A Comparative Analysis of Cigna and Aetna: Strategy, Performance, and Member Experience

Section 1: Corporate DNA and Strategic Imperatives

This section establishes the foundational identity of each company, comparing their historical trajectories, current market scale, and the transformative strategic decisions that define their modern competitive posture.

1.1 Historical Foundations and Evolution: From Insurance Pioneers to Healthcare Giants

To comprehend the contemporary strategic postures of The Cigna Group and Aetna, it is essential to first examine their deep historical roots, which are interwoven with the very fabric of the American insurance industry.

Both entities trace their origins to the nascent days of the United States, cultivating legacies of risk management, financial stewardship, and market adaptation that inform their operations today.

Cigna’s Deep Roots

The Cigna Group’s lineage extends back to 1792, with the formation of the Insurance Company of North America (INA) in Philadelphia’s Independence Hall.¹

As the first marine insurance company and the oldest stockholder-owned insurer in the United States, INA established a precedent for financial resilience and national significance.

Its historical milestones are notable; the company insured the hull and cargo of the ship

America on its maiden voyage, issued its first life insurance policy in 1794 to a sea captain, and played a crucial role in the nation’s recovery from disasters, paying out claims in full after the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 and the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.¹

During World War II, at the request of the U.S. Army, an INA company provided accident and health insurance to the scientists working on the clandestine Manhattan Project, underscoring its role as a trusted institutional partner.¹

The modern Cigna was forged in 1982 through the merger of INA Corporation and the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (CG), a firm founded in 1865 that helped make Hartford, Connecticut, the “insurance capital of the world”.¹

The name “Cigna” itself is a portmanteau, a blend of the letters from the merging companies, CG and INA, symbolizing the union of these two historic enterprises.²

This long and storied history imbues the Cigna brand with a legacy of stability, large-scale risk management, and a deep institutional memory of the American financial and healthcare landscape.

Aetna’s Parallel Path

Aetna’s journey began in 1819 as the Aetna (Fire) Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, its name inspired by Mount Etna, then Europe’s most active volcano, to signify resilience and strength.³

A pivotal moment in its history occurred on May 28, 1853, when the annuity department was formally separated and incorporated as the Aetna Life Insurance Company, with Eliphalet Bulkeley as its president.³

In a fascinating twist of corporate genealogy that highlights the intertwined nature of the early insurance industry, the original Aetna (Fire) Insurance Company eventually became part of Connecticut General, which later merged to form Cigna.³

Throughout its history, Aetna has been at the forefront of innovation.

It began offering automobile insurance as early as 1907, introduced the first combination auto policy in 1912, and created a group department in 1913 to sell group life insurance.³

Its role in American healthcare history was solidified in 1966 when it processed the very first Medicare claim in the country.⁴

The company was also an early adopter of technology, using Hollerith punched card machines for tabulation as early as 1910.³

This history demonstrates a corporate culture of forward-thinking adaptation, from insuring new technologies like the automobile to administering foundational government healthcare programs.

Both companies, therefore, emerged from the same Hartford-based insurance crucible, sharing a common heritage of financial conservatism and innovation.

This long-standing market presence provides them with significant brand recognition and a profound understanding of the complexities of the U.S. health insurance system, a crucial asset in today’s highly regulated and competitive environment.

1.2 The Modern Titans: Scale, Market Position, and Financial Posture

In the 21st century, Cigna and Aetna have evolved from traditional insurers into diversified healthcare services behemoths.

While a direct, one-to-one comparison is complicated by Aetna’s acquisition by CVS Health, examining their respective scales reveals two of the most powerful players in the industry.

The Cigna Group stands as a formidable standalone entity.

As of 2024-2025, its market capitalization has shown some volatility but consistently places it among the world’s most valuable companies, with figures reported in the range of $73 billion to $90 billion.⁵

The company reported staggering revenues of $247.1 billion in 2024, with total assets of $155.9 billion and total equity of $41.03 billion.²

Employing a global workforce of 73,500 people, Cigna’s scale is reflected in its prominent rankings: #15 on the 2023 Fortune 500 list and #68 on the 2023 Forbes Global 2000.²

These metrics paint a picture of a financially robust, global corporation with a massive operational footprint.

Aetna’s financial power is now nested within its parent company, CVS Health.

Prior to the finalization of the merger in 2018, Aetna was a major insurer in its own right, with $60.6 billion in revenue and nearly 48,000 employees.³

Today, it functions as the health insurance arm of CVS Health, which is the world’s second-largest healthcare company, surpassed only by UnitedHealth Group.⁹

CVS Health employs approximately 300,000 people and leverages Aetna to provide health services to a vast membership base that has grown from 22 million at the time of the merger to over 36 million people today.⁹

This structural difference is critical.

To accurately assess their competitive standing, one must compare The Cigna Group not with Aetna in isolation, but with the entire CVS Health enterprise.

This reframing reveals a battle between two distinct models of healthcare conglomerates, which is further illuminated by their defining strategic acquisitions.

Metric	The Cigna Group	CVS Health (Aetna’s Parent)
Market Capitalization	~$73.4B – $90.4B (2025) 5	~$75.7B (2024) 9
Annual Revenue	$247.1B (2024) 2	$357.8B (2023) 9
Net Income	$3.4B (2024) 2	$8.3B (2023) 9
Total Assets	$155.9B (2024) 2	$228.2B (2023) 9
Number of Employees	73,500 (2024) 2	~300,000 (2024) 9
Fortune 500 Rank	#15 (2023) 2	#6 (2023) 9
Forbes Global 2000 Rank	#68 (2023) 2	#42 (2023) 9

1.3 Defining Strategic Pivots: The Express Scripts and CVS Health Acquisitions

The late 2010s marked a watershed moment for the health insurance industry, as both Cigna and Aetna executed mega-mergers that fundamentally reshaped their business models and strategic imperatives.

Both companies correctly identified that the traditional role of a health insurer was becoming commoditized and that long-term growth depended on controlling a larger portion of the healthcare value chain.

However, they chose divergent paths to achieve this vertical integration.

Cigna’s PBM Power Play

In 2018, Cigna completed its acquisition of Express Scripts, one of the nation’s largest Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), in a colossal $67 billion transaction.²

This was a decisive move to gain direct control over the pharmaceutical supply chain, a primary driver of escalating healthcare costs.

A PBM acts as an intermediary between insurers, pharmacies, and drug manufacturers, managing prescription drug benefits, negotiating rebates, and creating formularies (lists of covered drugs).

By acquiring Express Scripts, Cigna internalized this critical function.

Subsequently, the company restructured its operations under a new holding company, The Cigna Group.

This parent now oversees two core business units: Cigna Healthcare, the benefits provider, and Evernorth Health Services, the health services division that includes the powerful Express Scripts P.M.²

This strategic pivot was fundamentally a

supply-chain-focused integration.

The goal was to leverage the immense scale of a top-tier PBM to manage drug costs more effectively, design more competitive pharmacy benefits, and offer a powerful, cost-containment solution to its primary customers: large employer groups.

Aetna’s Retail Health Revolution

In a similarly transformative but strategically different maneuver, Aetna was acquired by CVS Health in a $69 billion deal finalized in 2019 after a review by the Department of Justice.⁹

This merger created a new, vertically integrated healthcare paradigm by combining Aetna’s insurance products with CVS Health’s vast and diverse assets.

These assets include the ubiquitous CVS Pharmacy retail chain, over 1,100 in-store MinuteClinic locations, and CVS’s own formidable PBM, CVS Caremark.⁹

To secure regulatory approval and address antitrust concerns, the Department of Justice mandated that Aetna divest its Medicare Part D prescription drug plan business to WellCare, ensuring competition was preserved in that specific market segment.¹¹

Aetna’s path represents a member-journey-focused integration.

The strategy is not just to control costs behind the scenes, but to build a branded, end-to-end healthcare ecosystem that touches the member at multiple physical and digital points.

The vision is one of seamless integration: an Aetna member can receive a diagnosis for a minor illness at a MinuteClinic, walk a few aisles to have the prescription filled at the CVS Pharmacy, and use an Aetna-sponsored discount to purchase CVS-branded health products, all under a single corporate banner.⁹

The implications of these divergent strategies are profound and ripple through every aspect of their operations.

Aetna’s model, with its vast physical footprint, offers a tangible, “high-touch” platform for member engagement, chronic disease management, and convenient access to care.

It aims to capture the member’s entire healthcare journey, from diagnosis to treatment to wellness.

Cigna’s model, by contrast, is a powerful “low-touch,” high-efficiency engine designed to manage the single largest and most complex cost driver in healthcare: prescription drugs.

Its primary interface remains largely digital or through the human resources departments of its employer clients.

These two distinct philosophies of vertical integration define the core competitive tension between the two giants.

Section 2: The Insurance Portfolio: A Granular Comparison of Offerings

This section dissects and compares the specific insurance products offered by Cigna and Aetna, analyzing their structure, availability, cost, and target markets to reveal their respective strengths and strategic focus areas.

2.1 Plan Architecture: HMO, PPO, and Beyond

At their core, both Cigna and Aetna build their product portfolios upon a foundation of standardized plan architectures that are common across the U.S. health insurance industry.

These include Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPOs), and Point-of-Service (POS) plans.¹⁵

Both companies also offer High-Deductible Health Plans (HDHPs), which can be paired with tax-advantaged Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) to help members cover out-of-pocket costs.¹⁶

Cigna provides clear definitions for consumers, outlining the fundamental trade-offs.

HMOs typically feature lower premiums but require members to use a local network of providers, select a Primary Care Provider (PCP) to coordinate care, and obtain referrals to see specialists.¹⁵

PPOs, conversely, offer greater flexibility, allowing members to see both in-network and out-of-network providers without a referral, but this freedom comes at the cost of higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses.¹⁵

Aetna offers similar plan definitions and markets a variety of branded plan options to employers, such as the Aetna Open Choice® PPO and Aetna Managed Choice® POS, each designed to offer a different balance of provider choice and cost management.²⁰

While the underlying structures of these plans are essentially commodities, the true differentiation lies not in the plan type (e.g., HMO vs. PPO) but in the execution and packaging.

The factors that create meaningful differences for consumers are the size, quality, and accessibility of the associated provider network; the specific premium and cost-sharing structure (deductibles, copays, coinsurance); and the degree to which other services like pharmacy benefits and wellness programs are integrated.

Therefore, a consumer’s analysis should not stop at the plan acronym.

A critical evaluation must delve into the specifics of a named plan (e.g., “Cigna Open Access Plus” vs. “Aetna Silver 3”), as this is where the substantive value and cost distinctions are Found.

2.2 Individual & Family (ACA) Marketplace Presence

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace is a key battleground for insurers competing for individual and family customers.

In this segment, Aetna and Cigna exhibit distinct strategies regarding availability and pricing.

Availability

Aetna’s presence on the ACA marketplace is geographically focused, with plans available in approximately 13 to 17 states, depending on the source and year.¹⁷

Cigna is noted to have a broader national presence, but its individual and family plan availability still varies significantly by location.¹⁷

Critically, some analyses note that Cigna’s ACA offerings are limited to only EPO and HMO plan types in the marketplace, which restricts consumer choice by eliminating more flexible PPO options.²³

A significant strategic development is the report that Aetna plans to exit the ACA health marketplace at the end of 2025, a major consideration for consumers seeking long-term plan stability.²⁴

Cost Comparison: Premiums and Deductibles

When it comes to cost, a clear pattern emerges from third-party analyses.

Aetna generally positions itself as a more cost-competitive option in the ACA market.

• Premiums: Multiple sources comparing average monthly premiums for a 40-year-old on a Silver plan (the most common plan type) find Aetna’s rates to be lower than Cigna’s. Aetna’s average Silver premium is cited in the range of $502 to $587, while Cigna’s is higher, ranging from $566 to $608.²³ One analysis shows Aetna’s premiums are consistently below the national average across all metal tiers (Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum), reinforcing its competitive pricing strategy.²⁶
• Deductibles and Out-of-Pocket Costs: Aetna is frequently recognized for offering plans with lower average deductibles. This is a crucial benefit for individuals with significant health needs, as it means the insurer begins to cover a larger share of costs sooner.²⁴ One Forbes analysis ranked Aetna as having the lowest Bronze deductible and the second-lowest Silver and Gold deductibles among the companies it reviewed.²⁷ In contrast, the same analysis found Cigna’s Bronze and Gold plans to have higher-than-average deductibles.²⁷

These data points suggest that where Aetna chooses to compete in the ACA marketplace, it does so with a strong value proposition centered on affordability, both in terms of monthly premiums and initial out-of-pocket costs.

This makes Aetna plans particularly attractive for individuals and families who anticipate needing medical care beyond routine check-U.S. Cigna’s higher average costs in this segment may indicate a strategic focus on other markets, such as large employer groups, where its scale and PBM integration provide a different kind of competitive advantage.

For an ACA shopper in a state where both insurers are available, Aetna presents a more compelling starting point for a cost-benefit analysis, though its planned market exit is a serious concern.

Table 2.1: ACA Marketplace Plan Comparison (2025 Averages for 40-Year-Old)

Metric

State Availability (ACA)

Average Bronze Premium

Average Silver Premium

Average Gold Premium

Average Silver Deductible

2.3 Employer-Sponsored Group Plans

The market for employer-sponsored health insurance is the largest in the U.S. and represents the core business for both Cigna and Aetna.

Both companies offer a sophisticated range of products and services tailored to businesses of all sizes, from small groups with as few as two employees to large, multinational corporations with thousands of employees.²⁸

The competition in this space transcends simple network and price comparisons, focusing instead on the value of integrated services designed to control costs and improve workforce health.

Cigna’s value proposition to employers is heavily centered on cost control through PBM efficiency.

Leveraging the power of its Evernorth division and the Express Scripts pharmacy benefit manager, Cigna emphasizes its ability to deliver a fully connected medical, pharmacy, and behavioral health solution.

The company cites internal studies showing that this integration results in significant cost savings for employers, on the order of $148 per member per year (PMPY).³⁰

Its offerings include a wide array of plan types (OAP, PPO, HMO, EPO), flexible spending accounts (HRA, HSA, FSA), and advanced pharmacy services like the Accredo specialty pharmacy and Express Scripts Pharmacy for home delivery.¹⁸

This pitch is designed to appeal to sophisticated benefits managers who are keenly focused on managing their organization’s largest cost driver: prescription drug spend.

Aetna, backed by CVS Health, counters with a value proposition centered on member wellness and convenience through retail integration.

While it offers a similar full suite of plans and funding options (fully insured and self-funded), its unique selling point is the direct link to the CVS ecosystem.⁹

Aetna can market a benefits package to employers that provides their employees with convenient, low-cost access to care at over 1,100 MinuteClinic locations for minor illnesses and health screenings.⁹

This strategy aims to improve employee health and productivity by encouraging proactive care in a convenient setting, which can help prevent more expensive emergency room visits or downstream health complications.

The choice for an employer, therefore, becomes a strategic one.

A company whose primary concern is reining in its pharmacy budget and leveraging data analytics for cost containment might find Cigna’s powerful PBM-centric model more compelling.

Conversely, an employer focused on promoting a culture of wellness, improving employee productivity, and offering tangible, convenient care options as a key benefit might be more attracted to the unique and accessible ecosystem offered by Aetna and CVS Health.

2.4 The Medicare Battleground: Advantage, Part D, and Medigap

The Medicare market, particularly the rapidly growing Medicare Advantage (MA) segment, is a critical area of competition.

Here, Aetna and Cigna display significant differences in scale, quality, and strategy, presenting seniors with a classic trade-off between quality and cost.

Market Presence and Quality

Aetna is a dominant force in the Medicare Advantage space.

It ranks as the 4th-largest MA provider in the nation, serving over 4.1 million members across a broad footprint of 44 states and Washington, d+.C..³¹

More importantly, Aetna consistently achieves high marks for quality.

For 2025, its plans earned an impressive average CMS Star Rating of 4.29 out of 5, with nearly 8 out of 10 (78%) of its members enrolled in plans rated 4 stars or higher.³¹

These ratings, which are based on measures of clinical care, member experience, and plan administration, are a key indicator of quality for beneficiaries.

Cigna, by contrast, is a smaller player with a different focus.

It is the 7th-largest MA provider, with approximately 690,000 members, and has a more limited presence in 29 states and Washington, d+.C..³¹

Its quality ratings are notably lower than Aetna’s.

For 2025, Cigna’s average CMS Star Rating is 3.97, and only 33% of its plans achieved a rating of 4 stars or higher.¹⁷

Adding to questions about its long-term strategy in this sector, Cigna recently agreed to sell its Medicare businesses (including MA, Part D, and Medigap) to Health Care Service Corporation (HCSC) in a deal valued at approximately $3.7 billion.²

Cost and Premiums

While Aetna leads on quality and scale, Cigna has established itself as the market leader in cost leadership.

An extraordinary 80% of Cigna’s Medicare Advantage plans feature a $0 monthly premium, a figure that far surpasses Aetna’s 59%.³¹

Cigna is recognized as having the lowest average monthly premium among all major MA providers, making its plans highly attractive to budget-conscious seniors.³¹

This data crystallizes the core dilemma for Medicare beneficiaries choosing between the two.

Aetna offers a higher-quality, more widely available, and more reliable product, making it a prudent choice for seniors with complex health needs or those who prioritize top-rated clinical care.

Cigna offers an unbeatable value proposition on price, making it an ideal choice for healthy, price-sensitive seniors who are willing to accept a potentially lower-rated plan in exchange for eliminating a monthly premium.

The “better” choice is entirely dependent on the individual’s personal health status, risk tolerance, and financial circumstances.

Table 2.2: Medicare Advantage Head-to-Head (2025 Data)

Metric

State Availability

Total MA Enrollment

Average CMS Star Rating

% of Plans Rated 4+ Stars

% of Plans with $0 Premium

Available Plan Types

2.5 Ancillary and Supplemental Products

Beyond major medical plans, both Cigna and Aetna offer a comprehensive portfolio of ancillary and supplemental insurance products designed to cover gaps in traditional insurance and provide financial protection against specific health events.

Cigna provides a suite of supplemental policies that can be purchased directly by individuals, offering lump-sum cash benefits for events like cancer, heart attack, stroke, hospitalization, and accidents.³²

It also has a robust and varied dental insurance offering, with multiple PPO plans (e.g., Cigna Dental 1000, Cigna Dental 1500) and bundled products that combine dental, vision, and hearing coverage into a single plan.¹⁸

Cigna’s dental plans range in price from a basic preventive-only plan for around $19 per month to more comprehensive PPO plans for $30-$39 per month with annual benefit maximums of $1,000 to $1,500.²⁵

Aetna mirrors these offerings with its own lineup of supplemental plans that provide cash benefits for critical illnesses, accidents, and hospital stays.¹⁴

These benefits can be used to cover not only medical costs like deductibles and copays but also everyday living expenses like mortgage payments or groceries.¹⁴

Aetna also has a strong dental portfolio with both PPO and Dental Maintenance Organization (DMO) options, with plans starting at around $17 per month.³⁴

A key distinction for Aetna’s ancillary products is the integration with its parent company; members with Aetna supplemental plans gain access to exclusive discounts (up to 20%) on a wide range of CVS-branded health products, a tangible and unique perk that Cigna cannot replicate.¹⁴

Section 3: Network Analysis: Breadth, Quality, and Accessibility

This section evaluates the provider networks of both insurers, moving beyond simple provider counts to analyze the practical accessibility and quality of care available to members.

A health plan’s value is intrinsically linked to the network of doctors, hospitals, and specialists it provides.

3.1 A Tale of Two Networks: Size and Scope

On paper, both Cigna and Aetna command some of the largest provider networks in the United States, a testament to their national scale.

Cigna frequently cites a network size of “over 1.5 million” or even “2 million+ relationships” with healthcare providers, clinics, and facilities on a global scale.¹⁷

Aetna reports similarly massive numbers, with sources indicating a network of “1.2 million” to “1.8 million” healthcare professionals, which includes over 690,000 primary care doctors and specialists and more than 5,700 hospitals.³

However, relying on these national-level figures can be misleading for the individual consumer.

The sheer size of a national network is largely a marketing metric.

A member’s practical access to care is determined not by the total number of providers nationwide, but by the density and quality of the network in their specific geographic area for their specific plan.

A consumer in rural Wyoming derives no benefit from a dense network of specialists in downtown Chicago.

A more functional measure of access is the actual availability of plans in a given market.

As noted previously, Aetna’s Medicare Advantage plans are available in significantly more states (44) than Cigna’s (29), giving more seniors access to an Aetna network option.³¹

Therefore, while Cigna may claim a larger raw number of provider relationships globally, the critical question for any potential member is whether their preferred local doctors, hospitals, and specialists are in-network for the specific plan they are considering purchasing.

The national total is secondary to local adequacy.

3.2 The Illusion of Access: Navigating Network Accuracy and Tiers

The challenge of network access extends beyond geographic availability into the complex and often opaque realms of directory accuracy and tiered network structures.

This gap between a marketed network and a member’s practical, affordable access is a significant source of consumer frustration and a systemic issue across the health insurance industry.³⁷

A frequent and serious complaint leveled against both insurers involves inaccurate provider directories.

Consumers report using the insurer’s own online tools to identify an “in-network” provider, only to receive a surprise out-of-network bill after receiving care.³⁹

This issue is documented in customer reviews for Aetna’s mobile app and in detailed anecdotes on public forums, where members describe the painstaking process of trying to verify network status.³⁹

This problem is compounded by the increasing use of sophisticated, multi-tiered networks designed to control costs by steering members toward providers deemed more efficient or higher quality.

Aetna, for example, explicitly documents its use of products like the “Aetna Premier Care Network” (APCN) and the “Aetna Premier Care Network Plus”.⁴¹

These are not uniform networks.

A plan utilizing the “APCN Plus Multi-Tier” structure can have three distinct cost-sharing levels.

A provider in Tier 1 offers the member maximum savings, a provider in Tier 2 offers standard savings, and a provider in Tier 3 is considered out-of-network with the highest costs.⁴¹

Cigna employs similar strategies with products like its LocalPlus® network, which provides a narrower, localized network in exchange for lower premiums.¹⁸

The use of these complex network designs places an enormous cognitive burden on the consumer.

A physician may be listed as “in-network,” but could be in a higher-cost tier, a crucial detail that is often not transparent or easily accessible when a member is searching for a doctor or about to receive care.³⁸

The responsibility for verification is shifted entirely to the patient, who must navigate confusing online portals, make multiple phone calls to both the insurer and the provider’s office, and attempt to decipher complex plan documents—all while potentially managing a health issue.³⁷

This creates a significant disconnect between the advertised size of a network and the practical, affordable network a member can actually use.

While this is an industry-wide problem, Aetna’s detailed documentation of its multi-tier strategy suggests a highly structured, data-driven approach.

This can be a double-edged sword: it may lead to better cost and quality outcomes if navigated successfully, but it also elevates the risk of consumer confusion, frustration, and unexpected medical bills.

3.3 International Reach and Capabilities

For individuals who live or work abroad, and for multinational corporations, the scope and functionality of an insurer’s international network are paramount.

In this specialized market, Cigna demonstrates a distinct and well-developed focus.

Cigna maintains a dedicated International Health division that serves a diverse clientele, including globally mobile individuals, expatriates, and the employees of intergovernmental (IGOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in over 200 countries and jurisdictions.³⁵

A comparative analysis conducted for the World Bank highlights Cigna’s superior infrastructure for this market.

This includes a worldwide medical and hospital provider network spanning over 100 countries, which features streamlined direct billing arrangements to minimize upfront costs for members.

Furthermore, Cigna operates a dedicated multilingual call center based in Antwerp and provides international banking coordination to facilitate reimbursements in local currencies.⁴³

Aetna also operates Aetna International and provides global health plans.¹³

However, the same World Bank comparison points to potential gaps in its international offerings relative to Cigna’s.

For the specific plan analyzed, Aetna lacked an equivalent international network for dental or mental health providers.⁴³

Based on the available evidence, Cigna appears to possess a more mature, robust, and specialized infrastructure tailored to the unique needs of the expatriate and globally mobile market.

Its detailed service offerings suggest a deeper strategic commitment to this niche compared to Aetna.

Section 4: The Member Journey: Digital Tools, Telehealth, and Wellness

This section assesses the tools and programs designed to engage members in their health journey, from the digital applications that serve as a primary interface to the virtual care services and wellness incentives that shape the modern healthcare experience.

4.1 The Digital Front Door: Mobile App Usability and User Sentiment

In an increasingly digital world, an insurer’s mobile application often serves as the “digital front door” for its members.

The quality of this experience can significantly impact member satisfaction and engagement.

Despite heavy investment from both companies, neither Cigna nor Aetna has perfected this crucial touchpoint.

Cigna (myCigna App)

The myCigna app is designed to be a comprehensive portal for members, offering features to view digital ID cards, find providers, check claims, manage prescriptions, and access virtual care through its partner, MDLIVE.⁴⁴

However, user sentiment from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store is decidedly mixed, leaning toward negative.

A consistent pattern of complaints emerges from user reviews, which frequently describe the app as slow, unreliable, and prone to bugs.⁴⁴

Users report frustrating login issues, including problems with biometric authentication and being locked out of their accounts.

A particularly common grievance is that the app lacks the full functionality of the desktop website, forcing users to switch between platforms to complete essential tasks like assigning a primary care provider.⁴⁷

Many express frustration at being required to use an app for their ID card that they find functionally unreliable when needed most.⁴⁴

Aetna (Aetna Health App)

Aetna’s primary mobile application, Aetna Health, offers a similar suite of core functions: access to ID cards, deductible and claims tracking, provider search, and integration with care options like MinuteClinic scheduling.⁴⁸

Like Cigna’s app, user reviews for Aetna Health are polarized.

While some users praise the app’s convenience and ease of use, a significant number report severe functional problems.⁴⁰

Common complaints include persistent login loops that redirect to a non-functional browser page, inaccurate provider network information within the app, and general instability.⁴⁰

The separate Aetna Better Health app, designed for Medicaid members, appears to garner even more significant complaints about its lack of functionality and support.⁵⁰

The striking similarity in the nature of user complaints for both myCigna and Aetna Health suggests a shared struggle with digital execution.

Both companies have built feature-rich applications, but they appear to fall short on the fundamentals of performance, reliability, and a seamless user experience.

This represents a significant point of friction in the member journey for both insurers.

A potential customer of either company should not assume the mobile app will be a consistently reliable tool and should be prepared to rely on the desktop website or telephone support to manage their benefits.

4.2 The Rise of Virtual Care: A Comparative Look at Telehealth Services

Telehealth has become a cornerstone of modern healthcare delivery, and both Cigna and Aetna have developed robust virtual care platforms.

However, they have adopted different strategic approaches to providing these services.

Cigna’s domestic telehealth strategy is centered on a deep, primary partnership with MDLIVE.

Accessible through the myCigna platform, this partnership provides members with 24/7 access to a wide array of virtual services.⁴⁶

These include virtual urgent care for minor acute conditions (often with a $0 copay), virtual primary care consultations, behavioral and mental health counseling, dermatology services via asynchronous messaging, and even virtual dental consultations for urgent issues.⁴⁶

For its international members, Cigna utilizes a different platform, offering “Global Telehealth” services through the Teladoc Health network via its Cigna Wellbeing App.⁵⁴

This approach, focusing on a single, deeply integrated domestic partner, has the potential to create a more streamlined and less confusing user experience.

Aetna, in contrast, employs a multi-vendor telehealth strategy, leveraging a combination of third-party partners and its own proprietary services.

Members can access telehealth through Teladoc Health for a range of on-demand medical needs, but also through CVS Virtual Care, a key asset from its parent company.⁵⁵

This allows Aetna to cover everything from common illnesses and chronic condition management to mental health support and prescription refills.⁵⁵

For behavioral health specifically, Aetna’s approach is even more diversified, partnering with MDLIVE, Array AtHome Care, and Telemynd, with the available provider varying based on the member’s state of residence.⁵⁷

This difference in strategy presents a trade-off.

Aetna’s multi-vendor model may offer members greater choice and access to more specialized providers, particularly in the behavioral health space.

However, it also carries the risk of creating a fragmented and potentially confusing experience, as members may need to navigate different vendors and platforms for different types of care.

Cigna’s more unified domestic approach with MDLIVE could prove simpler and more intuitive for the average member to use.

The proprietary CVS Virtual Care platform is a significant strategic advantage for Aetna, as it allows the company to direct members into its own integrated care ecosystem, reinforcing the core strategy of the CVS-Aetna merger.

4.3 Fostering Health: A Review of Wellness and Member Rewards Programs

In an effort to move beyond simply paying claims, modern insurers invest heavily in wellness and rewards programs designed to encourage healthy behaviors and engage members proactively.

Both Cigna and Aetna offer a suite of such programs, but their approaches to incentivization differ significantly.

Cigna’s wellness offerings include the Cigna Health Matters® program, which provides health assessments and personalized recommendations, and lifestyle management programs that offer coaching for tobacco cessation, stress management, and weight management.⁵⁸

Its incentive structure is built around the

Cigna Take Control Rewards® program, a gamified system where members over 18 can earn points for completing healthy activities.

These points can then be redeemed for a reloadable debit card or for merchandise such as a Fitbit activity tracker or a Roku streaming player.⁶⁰

Cigna also offers the Healthy Rewards® program, which provides discounts on various health and wellness products and services.⁵⁸

Aetna provides a similar foundation of wellness tools, including its Simple Steps To A Healthier Life® online program with health assessments and coaching, mindfulness programs developed in partnership with Duke University, and a dedicated maternity program.⁶²

However, Aetna’s key differentiator in the rewards space is its ability to provide immediate, tangible, and highly relevant financial benefits through its integration with CVS Health.

Aetna members can receive direct discounts on CVS-branded health products (often 20%) and, depending on the plan, may receive a quarterly allowance (e.g., $25) to spend on over-the-counter items at CVS stores.¹⁴

This contrast highlights two different philosophies of member engagement.

Cigna’s model is an abstract, incentive-based system where members accumulate points toward a future reward.

Aetna’s model offers a concrete, easily understood, and frequently usable benefit.

For the average consumer, the simplicity and practical utility of saving money on everyday health purchases at a familiar retail store are likely more compelling and valuable than a points-based system.

This direct financial perk represents a powerful and unique competitive advantage derived directly from the CVS-Aetna merger.

Section 5: Performance, Quality, and Reputation: An Evidence-Based Assessment

This section transitions from analyzing what Cigna and Aetna offer to evaluating how well they perform.

By synthesizing third-party ratings, provider feedback, and direct consumer complaints, a comprehensive picture of quality, satisfaction, and overall market reputation emerges.

5.1 The Voice of the Customer: J.D. Power and Consumer Satisfaction Ratings

J.D. Power’s annual U.S. Commercial Member Health Plan Study is a critical benchmark for customer satisfaction in the insurance industry.

The studies consistently find that health insurance ranks among the lowest-rated industries evaluated, with satisfaction scores varying significantly by geographic region.⁶³

When comparing Cigna and Aetna within this framework, a clear pattern of Aetna outperformance emerges.

Aetna’s performance in the J.D. Power studies is consistently strong.

In the 2025 study, Aetna achieved the highest satisfaction score in both the Ohio and Southwest regions.⁶³

Similarly, in the 2024 study, it was the top-ranked plan in the East South Central region and Ohio.⁶⁶

This consistent high ranking across multiple regions and years indicates a strong ability to meet or exceed member expectations on key drivers of satisfaction, such as cost, coverage, and customer service.

Cigna’s performance, in stark contrast, is frequently at the lower end of the scale.

The 2024 J.D. Power results list Cigna as the lowest-ranked plan for customer experience in a remarkable ten different regions: Maryland, Florida, Pennsylvania, the Northwest (Oregon, Washington), the South Atlantic (Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina), Virginia, the Mountain region (Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming), Massachusetts, Colorado, and Ohio.⁶⁷

While there are exceptions—Cigna was the highest-ranking plan in Texas in one 2024 study ⁶⁸—the overwhelming trend is negative.

This pattern is corroborated by a 2022 analysis from SmartFinancial, which also noted that Cigna received below-average customer satisfaction ratings in most regions surveyed.¹⁷

This data provides compelling evidence that, on average, Aetna delivers a more satisfying member experience than Cigna.

While performance can certainly vary at a local level, the national trend captured by years of J.D. Power research indicates a significant gap in customer satisfaction, favoring Aetna.

5.2 Measuring Clinical Quality: NCQA and CMS Star Ratings

Beyond subjective satisfaction, objective measures of clinical quality provide another crucial lens for comparison.

The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) produce influential ratings based on how well plans perform on standardized measures of prevention, treatment, and patient outcomes.

In this domain, Aetna again demonstrates a consistent edge.

For commercial health plans, an Insure.com analysis of NCQA ratings gives Aetna a higher score (3.43 out of 5) than Cigna (3.24 out of 5).⁶⁹

While both companies are capable of achieving high scores in specific markets—for instance, both earned 4-star NCQA ratings in Connecticut ⁷⁰—Aetna’s overall average tends to be higher.

In a 2019-2020 rating of California plans, Aetna’s HMO/POS plan received 3.5 stars, while Cigna’s comparable plan received 3.0 stars.⁷¹

The quality gap is most pronounced in the highly regulated Medicare Advantage market.

As detailed previously, CMS Star Ratings reveal a significant disparity.

Aetna’s MA plans boast an average rating of 4.29 stars, with 78% of members in plans rated 4 stars or higher.

Cigna’s average rating is a full third of a star lower at 3.97, with only 33% of its members in plans rated 4 stars or higher.³¹

Historical data from 2018 shows a similar trend, with an NCQA analysis at the time finding that the vast majority of Aetna’s Medicare plans scored a 4 or higher, while most of Cigna’s scored 3.0 or lower.⁷²

For a consumer, employer, or policymaker who prioritizes evidence-based clinical quality, Aetna presents a much stronger case.

These consistent high ratings from both NCQA and CMS suggest that Aetna’s provider networks, care management programs, and preventive health initiatives are more effective at meeting established clinical benchmarks and delivering positive health outcomes for their members.

5.3 The Provider’s Perspective: Insights from the AMA Report Card

The American Medical Association (AMA) National Health Insurer Report Card offers a unique and valuable perspective: that of the physicians and healthcare providers who must interact with insurers daily.

This data reveals a more complex and nuanced picture, highlighting what can be described as the “Cigna Paradox.”

From a provider’s standpoint, the most critical functions of an insurer are to pay claims accurately and promptly.

On these metrics, the AMA data shows Cigna to be an industry leader.

A 2013 AMA report found that Cigna had the lowest claims denial rate among all major commercial insurers, at an exceptionally low 0.54%.⁷³

A subsequent report confirmed this leadership, with Cigna maintaining a denial rate of just 0.68%.⁷⁴

In contrast, Aetna’s denial rate was reported at 1.5%.⁷³

Cigna also excelled in administrative efficiency, ranking best on the AMA’s “Administrative Burden Index” with the lowest cost-per-claim ($1.25 for Cigna vs. $1.68 for Aetna) and was noted for significantly reducing its claims response time.⁷³

However, this back-end efficiency is coupled with front-end stringency.

The same AMA report that praised Cigna’s low denial rate also found that it had the highest rate of claims requiring prior authorization.⁷⁴

Prior authorization, or “pre-approval,” is a process that requires physicians to get permission from the insurer before a service is rendered.

It is a major source of administrative burden and frustration for providers and a frequent cause of delays in patient care.

This creates the Cigna Paradox: the company is an excellent and efficient partner for providers after a service has been approved, but it is the most difficult gatekeeper before that service can be delivered.

This heavy reliance on prior authorization is a key cost-containment strategy, but it directly contributes to the negative consumer experiences detailed in complaints about denied or delayed care.

Aetna, while less efficient on the back-end processing of claims, appears to be a slightly less demanding partner on the front-end.

5.4 A Pattern of Problems: Analyzing Consumer Complaints (BBB & Online Forums)

An examination of direct consumer complaints filed with organizations like the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and posted on public forums such as Reddit and ConsumerAffairs provides a raw, unfiltered view of the member experience.

This qualitative data reveals that despite their different strategies and performance on standardized metrics, the most severe problems faced by members of Cigna and Aetna are remarkably similar.

Both companies are the subject of a high volume of complaints, with each having over 1,000 complaints filed against their primary BBB profiles in the last three years.⁷⁵

Aetna is noted as not being accredited by the BBB.²¹

The recurring themes across these complaints are nearly identical for both insurers:

• Claim Denials and Refusal to Pay: Members recount exhausting battles to get coverage for treatments their own doctors have deemed medically necessary, from surgeries to life-saving medications.⁷⁸
• Prior Authorization Hurdles: The process of obtaining pre-approval is described as a nightmare of long waits, repeated denials, and administrative runarounds that lead to critical delays in care.⁷⁸
• Inaccurate Network Information: A common and deeply frustrating experience is being misled by the insurer’s own tools about a provider’s network status, resulting in large, unexpected bills.³⁹
• Poor Customer Service: Complaints frequently cite excessively long hold times, unhelpful or misinformed representatives, and an inability to get a straight answer or escalate an issue.⁷⁵
• High Out-of-Pocket Costs: Many members express dismay at the high costs they still face through deductibles and copays, even with an expensive insurance plan.⁷⁸

The consistency of these complaints across both companies points to a larger truth.

These are not just the failings of two individual corporations; they are the symptoms of a fundamentally complex, confusing, and often adversarial U.S. managed care system.³⁷

The core tenets of this system—utilization management (like prior authorization), restrictive provider networks, and complex cost-sharing structures—are the very things that generate the most anger and frustration among consumers.⁸¹

Therefore, while one insurer may perform marginally better than the other on certain metrics, both operate within this challenging framework.

The choice between Cigna and Aetna is not a choice to escape these systemic problems.

Rather, it is a choice of which company’s specific manifestation of these problems a consumer or employer is willing to navigate.

This context is essential for setting realistic expectations for any potential member.

Table 5.1: Quality, Satisfaction, and Reputation Scorecard

Metric/Source

J.D. Power Satisfaction

NCQA Commercial Plan Rating

Avg. CMS MA Star Rating

AMA Claim Denial Rate

AMA Admin. Burden Index

Common Complaint Themes

Section 6: Synthesis and Strategic Recommendations

This final section synthesizes the preceding analysis into a conclusive comparison, offering a summary scorecard and providing actionable recommendations tailored to the unique needs of different stakeholders.

6.1 Cigna vs. Aetna: A Synthesized Scorecard

The choice between Cigna and Aetna is a complex decision involving trade-offs across multiple domains.

The following scorecard distills the comprehensive analysis into a high-level, comparative summary of their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Table 6.1: Final Comparative Scorecard

Dimension

Corporate & Financial Strength

Individual/ACA Plan Competitiveness

Employer Group Plan Offerings

Medicare Plan Quality

Medicare Plan Affordability

Network Breadth & Accessibility

Digital Tools & User Experience

Wellness & Rewards Programs

Customer Satisfaction (J.D. Power)

Clinical Quality (NCQA/CMS)

Provider Relations (AMA)

Overall Reputation

6.2 Navigating the Choice: Recommendations for Key Stakeholders

The “better” insurer is not a universal designation but depends entirely on the priorities, health status, and risk tolerance of the decision-maker.

For the Individual Consumer

• If you are healthy, budget-conscious, and seeking Medicare Advantage: Cigna’s leadership in $0-premium MA plans presents an extremely compelling financial proposition.³¹ A healthy senior may find this to be the optimal choice, but must be aware of the lower quality ratings and the potential for significant administrative hurdles and customer service challenges should they require substantial care in the future.³¹
• If you have chronic health conditions or prioritize quality and stability: Aetna is the more prudent choice. Its consistently higher CMS and NCQA quality ratings suggest a more reliable and effective system for managing care.³¹ For ACA shoppers, its lower average deductibles mean coverage begins sooner, a critical factor when managing ongoing health needs.²⁴ The stability of care may well be worth a higher monthly premium.
• If you value convenience and tangible perks: Aetna’s integration with the CVS Health ecosystem is a unique and powerful advantage.¹⁴ The ability to access MinuteClinics for low-cost care and receive direct discounts on everyday health products is a practical benefit that Cigna’s more abstract rewards program cannot match.

For the Employer/Benefits Manager

• If your primary strategic goal is managing pharmacy spend: Cigna’s integrated Evernorth/Express Scripts PBM is arguably the most powerful tool on the market for controlling prescription drug costs, which is often the largest and fastest-growing component of an employer’s healthcare spend.¹⁸ For a large, self-funded employer focused on data analytics and cost containment, Cigna’s model is deeply compelling.
• If your primary strategic goal is promoting employee wellness and providing convenient access to care: Aetna’s CVS-integrated model offers a unique benefits package that can be marketed as a tangible perk to employees.⁹ Providing easy and affordable access to basic care through MinuteClinics can potentially improve productivity and reduce absenteeism by heading off minor issues before they become major ones.
• Due Diligence is Non-Negotiable: Regardless of the insurer chosen, benefits managers must conduct rigorous due diligence on network adequacy within their specific employee geographies. It is also crucial to recognize that employees will inevitably face administrative hurdles; the employer must be prepared to act as an advocate to help them navigate the complexities of prior authorizations and claims disputes.

For the Investor

• The Cigna Group (CI): An investment in Cigna is a pure-play bet on a highly efficient, diversified insurer with a dominant PBM. Its growth prospects are tied to its ability to win and retain large employer group contracts by demonstrating superior cost management, particularly in the pharmacy space. The recent divestiture of its Medicare businesses can be interpreted in two ways: either as a strategic move to focus on its more profitable core commercial business, or as a retreat from a highly competitive government programs market where it struggled to compete on quality.²
• Aetna (via CVS Health, CVS): An investment in CVS Health is a bet on a revolutionary, vertically integrated healthcare delivery model. The thesis is that by combining insurance (Aetna), retail (CVS Pharmacy), pharmacy benefits (CVS Caremark), and clinical delivery (MinuteClinic, Oak Street Health), the company can create powerful synergies that lower costs and improve outcomes.⁹ Its success hinges on the complex execution of this ambitious strategy. It is a more complex but potentially more transformative long-term investment than Cigna.

6.3 Concluding Thoughts: The Future of Two Health Insurance Giants

Cigna and Aetna represent two distinct and powerful answers to the fundamental question facing the modern U.S. healthcare industry: how to create durable value and a competitive moat in a system plagued by rising costs and consumer frustration.

Cigna’s chosen path is through logistical and financial control.

By acquiring Express Scripts, it seized control of the pharmaceutical value chain, betting that its ability to manage the system’s most expensive components more efficiently than its rivals would be its defining advantage.

Its focus is on the large-scale mechanics of healthcare financing and delivery.

Aetna’s chosen path, through its merger with CVS Health, is through experiential and physical control.

By integrating with a massive retail and clinical footprint, it seeks to own the member’s healthcare journey, from the moment they feel unwell to the moment they purchase a wellness product.

Its focus is on creating a seamless, convenient, and branded end-to-end ecosystem.

While both are formidable operators, the long-term trends in healthcare may favor Aetna’s approach.

In an industry that is slowly but inexorably being forced by regulatory pressure and consumer demand to become more transparent, accessible, and patient-centric, the ability to offer a tangible, convenient, and integrated care experience may prove to be the more durable competitive advantage.

Cigna’s model is a masterclass in managing the complexities of the current system, but Aetna’s model may be a better blueprint for building the system of the future.

Works cited

1. Milestones | The Cigna Group, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.thecignagroup.com/about-us/milestones
2. The Cigna Group – Wikipedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cigna_Group
3. Aetna – Wikipedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aetna
4. Our History – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/about-us/aetna-history.html
5. The Cigna Group (CI) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 11, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/cigna/marketcap/
6. Cigna Group Market Cap 2010-2025 | CI – Macrotrends, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/CI/cigna-group-the/market-cap
7. Cigna | CI Stock Price, Company Overview & News – Forbes, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/companies/cigna/
8. Cigna Corp Company Profile – Cigna Corp Overview – GlobalData, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.globaldata.com/company-profile/cigna-corp/
9. CVS Health – Wikipedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVS_Health
10. Facts About the Company | Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/about-us/aetna-facts-and-companies/aetna-facts.html
11. Judge gives final approval for CVS Health’s acquisition of Aetna | AHA News, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aha.org/news/headline/2019-09-05-judge-gives-final-approval-cvs-healths-acquisition-aetna
12. United States v. CVS and Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/d9/press-releases/attachments/2018/10/10/cvs-aetna_-_public_qa_final_0.pdf
13. Health Product & Service Discounts for Aetna Members, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families/health-insurance-through-work/discounts.html
14. Supplemental Health Insurance Plans for Individuals – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families/voluntary-benefits.html
15. Types of Health Insurance | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/knowledge-center/types-of-health-insurance
16. Individual & Family Health Insurance Plans & Coverage – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families.html
17. Cigna vs Aetna: What You Need to Know – SmartFinancial, accessed August 11, 2025, https://smartfinancial.com/compare-health/cigna-vs-aetna-insurance
18. Plans Offered Through Your Employer | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/individuals-families/shop-plans/plans-through-employer/
19. HMO, PPO, POS, EPO, & HDHP: What’s the Difference | Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/health-guide/hmo-pos-ppo-hdhp-whats-the-difference.html
20. PPO Health Insurance Plans from Aetna | Preferred Provider …, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/health-insurance-plans/ppo.html
21. Aetna Insurance Reviews | Pros & Cons – Trusted Choice, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.trustedchoice.com/insurance-articles/c/atena-insurance-company-review/
22. Aetna vs. Blue Cross: Comparisons, Costs, and More – Investopedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/aetna-vs-blue-cross-5190180
23. Cigna Health Insurance Review 2025 – Forbes, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/cigna-health-insurance-review/
24. 4 Best Health Insurance Companies for 2025 – ValuePenguin, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.valuepenguin.com/best-health-insurance-companies
25. Cigna Health Insurance Review – ValuePenguin, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.valuepenguin.com/cigna-health-insurance-review
26. psychologicalhealing.net, accessed August 11, 2025, https://psychologicalhealing.net/how-much-is-aetna-health-insurance/
27. Best Health Insurance Companies Of 2025 – Forbes Advisor, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/best-health-insurance-companies/
28. PPO Health Plans for Employers – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/employers/medical-plans/ppo
29. Employers & Organizations – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, http://www.aetna.com/employers-organizations.html
30. Employer Health Insurance for Midsize to Large Businesses | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/employers/midsize-to-large-business
31. Aetna vs. Cigna: Medicare Advantage Comparison – NerdWallet, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/insurance/medicare/aetna-vs-cigna-medicare
32. Cigna Healthcare | Health Insurance, Dental Plans & Medicare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/
33. Cigna vs. Aetna Dental Insurance: A Comparison Guide | Lower My Dental Bills, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.lowermydentalbills.com/dental-center/cigna-vs-aetna-dental-insurance-a-comparison-guide/?affid=110258
34. Dental Insurance Plans for Individuals & Families | Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families/buy-dental-coverage.html
35. About Us – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/about-us/
36. Aetna Health Insurance Review 2025 – Forbes, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/aetna-health-insurance-review/
37. Navigating the Maze: A Look at Health Insurance Complexities and Consumer Protections, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/issue-brief/navigating-the-maze-a-look-at-health-insurance-complexities-and-consumer-protections/
38. What’s Behind the Door: Consumers’ Difficulties Selecting Health Plans, accessed August 11, 2025, https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Consumer_Difficulties_Selecting_Health_Plans_Jan2012.pdf
39. Aetna Insurance is a nightmare : r/HealthInsurance – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HealthInsurance/comments/1i7jkgm/aetna_insurance_is_a_nightmare/
40. Aetna Health on the App Store, accessed August 11, 2025, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/aetna-health/id1261033071
41. Aetna Premier Care Network and Aetna Premier Care Network Plus Provider guide, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/content/dam/aetna/pdfs/aetnacom/healthcare-professionals/documents-forms/APCN-APCN-Plus-Provider-Guide.pdf
42. Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.thecignagroup.com/our-capabilities/cigna-healthcare
43. Summary of Coverage Differences between Aetna and Cigna International Health Services and Cigna Advantages for Members Residing Outside the U.S. – World Bank, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/human-resources/Summary-of-coverage-differences-between-aetna-and-cigna-international-health-services-and-cigna-advantages-for-members-residing-outside-the-us
44. myCigna – Apps on Google Play, accessed August 11, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cigna.mobile.mycigna
45. myCigna: Your Secure Member Portal – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/individuals-families/member-guide/mycigna
46. Virtual care from $0? – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/static/www-cigna-com/docs/ifp/m-24-fly-all-973806-ifp-virtual-care-broker-customer-flyer.pdf
47. myCigna on the App Store, accessed August 11, 2025, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mycigna/id569266174
48. Aetna Health App, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families/using-your-aetna-benefits/aetna-mobile.html
49. Aetna Health – Apps on Google Play, accessed August 11, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aetna.aetnahealth
50. Aetna Better Health – Medicaid on the App Store, accessed August 11, 2025, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/aetna-better-health-medicaid/id964515845
51. Aetna Better Health – Medicaid – Apps on Google Play, accessed August 11, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aetna.aetnabetterhealthmobile
52. Get ready for your virtual urgent care visit. – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/static/www-cigna-com/docs/virtual-care-digital-literacy-flyer.pdf
53. Virtual Care (Telehealth) Services – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/individuals-families/member-guide/virtual-care-services
54. Global Telehealth – Cigna Wellbeing® App, accessed August 11, 2025, https://comms.cigna.com/hw-telehealth
55. Virtual care, wherever you are – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/individuals-families/health-insurance-through-work/telemedicine.html
56. Telemedicine | Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/microsites/aonfi/telemedicine.html
57. Telehealth Online Consultations (or Service) – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/dsepublicContent/assets/html/content.html?resource=fsbp/behavioral-health-televideo-fsbp
58. Employee Health and Wellness Programs – Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/employers/health-wellness-programs/
59. Health Programs for Patients | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/health-care-providers/resources/patient-programs
60. Cigna Healthcare Individual and Family Plan Benefits, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/individuals-families/shop-plans/health-insurance-plans/plan-benefits/
61. Health Insurance Plans for Individuals and Families | Cigna Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.cigna.com/individuals-families/shop-plans/health-insurance-plans/
62. Workplace Wellness Programs for Employees – Aetna, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.aetna.com/insurance-producer/health-wellness/wellness-programs.html
63. Gap Widens between Highest- and Lowest-Performing Employer-Sponsored Health Plans, J.D. Power Finds High-Performing Plans Impro, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/file/2025-05/2025052%20U.S.%20Commercial%20Member%20Health%20Plan.pdf
64. 2025 U.S. Commercial Member Health Plan Study | J.D. Power, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2025-us-commercial-member-health-plan-study
65. Commercial Member Health Plan Study | J.D. Power, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.jdpower.com/business/healthcare/commercial-member-health-plan-study
66. J.D. Power’s top-ranked health plans for customer experience | 2024 – Becker’s Payer Issues, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/j-d-powers-top-ranked-health-plans-for-customer-experience-2024/
67. J.D. Power’s lowest-ranked health plans for customer experience | 2024, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/j-d-powers-lowest-ranked-health-plans-for-customer-experience-2024/
68. JD Power 2024 US Commercial Member Health Plan Study,SM, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/file/2024-05/2024048%20U.S.%20Commercial%20Member%20Health%20Plan.pdf
69. Best Health Insurance Companies of 2025 – Insure.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.insure.com/best-health-insurance-companies/
70. The best-rated commercial health plans in each state: NCQA – Becker’s Payer Issues, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/the-best-rated-commercial-health-plans-in-each-state-ncqa/
71. California Private Health Insurance Plan Ratings – NCQA Report Cards, accessed August 11, 2025, https://healthinsuranceratings.ncqa.org/2019/search/Commercial/CA
72. Kaiser, Aetna lead the way in NCQA’s Medicare plan ratings | Fierce Healthcare, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/ncqa-insurer-rankings-customer-satisfaction-prevention-kaiser-aetna
73. Cigna is the least likely to deny your health insurance claim, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.insure.com/health-insurance/health-insurance-denial-rates.html
74. New AMA Health Insurer Report Card Finds Increasing Inaccuracy in Claims Payment, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/new-ama-health-insurer-report-card-finds-increasing-inaccuracy-claims-payment
75. Cigna | BBB Complaints | Better Business Bureau, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bbb.org/us/pa/philadelphia/profile/insurance-companies/cigna-0241-80000928/complaints
76. Aetna Inc. | BBB Complaints | Better Business Bureau, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bbb.org/us/ct/hartford/profile/insurance-companies/aetna-inc-0111-71/complaints?page=3
77. Aetna Inc. | BBB Business Profile | Better Business Bureau, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bbb.org/us/ct/hartford/profile/insurance-companies/aetna-inc-0111-71
78. Cigna Health Insurance Reviews 2025 (Cost and Coverage) – Consumer Affairs, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.consumeraffairs.com/insurance/cigna_health.html
79. Cigna | BBB Reviews | Better Business Bureau, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bbb.org/us/pa/philadelphia/profile/insurance-companies/cigna-0241-80000928/customer-reviews
80. Aetna Health Insurance Reviews 2025 (Cost and Coverage) – Consumer Affairs, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.consumeraffairs.com/insurance/aetna_health.html
81. Signing Up for Marketplace Coverage Remains a Challenge for Many Consumers | KFF, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/signing-up-for-marketplace-coverage-remains-a-challenge-for-many-consumers/
82. Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual Market Health Insurance Plans – PMC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7333350/