The Two Journeys: My Search for the Truth About Canadian and American Healthcare

Introduction: A Tale of Two Crises

For fifteen years, I have lived and breathed health policy.

As a researcher, I built a career on the clean logic of data, crafting analyses of healthcare systems from the sterile comfort of a university office.

I could lecture for hours on the trade-offs between single-payer and market-based models, quoting statistics on cost, access, and outcomes with detached confidence.

I thought I understood the debate.

Then, life shattered my academic certainty with the brutal, messy reality of human suffering.

It happened in the span of a single, agonizing year, through two parallel family crises that exposed the hollow core of the political talking points and forced me to question everything I thought I knew.

The first crisis began with my uncle in Ontario, a retired history teacher who had spent his life paying into the Canadian system.

He was diagnosed with a severely degenerated hip, a condition that reduced a once-vibrant man to a prisoner in his own home.

The pain was a constant, grinding presence.

His world shrank to the dimensions of his living room.

The solution was straightforward: a hip replacement.

But in Canada, the solution was not the problem; the queue was.

He was placed on a waiting list, a faceless name in a seemingly endless line.

The projected wait was over a year.¹

As the months dragged on, I watched his physical condition deteriorate and, more painfully, his spirit dim.

He was trapped in what the data calls a “non-benign inconvenience”—a sterile term for the psychological distress and physical decline that accompanies waiting for care.¹

His story was not unique.

That year, I learned that thousands of Canadians die each year while on waiting lists for surgeries, procedures, or even diagnostic scans, their names tragically removed from a list they should never have been on for so long.²

Simultaneously, 8,000 kilometers away in California, a second crisis was unfolding.

My cousin, a young mother with what her employer called “gold-plated” health insurance, was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of cancer.

The American system, in stark contrast to the Canadian one, moved with breathtaking speed.

Within a week, she was meeting with one of the country’s top oncologists.

She had immediate access to advanced imaging, genetic sequencing, and cutting-edge experimental treatments that were the stuff of medical journals.⁴

The system was a marvel of innovation and responsiveness.

But this marvel came with a terrifying price tag.

Even with her excellent insurance, the bills began to pile up.

The high deductible was just the start.

Then came the co-insurance for every treatment, the out-of-network charges for a specialized anesthesiologist she never chose, and the uncovered costs for supportive therapies deemed “not medically necessary.” The financial toll was a secondary disease, a cancer of its own that metastasized through her family’s savings.

They drained their retirement accounts, took out a second mortgage, and stared into the abyss of a six-figure medical debt that threatened to consume their lives long after the cancer was gone.⁶

Her story, too, was tragically common.

In the United States, nearly one in twelve adults—20 million people—owe significant medical debt, a burden totaling at least $220 billion.⁸

For many, it leads to bankruptcy, a uniquely American consequence of getting sick.⁹

I was caught in the crossfire of these two realities.

How could both be true? How could one system offer such profound financial security but such agonizing, dangerous waits, while the other offered world-class speed and technology at the cost of potential financial ruin? The polarized rhetoric from think tanks like the libertarian Fraser Institute, which decries Canadian wait times, and the left-leaning Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, which champions the public model, felt utterly inadequate.¹¹

Neither captured the full, contradictory truth of my family’s experience.

The standard metrics were failing me.

I needed a new way to see the problem.

Part I: The Epiphany: It’s Not a Competition, It’s a Choice of Vehicle

In the aftermath of that year, I dove back into the data, but with a new, desperate urgency.

I tried to reconcile the contradictions.

How could Canada rank near the bottom in Commonwealth Fund surveys on timely access, yet rank highly on measures of equity and overall health outcomes?¹³ How could the United States be rated number one in the world for “responsiveness” (the quality of service for those receiving treatment) but dead last among high-income nations for overall system performance, access, and equity?¹⁴ The more I tried to force the systems into a simple “good vs. bad” framework, the more the data seemed to mock me.

It was like trying to declare a hammer “better” than a screwdriver; the judgment depends entirely on the task at hand.

The epiphany came not from a spreadsheet, but from stepping back and abandoning the premise of the debate itself.

I realized the Canada vs. U.S. healthcare argument is fundamentally flawed because we are trying to judge two completely different vehicles as if they were competing in the same race.

They are not.

They are engineered from different blueprints, built on different philosophies, and designed to achieve different goals.

Canada’s healthcare system is a Public Tour B.S. It is a social utility, a form of mass transit.

The fare is prepaid collectively through taxes.¹⁶

The core principles of the Canada Health Act—universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration—are the promise that everyone who is a resident gets a ticket.¹⁶

Once you’re on board, the ride for all medically necessary hospital and physician services is free at the point of service.

The bus is designed for safety, reliability, and equity.

Its primary mission is to get the entire group to the destination together, regardless of anyone’s individual ability to afford a private car.

The route is largely predetermined by medical necessity, and the journey can be slow.

There are often queues to get on, and the bus can get stuck in traffic, leading to delays.

But the one thing you don’t have to worry about is being left stranded on the side of the road because you can’t afford the fare.

The U.S. healthcare system is a High-Performance Sports Car. It is a consumer good, sold in a competitive market.

It offers breathtaking speed, cutting-edge technology, and an exhilarating degree of personal choice and control.⁴

But this performance comes at a premium.

The sticker price (insurance premiums) is astronomical.

It requires expensive, high-octane fuel (deductibles and co-pays) to R.N. And the maintenance is constant and costly.

For those who can afford the car and its upkeep, the journey can be spectacular.

They can go wherever they want, whenever they want, at incredible speed.

For some, the government provides a subsidy to help buy a basic model (the Affordable Care Act marketplaces) or offers a standard-issue government vehicle for specific groups (Medicare for the elderly, Medicaid for the poor).¹⁸

But for millions, the car is simply unaffordable.

And for those who own one, a sudden breakdown—a serious illness or accident—can lead to a repair bill so catastrophic that it results in financial ruin.

This analogy became my new framework.

It allowed me to stop asking, “Which system is better?” and start asking the more incisive questions of an engineer: What are the design specifications of these two vehicles? What are their performance trade-offs? What is the user experience for different kinds of passengers? And what happens when they break down?

Part II: The Tour Bus vs. The Sports Car: A Head-to-Head Analysis

Section 1: The Price of the Ticket (Cost & Funding)

The most dramatic difference between the two systems—the one that defines the daily experience for citizens—is the price of admission and the nature of the financial risk.

The Tour Bus and the Sports Car are financed through completely different philosophies, leading to vastly different burdens on their passengers.

The Bus Fare: Predictable, Collective Funding

Canada’s system operates on a principle of collective prepayment.

It is funded almost entirely through general tax revenues collected by federal and provincial governments.¹⁷

The federal government transfers funds to the provinces via the Canada Health Transfer, and as long as provinces adhere to the five principles of the Canada Health Act, they ensure that all “medically necessary” hospital and physician services are provided without any direct charge to the patient at the point of service.¹⁶

This is often mislabeled as “free” healthcare.

It is not free.

It is prepaid.

The Fraser Institute, a Canadian think tank, calculates that the average Canadian family pays anywhere from $4,908 to $17,713 per year in taxes to fund the public health insurance system.²²

This is the bus fare—a predictable, recurring cost bundled with other civic services.

The key feature is the elimination of financial uncertainty at the moment of illness.

A defining characteristic of this model is its administrative efficiency.

By having a single payer (the provincial government) in each province, the system eliminates the immense complexity and overhead associated with a competitive insurance market.

While data is dated, a landmark 1999 study found that administrative costs accounted for only 16.7% of healthcare expenditures in Canada, compared to 31.0% in the United States.¹⁵

More recent analysis shows the U.S. spends nearly five times more per person on administrative costs than the average of other wealthy countries.²³

This is the inherent efficiency of a single, streamlined ticketing and scheduling system for the bus route, compared to a chaotic market of competing private taxi companies.

The Sports Car: High Price, High Upkeep

The American system is a complex, fragmented, multi-payer model.

Healthcare is financed through a dizzying mix of private employer-sponsored insurance, individual plans purchased on ACA marketplaces, and public programs like Medicare and Medicaid.⁴

This is a vast, competitive marketplace with countless dealerships, financing options, insurance policies, and service plans.

The price of this high-performance vehicle is staggering.

The U.S. spends more on healthcare than any other nation on earth, both in absolute and relative terms.

In 2022, U.S. healthcare spending was $12,555 per person, nearly double Canada’s $6,319.¹⁵

As a share of the economy, the U.S. devoted 16.6% of its GDP to health, while Canada spent 11.2%.¹⁵

This enormous gap is not driven by Americans using more services; in fact, utilization rates are broadly similar to other wealthy countries.

The difference is price.

Everything from physician salaries to hospital stays to pharmaceuticals costs more in the United States.¹⁵

The most devastating consequence of this high-cost, high-cost-sharing model is the crisis of medical debt.

For millions of Americans, the sports car’s breakdown is not a possibility; it is a statistical likelihood.

About 41% of U.S. adults report having debt from medical or dental bills.⁹

An estimated 20 million people carry what is defined as “significant” medical debt (over $250), with the total burden nationwide estimated to be at least $220 billion.⁸

This debt is not confined to the uninsured; most people struggling with medical bills have health insurance.⁷

High deductibles, which can exceed $9,000 for an individual, and substantial co-insurance mean that even a “covered” illness can lead to financial ruin.⁷

This burden falls disproportionately on women, Black and Hispanic Americans, and people with disabilities or chronic health conditions.⁸

This is the catastrophic repair bill that forces the car owner to sell their house or declare bankruptcy.

Looking at these two funding models reveals a deeper truth beyond the numbers.

The American system imposes a profound psychological cost.

The constant fear of a financially ruinous medical event is a feature, not a bug, of a system that rations care based on ability to pay.

KFF polling finds that affording healthcare costs and unexpected medical bills are the top financial worries for American families, outranking housing, food, or other basic necessities.²⁵

Half of U.S. adults with lower incomes report skipping needed medical care because of cost.²⁷

This creates a pervasive, low-level anxiety that is largely absent from the Canadian experience, where financial ruin is decoupled from a medical diagnosis.²⁸

This is a fundamental difference in the user experience of the two vehicles—one is a stressful, high-stakes drive where every pothole could mean bankruptcy; the other is a less thrilling but more secure ride.

Furthermore, the high administrative costs in the U.S. are not simply waste; they are the necessary price of maintaining a for-profit, market-based system.

The immense resources spent on billing, negotiating between thousands of different insurers and providers, marketing, and claims processing are the operational costs of the marketplace itself.

The Canadian “Tour Bus” model achieves its efficiency precisely by eliminating this market complexity.

The high cost of the American “Sports Car” is, in part, the price paid to keep the market running.

Table 1: Comparative Financial Breakdown (Canada vs. United States)

Metric	Canada	United States	Source(s)
Health Spending as % of GDP (2022)	11.2%	16.6%	15
Health Spending Per Capita (USD PPP, 2022)	$6,319	$12,555	15
Public vs. Private Spending Split (%)	~70% Public, 30% Private	~50% Public, 50% Private	17
Administrative Costs as % of Total Spending	~17%	~31%	15
Prevalence of Significant Medical Debt (% of Adults)	Negligible / Not Tracked	20 million people (nearly 1 in 12 adults)	8
Total Estimated Medical Debt	N/A	At least $220 Billion	6

Section 2: The Itinerary & The Speed (Access & Wait Times)

If cost defines the price of the ticket, access and timeliness define the nature of the journey itself.

Here, the trade-offs of the Tour Bus and the Sports Car become starkly apparent, revealing that the word “waiting” has two very different meanings in the two countries.

The Predictable Route: Rationing by Waiting

In Canada, access to specialized care is typically managed through a gatekeeper system.

A General Practitioner (GP) is the first point of contact and must provide a referral to a specialist for non-emergency care.²¹

This is the bus driver, who follows a set, orderly route designed to manage flow and prioritize need.

The system’s most infamous feature is the consequence of this managed flow combined with capacity constraints: wait times.

The data is unequivocal.

Canadians wait longer for many types of care than citizens of almost any other developed nation.⁴

In 2024, the median wait time from a GP referral to receiving treatment hit a record high of 30 weeks.¹

This wait is composed of two segments: a 15-week wait just to see the specialist, and another 15-week wait from that consultation to the actual treatment.³¹

These waits vary dramatically by specialty and province.

For orthopedic surgery, the median wait is a staggering 57.5 weeks.

For neurosurgery, it is 46.2 weeks.¹

In provinces like Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, the median wait for treatment across all specialties is over a year.¹

This is the Tour Bus stuck in a monumental traffic jam, with a long, slow-moving queue to board.

As my uncle’s story illustrates, and as research confirms, these delays are not benign.

They result in measurable physical pain, psychological distress, and a worsening of the underlying condition while the patient waits.¹

Tragically, for thousands of Canadians each year, the wait ends not with treatment, but with death.²

The Open Road: Rationing by Price

The American system’s greatest strength is its speed—for those who can afford the tolls.

For patients with good insurance, access to specialists and advanced technology is remarkably fast.

One study showed that 70% of American patients could see a specialist in under four weeks, a feat achieved by less than 40% of Canadians.³²

The U.S. also has a significant technological advantage in terms of equipment density, with far more MRI and CT scanners per capita than Canada.⁵

This is the key selling point of the Sports Car: it can get you where you need to go, fast.

However, this open road is lined with financial tollbooths.

Access is inextricably linked to insurance status and the ability to pay.⁴

The 26 million uninsured Americans, the millions more who are underinsured with high-deductible plans, and those living in rural or low-income areas face formidable barriers to care.⁴

The most common form of “waiting” in the U.S. is not a systemic queue, but a personal delay driven by cost.

A 2020 Commonwealth Fund survey found that half of all lower-income U.S. adults had skipped or postponed needed medical care or prescriptions in the past year because of the price.²⁷

This is a form of rationing by wallet.

The road is clear, but only for those who can afford to drive on it.

This distinction reveals that the two countries have two entirely different definitions of “waiting.” In Canada, waiting is a systemic problem of capacity and resource allocation—a literal queue.

In the United States, waiting is often a personal problem of affordability—a financial barrier that forces individuals to delay or forgo care.

A Canadian waits because the bus is full and the next one is an hour away.

An American waits because they are standing in front of the tollbooth, trying to decide if they can afford the price of the journey.

This reframing uncovers a stunning paradox.

While the dominant narrative suggests Canada waits while the U.S. is fast, this breaks down for the most vulnerable patients facing the most critical illnesses.

A rigorous 2019 meta-analysis published in a peer-reviewed journal found that, contrary to all political rhetoric, socioeconomically vulnerable Americans face more than double the risk of experiencing long waits for breast or colon cancer care, or of dying while waiting for an organ transplant, compared to their Canadian counterparts.³⁴

For the poor or inadequately insured in the U.S., the complex and terrifying process of navigating financial approvals, out-of-network providers, and crushing out-of-pocket costs for life-saving treatment creates its own deadly waitlist.

This is a third-order effect that completely upends the simplistic public narrative.

The Sports Car may be fast on an open road, but for many, the on-ramp is blocked by an insurmountable financial wall.

Table 2: Access & Timeliness Metrics (Canada vs. United States)

Metric	Canada	United States	Source(s)
Median Wait Time: GP to Treatment (Weeks, 2024)	30.0	N/A (not a comparable metric)	1
% Patients Waiting >4 Weeks for Specialist	57%	23%	13
% Patients Waiting >4 Months for Elective Surgery	33%	8%	13
MRI Machines per Million People (2022)	10.5	40.4	5
CT Scanners per Million People (2022)	15.2	45.4	5
% of Adults Skipping Care Due to Cost (Past Year)	~5-10% (varies by study)	~36% (overall), 50% (lower-income)	25
% of Adults Without a Regular Doctor	~15% (millions lack access)	Higher than most peer countries	1

Section 3: The Ride Quality & The Final Destination (Outcomes & Patient Experience)

A vehicle’s ultimate worth is measured not just by its speed or cost, but by the quality of the ride and its ability to deliver passengers safely to their destination.

When examining health outcomes and patient experience, the design philosophies of the Tour Bus and the Sports Car produce their most telling and divergent results.

A Smoother Ride for All: Equity and Population Health

The Canadian Tour Bus, for all its slowness, is remarkably effective at its primary mission: ensuring the entire population reaches a high standard of health.

On key macro-level health indicators, Canada consistently outperforms the United States.

Life expectancy at birth is significantly higher—82.6 years in Canada versus 76.3 years in the U.S. in 2021.¹⁵

This gap has widened dramatically since 1980, when they were nearly identical.³⁶

Canada also has substantially lower infant and maternal mortality rates.⁴

This is the tangible result of a system designed to provide a baseline of quality care to everyone.

It is the Tour Bus, ensuring the whole group arrives at the destination safely and together.

The “ride quality” of the Canadian system is defined by its equity.

By removing financial barriers to core services, the system ensures that care is distributed based on need, not wealth.

Studies consistently show that low-income and less-educated Canadians have better access to and utilization of healthcare services than their American counterparts.³³

The most powerful evidence comes from the meta-analysis showing that socioeconomically vulnerable Canadians have a 36% greater chance of receiving better care and surviving than vulnerable Americans.³⁴

This demonstrates a system with a smoother, more predictable ride quality for all its passengers, especially the most fragile.

A Thrilling but Risky Drive: Innovation and Inequality

The American Sports Car offers a very different experience.

Despite spending nearly twice as much, the U.S. achieves worse overall health outcomes than any other high-income nation.¹⁴

Its life expectancy has not only failed to keep pace but has actually declined in recent years, falling far below the average of comparable countries.³⁶

This is the Sports Car that, for many of its passengers, crashes before reaching the final destination.

Where the U.S. system excels is at the pinnacle of medicine.

It leads the world in medical research, pharmaceutical development, and the availability of cutting-edge technology and treatments.⁴

For a patient with a complex condition and excellent insurance, like my cousin, the quality of care can be unparalleled.

The World Health Organization’s 2000 study, while dated, rated the U.S. #1 in the world for “responsiveness”—a measure of the quality of service for those actively receiving treatment.¹⁵

This is the exhilarating performance of the Sports Car at full throttle.

However, this high-performance ride is incredibly bumpy and unequal.

The world-class care available to some exists alongside deep and persistent disparities in access and outcomes based on income, race, insurance status, and geography.⁴

The result is a system of averages that masks a reality of extremes: the best care in the world for some, and inadequate or inaccessible care for many others.

This dichotomy helps explain the seemingly contradictory data on patient satisfaction.

When polls ask about the competence of professionals or the quality of care received, Canadians often report higher satisfaction.³⁸

They are satisfied with the philosophy of the system and their interactions with providers.

However, when polls ask about timely access, Canadians express deep frustration, while a majority of Americans feel confident they can get timely care.³⁹

This is not a contradiction.

It reveals that the two populations are rating different aspects of their journey.

Canadians are satisfied with the fundamental promise of the Tour Bus (security, equity) but frustrated by its logistics (the wait).

Americans with good insurance are satisfied with the logistics of the Sports Car (speed, choice) but live with a constant, underlying anxiety about its core philosophy (cost, financial risk).

The data on outcomes and experience reveals that the two systems are optimized for fundamentally different goals.

Canada’s system is optimized for equity and raising the population average.

It accepts a lower ceiling of performance (in terms of speed and choice) in order to raise the floor for everyone.

The U.S. system is optimized for innovation and peak performance.

It accepts a lower floor and a worse population average in order to push the ceiling of what is medically possible for those who can afford it.

One is engineered for mass transit, the other for elite racing.

Section 4: The Optional Upgrades (Coverage for Drugs, Dental, and Mental Health)

A pervasive myth surrounding the debate is that Canada’s system is comprehensively “free” while the U.S. system is not.

The reality is that both systems draw a similar, historically determined line between core medical services and other essential forms of care, treating them as “optional upgrades” that require separate, private payment.

Prescription Drugs (Pharmacare vs. Part D)

The most glaring omission in Canada’s universal system is prescription drugs.

Canada is the only high-income country with a universal healthcare system that does not provide universal coverage for outpatient prescription medications.⁴⁰

Coverage is a confusing and inequitable patchwork of over 100 public plans (provincial programs for seniors, low-income residents, or those with specific diseases) and over 1,000 private insurance plans, typically linked to employment.⁴⁰

This fragmentation leads to significant out-of-pocket costs and high rates of cost-related non-adherence to medication, where patients skip or stretch doses because they cannot afford them.⁴⁰

The U.S. system for prescription drugs is similarly fragmented, with coverage primarily through private insurance plans and the public Medicare Part D program for seniors.²¹

High drug prices and cost-sharing are a major source of financial burden for American patients as well, with about a third of adults reporting taking cost-saving measures like skipping doses or not filling prescriptions.²⁵

Mental Healthcare

Both countries treat mental healthcare as a separate and unequal part of the health system.

In Canada, mental health is widely seen as chronically underfunded.⁴²

While services from a psychiatrist (a medical doctor) are covered under provincial health plans, therapy from psychologists, social workers, or counsellors generally is not, creating a massive barrier to accessing talk therapy, the cornerstone of modern mental healthcare.⁴²

In the U.S., access is again dictated by the specifics of one’s insurance plan.

Many mental health providers do not accept insurance at all, opting for private, out-of-pocket payment models due to low reimbursement rates and administrative hassle.⁴²

This makes consistent, quality therapy unaffordable for a large portion of the population.

Dental and Vision Care

In both Canada and the United States, dental and vision care are almost entirely outside the public system.

They are financed predominantly through private, employer-sponsored insurance or direct out-of-pocket payments.²⁰

For this crucial aspect of health, the two systems are nearly identical in their reliance on the private market.

This analysis of “optional upgrades” reveals a shared philosophical blind spot.

The fact that both a system rooted in social solidarity and one rooted in market principles drew the line in the same places—excluding drugs, mental health, and dental from core coverage—points to a common historical legacy.

Both systems were designed in the mid-20th century, a time when “medically necessary care” was defined narrowly as the services of doctors and hospitals.

This demonstrates a surprising convergence in philosophy that is rarely discussed.

For these parts of the journey, both the Tour Bus and the Sports Car decided that passengers needed to buy a separate, more expensive ticket.

Conclusion: Designing a Better Journey

My year of two family crises sent me on a journey to understand a truth that data alone could not provide.

The polarized debate over Canadian and American healthcare had failed me, offering only caricatures that didn’t align with the complex, painful realities my loved ones faced.

The epiphany—reframing the systems not as competitors in a single race, but as two different vehicles built for different purposes—finally brought clarity.

The Canadian “Public Tour Bus” is a testament to the value of collective security.

It delivers on its promise of removing the terror of financial ruin from the experience of illness.

It produces superior and more equitable health outcomes for its population as a whole.

But this security comes at the cost of timeliness, responsiveness, and patient choice, creating agonizing waits that can cause real harm.

It is a slow, sometimes frustrating, but fundamentally safe and predictable journey for all.

The American “High-Performance Sports Car” is a monument to innovation and individual choice.

It offers breathtaking speed and access to the world’s most advanced technology for those who can afford it.

But this performance is built on a foundation of profound inequality and catastrophic financial risk.

It produces world-leading results for some while leaving millions behind, resulting in worse overall population health at twice the cost.

It is a thrilling, empowering, but dangerously unreliable and unequal journey.

My journey, both personal and professional, culminates in a simple conclusion: defending one vehicle and attacking the other is a futile exercise.

Both have critical, life-altering design flaws.

The Canadian bus is too slow, its technology outdated, and its rigid itinerary is failing too many of its passengers.

The American sports car is astronomically expensive, wildly inefficient, and leaves far too many people stranded and bankrupt on the roadside.

The true path forward is not to be a passenger arguing about the ride, but to become an engineer.

The most urgent task for policymakers in both nations is to move beyond ideological purity and begin the work of designing a better, hybrid vehicle.

We must look to other high-performing universal systems—in countries like Switzerland, Germany, or the Netherlands—that have successfully blended the Canadian principle of universal, equitable funding with the American strengths of choice, competition among providers, and timely access to innovation.¹

The goal must be to create a system with the Tour Bus’s affordable, universal ticket and the Sports Car’s responsiveness and technological edge.

This means embracing Canada’s commitment to healthcare as a public good, free from financial barriers at the point of care, while simultaneously learning from market-based principles that can drive efficiency, improve timeliness, and foster innovation within that public framework.

It means resolving the paradox that has defined this debate for half a century: creating a system that is at once equitable and excellent, secure and swift.

That is the destination we should all be striving for.

Works cited

1. Canadians face longest waits for health care on record – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canadians-face-longest-waits-health-care-record
2. 15,474 Canadians Died Waiting for Health Care in 2023-24 – SecondStreet.Org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://secondstreet.org/2025/01/15/15474-canadians-died-waiting-for-health-care-in-2023-24/
3. Waiting for health care cost thousands of Canadian lives, new study finds – YouTube, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5pzPSZCpqk
4. Healthcare in Canada vs U.S. – Costs, Coverage & Quality – American University of Antigua, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.auamed.org/blog/healthcare-in-canada-vs-us/
5. Comparisons of Health Care Systems in the United States, Germany and Canada – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3633404/
6. The Burden of Medical Debt in the United States – KFF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
7. Medical Debt Among People With Health Insurance – KFF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/report/medical-debt-among-people-with-health-insurance/
8. The burden of medical debt in the United States – Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
9. AHA Senate Statement on What Can Congress Do to End the Medical Debt Crisis in America – American Hospital Association, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aha.org/testimony/2024-07-10-aha-senate-statement-what-can-congress-do-end-medical-debt-crisis-america
10. Health Insurance and Bankruptcy Rates in Canada and the United States – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/HealthInsuranceandBankruptcyRates.pdf
11. Comparing Performance of Universal Health Care Countries, 2024 …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/comparing-performance-of-universal-health-care-countries-2024
12. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Centre_for_Policy_Alternatives
13. Comparing Health Care in Canada to the U.S. – FactCheck.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.factcheck.org/2007/12/comparing-health-care-in-canada-to-the-us/
14. US vs. Canadian Healthcare: What is The Difference? | RUSM, accessed August 10, 2025, https://medical.rossu.edu/about/blog/us-vs-canadian-healthcare
15. Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_healthcare_systems_in_Canada_and_the_United_States
16. About Canada’s health care system – Canada.ca, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-health-care-system.html
17. Medicare (Canada) – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(Canada)
18. Health System Financing – Community Catalyst, accessed August 10, 2025, https://communitycatalyst.org/issues/affordability/health-system-financing/
19. Health care finance in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_finance_in_the_United_States
20. Canada Health Care System Profile – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/canada
21. What Is the Difference Between Canadian vs US Medicare – ClearMatch, accessed August 10, 2025, https://clearmatchmedicare.com/blog/medicare/what-is-the-difference-between-canadian-vs-us-medicare
22. The Price of Public Health Care Insurance, 2024 | Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/price-of-public-health-care-insurance-2024.pdf
23. How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries? – Peterson Foundation, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-system-compare-to-other-countries/
24. The 4 Types of Healthcare System Designs and Structures – GoodRx, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.goodrx.com/hcp-articles/providers/healthcare-system-designs
25. Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs | KFF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
26. Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
27. 2020 International Health Policy Survey – Chartpack – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/2020_Commonwealth_Fund_International_Survey_Chartpack_PDF_v2.pdf
28. A Comparison of the Canadian and U.S. Healthcare Systems – The Rheumatologist, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.the-rheumatologist.org/article/a-comparison-of-the-canadian-and-u-s-healthcare-systems/
29. US Healthcare System Overview-Background – ISPOR, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/more-heor-resources/us-healthcare-system-overview/us-healthcare-system-overview-background-page-1
30. Health-care lessons from Switzerland for a Canada ready for reform – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/health-care-lessons-switzerland-canada-ready-reform
31. Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2024 Report | Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2024
32. America Outperforms Canada in Surgery Wait Times—And It’s Not Even Close – FEE.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://fee.org/articles/america-outperforms-canada-in-surgery-wait-times-and-its-not-even-close/
33. Comparison of Health Care Utilization: United States versus Canada …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3626357/
34. Care of acute conditions and chronic diseases in Canada and the …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6444377/
35. Mythbusting Canadian Healthcare, Part II: Debunking the Free …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pnhp.org/news/mythbusting-canadian-healthcare-part-ii-debunking-the-free-marketeers/
36. What drives differences in life expectancy between the U.S. and comparable countries?, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/what-drives-differences-in-life-expectancy-between-the-u-s-and-comparable-countries/
37. A comparison of foetal and infant mortality in the United States and, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18806278/
38. Satisfaction with the Health Care System – July 13, 2021 – Leger Marketing, accessed August 10, 2025, https://leger360.com/legers-north-american-tracker-july-13-2021/
39. Canadians less satisfied in their access to health care than Americans: poll | CBC News, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-health-care-access-1.6574184
40. Drug coverage in Canada: gaps and opportunities – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5915235/
41. Full article: Prescription drug coverage in Canada: a review of the economic, policy and political considerations for universal pharmacare – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1186/s40545-018-0154-x
42. A Canadian’s Reflections on American Psychiatry | Psychiatric News, accessed August 10, 2025, https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.pn.2020.7a12
43. Mental Health Care—How is Canada Doing? – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/mental-health-care-how-is-canada-doing.pdf
44. Do Canada and the United States Differ in Prevalence of Depression and Utilization of Services? – Psychiatry Online, accessed August 10, 2025, https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ps.2007.58.1.63
45. How Canada got universal health care and what the U.S. could learn | PBS News, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/how-canada-got-universal-health-care-and-what-the-u-s-could-learn
46. 7 Common Myths About Canada’s Health Care System Debunked, accessed August 10, 2025, https://canadianimmigrant.ca/settlement/7-common-myths-about-canadas-health-care-system-debunked-for-newcomers