Table of Contents
Part I: The Maze – A Journey into the Heart of a Broken System
The Data Didn’t Bleed
For the first decade of my career as a health systems analyst, I lived inside the architecture of failure.
My world was built from charts and statistics, each one a brick in a wall of damning evidence.
I could recite the figures in my sleep: the United States spends 17.8% of its GDP on healthcare, nearly double the average of other high-income countries, yet consistently ranks last on fundamental outcomes like life expectancy and avoidable mortality.1
I knew that roughly 20 million Americans were wrestling with significant medical debt and that our neighbors in Canada faced a median 30-week wait for surgical treatment.4
But the numbers were sterile.
They were clean, abstract representations of human suffering, stripped of their blood and tears.
They quantified the crisis without conveying its reality.
The data showed the cracks in the foundation, but it didn’t show the people falling through them.
That changed with a case file I was assigned to review, the story of a man I’ll call George.
On paper, George was a system success.
He had a life-saving surgery for an industrial accident, was discharged from the hospital, and did not return within 30 days.
The hospital’s readmission metric, a key indicator of quality, was M.T. The box was checked.
The reality, however, was a quiet catastrophe.
George had insurance, but the 20% he was responsible for left him with over $20,000 in debt.
To avoid falling further behind, he skipped essential follow-up appointments.
His diabetes, once managed, spiraled out of control.
He lost his job during his recovery, fell into a deep depression, and his credit score plummeted, making it impossible to secure stable housing or a better job.
The system hadn’t failed to treat his injury; it had failed to care for him.
It had optimized a single, isolated metric while methodically dismantling a human life.6
This was the moment the sterile data began to bleed.
My core struggle crystallized: the very metrics we used to define and rank “best health care” were profoundly, dangerously disconnected from human well-being.
We were measuring the efficiency of the parts while ignoring the dysfunction of the whole.
The Epiphany: Looking at a City Map
Frustrated and searching for a new lens, I took a break from health policy and stumbled into the world of urban planning.
It was a revelation.
I realized we have been trying to perfect the individual components of healthcare—faster ambulances (emergency departments), more efficient factories (hospitals), better technicians (specialists)—while completely ignoring the design of the city itself.
Our healthcare “city” is a sprawling, incoherent mess.
The American version is a labyrinth of predatory toll booths, unmarked dead ends, and neighborhoods with wildly different levels of service and safety.
The Canadian version offers free roads for all, but these roads are choked with perpetual gridlock, where you can wait so long for a simple repair that your vehicle breaks down completely.5
This led to my epiphany: the question “Who has the best healthcare system?” is fundamentally flawed.
It’s like asking which city has the best fire department while ignoring that one city is built of kindling and the other has no fire hydrants.
The real question, the one that can lead to a genuine solution, is this: What are the design principles of a city that fosters well-being? This report will use this new paradigm—viewing healthcare as an urban environment—to deconstruct our current failures and map a blueprint for a healthier future.
Part II: Surveying the Landscape – Two Cities in Crisis
A. The American Metropolis: A Labyrinth of Tolls and Dead Ends
The American healthcare system is not designed for health; it is designed for transactions.
It is a city where every bridge, road, and intersection has a different, often hidden, toll, creating an architecture of financial ruin that traps its inhabitants.
The Architecture of Financial Ruin
The sheer cost of navigating this city is staggering.
The U.S. spends more on healthcare than any other nation, and this spending is projected to consume one-fifth of the entire economy by 2033.8
This is not an abstract government problem; it is a crushing weight on its citizens.
For employers, the cost averages around $14,000 per employee.9
A stunning 25% of all this spending is considered waste, lost to administrative complexity, over-treatment, and pricing failures.10
The consequence of this design is a national medical debt crisis totaling at least $220 billion.4
Nearly half of all U.S. adults report difficulty affording care, forcing many to skip or postpone necessary treatments.12
This is not a crisis of the uninsured.
On the contrary, 80% of people carrying medical debt
have health insurance, a testament to the system’s insidious design.6
These are not edge cases; they are features of the system.
The Richmond family, whose 13-year-old daughter’s leukemia battle forced them to fundraise to avoid bankruptcy despite being hardworking and self-employed, illustrates the vulnerability of those outside the employer-sponsored system.14
Meanwhile, Andrew Heymann’s story of receiving a surprise $6,000 bill from an out-of-network surgeon after being rushed to an
in-network hospital for a simple ankle injury shows that even those who follow the rules can fall into financial traps.15
The ultimate tragedy is that despite these exorbitant tolls, the city’s infrastructure is crumbling.
The U.S. suffers from the lowest life expectancy, the highest rates of maternal and infant mortality, and the most deaths from avoidable causes among all high-income countries.1
This is the inevitable outcome of a city designed for profit, not for the well-being of its people.
The conventional narrative often frames medical debt as a personal failure or a problem of the uninsured.
However, the data reveals a systemic design flaw.
The fact that medical debt affects such a large portion of the population, including those with insurance and middle incomes, points to a deeper issue.4
The system’s architecture—defined by thousands of fragmented payers, a complete lack of price transparency, and a confusing web of “in-network” and “out-of-network” providers—is not a bug.
It is a feature of a transaction-based model engineered to generate revenue from these very gaps and complexities.10
This understanding leads to a critical conclusion: simply expanding insurance coverage, as the Affordable Care Act aimed to do, is an insufficient solution.
Without fundamentally redesigning the predatory financial architecture to eliminate these traps, the city will continue to bankrupt its citizens.
Table 1: The American Anomaly: U.S. Health System Performance vs. High-Income Countries (2024)
| Country | Overall Ranking | Access to Care | Care Process | Administrative Efficiency | Equity | Health Outcomes |
| Australia | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 2 |
| Germany | 5 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| New Zealand | 6 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
| Sweden | 7 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| France | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| Canada | 9 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| United States | 10 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 11 |
Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund, “Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System”.3
Note: Rankings are out of 11 countries, including Norway which was not detailed in this report’s scope.
B. The Canadian Metropolis: A City of Free Roads and Perpetual Gridlock
In contrast to the American labyrinth of tolls, the Canadian healthcare city was built on a single, noble principle: free and open roads for everyone.
Yet, this city is also in crisis, suffering from a failure to invest in the necessary capacity and infrastructure, leading to a state of perpetual gridlock.
The Promise and Peril of Universal Access
The defining feature of the Canadian system is the wait.
The median time from a general practitioner’s referral to treatment by a specialist has reached a record 30 weeks.5
Patients wait months for specialist consultations and even longer for non-emergency surgeries.18
This is not a benign inconvenience.
For Joan Hama, an eight-month wait for a colonoscopy that should have happened within 60 days led to a ruptured colon and a near-fatal emergency surgery.7
Beyond the physical and emotional toll, these delays cost the Canadian economy an estimated $5.2 billion in lost wages annually.5
This city-wide traffic jam is a direct consequence of supply failing to meet demand.
Among developed nations with universal care, Canada ranks near the bottom for the number of physicians, hospital beds, and modern diagnostic equipment like MRI and CT scanners per capita.19
This scarcity is worsened by a stark urban-rural divide, with remote communities facing even longer waits and more outdated technology.20
The crisis in primary care is so acute that one in six Canadians does not have a regular family physician.22
A critical and often-overlooked design flaw in this “free” city is the roads that simply aren’t paved.
Canada’s universal system is the only one in the developed world that does not provide universal coverage for prescription drugs.20
This policy pushes patients with chronic illnesses, who rely on medication, into the same state of financial precarity as their American counterparts, undermining the very principle of universal care.
The standard debate forces a choice between the American “market-based” system and the Canadian “single-payer” system.
This is a false dichotomy.
The American system, with its opaque pricing and lack of consumer choice, is not a true free market.10
The Canadian system, while providing “free” access to doctors, imposes immense non-financial costs in the form of time, pain, and lost productivity, alongside significant financial costs for essentials like medication.5
Both systems fail their citizens because they are poorly designed cities, just with different architectural flaws.
One has too many toll booths; the other has too few lanes and unpaved roads.
The path forward is not to choose one broken model over the other, but to identify and adopt the best design principles from truly high-performing systems—like Germany’s cost-capping measures or Australia’s administrative efficiency—to create an entirely new blueprint.3
Part III: The Blueprint – Principles of a Well-Being City
To escape the failures of our current healthcare cities, we must abandon the flawed blueprints and adopt a new set of architectural principles.
A city designed for well-being is not built around transactions or gridlock; it is built around its inhabitants, grounded in proactive wellness, and structured with incentives that align with its purpose.
A. Principle 1: Designing for People, Not Problems (Patient-Centricity)
A well-designed city is intuitive, accessible, and easy to navigate for its residents.
Our current healthcare cities are the opposite; they are complex and confusing, built for the convenience of bureaucrats and engineers—the payers and administrators—not for the people who live in them.
A patient-centric city puts the inhabitant’s perspective first.
This begins with Shared Decision-Making (SDM), which is the process of creating a shared map for the healthcare journey.
Described as the “pinnacle of patient-centered care,” SDM is a collaborative process where clinicians and patients work together, using evidence-based tools and patient decision aids, to select tests, treatments, and care plans that align with the patient’s unique values, goals, and life circumstances.23
It transforms the clinical encounter from a top-down directive to a partnership of co-creation.26
For inhabitants to navigate any city, they must be able to read the signs.
Health literacy is the language of this city.
Yet, only 12% of U.S. adults possess proficient health literacy, meaning the vast majority struggle to understand and use health information to make informed decisions.27
This is not a trivial matter.
A large body of research consistently links low health literacy to poorer health outcomes, including more frequent hospitalizations, greater use of emergency care, and lower rates of preventive service use.28
The conventional view frames low health literacy as a personal deficit—a problem with the patient that needs to be fixed through education.
But when 88% of the adult population is not proficient, it suggests the problem is not with the “reader” but with the “text”.27
The healthcare system itself is written in an indecipherable language of byzantine billing codes, medical jargon, and confusing instructions.
We are blaming the city’s inhabitants for being unable to read signs written in code.
A truly well-designed system would prioritize clarity and simplicity as a core architectural feature.
This means the most powerful health literacy interventions are not more pamphlets, but systemic changes: simplified and transparent billing, clear communication protocols for clinicians, and the deployment of patient navigators who can act as expert guides for those lost in the city’s complexity.31
B. Principle 2: Building Parks, Not Just Hospitals (A Proactive Foundation)
Our current systems are overwhelmingly reactive.
They are “sick care” systems, cities composed almost entirely of fire stations and emergency rooms, operating on a “you break, I fix” model.33
We wait for the fire of disease to erupt and then mobilize expensive, high-tech resources to put it O.T.
A true “health care” system is proactive.
It is a city that invests heavily in parks, clean water, and safe public spaces to prevent fires from starting in the first place.
This represents a fundamental shift in focus toward primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention—stopping disease before it starts, detecting it early, and managing it effectively to prevent complications.34
It means empowering people with the tools, information, and environment needed to make healthy choices the easy choices.35
Lifestyle Medicine is the practical application of this principle—it is the “urban greening” of our healthcare city.
It is an evidence-based medical specialty that uses therapeutic lifestyle interventions as a primary modality to prevent, treat, and even reverse the chronic diseases that account for the vast majority of our healthcare burden and costs.36
The six pillars of lifestyle medicine—optimal nutrition, physical activity, restorative sleep, stress management, social connectedness, and avoidance of risky substances—are the foundational elements of a healthy life.36
This approach reframes our understanding of chronic illness.
We tend to treat conditions like type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease as individual medical failings to be managed with pharmaceuticals.
However, their epidemic-level prevalence points to a systemic, environmental cause.
The “city” many of us inhabit—with its food deserts, unsafe streets, high-stress workplaces, and design that discourages physical activity—is a primary driver of these conditions.
Our current healthcare system is trying to treat the symptoms of a sick environment with pills and procedures, an incredibly inefficient and ultimately futile strategy.
The most powerful “health” interventions, therefore, may lie outside the clinic walls.
A truly effective healthcare system must not only practice lifestyle medicine but also integrate with and advocate for a healthier society through policies that support healthy food access, urban design that encourages movement, and cultures that promote well-being.
C. Principle 3: Aligning the Economics with the Architecture (Value-Based Design)
The way we pay for care is the blueprint that dictates the entire architecture of the system.
It is the set of zoning laws and building codes that determines what gets built, where it gets built, and for whose benefit.
The dominant model in the U.S., Fee-for-Service (FFS), is a blueprint for urban sprawl and dysfunction.
It rewards volume, not value.
Providers are paid for each individual service, test, and procedure they perform.40
In our city analogy, this is a powerful incentive to build more roads, more buildings, and more toll booths, regardless of whether they improve the city’s function or the inhabitants’ well-being.
This model actively discourages prevention (there’s no billing code for a crisis averted), disincentivizes coordination (each specialist works in their own silo), and drives up costs.41
Value-Based Care (VBC) offers a new blueprint designed for smart growth.
In VBC models, providers are reimbursed based on patient health outcomes, quality of care, and overall efficiency.40
This includes arrangements like Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), where groups of providers take collective responsibility for the health of a population, and bundled payments, where a single payment covers an entire episode of care.
This is a blueprint that rewards building a functional, healthy, and efficient city.
It creates financial incentives to keep people healthy (prevention), coordinate their journey through the city (reducing waste and errors), and ensure they reach their desired destination (good health outcomes).
Table 2: A Tale of Two Blueprints: Fee-for-Service vs. Value-Based Care
| Feature | Fee-for-Service (FFS) | Value-Based Care (VBC) |
| Financial Incentive | Volume of services | Quality and value of care |
| Provider Focus | Performing more procedures and tests | Achieving optimal patient health |
| Care Approach | Siloed, fragmented, and episodic | Coordinated, team-based, and continuous |
| Primary Goal | Reactive treatment of sickness | Proactive wellness and prevention |
Source: Synthesized from Oracle and AMA resources.40
While the promise of VBC is clear, the transition is a massive infrastructure project, not a simple policy switch.
The research reveals significant barriers to implementation, including a lack of data interoperability between different electronic health records, provider resistance to changing workflows, the complexity of quality metrics, and the need for high upfront financial investment in new technology and training.43
A city cannot replace its road network with a high-speed rail system overnight.
It requires laying new tracks (integrated data systems), building new stations (coordinated care teams), and training new engineers (providers skilled in population health).
Many early VBC initiatives have struggled or failed because they underestimated this immense infrastructure challenge, leading to provider burnout and a retreat to the familiarity of FFS.
A successful transition requires a long-term, phased approach with significant, sustained public and private investment in the foundational technology, training, and support needed to make the new city plan a reality.
Part IV: Neighborhoods of the Future – The New Paradigm in Practice
The Micro-Community Model: A Deep Dive into Direct Primary Care (DPC)
While redesigning an entire healthcare metropolis is a monumental task, the Direct Primary Care (DPC) model shows what is possible when a single “neighborhood” is rebuilt from the ground up using these new architectural principles.
DPC practices operate on a radically simple and transparent framework.
Instead of navigating the labyrinth of insurance billing, patients pay their physician a flat, predictable monthly fee—typically ranging from $50 to $100—for a comprehensive set of primary care services.46
This fee covers unlimited office visits, direct communication with the doctor via phone or text, and many in-office procedures and tests.
This model effectively removes the toll booths and billing offices from the most common point of entry into the healthcare city.
By freeing themselves from the immense administrative burden of the FFS system, DPC physicians are able to fundamentally change their practice structure.
They can reduce their patient panel size from the typical 2,300 to a more manageable 400 or 500.47
This single change allows for a cascade of benefits: longer appointments (30-60 minutes instead of 8), same-day or next-day scheduling, and the time to build a trusting, continuous relationship with patients—the very foundation of good medicine.47
Success stories from both patients and physicians highlight immense satisfaction, with patients saving money and receiving more accessible, personalized care, and physicians rediscovering their passion for medicine, free from burnout.50
However, DPC is not a panacea for the entire city.
It exists as a small, well-designed neighborhood within a larger, dysfunctional metropolis.
Key challenges remain.
Patients in DPC practices can face difficulty and high costs when they need referrals to specialists or hospital care, as these services operate within the old, broken system.49
Access to affordable medications can also be a challenge if a drug is not available through the practice’s wholesale arrangements.52
Furthermore, valid concerns exist that a widespread shift to DPC could exacerbate the national primary care physician shortage and deepen health disparities, as the model may be most attractive to healthier, wealthier populations who can afford both the monthly fee and the necessary wraparound catastrophic insurance.48
Table 3: The Direct Primary Care (DPC) Model at a Glance
| Feature | Description |
| Payment Model | Flat, recurring membership fee (monthly, quarterly, or annual) paid directly to the practice. |
| Insurance Interaction | Practices typically do not accept or bill insurance for primary care services. Patients are encouraged to have a separate high-deductible plan for catastrophic events. |
| Typical Patient Panel | ~413 patients per physician. |
| Typical Monthly Fee | $50 – $100. |
| Key Benefits | For Patients: Enhanced access, longer appointments, transparent pricing, strong patient-physician relationship. For Physicians: Reduced administrative burden, less burnout, more time with patients, practice autonomy. |
Source: Adapted from AAFP and Wolters Kluwer resources.47
The success of DPC provides a powerful proof-of-concept.
It demonstrates that when you simplify the financial model (Principle 3), prioritize the patient-physician relationship (Principle 1), and create the time and space for proactive care (Principle 2), better health and higher satisfaction follow.
However, its limitations reveal a crucial truth: a well-designed neighborhood cannot thrive in complete isolation within a broken city.
The greatest value of DPC, therefore, may not be as a universally scalable replacement for the entire system, but as a living laboratory.
It proves a set of design principles that work in the real world.
Policymakers and health systems should look to DPC not as a model to be copied wholesale, but as a source of proven architectural elements that can be integrated into broader reforms, such as building VBC payment models that have a strong, DPC-like primary care foundation at their core.
Part V: Conclusion – How We Start Building Tomorrow’s City, Today
The search for the “best health care” is a flawed quest if it remains a debate over which broken national model to emulate.
The American and Canadian systems are not opposing ideologies to choose between; they are cautionary tales of poor urban planning, each failing its citizens in different but equally profound ways.
The path forward does not lie in choosing one broken city over the other, but in adopting a new set of architectural principles to build something better.
This requires a coordinated effort from all stakeholders, each playing a critical role in constructing this new city of well-being.
For Policymakers (The City Planners):
The focus must shift from tinkering with the dysfunctional systems of today to investing in the blueprint for tomorrow.
This means a massive reallocation of resources toward the foundations of health.
- Invest in Primary and Preventive Care: Dramatically increase the percentage of healthcare spending dedicated to primary and preventive services, which are proven to produce better health at lower costs.35
- Fund the VBC Transition: Treat the shift to Value-Based Care as the critical infrastructure project it is. Provide the long-term funding and technical support necessary for health systems to build the data and care coordination capabilities required for success.44
- Build Healthy Communities: Recognize that health is created where we live, work, and play. Enact policies that address the social determinants of health, such as improving access to nutritious food, designing communities that encourage physical activity, and ensuring safe and stable housing.35
For Healthcare Leaders (The Developers & Engineers):
Hospital systems, clinics, and insurers must embrace their role as the builders of this new city, moving from a culture of transactions to one of value.
- Accelerate the Shift from FFS: Aggressively design, pilot, and scale Value-Based Care models. Work collaboratively with payers to create payment arrangements that reward keeping people healthy, not just treating them when they are sick.53
- Invest in Interoperability: Prioritize and invest in technology that allows for the seamless and secure sharing of patient information across different providers and settings. Data transparency is the bedrock of coordinated, high-value care.53
- Empower Patient Navigators: Hire, train, and integrate patient navigators and health coaches into care teams. These professionals are the expert guides who can help inhabitants navigate the complexities of the system, improving both experience and outcomes.32
For Individuals (The Inhabitants):
We cannot be passive residents waiting for the city to be rebuilt around us.
We must become empowered advocates for our own health and for systemic change.
- Become Health Literate: Take responsibility for understanding our own health conditions and care plans. Ask questions until we understand. Use resources from patient advocacy groups to learn how to navigate the system.54
- Demand Shared Decision-Making: Insist on being a partner in our healthcare decisions. Come to appointments prepared to discuss our goals and values, and seek out providers who respect and engage in this collaborative process.24
- Vote with Our Feet and Our Voices: Support physicians, practices, and health systems that are pioneering better models of care, like DPC and other patient-centered initiatives. Advocate for policies that align with the principles of a well-being city.
My journey as an analyst began with the cold, hard data of a failing system.
It was the story of George that forced me to look beyond the numbers and see the human cost of a poorly designed city.
In a healthcare system built on the principles of well-being, George’s journey would have been different.
His care wouldn’t have ended at the hospital exit; it would have been a coordinated path through a supportive neighborhood with financial clarity, proactive follow-up, and community resources to ensure not just his survival, but his ability to thrive.
Building that city is the true definition of achieving the “best health care.” It is a long-term, generational project, but by laying the foundation with the right principles, we can begin building it today.
Works cited
- U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective, 2022: Accelerating Spending, Worsening Outcomes – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/jan/us-health-care-global-perspective-2022
- US spends more than twice as much on health as similar countries for worse outcomes, finds report | The BMJ, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2340
- Health Care by Country 2024 Report | Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
- The burden of medical debt in the United States – Peterson-KFF …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
- Long waits for health care hit Canadians in their pocketbooks – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/long-waits-health-care-hit-canadians-their-pocketbooks
- Healthcare Insights: How Medical Debt Is Crushing 100 Million …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/scheinman-institute/blog/john-august-healthcare/healthcare-insights-how-medical-debt-crushing-100-million-americans
- Health care Canada study: Patient shares wait times ordeal – CTV News, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/article/i-pretty-well-would-have-died-on-the-operating-table-canadian-patient-shares-ordeal-on-long-wait-list-for-colonoscopy/
- Chart Pack: U.S. Healthcare Spending – Peterson Foundation, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/chart-pack-healthcare/
- US Healthcare System Is in Crisis | ACS – The American College of Surgeons, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2025/february-2025-volume-110-issue-2/us-healthcare-system-is-in-crisis/
- US Healthcare Problems – GoInvo, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.goinvo.com/vision/us-healthcare-problems/
- The Burden of Medical Debt in the United States – KFF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
- Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs – KFF, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
- Healthcare debts in the United States: a silent fight – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918610/
- One Family’s Struggle Against Leukemia and Medical Bills, accessed August 10, 2025, https://familiesusa.org/resources/one-familys-struggle-against-leukemia-and-medical-bills/
- Americans who confronted ‘surprise’ medical bills share their stories | PBS News Weekend, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/americans-who-confronted-surprise-medical-bills-share-their-stories
- Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System – Comparing Performance in 10 Nations – Commonwealth Fund, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/Blumenthal_mirror_mirror_2024_final_v4.pdf
- Canadians face longest waits for health care on record – Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canadians-face-longest-waits-health-care-record
- Canadian health care continues to perform poorly compared to other countries, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canadian-health-care-continues-perform-poorly-compared-other-countries
- Despite high spending, Canada’s health-care system is failing badly | Fraser Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/despite-high-spending-canadas-health-care-system-failing-badly
- The Pitfalls of the Canadian Healthcare System – Management Study Guide, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.managementstudyguide.com/pitfalls-of-canadian-healthcare-system.htm/
- The Pitfalls of the Canadian Healthcare System – Management …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.managementstudyguide.com/pitfalls-of-canadian-healthcare-system.htm
- Canada’s primary care crisis: Federal government response – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10448296/
- Patient engagement and shared decision-making: What do they look like in neurology practice? – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4828680/
- Strategy 6I: Shared Decisionmaking | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/improvement-guide/6-strategies-for-improving/communication/strategy6i-shared-decisionmaking.html
- Shared Decision Making: Informed Patients Make Safer, More Cost-effective Choices, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/shared-decision-making-informed-patients-make-safer-more-cost-effective-choices
- Shared decision-making as a method of care – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10423463/
- What is Health Literacy and Why is it Important to Patient Outcomes? – ThoroughCare, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.thoroughcare.net/blog/health-literacy-important-patient-outcomes
- Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature – ResearchGate, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8120494_Literacy_and_health_outcomes_A_systematic_review_of_the_literature
- Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review | Evidence Report/Technology Assessment – AHRQ, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/literacy/literacyup.pdf
- Literacy and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1492599/
- Navigating the Healthcare System: A Guide for Patients and Families – Blog, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.kellymedicinemd.com/blog/navigating-the-healthcare-system-a-guide-for-patients-and-families
- How to navigate the healthcare system as a first-time patient, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.willowshealthcare.com/blog/how-to-navigate-the-healthcare-system-as-a-first-time-patient
- Focusing on Healthcare Instead of “Sick Care” – Papa, accessed August 10, 2025, https://resources.papa.com/focusing-on-health-care-instead-of-sick-care
- From Sick-Care to Healthcare: Embracing Preventive Medicine in Daily Life – Healthdom, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.healthdom.com/1905-2/
- The National Prevention Strategy: Shifting The Nation’S Health-Care System – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3185312/
- What is Lifestyle Medicine? | Healthcare Transformation | ACLM, accessed August 10, 2025, https://lifestylemedicine.org/about-lifestyle-medicine/
- Direct Primary Care: A Successful Financial Model for the Clinical Practice of Lifestyle Medicine – PMC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504342/
- Lifestyle Medicine | AAFP, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/prevention-wellness/lifestyle-medicine.html
- Lifestyle Medicine for Patients | Empower Your Health Journey, accessed August 10, 2025, https://lifestylemedicine.org/patient/
- Understanding Value-Based Care Models – Oracle, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.oracle.com/health/value-based-care-models/
- Value-based Payment Models for Primary Care (Position Paper) – AAFP, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/payment-models.html
- What is value-based care? – American Medical Association, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/payment-delivery-models/what-value-based-care
- Successful and Failed Case Studies in Measurement-based and Value based Contracts, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.imhpa.org/successful-and-failed-case-studies-in-measurementbased-and-value-based-contracts
- Implementing value-based healthcare: a scoping review of key elements, outcomes, and challenges for sustainable healthcare systems – PubMed Central, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12014573/
- 6 Value-based Care Challenges to Overcome – Vim, accessed August 10, 2025, https://getvim.com/blog/value-based-care-challenges/
- Direct Primary Care – AAFP, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/direct-primary-care.html
- Direct Primary Care | AAFP, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/practice-and-career/delivery-payment-models/direct-primary-care.html
- Is Direct Primary Care the Solution to Our Health Care Crisis? – AAFP, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/fpm/issues/2016/0900/p10.html
- The pros and cons of direct primary care (DPC) | Wolters Kluwer, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/what-exactly-is-direct-primary-care
- Direct Primary Care Is What Medicine Should Be | AAFP Voices, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/news/blogs/aafp-voices/lovins-dpc.html
- DPC Success Stories: Real Patient Experiences with Direct Primary …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://arkfamilyhealth.com/blog/dpc-success-stories-real-patient-experiences-with-direct-primary-care/
- Understanding Patient Perceptions Towards Direct Primary Care: A Focus Group Study, accessed August 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9350501/
- Leveraging Technology and Value-Based Care | Case Study: Hattiesburg Clinic – American Medical Association, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/future-health-case-study-hattiesburg-clinic.pdf
- Navigating the Medical System (Tips from a RN) | Whealth, accessed August 10, 2025, https://spreadwhealth.com/whealth-blog/navigating-the-healthcare-system
- Navigating the Healthcare System: Tips From an Insider – Sunflower Health Advocates, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.sunflowerhealthadvocates.com/blog-/navigating-the-healthcare-system-tips-from-an-insider
