |
| Self-Reflection: Have you noticed your pain is worse when you are sleep-deprived, stressed, or physically run-down? | Self-Reflection: What thoughts automatically run through your mind when your pain flares up? Do you feel helpless or terrified? | Self-Reflection: How do the people around you react to your pain? Does it change your role at home or at work? Do you feel supported? |
This framework empowers individuals to stop searching for a single, simple cause and start recognizing the web of factors that contribute to their unique experience.
It is the first, most crucial step toward taking back control.
Part 3: Deconstructing the Alarm: The Three Pillars of Modern Pain Care
With this new map, we can explore the territory of chronic pain with much more clarity.
The BPS model gives us three interconnected pillars to understand what is happening when the alarm system goes haywire.
Pillar I – The “Bio”: When the Alarm System Gets Stuck ‘On’
This pillar revisits biology, but through the new lens of the “sensitive alarm.” The key biological process in most chronic pain states is central sensitization.
This is a real, measurable physiological change where the neurons in the central nervous system (the spinal cord and brain) become persistently hyper-reactive.4
It’s as if the “volume” knob for the entire system has been cranked up and broken.
Central sensitization manifests in two clinically important ways 21:
- Hyperalgesia: A stimulus that would normally be a little painful (like a poke or mild pressure) is perceived as intensely painful. The system is over-reacting to a known threat.
- Allodynia: A stimulus that is normally not painful at all is now perceived as painful. This is when the system starts misinterpreting safe signals as threats. It’s why for some people with chronic pain, the light touch of a bedsheet, the pressure of clothing, or a cool breeze can be excruciating.
This isn’t just a subjective feeling; it’s a change in the circuitry of the nervous system.4
The system is no longer a reliable reporter of what’s happening in the tissues; it has become an over-protective, hypervigilant guard that screams “DANGER!” at the slightest provocation.
Table 2: Acute Pain vs. Chronic Pain: A Tale of Two Alarms
| Attribute | Acute Pain (The “True Alarm”) | Chronic Pain (The “Faulty Alarm”) |
| Cause | Typically caused by a specific, identifiable injury or illness.6 | Can persist long after tissue has healed; may have no clear initial cause.7 |
| Duration | Short-term; lasts less than 3 to 6 months and resolves as the underlying issue heals.7 | Long-term; persists for more than 3 to 6 months.7 |
| Purpose | Serves a useful biological purpose; it is a warning signal to protect from further harm.8 | Serves no useful biological purpose; it is a maladaptive, persistent signal.8 |
| Nervous System | The nervous system is functioning normally, accurately reporting tissue status. | The nervous system has become sensitized and over-protective, amplifying and distorting signals.7 |
| Effective Approach | Treat the underlying cause (e.g., set the bone, stitch the cut, fight the infection). | Retrain the over-sensitive nervous system; address the biopsychosocial factors contributing to the pain.7 |
Pillar II – The “Psycho”: The Brain as the Volume Knob
If central sensitization is the alarm system stuck on high, our psychological state is the hand that controls the volume knob.
Our thoughts, beliefs, and emotions are not just reactions to pain; they are active ingredients in the pain experience itself, capable of turning the volume up or down.24
Three of the most powerful psychological factors are:
- Pain Catastrophizing: This is more than just negative thinking. It is an exaggerated negative cognitive and emotional response to pain, characterized by three core components: rumination (constantly thinking about the pain), magnification (magnifying the threat value of the pain), and helplessness (feeling powerless to do anything about it).10 Catastrophizing is one of the single biggest predictors of who will develop chronic pain after an injury and how disabled they will become. It acts like fuel on the fire of central sensitization.
- Fear-Avoidance: This cycle begins with the belief that “hurt equals harm.” This fear of causing damage leads to the avoidance of movement and activity (sometimes called kinesiophobia).11 This avoidance has disastrous consequences. It leads to physical deconditioning, muscle weakness, and joint stiffness, which can create new sources of pain. More importantly, it shrinks a person’s life, leading to social isolation, depression, and loss of identity. By never challenging the fear, the brain never gets the chance to learn that movement can be safe, and the fear-avoidance cycle becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.11
- Anxiety and Depression: These are not just unfortunate side effects of living with pain; they are part of the same tangled neurochemical web.11 Anxiety floods the body with stress hormones and increases muscle tension, priming the nervous system for a pain response. Depression can deplete the brain’s own natural pain-modulating chemicals, like serotonin and norepinephrine.26 The presence of anxiety and depression is strongly correlated with higher pain intensity and greater disability, as they share overlapping brain circuits with pain processing, particularly in areas related to emotion and memory.11
Pillar III – The “Social”: How Our World Shapes Our Hurt
The final pillar recognizes that no person experiences pain in a vacuum.
Our social environment can either be a powerful buffer against pain or a significant contributor to it.
- Work and Finances: A stressful or unsupportive work environment, the fear of losing a job, or the financial strain of being unable to work are all major “threats” that the brain processes. These stressors can keep the nervous system on high alert, making it more difficult for the pain system to calm down.20
- Family and Support Systems: The way our loved ones respond to our pain has a profound impact. A spouse who is overly solicitous—constantly telling the person to rest, taking over all their chores, and expressing worry—can unintentionally reinforce the idea that the person is fragile and disabled, thus promoting more fear-avoidance.27 Conversely, a supportive network that encourages gentle activity and focuses on what the person
can do is a powerful therapeutic tool. - Cultural and Societal Norms: Our culture provides us with scripts for how to understand, express, and respond to pain.25 These societal beliefs can influence everything from our willingness to seek help to the types of treatments we believe will be effective, shaping the entire pain experience.
Part 4: A New Toolkit: How We Turn the Alarm Down
Understanding the new map is the first step.
The next is using it.
The BPS model provides a toolkit for recalibrating the sensitive alarm system, moving away from ineffective treatments and toward strategies that empower the individual.
The Power of Understanding: Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
The single most powerful tool in this new kit is Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE).
PNE is the process of teaching people the very concepts laid out in this article: the difference between acute and chronic pain, the reality of central sensitization, and the role of biopsychosocial factors.21
It uses stories, metaphors (like the alarm system), and pictures to help people reconceptualize their pain.29
PNE is often misunderstood as simply “giving information.” It is far more than that.
It is a targeted neurobiological intervention delivered through education.
Its primary goal is to change a patient’s beliefs and reduce the threat value of their pain.31
When a person stops believing their pain is a sign of ongoing damage and starts understanding it as a sign of a sensitive nervous system, the fear and catastrophizing begin to diminish.
This process of “deeducation” (unlearning harmful myths) and “reeducation” (learning the new science) directly removes the psychological fuel that keeps the nervous system in a state of high alert.21
By changing the “software” of belief, we can begin to change the “hardware” of the nervous system.
PNE is a top-down approach to modulating pain, using knowledge to induce a real, neuroplastic change in the brain.
Debunking the Myths That Fuel the Fire
A core part of PNE is systematically dismantling the common myths that keep people trapped in cycles of pain and disability.
Here are the most pervasive myths, contrasted with the scientific reality.
Table 3: Common Pain Myths vs. The Scientific Reality
| Myth | The Scientific Reality |
| 1. Hurt always means harm. | In chronic pain, the “alarm system” is over-sensitive. The pain is 100% real, but it is a poor indicator of the state of your tissues. It is a “false alarm” signaling hurt, but not necessarily new or ongoing harm.3 |
| 2. My pain must be “in my head” because scans are normal. | Pain is always an experience created by the brain, based on all available information. It is never imaginary. A normal scan simply means the pain is not being caused by a major structural problem, but likely by a sensitized nervous system.3 |
| 3. I need to rest until the pain goes away. | For chronic pain, prolonged rest is counterproductive. It leads to deconditioning, weakness, and increased pain sensitivity. Gentle, graded movement is one of the best ways to turn down the alarm system.12 |
| 4. Chronic pain is a normal part of aging. | While aches may become more common with age, chronic, disabling pain is not an inevitable part of getting older. It is a treatable condition, and you should not have to “just live with it”.13 |
| 5. I need stronger medications to fix my pain. | For chronic pain, non-drug approaches are the foundation of effective care. Long-term opioid use is particularly ineffective and risky for chronic non-cancer pain, and should not be a first-line treatment.3 |
Movement as Medicine: Proving Safety to the Brain
With a new understanding from PNE, the role of exercise is transformed.
In the old model, exercise was to “strengthen a weak part.” In the new model, graded movement is a way to send messages of safety to the brain.
The goal is not to push through pain, which would only confirm the brain’s belief that movement is dangerous.
Instead, the goal is to find a baseline of gentle, comfortable movement and slowly, patiently build from there.
This could be a short walk, gentle stretching, yoga, or tai chi.33
Every time you move without a major pain flare-up, you are providing your brain with evidence that contradicts its fear.
You are teaching the alarm system, “See? This is safe.” Over time, this process of graded exposure helps to desensitize the nervous system and recalibrate the alarm back to normal levels.
As leading guidelines now suggest, exercise and movement should be the primary intervention for chronic pain, and PNE is the key that unlocks a person’s ability to engage in it without fear.30
Conclusion: Becoming a New Kind of Healer
When I finally understood this new map, I went back to David.
I sat down with him, and for the first time, I didn’t talk about his discs or his posture.
I talked about his nervous system.
I drew him a picture of an over-protective alarm system.
We talked about his fears, his stress at work, and his feelings of hopelessness.
We identified the factors from all three pillars—the biological, the psychological, and the social—that were contributing to his pain.
The change wasn’t instant, but it was profound.
For the first time, he had an explanation for his experience that made sense.
The pain was real, but it wasn’t a sign that his body was falling apart.
With this new understanding, the fear began to recede.
We started a program of gentle, graded movement, not to “fix” his back, but to “retrain” his brain.
We celebrated small victories—walking to the end of the driveway, playing on the floor with his daughter for five minutes.
Slowly, patiently, his world began to expand again.
My journey with David transformed me from a biomechanical “fixer” into a pain “coach” or “guide.” My role is no longer to find and eliminate a single source of pain.
My role is to provide my patients with a better map—the map of the biopsychosocial model.
I empower them with the knowledge to understand their own complex experience and provide them with the tools of PNE, movement, and self-management to navigate their own journey.
There is no magic cure for chronic pain, but there is a path forward.
It is a path of understanding, of recalibrating, and of patiently reclaiming a full and meaningful life, one safe step at a time.
Works cited
- Nociception – Physiopedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Nociception
- Pain Mechanisms – Physiopedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Pain_Mechanisms
- Myths About Chronic Pain | SBM – Society of Behavioral Medicine, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.sbm.org/healthy-living/myths-about-chronic-pain
- 4. The Physiology of Pain | ATrain Education, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.atrainceu.com/content/4-physiology-pain
- Pain and Nociception – Introduction to Neuroscience, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/introneuroscience1/chapter/pain/
- health.clevelandclinic.org, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://health.clevelandclinic.org/acute-vs-chronic-pain#:~:text=Acute%20pain%20usually%20comes%20on,than%20three%20to%20six%20months.
- Acute vs. Chronic Pain: What To Know, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://health.clevelandclinic.org/acute-vs-chronic-pain
- The difference between acute and chronic pain – PubMed, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1875958/
- Common Pain Myths and Misconceptions – Newsroom Shepherd Center, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://news.shepherd.org/common-pain-myths-and-misconceptions/
- Impact of Psychological Factors in the Experience of Pain – Oxford Academic, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/91/5/700/2735743
- Psychological Basis of Pain | Health Psychology – Lumen Learning, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hvcc-healthpsychology/chapter/psychological-basis-of-pain/
- Is Chronic Pain Real? Myths of Chronic Pain – CHOC – Children’s health hub, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://health.choc.org/is-chronic-pain-real/
- 8 Myths and Facts About Chronic Pain – WebMD, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.webmd.com/pain-management/ss/slideshow-chronic-pain-myths-facts
- Why Healthcare Providers Deliver Ineffective Care — Institute for …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.instituteforchronicpain.org/providers-and-payers/ineffective-treatment
- The Top Five Useless Chronic Pain Treatments | Psychology Today, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/overcoming-pain/201401/the-top-five-useless-chronic-pain-treatments
- Research shows opioids are ineffective for chronic pain – Norton Healthcare Provider, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://nortonhealthcareprovider.com/news/research-shows-opioids-are-ineffective-for-chronic-pain-2/
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6067990/#:~:text=The%20biopsychosocial%20model%20of%20pain,that%20reciprocally%20influence%20one%20another.
- Full article: The biopsychosocial model of pain in physiotherapy: past, present and future, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10833196.2023.2177792
- Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6067990/
- What is the biopsychosocial model of pain? – European Pain Federation, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://europeanpainfederation.eu/what-is-the-bio-psycho-social-model-of-pain/
- A clinical perspective on a pain neuroscience education approach to manual therapy – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5498797/
- Acute Pain vs. Chronic Pain – Adventist Health, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.adventisthealth.org/blog/2023/june/acute-pain-vs-chronic-pain/
- Acute vs. chronic pain: Definitions, causes, and treatment – Medical News Today, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/acute-vs-chronic-pain
- www.physio-pedia.com, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Psychological_Basis_of_Pain#:~:text=The%20interaction%20of%20these%20dimensions,motivate%20the%20response%20to%20pain
- What Are The Keys To Assessing Pain’s Seven Dimensions?, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://oklahomapaintreatmentcenters.com/article/what-are-the-keys-to-assessing-pains-seven-dimensions
- Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain – PubMed, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10846154/
- Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067990/
- Know Pain, Know Gain? A Perspective on Pain Neuroscience … – jospt, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2016.0602
- Why You Hurt | Adriaan Louw – Teach Pain Neuroscience Education, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://whyyouhurt.com/WYH-teach.html
- Revisiting the Provision of Pain Neuroscience Education: An Adjunct Intervention for Patients but a Primary Focus of Clinician Education | Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2021.9804
- Therapeutic Neuroscience Education • Courses by EIM | Evidence In Motion, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://evidenceinmotion.com/course/therapeutic-neuroscience-education/
- 5 Myths About Chronic Pain – Comprehensive Pain Management, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.comprehensivepainmd.com/blog/5-myths-about-chronic-pain
- Non-Drug Approaches to Chronic Pain – Whole Health Library – VA.gov, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.va.gov/WHOLEHEALTHLIBRARY/tools/non-drug-approaches-to-chronic-pain.asp
